The Gemini Report – Investment Deep Dives

Comprehensive Investment Analysis: Advance Auto Parts Inc. (AAP)

All investment deep dives on this site have been written by Google Gemini with light human editing. Nothing on this site constitutes investment advise. All materials on this site are for informational purposes only.

The Gemini Report - Investment Deep Dives
The Gemini Report – Investment Deep Dives
Comprehensive Investment Analysis: Advance Auto Parts Inc. (AAP)
Loading
/

1. Company Overview & Business Model

Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (NYSE: AAP) is a prominent North American retailer of automotive aftermarket parts, serving a diverse customer base that includes both professional installers, commonly referred to as the “Do-It-For-Me” (DIFM) segment, and retail “Do-It-Yourself” (DIY) consumers.1 The company’s fundamental go-to-market strategy is centered on a “blended-box” model, which aims to cater to both of these distinct customer segments from a unified network of physical store locations.3 This approach is designed to leverage a single operational infrastructure to capture a broader share of the automotive aftermarket. However, the company is currently navigating a period of profound strategic and operational transformation under a relatively new leadership team, which has been tasked with addressing a legacy of underperformance relative to its primary industry competitors.3

Revenue Streams and Business Segments

The primary revenue driver for Advance Auto Parts is the sale of a wide array of automotive products. This includes replacement parts (often called “hard parts”), maintenance items (such as oil and filters), batteries, and various accessories.6 Sales are generated through its extensive network of retail stores and its growing e-commerce platforms.

The company operates under several distinct banners, each targeting specific market niches. The flagship Advance Auto Parts stores form the core of its retail presence. In addition to its company-owned stores, AAP supports a network of independently owned Carquest branded stores, extending its market reach.8 The company’s portfolio also includes

Worldpac and Autopart International, two businesses that have historically focused almost exclusively on serving the professional installer market, with a particular specialization in parts for import vehicles.8

A critical element of the company’s current strategic pivot involves a significant simplification of this multi-banner structure. Management has publicly stated it is exploring the potential sale of its Worldpac and Canadian business units.10 This move represents a deliberate effort to divest non-core assets and concentrate financial and managerial resources on revitalizing the core blended-box operations in the United States. This strategic narrowing acknowledges the immense challenge of competing effectively against highly focused peers and suggests that the complexity resulting from past acquisitions became a significant operational impediment. By streamlining the business, the new leadership aims to simplify the execution of its turnaround plan and improve accountability.

Geographic Footprint and Store Network

Advance Auto Parts maintains a substantial, albeit smaller, physical footprint compared to its main rivals. As of April 19, 2025, the company operated 4,285 stores. The majority of these are located within the United States, supplemented by a presence in Canada, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.1 A slightly earlier count from December 28, 2024, reported a total of 4,788 company-operated stores alongside 934 independently owned Carquest locations.9 The variance in these figures is a direct result of an aggressive and recently completed store footprint optimization program.

This optimization was a key pillar of the company’s transformation strategy. It involved the closure of over 700 underperforming or non-strategic stores.3 The primary goal of this consolidation was to increase market density and competitive strength in its most important regions. Following the completion of this program, Advance Auto Parts reports that over 75% of its remaining stores are now situated in markets where it holds either the number one or number two position based on local store count.3 This strategic rationalization is intended to improve local scale, enhance the efficiency of parts delivery to professional customers, and strengthen overall in-store execution.

Customer Mix: A Balancing Act

The company’s revenue is divided almost equally between its DIY and professional (DIFM) customer segments, with a split of roughly 50/50.3 This balanced approach contrasts slightly with competitors like O’Reilly Automotive, which in 2024 derived approximately 52% of its sales from DIY customers and 48% from professionals.12 The professional segment is a critical and highly competitive battleground in the aftermarket industry. Sales to DIFM customers are generally considered more resilient during economic downturns, as vehicle repairs are less discretionary for consumers who rely on their vehicles for daily transportation. Consequently, a company’s ability to effectively serve professional installers with rapid parts availability, competitive pricing, and strong relationships is a crucial determinant of long-term success and market share gains. AAP’s historical struggles in this segment have been a key driver of its underperformance.

Key Brands and Private Label Strategy

A strong brand portfolio is essential for attracting and retaining customers in the automotive aftermarket. One of AAP’s most significant brand assets is DieHard. Acquired from Sears, the company relaunched the iconic battery brand in its stores in July 2020 and has since developed it into what it reports as a billion-dollar business, leveraging its strong consumer recognition.13

In addition to prominent national brands, Advance Auto Parts employs a robust private label strategy, offering products under its own proprietary brands, such as Carquest for a wide range of parts. This strategy, common among all major aftermarket retailers, allows the company to offer a tiered product selection across “good, better, and best” quality and price points. This provides value-oriented options for budget-conscious DIY consumers while also offering higher-grade parts that meet the durability and performance standards required by professional service providers.12

2. Industry Dynamics & Competitive Landscape

Advance Auto Parts operates within the large and resilient automotive aftermarket industry, which is supported by powerful and durable secular trends. The health of this industry provides a crucial backdrop for assessing the company’s challenges and opportunities.

Industry Size and Growth

The automotive aftermarket is a vast global market, with various estimates placing its value between $430 billion and $470 billion in 2024.14 Industry forecasts project steady, albeit modest, growth, with a consensus Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) in the range of 3.6% to 3.8% through the early 2030s.14

The North American market, where AAP primarily operates, is particularly robust. The U.S. light-duty aftermarket alone was projected to be a $405 billion industry in 2024, with forecasts suggesting a stronger CAGR of 5.8% through 2026.17 This healthy growth environment creates a favorable tailwind for all participants. It implies that a company does not necessarily need to innovate new sources of demand to grow; rather, it can achieve growth by effectively capturing its share of a naturally expanding market. This dynamic provides a significant margin for error for a company like Advance Auto Parts as it executes its turnaround. The rising tide of the industry can help lift its performance, provided it can make even modest improvements in its operational execution.

Key Industry Drivers

The stability and growth of the automotive aftermarket are underpinned by several powerful, long-term drivers that are largely insulated from economic cycles.

