
Executive Summary & Investment Thesis Highlights
Dino Polska SA represents a compelling case of a high-growth, high-return “compounder” built on a uniquely defensible business model within the Polish grocery retail sector. The company’s meticulously executed strategy of targeting smaller, underserved Polish communities with standardized, company-owned proximity supermarkets has yielded an exceptional track record of growth in revenue, store count, and market share since its 2017 IPO.1 Dino has successfully carved out a niche that insulates it from direct, head-to-head competition with larger-format retailers, while its operational excellence has delivered industry-leading returns on capital.
The central investment dichotomy for Dino Polska revolves around a critical question: can the company’s proven operational prowess and substantial runway for continued store expansion justify its persistent premium valuation, especially in the face of a maturing domestic market, intensifying competition, and a recent, sharp deceleration in like-for-like (LFL) sales growth? This report seeks to provide a comprehensive framework for analyzing this dichotomy.
The bullish perspective is anchored in the company’s identity as a best-in-class operator. Its growth model is self-funding, driven by strong operating cash flows and a negative working capital cycle.2 There remains significant whitespace for store expansion, with market saturation estimates suggesting the current network could multiply several times over before reaching its ceiling.4 A structural cost advantage, derived from owning its real estate assets, provides a durable competitive moat that is difficult for leasing-focused rivals to replicate.6 This is all overseen by a highly aligned, founder-led management team with a 51% ownership stake, ensuring a focus on long-term value creation.4 From this viewpoint, the recent LFL sales slowdown is a temporary headwind caused by the normalization of food price inflation, not a structural flaw in the business model.
Conversely, the bearish case argues that the premium valuation is predicated on historical growth rates that are no longer sustainable. As the Polish grocery market matures and price wars with larger, well-capitalized rivals like Biedronka and Lidl intensify, Dino’s ability to expand margins and grow LFL sales will be severely tested.8 The recent LFL slowdown and concurrent EBITDA margin compression are viewed not as cyclical issues, but as early indicators of a structural shift towards a more competitive, lower-growth, and lower-margin environment. This shift, if it proves permanent, could lead to a significant contraction in the company’s valuation multiple.
Financially, Dino Polska is characterized by a robust balance sheet with minimal net debt, historically high Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), and remarkably efficient working capital management.2 The primary risks confronting the company are operational and strategic in nature. These include the escalating competitive pressure from discounters, the execution risk associated with its aggressive expansion strategy, macroeconomic sensitivity inherent in the retail sector, and the overarching risk that its high valuation cannot be sustained if growth moderates.
Company Overview & Business Model: The “Proximity Supermarket” Playbook
Dino Polska’s success is rooted in a disciplined and highly effective business model that has been refined over two decades. The company’s strategy is not a complex amalgamation of ventures but a singular focus on perfecting one format and replicating it with relentless efficiency.
The Dino Format: A Standardized, Repeatable Engine for Growth
Dino operates a nationwide network of medium-sized “proximity supermarkets.” The core value proposition is convenience, with stores strategically located close to customers’ places of residence, primarily catering to daily or frequent shopping trips.11 This model is designed to offer a superior alternative to both small, traditional shops with limited assortments and large, distant hypermarkets that require a dedicated, time-consuming journey.
The physical stores are a testament to standardization. A typical Dino outlet features a sales floor of approximately 400 square meters (around 4,300 sq ft), a consistent and easy-to-navigate layout, and dedicated parking.7 This uniformity is a critical operational advantage, as it allows the company to streamline construction, logistics, staffing, and marketing, facilitating a rapid and cost-effective new store rollout process.7 As of the end of the first quarter of 2025, the company’s total selling area had expanded to 1.08 million square meters, a year-over-year increase of 12.9%.14
The product assortment is carefully curated to meet the vast majority—estimated at 95%—of a typical household’s daily needs.7 With approximately 5,000 stock-keeping units (SKUs), the focus is on a mix of well-known national brands and a comprehensive selection of fresh products.7 This strategy allows Dino to combine the convenience of a local corner store with the product breadth and quality perception of a full-service supermarket.