  • Aging Vehicle Parc: The single most important driver for the industry is the increasing average age of vehicles on the road. In the U.S., the average age of light vehicles reached a new record of 12.6 years in 2024 and is projected to climb further to 12.8 years in 2025.15 This trend is driven by factors including improved vehicle manufacturing quality and the rising cost of new cars, which incentivizes consumers to keep their existing vehicles for longer. Older vehicles are typically past their manufacturer warranty periods, meaning the financial responsibility for repairs shifts from the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the vehicle owner. These older vehicles require more frequent and often more substantial repairs, creating a consistent and growing stream of demand for aftermarket parts and services. The industry’s “sweet spot”—vehicles aged between 6 and 14 years—now accounts for over 110 million vehicles in the U.S., representing nearly 38% of the entire fleet.20
  • Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT): The total number of miles driven is a direct indicator of wear and tear on vehicles. Higher VMT leads to more frequent replacement of consumable parts like tires, brakes, filters, and fluids. After a sharp drop during the COVID-19 pandemic, VMT in the U.S. fully recovered, reaching 3.26 trillion miles in 2023, surpassing pre-pandemic levels.21 Monthly data from the Federal Highway Administration continues to show robust driving activity, with 277 billion miles traveled in April 2025, ensuring a steady baseline of repair and maintenance demand.22
  • Increasing Vehicle Complexity: While modern vehicles are more durable, they are also significantly more complex, incorporating sophisticated electronics, sensors, and software. This increasing complexity makes many repairs more difficult for the average DIY consumer, driving a greater share of the repair business toward the professional DIFM channel.14 This trend benefits aftermarket retailers that have a strong commercial program and can effectively supply professional repair shops.

Competitive Landscape

The U.S. automotive aftermarket is characterized by a mix of large-scale national chains and a fragmented base of smaller, independent operators. The industry is dominated by three publicly traded giants: AutoZone (AZO), O’Reilly Automotive (ORLY), and Advance Auto Parts (AAP).

  • O’Reilly Automotive: As of mid-2025, O’Reilly operated a network of 6,483 stores.24 The company is widely regarded as a best-in-class operator, known for its dual-market strategy and highly efficient supply chain.
  • AutoZone: The largest player by store count, AutoZone operated 7,353 stores as of August 2024.25 It has a strong brand presence and a particularly formidable position in the DIY market, complemented by a rapidly growing commercial business.
  • Genuine Parts Company (GPC): GPC operates through its NAPA Auto Parts banner. NAPA’s business model differs from its peers, relying on a network of over 6,000 stores, the majority of which are independently owned and operated franchises.27 This model gives NAPA a broad reach, particularly in smaller markets.

The continued existence of a large number of independent “mom-and-pop” stores provides a long-term opportunity for consolidation, allowing the major national chains to continue gaining market share for the foreseeable future.29

The Long-Term Impact of Electric Vehicles (EVs)

The transition to electric vehicles represents the most significant long-term structural change facing the automotive aftermarket. The impact is twofold, presenting both a threat and an opportunity.

  • Threats: Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) have fundamentally simpler powertrains with dramatically fewer moving parts than internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. More than 150 component types found in ICE systems—such as spark plugs, fuel injectors, exhaust systems, and transmissions—are eliminated in BEVs.30 This will lead to a structural decline in demand for these traditional replacement parts. Some estimates suggest that the value of routine maintenance and repair for an EV could be up to 60% lower than for a comparable ICE vehicle.31
  • Opportunities: The rise of EVs will create new revenue streams from parts and services unique to them. These include high-voltage battery packs, electric motors, thermal management systems, power inverters, and charging equipment.32 Furthermore, some EV components may experience accelerated wear; for example, due to higher vehicle weight and instant torque, EV tires may wear out up to 20% faster than those on ICE vehicles.30

The transition, however, will be gradual. The immediate impact on the aftermarket is minimal. In 2023, EVs constituted less than 1% of total aftermarket product volume.35 This is because the bulk of repair spending occurs on vehicles that are four years old or more, a demographic that the current EV population is only just beginning to enter. Even with optimistic adoption rates, projections indicate that ICE and hybrid vehicles will still account for over 90% of the U.S. vehicle parc in 2030.30 This provides a long runway for aftermarket companies to adapt their business models, develop new competencies, and adjust their supply chains.

3. Competitive Position & Differentiation

While Advance Auto Parts is a major player in a favorable industry, its competitive position has been demonstrably weaker than that of its primary rivals, AutoZone and O’Reilly Automotive. The company’s current strategy is an explicit attempt to address these long-standing disadvantages through a fundamental operational overhaul.

Competitive Disadvantages versus Peers

  • Operational Inefficiency and Profitability Gap: The most significant and persistent disadvantage for AAP is its operational inefficiency, which manifests in a stark profitability gap. For years, the company has lagged its peers in key performance metrics. This underperformance is the result of a confluence of factors, including a historically complex and inefficient supply chain, a period of under-investment in store operations and technology, and a track record of poorly integrated, large-scale acquisitions.3 In 2023, O’Reilly and AutoZone reported operating margins of 20.2% and 19.9%, respectively.36 In stark contrast, AAP’s adjusted operating margin guidance for 2025 is just 2.0% to 3.0%, and its ambitious long-term goal for 2027 is to reach approximately 7%—still less than half of what its competitors achieve today.4
  • Scale and Market Density: With a store count in the mid-4,000s, AAP operates fewer locations than O’Reilly (~6,500) and AutoZone (~7,300).24 This results in lower market density in many key regions. For the professional (DIFM) customer, speed of delivery is a paramount concern. A denser store network allows competitors to place inventory closer to their professional clients, enabling faster delivery times and giving them a significant competitive advantage.3 AAP’s recent store closure program was designed specifically to address this issue by concentrating its footprint in markets where it can compete more effectively on density.

Supply Chain and Distribution: A Strategy of Imitation

AAP’s competitive strategy is not predicated on innovation but on the imitation of proven, successful models. The company’s leadership has effectively acknowledged that its legacy supply chain was a core weakness and is now remodeling it to mirror the hub-and-spoke systems that have powered the success of AutoZone and O’Reilly.

Historically, AAP’s network consisted of 38 disparate distribution centers (DCs), a complex structure that created inefficiencies for both the company and its suppliers.3 The new strategy involves a multi-year consolidation down to 12 large, modern regional DCs. This will be complemented by the addition of 60 “market hubs”—large-format stores carrying an expanded inventory of 75,000 to 85,000 SKUs, far more than the 20,000 to 25,000 SKUs in a typical store.3 This hub-and-spoke model is designed to improve inventory availability across the entire network, reduce transportation costs, and, most importantly, enable faster and more reliable same-day delivery to professional customers. This suggests that the “secret sauce” in the auto parts industry is less a secret and more a matter of disciplined, consistent execution of a known logistical playbook. The primary risk for AAP is therefore not strategic—choosing the wrong path—but executional—failing to implement the right path effectively.

Customer Service and Parts Availability

A direct consequence of AAP’s supply chain issues has been its inability to consistently have the right part in the right store at the right time. For both DIY and DIFM customers, parts availability is a primary driver of store choice. The company’s historical availability rates in the low-90% range were not competitive.3

Under new leadership, this has become a central focus of the turnaround. Through improved inventory management and the initial rollout of the market hub strategy, the company reported that parts availability improved to the mid-90% range in the first quarter of 2025.3 Furthermore, a critical metric for the professional business, “Time to Serve,” which measures the time from order placement to customer delivery, has seen significant improvement. After averaging over 50 minutes in fiscal 2024, this metric was brought down into the company’s target range of 30 to 40 minutes in the second quarter of 2025.39 These are tangible, early indicators that the operational changes are beginning to yield positive results at the customer level.

Pricing Strategy Missteps

In 2022, AAP’s previous management team initiated a pricing strategy that proved to be a major strategic blunder. In an attempt to close its margin gap with peers, the company raised prices, first in its DIY segment and then in its professional business. This move was ill-timed, as competitors either held their pricing steady or became more aggressive, leading to a significant loss of volume and market share for AAP, particularly among price-sensitive professional customers who defected to rivals.3 The company was eventually forced to reverse course in early 2023, slashing prices to win back business. This reversal stabilized volumes but came at a significant cost to gross margins and required a painful period of rebuilding trust with its customer base.3

4. Financial Performance & Growth History

An analysis of Advance Auto Parts’ historical financial performance reveals a consistent pattern of underperformance relative to its primary peers, AutoZone and O’Reilly Automotive. This performance gap across key metrics such as sales growth, profitability, and returns on capital is the central challenge that the company’s current transformation strategy aims to address.

Revenue and Comparable Store Sales

In recent years, AAP’s top-line growth has been sluggish and has lagged the industry. For the full fiscal year of 2024, the company reported a comparable store sales decline of 0.5%.4 Performance in 2025 has shown signs of stabilization, but not yet a robust recovery. In the second quarter of 2025, net sales totaled $2.0 billion, a year-over-year decline from $2.2 billion, which was partly attributable to the company’s store closure program. However, comparable store sales posted a marginal increase of 0.1%, indicating that the underlying business has stopped contracting.40

This performance stands in stark contrast to that of its competitors, who have continued to post healthy growth on much larger revenue bases. For its quarter ending in mid-2025, O’Reilly reported a strong comparable store sales increase of 4.1%.41 Similarly, AutoZone reported a domestic comparable store sales increase of 5.0% for its third quarter of fiscal 2025.43 This divergence underscores the market share AAP has been ceding to its more efficient rivals.

Profitability Metrics

The most glaring disparity in financial performance is in profitability. AAP has operated with chronically lower gross and operating margins for years.

  • Gross Margin: In the second quarter of 2025, AAP’s adjusted gross margin was 43.8%.40 This compares to O’Reilly’s gross margin of 51.4% 41 and AutoZone’s of 52.7% in their respective recent quarters.44 This gap of approximately 800-900 basis points is a massive structural disadvantage.
  • Operating Margin: The gap is even more pronounced at the operating income level. AAP’s adjusted operating margin in Q2 2025 was just 3.0%.40 During the same period, O’Reilly’s operating margin was a robust 20.2% 45, and AutoZone’s was 19.6%.46 This enormous difference in profitability is the core financial problem the company must solve and highlights the scale of the potential value creation if the turnaround is successful. Management’s long-term goal is to achieve an adjusted operating margin of approximately 7% by fiscal 2027, a significant improvement but still far below peer levels.4

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

Return on invested capital is a critical measure of how efficiently a company uses its capital to generate profits. In the retail sector, where success is driven by inventory management and supply chain logistics, ROIC is a key indicator of operational excellence. On this metric, AAP has dramatically underperformed. While specific historical ROIC figures for AAP are not readily available in the provided materials, analysis from third parties confirms that its ROIC has significantly lagged its peers.5 For context, AutoZone has consistently generated an after-tax ROIC of over 35%, reaching 55.4% in 2023.37 O’Reilly’s ROIC is even higher, reaching 76.3% in 2023.36 This demonstrates their superior ability to generate cash flow from their asset base.

Working Capital Management and Cash Flow Generation

Effective working capital management is crucial in the auto parts business. The industry leaders, AutoZone and O’Reilly, have mastered the art of leveraging their scale to negotiate favorable payment terms with suppliers, often resulting in a negative cash conversion cycle where they sell inventory and collect cash from customers before they have to pay their suppliers.

Advance Auto Parts has struggled in this area. The company has historically paid its suppliers more quickly than it turns its inventory, leading to a constant need for cash to fund working capital and a significant drag on free cash flow.5 This issue has been exacerbated during the initial phases of the turnaround. For the first half of 2025, AAP reported a free cash flow

outflow of $201 million, a deterioration from the $48 million outflow in the same period of the prior year.40 The company’s full-year 2025 guidance projects a continued free cash flow outflow in the range of $25 million to $85 million, highlighting the significant cash investment required to fund its strategic initiatives.38

The following table provides a direct comparison of key financial metrics for Advance Auto Parts and its primary competitors for the most recent full fiscal years, illustrating the performance gap that AAP’s management is working to close.