Geographic Footprint & Rural Focus: A Contrarian and Defensible Niche
Dino Polska’s geographic strategy is arguably its most defining characteristic. While major competitors historically focused on large urban centers, Dino deliberately targeted smaller, less-urbanized communities.16 The company’s model is designed to be profitable in catchment areas with as few as 2,500 to 3,500 residents, a demographic density often considered insufficient for larger discounters and hypermarkets.5 This contrarian approach has allowed Dino to establish a dominant presence in small towns, villages, and the suburbs of larger cities, effectively creating a defensible niche with fewer direct competitors.7
The company’s expansion has been methodical and geographically clustered. Originating in the Wielkopolska region of western Poland, Dino has systematically increased its store density while expanding into adjacent regions.11 This “creeping” expansion strategy is logistically efficient, as it allows new stores to be serviced by existing distribution centers, minimizing transport costs and building strong regional brand recognition before moving to the next area.7 This disciplined rollout is reflected in the steady increase in network density, which reached 7.3 stores per 100,000 inhabitants nationally by March 2025, up from 6.5 stores just one year prior, underscoring the ongoing market penetration.18
Vertical Integration & Supplier Relationships: The Fresh Meat Differentiator
A cornerstone of Dino’s value proposition and a key competitive differentiator is the inclusion of a staffed fresh meat counter in every store.16 These counters are supplied by Agro-Rydzyna, a meat processing and production plant that Dino Polska acquired in 2003 and has since expanded.7 Fresh products, with meat and related items at the forefront, are a major driver of sales, accounting for 39.8% of revenue in 2024 and rising to 42.0% in the first quarter of 2025.2
This vertical integration into meat production provides several powerful advantages. It gives Dino direct control over the quality, consistency, and supply of a critical product category that drives significant customer traffic. This stands in stark contrast to competitors like Biedronka and Lidl, which predominantly offer pre-packaged meat products.17 The Agro-Rydzyna supply chain likely results in superior gross margins, lower spoilage rates due to daily deliveries, and a stronger perception of quality and freshness among Polish consumers who traditionally value fresh cuts of meat.17
Beyond its own meat production, Dino’s procurement strategy emphasizes direct relationships with reputable domestic and regional Polish producers.6 By offering these regional brands, Dino provides customers with affordable alternatives to leading national and international brands. This approach effectively functions as a private label strategy, enhancing value perception and margins, but without the significant marketing and brand development costs typically associated with creating a private label from scratch.7
The Real Estate Strategy: Building a Moat on Owned Land
Perhaps the most underappreciated but fundamentally critical pillar of Dino’s business model is its real estate strategy. Unlike many of its competitors who primarily lease their store locations, Dino Polska owns the vast majority—approximately 90%—of its properties, including the land on which they are built.4 To ensure consistency and cost control, store construction is managed by Krot Invest, a separate construction business owned by Dino’s founder, Tomasz Biernacki.7
This ownership model creates a powerful, self-reinforcing competitive advantage. While competitors like Biedronka operate on a leasehold basis, exposing them to rent inflation and the accounting complexities of IFRS 16 that can obscure underlying profitability, Dino is insulated from the volatility of the commercial rental market.8 This translates into a structural operating cost advantage that becomes more pronounced over time.
Furthermore, owning the real estate provides unparalleled strategic flexibility. Dino is not constrained by the availability of space in existing retail parks or the preferences of landlords. It can execute its data-driven site selection model with precision, purchasing land and building stores exactly where its analysis indicates an underserved population exists. This is a crucial enabler of its rural expansion strategy.
The owned property portfolio also functions as a significant and growing asset on the company’s balance sheet. This tangible asset base provides strong collateral, enabling favorable financing terms for its aggressive expansion program, even as the company maintains a very low net debt profile. In essence, Dino Polska operates not just as a grocery retailer but as a highly efficient real estate development company with a captive, high-return tenant: itself. This integrated model of retail operations and real estate ownership creates a formidable moat that is exceptionally difficult and capital-intensive for competitors to replicate, forming the bedrock of its long-term investment case.
Industry Dynamics & Market Structure: A Shifting Battleground
The Polish grocery retail market is a complex and evolving landscape, characterized by its large scale, increasing maturity in certain segments, and fierce competition among a few dominant players. Understanding these dynamics is crucial to contextualizing Dino Polska’s performance and future prospects.
Market Structure & Size: Mature but Dynamic
With a population of nearly 40 million, Poland stands as the largest food and beverage market in Central and Eastern Europe.21 The grocery retail market’s value was estimated at PLN 435 billion (approx. €100 billion) in 2024, with forecasts projecting continued nominal growth of around 5% in 2025.22 Other analyses project a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.8% for the period between 2022 and 2027, indicating a robust, albeit moderating, expansion.23
While the market is often described as “maturing,” this term primarily applies to the large-format hypermarket channel, which has faced saturation and declining share for years.24 The overall market remains relatively fragmented compared to Western European counterparts. The top 20 retailers command approximately 75% of the market, which suggests that there is still considerable room for consolidation and market share shifts among the leading formats.25
Competitive Landscape: The Reign of the Discounters
The Polish retail scene is dominated by foreign-owned discount chains, a unique feature compared to many other European markets.25 The two titans of the industry are Biedronka, owned by the Portuguese group Jeronimo Martins, and Lidl, part of Germany’s Schwarz Group.27
Biedronka is the undisputed market leader, capturing an estimated 20% of all food and grocery sales in Poland in 2023—a share more than three times larger than its closest competitor.28 Lidl holds the number two position with a market share of approximately 6%, while Dino Polska has rapidly ascended to become a major force, securing the number three spot with a share of around 5-6%.7 These three players have been the primary beneficiaries of market shifts over the past decade, consistently gaining share at the expense of both traditional “mom-and-pop” stores and legacy hypermarket chains.4
This competitive dynamic has recently culminated in an intense “price war,” waged primarily between the two giants, Biedronka and Lidl.8 This battle for price leadership has exerted significant downward pressure on gross margins across the entire sector, impacting all players, including Dino.9 However, this price war should not be misinterpreted as a sign of a declining industry. Instead, it represents a “winner-take-most” struggle within the healthiest and fastest-growing segment of Polish retail. As legacy formats like hypermarkets and independent stores continue to cede ground, the top three discounter and proximity players are competing aggressively to capture this liberated market share. While this creates painful near-term margin pressure, the operators with the most resilient business models and strongest balance sheets are poised to emerge with an even more dominant long-term market position. Dino’s primary challenge in this environment is to compete on price where necessary while simultaneously leveraging its unique differentiators—namely its fresh meat offering and superior convenience—to avoid becoming a pure price-taker.
Consumer & Macroeconomic Trends: The Quest for Convenience and Value
The Polish consumer is at the heart of the market’s evolution. Recent periods of high inflation have heightened price sensitivity, making value, discounts, and promotions paramount in purchasing decisions.17 This environment naturally favors the value proposition of discounters and proximity formats.
Simultaneously, a powerful secular trend towards convenience is reshaping shopping habits. Consumers increasingly prefer to shop closer to their homes, valuing time and ease over the vast selection of distant hypermarkets.11 This is evidenced by stagnating footfall in large shopping centers while smaller, conveniently located formats like Dino’s stores and retail parks are thriving.31 Furthermore, a growing awareness of health and wellness is fueling demand for fresh, high-quality, and locally sourced products—a trend that aligns perfectly with Dino’s strategic focus on fresh categories.11
The macroeconomic backdrop for 2024 and 2025 appears supportive. Moderating inflation, coupled with robust real wage growth, is expected to bolster household disposable income and consumption, providing a tailwind for the retail sector.29
Format Evolution & Digitalization
The structural shifts in the market are clear: there is a definitive move away from large-scale hypermarkets and supermarkets towards more nimble formats like discounters, proximity stores, and retail parks.22
E-commerce represents another significant, albeit still developing, frontier. The online channel in Poland is forecast to grow by more than PLN 94 billion between 2021 and 2027, with the food and grocery category expected to be a major contributor.34 This growth is being actively spurred by the entry of retail giants like Biedronka and Lidl into online sales, typically through strategic partnerships with third-party delivery platforms such as Glovo.34 The rise of “q-commerce” (quick commerce), promising delivery within minutes, is further reshaping consumer expectations, particularly in more densely populated urban areas.34
Against this backdrop, Dino Polska’s conspicuous absence from the digital space is a critical strategic consideration. The company’s public communications and strategic plans are almost exclusively focused on the rapid rollout of its physical store network, with no significant mention of an e-commerce or omnichannel strategy.11 This approach represents a calculated risk. Dino’s management is effectively betting that its core target demographic—residing in rural and semi-urban areas—is less penetrated by and has less immediate demand for online grocery services. They are also likely calculating that the unit economics of online delivery in these less dense regions are currently unfavorable. This allows the company to dedicate 100% of its capital and management focus to its highly profitable and proven physical store expansion model.