Table 1: Key Financial Metrics Comparison (FY 2021-2023)

MetricCompany202120222023
Net Sales ($M)AAP$10,999$11,287$11,269
AZO$14,630$16,252$17,457
ORLY$13,328$14,410$15,812
Comp Sales Growth (%)AAP10.9%1.4%-0.2%
AZO13.6%7.1%5.3%
ORLY13.3%6.4%7.9%
Gross Margin (%)AAP44.7%44.5%43.1%
AZO52.7%52.3%52.0%
ORLY52.7%51.2%51.3%
Operating Margin (%)AAP8.8%7.8%4.7%
AZO20.1%20.1%19.9%
ORLY21.9%20.5%20.2%
Net Income ($M)AAP$616$586$259
AZO$2,170$2,430$2,528
ORLY$2,165$2,173$2,347
ROIC (%)AAPN/AN/AN/A
AZO41.0%52.9%55.4%
ORLY67.7%71.6%76.3%

Note: Financial data sourced from company 10-K filings.6 AAP fiscal years end around the last Saturday in December. AZO fiscal years end on the last Saturday in August. ORLY fiscal years end on December 31. Data is aligned by calendar year for comparability. AAP’s ROIC is not explicitly provided in the source materials and is marked N/A.

5. Recent Challenges & Strategic Initiatives (2023-2025)

The period from 2023 through 2025 has been one of the most tumultuous and transformative in Advance Auto Parts’ history. The company faced a full-blown operational and financial crisis that necessitated a complete overhaul of its leadership, strategy, and operational structure.

Deep-Seated Operational and Financial Challenges

The company’s recent struggles were the culmination of years of underperformance, but they were acutely exacerbated by a series of critical missteps. The most damaging of these was the failed pricing initiative launched in 2022. By raising prices at a time when competitors were holding the line, AAP triggered a significant loss of customers, particularly in the crucial professional segment, which severely impacted sales volumes and market share.3

This strategic error compounded existing weaknesses. The company’s supply chain remained a significant liability, characterized by inefficiency and complexity that led to poor parts availability.3 Internally, the company was also facing instability. In the first quarter of 2023, management identified a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting, citing the turnover of key personnel in its accounting department as a primary cause.49 This disclosure pointed to deeper issues within the organization’s structure and talent management. The combination of these factors led to a collapse in profitability, a sharp decline in the company’s stock price, and a crisis of confidence among investors.

A New Leadership Team and a Decisive Strategic Pivot

In response to the escalating crisis, the company’s board initiated a comprehensive leadership change. Shane O’Kelly was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer in late 2023, followed by the hiring of Ryan Grimsland as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in November 2023.50 The new leadership team was rounded out in early 2025 with the appointments of a new Chief Technology Officer, Shweta Bhatia, and a new General Counsel, Jeff Vining.51

This new executive team moved quickly to diagnose the company’s problems and launched a comprehensive transformation plan. The strategy represents an explicit admission that nearly every core operational function of the business was broken and required a fundamental overhaul rather than incremental adjustments. The plan is anchored on three core pillars:

  1. Merchandising Excellence: Focusing on strategic sourcing to improve costs, enhancing assortment management to ensure better parts availability, and implementing more effective pricing and promotion strategies to rebuild gross margin.4
  2. Supply Chain Modernization: A multi-year plan to consolidate the company’s sprawling network of distribution centers and build out a more efficient hub-and-spoke model.4
  3. Store Operations Improvement: Standardizing the operating model across all stores, improving labor productivity, and enhancing the customer experience through better training and technology.4

Store and Asset Optimization

A key early action in the transformation was a decisive rationalization of the company’s physical assets. Management undertook a thorough review of the entire store portfolio, resulting in the closure of over 700 underperforming and non-strategic locations.3 This move was designed to eliminate a significant source of financial drag and allow the company to concentrate its resources on its most promising markets.

Simultaneously, the company began a process of strategic simplification by announcing its intent to explore the sale of non-core business units, specifically Worldpac and its Canadian operations.4 This initiative is aimed at streamlining the company’s focus onto its primary objective: fixing the core U.S. blended-box retail model.

Foundational Investments in Supply Chain and Technology

The centerpiece of the turnaround is the multi-year, capital-intensive overhaul of the supply chain. The plan calls for the consolidation of 38 legacy distribution centers down to just 12 large, modern regional facilities by the end of 2026. This will be supported by the rollout of 60 market hubs by mid-2027.4 These investments are foundational and are designed to bring AAP’s logistics capabilities up to the standard set by its industry-leading competitors. The company is also making necessary investments in its IT infrastructure, including the implementation of a new Warehouse Management System across its network, to standardize processes and improve efficiency.9

6. Capital Allocation & Financial Strategy

In conjunction with its operational overhaul, Advance Auto Parts has fundamentally shifted its capital allocation strategy. The previous focus on shareholder returns has been decisively replaced by a strategy that prioritizes preserving cash to fund the multi-year turnaround plan and strengthen the balance sheet.

Capital Allocation Priorities

The company’s primary capital allocation priority is now internal investment. For fiscal 2025, capital expenditures are guided to be approximately $300 million.38 These funds are earmarked for the critical initiatives at the heart of the transformation plan. This includes the significant costs associated with consolidating the supply chain network, building out new market hubs, and making long-overdue investments in in-store technology, equipment, and general maintenance to improve the customer experience.4 This represents a necessary pivot from returning cash to shareholders to reinvesting it back into the core business to fix foundational issues.

Dividend Policy and Share Repurchases

One of the most significant and telling actions taken by the new management team was the dramatic reduction of the company’s quarterly dividend in 2023. This move was a clear signal to the market that the priority was balance sheet preservation. The current quarterly dividend stands at $0.25 per share, as declared on August 5, 2025.38

Furthermore, the company has suspended its share repurchase program. This stands in stark contrast to its primary competitors, AutoZone and O’Reilly Automotive. Both of these companies have long-standing, aggressive share repurchase programs that are a cornerstone of their capital allocation strategies and a major driver of their earnings per share growth.41 AAP’s inability to fund a buyback program at this time highlights its weaker financial position and the cash demands of its turnaround.

Debt, Capital Structure, and Financial Flexibility

To ensure it has sufficient liquidity to navigate the turnaround, AAP has proactively restructured its debt. In July 2025, the company completed a large offering of $1.95 billion in aggregate senior notes.40 This was accompanied by the establishment of a new $1.0 billion asset-backed revolving credit facility.38

Management has described these actions as necessary steps to preserve financial flexibility, refinance upcoming debt maturities, and provide a bridge toward potentially re-attaining an investment-grade credit rating in the future.11 However, these moves also increase the company’s overall leverage at a time when it is generating negative free cash flow. This underscores the financial risk inherent in the turnaround plan; the company is betting that the operational improvements will generate sufficient cash flow in the future to service this increased debt load.

Acquisition Strategy and Store Expansion

The era of large-scale, transformative acquisitions for Advance Auto Parts appears to be over. The strategic focus has shifted decisively from M&A-led growth to organic improvement and the potential divestiture of non-core assets acquired in previous deals.4

After a period of significant store closures and network consolidation, the company is now cautiously returning to a strategy of modest, targeted store growth. The plan for 2025 includes the opening of 30 net new stores and 10 new market hubs.9 This represents a shift from a purely defensive posture to a more offensive one, but on a much smaller and more strategically focused scale than in the past.

7. Growth Opportunities & Strategic Outlook

The primary growth opportunity for Advance Auto Parts is not contingent on the expansion of the overall automotive aftermarket, but rather on its ability to execute its internal turnaround and close the significant performance gap with its industry peers. The strategic outlook is therefore entirely dependent on the execution capabilities of its new management team.

Primary Growth Driver: Margin Expansion

The most substantial opportunity for value creation at AAP lies in improving its profitability. The company’s operating margins have languished in the low-to-mid single digits, while competitors AutoZone and O’Reilly consistently operate at or near 20%.4 This vast chasm in profitability represents a massive, albeit challenging, opportunity.

Management has set a long-term target of achieving an adjusted operating margin of approximately 7% by fiscal year 2027.4 While this goal is ambitious compared to the company’s recent performance—the guidance for 2025 is for a margin between 2.0% and 3.0%—it is still a very conservative target relative to the industry leaders.38 If AAP can successfully execute its supply chain consolidation, improve its merchandising, and streamline store operations, each percentage point of margin improvement will translate into a significant increase in earnings and cash flow from its current depressed base. This internal improvement is the central pillar of the investment thesis.

Market Share Recapture

A direct result of improved operational execution would be the potential to recapture lost market share. The company’s struggles with parts availability and delivery speed, particularly following its failed pricing strategy in 2022, led to an exodus of customers, especially in the valuable professional (DIFM) segment.3

As the company’s turnaround initiatives take hold—as evidenced by early improvements in parts availability and “Time to Serve” metrics—it has the opportunity to win back these professional customers.3 The newly optimized store footprint, which concentrates stores in denser markets, should also enhance its competitive positioning and ability to serve both DIFM and DIY customers more effectively.9 A return to sustained, positive comparable store sales growth would be the clearest indicator that this market share recapture is underway.

Positioning for Industry Evolution

Like all participants in the automotive aftermarket, Advance Auto Parts must prepare for the long-term transition to electric vehicles. This will require developing new supplier relationships for EV-specific components, investing in training for its employees to handle high-voltage systems, and adapting its store inventory and services.

However, in the near to medium term, the company’s strategic focus is rightly on its core business serving the massive installed base of internal combustion engine vehicles, which will continue to dominate the aftermarket for at least the next decade.30 The success of the current turnaround is a prerequisite for future success in the EV era. Only by establishing a foundation of operational excellence and financial stability will AAP have the resources and credibility to make the necessary long-term investments to adapt to the industry’s evolution.

Management Execution Capability

Ultimately, the strategic outlook for Advance Auto Parts rests almost entirely on the execution capabilities of its new leadership team. The strategy itself—imitating the successful hub-and-spoke model of its peers—is sound and well-understood. The challenge lies in the implementation of such a large-scale transformation within a company that has a long history of operational missteps. The early signs of progress in key operational metrics are encouraging, but the path to achieving the company’s long-term financial targets is long and fraught with execution risk.3

8. Risk Assessment

An investment in Advance Auto Parts at this juncture carries a unique and elevated risk profile centered on the successful execution of a complex corporate turnaround. While the company benefits from operating in a resilient industry, its internal challenges are substantial.

Operational and Execution Risk

This is the most significant and immediate risk facing the company. The transformation plan is a comprehensive and multi-year overhaul of nearly every aspect of the business, from supply chain logistics to in-store processes.4 Failure to effectively manage this complex transition could result in further operational disruptions, an inability to achieve projected cost savings, and a failure to close the performance gap with competitors. The success of the entire investment thesis hinges on management’s ability to execute this plan.

Competitive Threats

Advance Auto Parts is competing against two of the most formidable and well-managed retailers in any sector: AutoZone and O’Reilly Automotive. These companies possess significant advantages in scale, operational efficiency, and financial resources.3 They are not static competitors and will likely respond aggressively to any attempts by AAP to regain market share. The risk is that even if AAP improves its operations, its competitors may improve at an equal or faster rate, preventing AAP from ever meaningfully closing the gap.

Financial Risk

To fund its turnaround, the company has taken on significant additional debt, increasing its financial leverage at a time when it is experiencing negative free cash flow.11 This creates a heightened level of financial risk. If the turnaround stalls or if the macroeconomic environment deteriorates, the company’s ability to service its debt and continue to fund necessary capital expenditures could be compromised. A failure to return to positive and sustainable free cash flow generation in a timely manner is a critical risk to the company’s long-term viability.

Macroeconomic Sensitivity

While the automotive aftermarket is more resilient than many other retail sectors, it is not immune to macroeconomic pressures. A severe economic downturn could lead to higher unemployment and a reduction in vehicle miles driven as consumers cut back on travel. This could soften demand for both DIY and DIFM services, creating a more challenging environment in which to execute a turnaround.25 Inflationary pressures can also impact consumer discretionary spending and increase the company’s input costs.

Technological Disruption

The long-term, accelerating shift toward electric vehicles (EVs) poses an existential threat to the traditional auto parts business model. EVs have fewer parts and require significantly less routine maintenance, which will structurally reduce demand for many of the products that AAP and its peers sell today.30 While this is a long-term risk that affects the entire industry, a failure by AAP to successfully navigate its current turnaround could leave it financially and operationally too weak to make the necessary investments to adapt to this technological shift over the next decade.

Internal Control and Talent Risk

The company’s disclosure of a material weakness in its internal controls in 2023, linked to turnover in key accounting roles, highlights the risk associated with attracting and retaining the high-caliber talent required to manage a complex, large-scale transformation.49 Continued instability in key positions could undermine the execution of the strategic plan and damage investor confidence.