However, this creates a potential long-term vulnerability. As digital adoption inevitably spreads beyond Poland’s major cities and as competitors refine their online models, Dino risks ceding the entire e-commerce channel to its rivals. Over time, this could lead to a loss of share in its customers’ total grocery wallet, even if they remain loyal to the physical stores for certain purchases. The decision to remain a pure-play brick-and-mortar operator in an increasingly digital world is a key strategic question that will shape Dino’s competitive position over the next decade.
Competitive Position & Differentiation
Dino Polska has established a formidable competitive position through a combination of a unique strategic focus and superior operational execution. A quantitative comparison against its primary rivals, Biedronka and Lidl, reveals a business with distinct characteristics and strengths.
Sales Productivity and Margins
A key measure of retail efficiency is sales per square meter. Based on preliminary 2024 results, Dino generated sales of PLN 29.27 billion across a year-end selling area of 1,061,214 square meters, equating to sales productivity of approximately PLN 27,580 per square meter.2 This represents a slight increase from the ~PLN 27,080 per square meter achieved in 2023.12
Profitability is where Dino’s model has historically shone, although it has recently come under pressure. The company’s EBITDA margin declined from 8.7% in 2023 to 7.9% in 2024 due to the aforementioned price competition and cost inflation.2 This figure still compares favorably within the European grocery sector, where average EBITDA margins hover around 6.5-7.1%.36 The comparison with Biedronka is particularly illustrative of Dino’s underlying strength. While Biedronka reported a comparable IFRS 16 EBITDA margin of 7.6% in the first half of 2024, analysis adjusting for the impact of leases suggests its underlying (non-IFRS 16) margin is closer to 5.8%.8 Dino’s superior profitability is a direct result of its real estate ownership model, which eliminates rental expenses that depress the margins of its leasing-focused competitors.
Supply Chain & Logistics Efficiency
Dino’s rapid expansion is underpinned by a highly efficient and scalable logistics network. The company’s strategy involves the preemptive construction of new distribution centers, with each new facility designed to service a cluster of 350-400 stores.7 By early 2025, the company was operating eleven such centers, ensuring that its growing store base is supported by a dense and responsive supply chain.2 This network density is crucial for executing its core value proposition: the daily delivery of fresh products to every store, which supports customer loyalty and drives LFL sales.11
Furthermore, Dino enhances its margin structure by sourcing the majority of its products directly from producers or their main representatives, bypassing intermediaries and wholesalers.7 As the company’s scale and order volumes continue to grow, its bargaining power with suppliers increases, creating a virtuous cycle of improving purchasing terms and cost efficiencies.
The following table provides a comparative analysis of key operational and financial metrics for Dino Polska against its main competitors, offering a quantitative snapshot of its market position.
Metric | Dino Polska | Biedronka (Jeronimo Martins) | Lidl (Schwarz Group) | European Peer Average |
Revenue (2023, PLN bn) | 25.7 | 103.9 | 32.4 | Varies |
Revenue Growth (2023, YoY %) | 29.6% | ~24% (PLN) | ~24% (PLN, FY22) | Low-to-mid single digits |
Number of Stores (YE 2023) | 2,406 | ~3,500 | ~750 | Varies |
New Stores Opened (2023) | 250 | ~150-200 (est.) | Varies | Varies |
LFL Sales Growth (2023, %) | 17.2% | High single digits (est.) | N/A | Low single digits |
EBITDA Margin (2023, %) | 8.7% | ~8.5% (IFRS 16) | N/A | ~6.5-7.1% |
Net Profit Margin (2023, %) | 5.5% | ~2.5% (Group level) | N/A | ~2-3% |
ROIC (%) | ~15-20% | N/A | N/A | ~7-12% |
Note: Data is compiled from various sources and may involve estimates, especially for privately-held Lidl. Biedronka’s margins are reported at the group level or on an IFRS 16 basis, which may not be directly comparable. Sources: 2
Financial Performance & Historical Growth Trajectory
Dino Polska’s financial history is a story of remarkable and sustained high-speed growth. Since its public listing in 2017, the company has been one of the most dynamic growth stories on the Warsaw Stock Exchange, consistently delivering exceptional results fueled by its dual-engine growth model.1
A Decade of Explosive Growth
The company’s expansion has been nothing short of explosive. From 2015 to year-end 2024, the store network expanded nearly five-fold, growing from 511 to 2,688 locations.2 This physical expansion has translated into staggering top-line growth. Revenue has compounded at an average annual rate of 29.9% between 2022 and 2024 alone.2 Taking a longer view, sales have grown at a CAGR of 30.2% since 2014, with earnings per share (EPS) growing at an even more impressive 42.9% CAGR over the same period, showcasing significant operating leverage.4
This growth was achieved through a powerful combination of aggressive new store openings and, until recently, very strong like-for-like (LFL) sales growth in the existing store base.