9. Valuation Analysis

The valuation of Advance Auto Parts is a story of two competing narratives. On one hand, the company’s current financial performance is poor, and its valuation on a trailing basis reflects significant distress. On the other hand, the potential for a successful turnaround presents a scenario where the company’s normalized earnings power could be substantially higher, suggesting potential undervaluation if the new strategy succeeds. Traditional valuation metrics are therefore less useful than a forward-looking assessment of the turnaround’s potential.

Historical Valuation Ranges and Peer Benchmarking

Historically, AAP has traded at a valuation discount to its superior-performing peers, AutoZone and O’Reilly. This discount has widened into a chasm during the company’s recent crisis.62 A review of key valuation multiples starkly illustrates this disparity.

The most telling metric is often Enterprise Value to Sales (EV/Sales), as it is not distorted by currently depressed profitability. On this basis, AAP’s valuation is a fraction of its peers. While AAP’s EV/Sales multiple is approximately 0.7x, AutoZone and O’Reilly trade at multiples of 4.0x and 5.3x, respectively.63 This vast difference reflects the market’s willingness to pay a significant premium for the superior profitability and cash flow generation that its competitors derive from each dollar of sales.

On an Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) basis, the picture is more complex due to AAP’s compressed earnings. As of mid-2025, AAP’s LTM EV/EBITDA multiple was 23.6x. This seemingly high multiple is a function of a severely depressed EBITDA denominator. For comparison, O’Reilly’s multiple was 25.2x, and AutoZone’s was 18.5x.63

Table 2: Valuation Multiples – AAP vs. Competitors (as of mid-2025)

MetricAdvance Auto Parts (AAP)AutoZone (AZO)O’Reilly Automotive (ORLY)
Market Cap~$3.5B~$69.1B~$87.9B
Enterprise Value (EV)~$6.1B~$76.1B~$95.1B
EV / Sales (LTM)~0.7x~4.0x~5.3x
EV / EBITDA (LTM)23.6x18.5x25.2x
P / E (LTM)N/A (Negative Earnings)27.0x36.3x
P / Book (P/B)~1.5xN/A (Negative Equity)N/A (Negative Equity)

Note: Data sourced from financial data providers and company filings as of mid-2025.46 Multiples can fluctuate and are subject to market changes.

Appropriate Valuation Frameworks

Given the turnaround situation, relying solely on trailing valuation multiples is insufficient. The current stock price does not reflect the company’s recent performance; rather, it reflects the market’s deep skepticism about its ability to execute the turnaround.

A more appropriate valuation framework involves assessing the company’s potential normalized earnings power. The investment case for AAP is not that the stock is cheap based on its current, depressed earnings, but that it is cheap relative to what it could earn if the transformation is successful. For example, if management were to achieve its 7% adjusted operating margin target on its current revenue base, the resulting earnings and cash flow would be multiples of their current levels.

The bull case rests on the belief that as the company demonstrates tangible progress toward its goals, the market will begin to re-rate the stock, closing the massive valuation gap with its peers. The bear case is that the execution will falter, the targets will not be met, and the current valuation will prove to be a value trap rather than a value opportunity. Therefore, the analysis of AAP’s valuation is inextricably linked to an assessment of its operational progress.

10. Key Financial Metrics & Ratios to Track

For investors monitoring the progress of Advance Auto Parts’ transformation, focusing on a specific set of key performance indicators (KPIs) is essential. These metrics will serve as leading indicators of whether the turnaround strategy is gaining traction and creating value. Constant benchmarking against the performance of AutoZone and O’Reilly is the most critical analytical exercise.

Leading Indicators of Turnaround Success

  • Comparable Store Sales Growth: This is the most direct measure of the company’s health at the customer level. Positive and accelerating comparable sales growth, particularly in the professional (DIFM) segment, would indicate that merchandising and availability improvements are successfully winning back market share.
  • Adjusted Operating Income (AOI) Margin: This is the primary metric for tracking profitability improvement and progress toward management’s long-term financial targets. Investors should closely monitor the sequential and year-over-year change in AOI margin, looking for consistent expansion driven by both gross margin improvements and SG&A leverage.
  • Inventory Turnover and Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO): These are key indicators of supply chain efficiency and working capital management. An increase in inventory turns (or a decrease in DIO) would provide tangible evidence that the new supply chain strategy and merchandising assortment plans are effectively improving the productivity of the company’s largest asset.
  • Free Cash Flow (FCF): The ultimate measure of financial health and the success of the turnaround. A return to sustained, positive free cash flow is a non-negotiable milestone. Investors should track the company’s progress against its guidance, looking for the inflection from cash outflow to cash inflow.

Peer Comparison Benchmarks

The performance of AutoZone and O’Reilly provides the definitive benchmark for success. In every quarterly earnings release, investors should compare AAP’s KPIs directly against those of its two main competitors. The central question is whether the performance gap is narrowing. Key comparisons include:

  • Comparable Sales Growth: Is AAP closing the growth gap?
  • Gross and Operating Margins: Is AAP’s margin expansion outpacing any changes at its peers, thus narrowing the profitability gap?
  • Return on Invested Capital (ROIC): Over the long term, is AAP demonstrating an improved ability to generate cash flow from its asset base, leading to a rising ROIC?

Strategic Milestones to Monitor

Beyond financial metrics, investors should track the progress of the key strategic initiatives that are designed to drive the financial improvements:

  • Supply Chain Consolidation: Updates on the number of distribution centers that have been closed or consolidated, tracking progress toward the goal of 12 large facilities by 2026.
  • Market Hub Rollout: The pace of new market hub openings, monitoring progress against the target of 60 hubs by mid-2027.
  • Asset Divestitures: Any announcements or progress regarding the potential sale of non-core assets like Worldpac or the Canadian business, which would provide capital and simplify the business.