The LFL Growth Inflection Point
The trajectory of LFL sales growth represents the most significant recent change in Dino’s financial narrative and is a central point of analysis. After posting extraordinary LFL growth of 28.5% in 2022 and a very strong 17.2% in 2023, the metric decelerated dramatically to 5.3% for the full year 2024.2 The trend worsened into the new year, with Q1 2025 LFL growth slowing to a near-standstill at just 0.5%.15
This sharp slowdown is primarily attributed to the normalization of food price inflation in Poland. During 2022 and 2023, high inflation allowed Dino and other retailers to implement significant price increases, which directly boosted the value of sales in existing stores.18 As inflation has subsided, this pricing tailwind has disappeared. In 2024, the company’s entire 5.3% LFL growth was driven by an increase in the volume of products sold, as the net average price of its goods was actually deflationary.2
This shift reveals the double-edged nature of the operational leverage inherent in Dino’s business model. The company’s cost structure has a large semi-fixed component related to operating its physical stores.11 During the high-growth years, rapidly rising LFL sales meant that revenue growth far outpaced the growth in these semi-fixed costs, leading to significant EBITDA margin expansion and accelerating profitability.
With LFL growth now hovering near zero, this leverage works in reverse. Costs, particularly for labor, which have been rising across Poland, continue to increase while revenue from the existing store base stagnates. This dynamic is the direct cause of the EBITDA margin compression observed in 2024, when the margin fell by 80 basis points from 8.7% to 7.9%.2 The future sustainability of Dino’s premium profitability and, by extension, its valuation, now hinges almost entirely on two factors: the continued pace and high return on investment of new store openings, and the company’s ability to restore a “normalized” LFL growth rate that can at least offset underlying cost inflation. The market is currently grappling with what this new normalized rate will be, which is a primary source of investor uncertainty.
Capital Efficiency & Returns: The Hallmark of Quality
Despite the recent headwinds, Dino’s track record of capital efficiency remains a hallmark of a high-quality business. The company consistently generates a high Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and Return on Equity (ROE). Trailing-twelve-month figures show an ROE of approximately 22.9% and an ROIC of around 15.4%.10 Other analyses, using slightly different methodologies or timeframes, cite an even higher ROIC of over 20% and a Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) that has been stable at an impressive 24%.4
What makes these figures particularly remarkable is that they have been maintained while the company has been deploying massive amounts of new capital—the total capital employed in the business has increased by 191% over the last five years.42 The ability to reinvest huge sums of capital at such high rates of return is the defining characteristic of a “compounding machine” and a core tenet of the long-term bull case.42 At the individual store level, the economics are even more compelling, with mature stores estimated to generate an ROIC of 30-40%.5
Balance Sheet & Working Capital: A Self-Funding Machine
Dino’s high-growth strategy is supported by a fortress-like balance sheet and exceptionally efficient working capital management. The company maintains very low leverage, with the net debt to EBITDA ratio falling from 0.76x in 2022 to an almost negligible 0.1x by the end of 2024.2 This provides significant financial flexibility and resilience.
Operationally, the company benefits from a negative working capital cycle, with an average cash conversion cycle of approximately -25 days.3 This means that Dino typically sells its inventory and collects cash from customers long before it has to pay its suppliers, who are effectively providing interest-free financing for the company’s inventory. This efficiency, combined with strong profitability, allows the company to generate substantial cash flow from operations (PLN 2.55 billion in 2024, a 44% year-over-year increase), which is then fully reinvested into its new store growth engine.2
The table below presents a 10-year overview of Dino Polska’s key financial and operational metrics, illustrating the scale and consistency of its historical performance.
Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (Prelim.) |
Revenue (PLN m) | 2,586 | 3,371 | 4,547 | 5,856 | 7,647 | 10,126 | 13,365 | 19,802 | 25,666 | 29,274 |
Revenue Growth (%) | 32.2% | 30.4% | 34.9% | 28.8% | 30.6% | 32.4% | 32.0% | 48.2% | 29.6% | 14.1% |
EBITDA (PLN m) | 188 | 255 | 373 | 482 | 649 | 903 | 1,223 | 1,838 | 2,233 | 2,317 |
EBITDA Margin (%) | 7.3% | 7.6% | 8.2% | 8.2% | 8.5% | 8.9% | 9.2% | 9.3% | 8.7% | 7.9% |
Net Income (PLN m) | 80 | 120 | 214 | 283 | 386 | 644 | 868 | 1,132 | 1,405 | 1,496 (est.) |
Net Margin (%) | 3.1% | 3.6% | 4.7% | 4.8% | 5.0% | 6.4% | 6.5% | 5.7% | 5.5% | 5.1% (est.) |
LFL Sales Growth (%) | 9.6% | 11.4% | 15.2% | 10.3% | 9.9% | 11.3% | 12.1% | 28.5% | 17.2% | 5.3% |
Number of Stores (YE) | 511 | 628 | 775 | 977 | 1,218 | 1,496 | 1,815 | 2,156 | 2,406 | 2,688 |
New Stores Opened | 101 | 117 | 147 | 202 | 241 | 278 | 319 | 341 | 250 | 283 |
Selling Area (sqm, YE) | 196k | 242k | 298k | 376k | 469k | 577k | 699k | 845k | 948k | 1,061k |
ROE (%) | 22.1% | 27.8% | 33.1% | 29.5% | 29.0% | 34.1% | 32.9% | 30.0% | 29.4% | ~22.9% |
Net Debt/EBITDA | 2.5x | 2.0x | 1.3x | 1.1x | 1.0x | 0.8x | 0.8x | 0.8x | 0.4x | 0.1x |
Note: Data compiled and calculated from company financial reports, presentations, and financial data providers. Some historical figures may be based on previous accounting standards. 2024 figures are preliminary. Sources: 2
Growth Strategy, Capital Allocation & Management Quality
Dino Polska’s strategy is characterized by a singular, unwavering focus on organic growth, funded by a disciplined capital allocation policy and overseen by a deeply invested management team.
Store Expansion: The Primary Growth Driver
The cornerstone of Dino’s growth strategy is the rapid, organic expansion of its store network.11 The company’s entire operational and financial apparatus is geared towards this objective. In 2024, Dino opened 283 new stores, an acceleration from the 250 opened in 2023, and management has guided for a further acceleration in 2025, with a planned percentage increase in new openings in the “high teens” compared to 2024.2 This expansion is financed almost entirely through internally generated cash flow, a testament to the profitability of the existing store base.4
The long-term sustainability of this strategy hinges on the size of the total addressable market (TAM) and the risk of market saturation. This is a key point of debate among analysts. Management maintains that with a market share of only around 6%, there remains significant whitespace for growth, both by increasing store density in existing regions and expanding into new ones.11 More optimistic external analyses support this view, with some estimating a theoretical TAM of up to 11,000 stores in Poland, which would be more than four times the current network size.4 More conservative estimates place the TAM in the range of 4,000 to 6,000 stores, which still implies a doubling or more of the current footprint.7
However, the mathematical certainty of the “law of large numbers” presents a challenge to the rate of growth. As the store base increases, maintaining a high percentage growth rate requires an ever-larger absolute number of new store openings each year. For instance, opening 340 stores on a base of 1,800 (as in 2021-2022) represents nearly 19% unit growth. Opening the same number of stores on a future base of 3,000 would represent only 11% growth. This implies that the company’s overall revenue growth rate is destined to decelerate over the long term, even if the absolute pace of openings remains high. The market’s current valuation is built on expectations of very high growth, and the key question is when this inevitable slowdown will become more apparent and how the market will re-rate the stock in response.