Works cited

  1. Investors – Advance Auto Parts, Inc., accessed August 26, 2025, http://ir.advanceautoparts.com/investors/overview/default.aspx
  2. Advance Auto Parts Announces Date for Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Release and Conference Call, accessed August 26, 2025, https://ir.advanceautoparts.com/investors/news-and-events/press-releases/press-release-details/2025/Advance-Auto-Parts-Announces-Date-for-Second-Quarter-2025-Earnings-Release-and-Conference-Call/default.aspx
  3. Highlighted Holding: Advance Auto Parts | Insights – Pzena Investment Management, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.pzena.com/americas/institutional-investors/insights/highlighted-holding-advance-auto-parts-2q-2025/
  4. Advance Auto Parts Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Results, accessed August 26, 2025, https://corp.advanceautoparts.com/investors/news-and-events/press-releases/press-release-details/2025/Advance-Auto-Parts-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2024-Results/default.aspx
  5. The Most Important Thing for Advance Auto Parts Investors to Watch in 2025, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.fool.com/investing/2025/08/17/the-most-important-thing-for-advance-auto-parts-in/
  6. advance-auto-parts-annual-report.pdf, accessed August 26, 2025, https://s1.q4cdn.com/172833328/files/doc_financials/2023/ar/advance-auto-parts-annual-report.pdf
  7. accessed December 31, 1969, https://ir.advanceautoparts.com/static-files/c329029f-7f72-466e-a719-21801267a63e
  8. advance auto parts, inc. – SEC.gov, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1158449/000115844918000039/aap_10kx12302017.htm
  9. Advance Auto Parts Opening New Stores After Completing Strategic …, accessed August 26, 2025, https://ir.advanceautoparts.com/investors/news-and-events/press-releases/press-release-details/2025/Advance-Auto-Parts-Opening-New-Stores-After-Completing-Strategic-Optimization-of-U-S–Retail-Footprint/default.aspx
  10. Advance Auto Parts Annual Report | PDF | Form 10 K | Supply Chain – Scribd, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/859575874/Advance-Auto-Parts-Annual-Report
  11. Advance Auto Parts Announces Preliminary Second Quarter 2025 Financial Highlights, accessed August 26, 2025, https://corp.advanceautoparts.com/investors/news-and-events/press-releases/press-release-details/2025/Advance-Auto-Parts-Announces-Preliminary-Second-Quarter-2025-Financial-Highlights/default.aspx
  12. 2024 Annual Report – SEC.gov, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/898173/000089817325000020/orly-20241231xars.pdf
  13. 2020 Annual Report, accessed August 26, 2025, https://s1.q4cdn.com/172833328/files/doc_financials/2020/ar/384726-Advance-Auto-Parts-AR-WR.pdf
  14. Automotive Aftermarket Industry Trends, Size Report, 2032 – Fortune Business Insights, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/automotive-after-market-102613
  15. Automotive After Market Size, Share & Growth | Industry Report, 2033 – Straits Research, accessed August 26, 2025, https://straitsresearch.com/report/automotive-after-market
  16. Automotive Aftermarket Industry Size & Share Report, 2030 – Grand View Research, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/aftermarket-automotive-parts-market
  17. Automotive Aftermarket Industry Size, Growth and Trends, accessed August 26, 2025, https://automotiveaftermarket.org/aftermarket-industry-trends/automotive-aftermarket-size/
  18. Analysis of Average Age of Cars and Trucks on the Road, accessed August 26, 2025, https://hedgescompany.com/blog/2024/02/average-age-of-cars-trucks/
  19. Average U.S. vehicle age hits record 12.6 years as high prices force people to keep them longer – PBS, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/average-u-s-vehicle-age-hits-record-12-6-years-as-high-prices-force-people-to-keep-them-longer
  20. Average age of vehicles hits new record in 2024 | S&P Global, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.spglobal.com/mobility/en/research-analysis/average-age-vehicles-united-states-2024.html
  21. VMT Back to Pre-COVID Level in 2023, but Still Lags Per Capita, accessed August 26, 2025, https://enotrans.org/article/vmt-back-to-pre-covid-level-in-2023-but-still-lags-per-capita/
  22. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) | FRED | St. Louis Fed, accessed August 26, 2025, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/VMT
  23. Vehicle Miles Traveled (TRFVOLUSM227NFWA) | FRED | St. Louis Fed, accessed August 26, 2025, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/TRFVOLUSM227NFWA
  24. Investor Relations | O’Reilly Auto Parts, accessed August 26, 2025, https://corporate.oreillyauto.com/investor-relations-information/
  25. Form 10-K for Autozone INC filed 10/28/2024, accessed August 26, 2025, https://investors.autozone.com/static-files/820500c3-b378-4e59-a7cd-603a0f4519f4
  26. Form 10-K for Autozone INC filed 10/24/2023, accessed August 26, 2025, https://about.autozone.com/static-files/6a3485e5-1183-4a09-89bc-f06642850b46
  27. NAPA Auto Parts – Wikipedia, accessed August 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAPA_Auto_Parts
  28. About NAPA Auto Parts, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.napaonline.com/en/about
  29. O’Reilly Automotive Report | PPTX – SlideShare, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/oreilly-automotive-report/10595593
  30. The Impact of Electric Vehicles on the Aftermarket | L.E.K. Consulting, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.lek.com/insights/ind/us/ei/impact-electric-vehicles-aftermarket
  31. Can OEMs endure the effects of EVs on their parts business? – MSXI, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.msxi.com/us/benchmarker/can-oems-endure-the-effects-of-evs-on-their-parts-business/
  32. Impact of Electric Vehicles on the Automotive Aftermarket Industry, accessed August 26, 2025, https://pdmautomotive.com/rise-of-electric-vehicles-will-alter-the-automotive-aftermarket-industry/
  33. Market insights: Impact of Electrification on Aftermarket Business and Spare Parts Demand – Consumer Goods & Industry – Katoen Natie, accessed August 26, 2025, https://consumergoods-industry.katoennatie.com/news/market-insights-impact-of-electrification-on-aftermarket-business-and-spare-parts-demand/
  34. Exploring the Impact of Electric Vehicles on Auto Accessories – Car EV & Alternative Energy Articles – JC Whitney, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.jcwhitney.com/technology/exploring-the-impact-of-electric-vehicles-on-auto-accessories/
  35. How big is the impact of EVs on the aftermarket? – Auto Service World, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.autoserviceworld.com/how-big-is-the-impact-of-evs-on-the-aftermarket/
  36. 2023 Annual Report – SEC.gov, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/898173/000089817324000015/orly-20231231xars.pdf
  37. 2023 ANNUAL REPORT – Annual Reports, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/a/NYSE_AZO_2023.pdf
  38. Investors – Financials – Quarterly Results – Advance Auto Parts, Inc., accessed August 26, 2025, https://ir.advanceautoparts.com/investors/financials/quarterly-results/default.aspx
  39. Advance Auto Parts Q2 2025 slides: Return to profitability amid ongoing transformation, accessed August 26, 2025, https://au.investing.com/news/company-news/advance-auto-parts-q2-2025-slides-return-to-profitability-amid-ongoing-transformation-93CH-3979299
  40. Advance Auto Parts Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results and Reaffirms Full Year Sales, Operating Margin and Free Cash Flow Guidance, accessed August 26, 2025, https://ir.advanceautoparts.com/investors/news-and-events/press-releases/press-release-details/2025/Advance-Auto-Parts-Reports-Second-Quarter-2025-Results-and-Reaffirms-Full-Year-Sales-Operating-Margin-and-Free-Cash-Flow-Guidance/default.aspx
  41. O’Reilly Automotive, Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results, accessed August 26, 2025, https://corporate.oreillyauto.com/2025/07/23/oreilly-automotive-inc-reports-second-quarter-2025-results/
  42. O’Reilly Automotive, Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results – GlobeNewswire, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/07/23/3120655/10672/en/O-Reilly-Automotive-Inc-Reports-Second-Quarter-2025-Results.html
  43. Investor Relations | AutoZone, Inc, accessed August 26, 2025, https://about.autozone.com/investor-overview/
  44. AutoZone, Inc. Reports Q3 Fiscal 2025 Financial Results with Sales Growth and Share Repurchases | Nasdaq, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/autozone-inc-reports-q3-fiscal-2025-financial-results-sales-growth-and-share-repurchases
  45. What O’Reilly Automotive’s Earnings Say About the Health of Its Business | The Motley Fool, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.fool.com/investing/2025/07/31/oreilly-automotive-earnings-health-business/
  46. AZO Fundamental Statistics Autozone – Market Chameleon, accessed August 26, 2025, https://marketchameleon.com/Overview/AZO/Fundamentals-Financial-Key-Ratios/
  47. accessed December 31, 1969, https://corporate.oreillyauto.com/static-files/17e34442-881c-4c92-801e-952553e7a0b8
  48. Document – SEC.gov, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1158449/000115844920000035/aap10k12282019secreport.htm
  49. NT 10-K – SEC.gov, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1158449/000119312524049060/d796245dnt10k.htm
  50. Investors – Governance – Leadership – Advance Auto Parts, Inc., accessed August 26, 2025, https://corp.advanceautoparts.com/investors/governance/leadership/default.aspx
  51. Investors – News & Events – Press Releases – Advance Auto Parts, Inc., accessed August 26, 2025, https://ir.advanceautoparts.com/investors/news-and-events/press-releases/default.aspx
  52. AutoZone (AZO) Intrinsic Value: Stock Valuation – The Investor’s Podcast Network, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.theinvestorspodcast.com/intrinsic-value/autozone-azo/
  53. Capital Allocation: Principles, Strategies, and Processes for Creating Long-Term Shareholder Value – O’Reilly Media, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/capital-allocation-principles/9781264270071/ch10.xhtml
  54. O’Reilly Automotive, Inc. Reports First Quarter 2025 Results, accessed August 26, 2025, https://corporate.oreillyauto.com/2025/04/23/oreilly-automotive-inc-reports-first-quarter-2025-results/
  55. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. – Investors, accessed August 26, 2025, http://ir.advanceautoparts.com/
  56. STRATEGIC UPDATE INVESTOR PRESENTATION, accessed August 26, 2025, https://s1.q4cdn.com/172833328/files/doc_presentations/Final-AAP_InvestorDeck-04-20-21.pdf
  57. Advance Auto Parts Reports First Quarter 2025 Results and Reaffirms Full Year Guidance, accessed August 26, 2025, https://ir.advanceautoparts.com/investors/news-and-events/press-releases/press-release-details/2025/Advance-Auto-Parts-Reports-First-Quarter-2025-Results-and-Reaffirms-Full-Year-Guidance/default.aspx
  58. 10-K – SEC.gov, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1158449/000115844916000299/aap_10kx122016.htm
  59. Financial Assessment of Executive Decision-Making and Risk Management: A Case Study of AutoZone – eGrove, accessed August 26, 2025, https://egrove.olemiss.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4135&context=hon_thesis
  60. Form 10-K for Autozone INC filed 10/23/2022, accessed August 26, 2025, https://about.autozone.com/static-files/996905de-b43f-4907-83eb-81220ef57449
  61. O’Reilly Automotive, Inc. Announces Additional $1 Billion Share Repurchase Authorization, accessed August 26, 2025, https://corporate.oreillyauto.com/2019/05/31/oreilly-automotive-inc-announces-additional-1-billion-share-repurchase-authorization-6/
  62. Valuation – Advance Auto Parts Inc AAP – Morningstar, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/xnys/aap/valuation
  63. EV / Revenue For AutoZone Inc (AZO) – Finbox, accessed August 26, 2025, https://finbox.com/NYSE:AZO/explorer/ev_to_revenue_ltm
  64. EV / EBITDA For Advance Auto Parts Inc (AAP) – Finbox, accessed August 26, 2025, https://finbox.com/NYSE:AAP/explorer/ev_to_ebitda_ltm/
  65. AZO Relative Valuation – Autozone Inc – Alpha Spread, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nyse/azo/relative-valuation/base-case
  66. EV / EBITDA For O’Reilly Automotive Inc (ORLY) – Finbox, accessed August 26, 2025, https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:ORLY/explorer/ev_to_ebitda_ltm/
  67. ORLY Relative Valuation – O’Reilly Automotive Inc – Alpha Spread, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nasdaq/orly/relative-valuation
  68. Advance Auto Parts Enterprise Value Insights – YCharts, accessed August 26, 2025, https://ycharts.com/companies/AAP/enterprise_value
  69. AAP Intrinsic Valuation and Fundamental Analysis – Advance Auto Parts Inc – Alpha Spread, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nyse/aap/summary
  70. ORLY Fundamental Statistics O’reilly Automotive, accessed August 26, 2025, https://marketchameleon.com/Overview/ORLY/Fundamentals-Financial-Key-Ratios/