Capital Allocation: A Disciplined Reinvestment Model
Dino Polska’s capital allocation policy is a model of simplicity and discipline: reinvest virtually 100% of operating cash flow into opening new, high-ROIC stores.4 The company has a stated policy of not paying a dividend and has eschewed mergers and acquisitions, preferring to focus exclusively on its proven organic growth formula.4
Capital expenditures are consequently significant, with a budget of PLN 1.7-1.8 billion for 2025, directed primarily towards the construction of new stores and the expansion of the logistics network to support them.2 A noteworthy and growing component of this capital expenditure is investment in sustainability initiatives. The company has been systematically installing photovoltaic (PV) solar panels on the roofs of its new and existing stores. As of Q1 2025, 94% of the entire network, or 2,569 stores, was equipped with PV installations, along with four of its distribution centers.14 This initiative not only reduces the company’s environmental impact but also provides a long-term operational cost advantage by lowering electricity expenses.11
Management Quality & Corporate Governance
Dino Polska’s governance and management structure are defined by the significant influence of its founder, Tomasz Biernacki. Mr. Biernacki serves as the Chairman of the Supervisory Board and holds a controlling 51% stake in the company.4 This high level of insider ownership is a powerful aligning force, ensuring that management’s interests are closely tied to the creation of long-term shareholder value.
The company’s compensation policy for its Management Board reflects this performance-oriented culture. Remuneration is heavily weighted towards variable components, including quarterly and annual bonuses that are tied to specific performance metrics.47 The total annual bonus pool for the Management Board and other key managers is explicitly capped at 1% of the Dino Group’s consolidated net profit, directly linking executive pay to bottom-line results.47
In its 2024 Corporate Governance Statement, Dino Polska reported that it complies with most of the Best Practices for WSE Listed Companies.49 However, it noted specific exceptions. The company does not have a formalized diversity policy for its boards, stating that members are chosen based on competence and experience regardless of other attributes.49 It also highlighted its long-term, single-source relationship with the construction company related to its major shareholder, justifying this by citing the superior efficiency, standardization, and reliability this model provides for its rapid expansion compared to using multiple contractors.49 To mitigate potential conflicts of interest, this relationship is governed by a master agreement and requires approval from independent members of the Supervisory Board.49 The Supervisory Board itself includes two independent members who also form the core of the Audit Committee, in line with governance best practices.50
Comprehensive Risk Assessment
A thorough investment analysis requires a balanced assessment of the risks that could impede a company’s performance and impact its valuation. For Dino Polska, these risks are concentrated in the operational, strategic, and valuation spheres.
Operational & Competitive Risks
- Intensifying Competition and Margin Pressure: This is the most significant and immediate risk facing Dino Polska. The Polish grocery market is characterized by aggressive competition, particularly from the two largest players, Biedronka and Lidl. The ongoing “price war” between these giants has the potential to create sustained pressure on gross margins across the sector. If Dino is forced to match deep price cuts to defend its market share, its profitability could be significantly eroded.8
- Rising Labor Costs: Poland has experienced a demanding labor market and significant increases in the minimum wage. As a company with a large and growing workforce (nearly 50,000 employees at the end of 2024), rising labor costs represent a material headwind to operating margins.2 This pressure is magnified in the current environment of low LFL sales growth, where it is difficult to offset cost inflation with revenue growth from existing stores.
- Expansion Execution Risk: The company’s strategy is predicated on an aggressive store rollout plan. This carries inherent execution risks, including the ability to consistently identify and acquire suitable land plots, manage a high volume of construction projects simultaneously, and effectively hire and train thousands of new employees each year to staff the new locations.2 Any stumble in this well-oiled machine could slow growth and impact results.
Macroeconomic & Regulatory Risks
- Consumer Spending Sensitivity: As a consumer-facing retailer, Dino’s performance is intrinsically linked to the health of the Polish economy and the disposable income of its customers. A significant economic downturn, leading to higher unemployment or a sharp drop in consumer confidence, would negatively impact spending and sales.8
- Inflation and Deflation Dynamics: The company’s recent performance has highlighted its sensitivity to the inflation environment. While high food inflation provided a strong tailwind to LFL sales in 2022-2023, the current environment of moderating inflation and even deflationary pricing on certain goods is a significant headwind.2 A future scenario of high input cost inflation (e.g., energy, commodities) without the ability to pass these costs on to consumers would severely squeeze margins.
- Regulatory Environment: The Polish retail sector is subject to various regulations that can impact operations. The Sunday trading ban, for example, has altered shopping patterns.21 The potential for future regulatory interventions, whether related to competition, environmental standards, or taxes, remains a constant uncertainty.
Growth Sustainability & Saturation Risk
- While the consensus is that Dino still has a long runway for growth, the Polish market is finite. There is a long-term risk that the pace of new store openings will inevitably have to slow as the most attractive and profitable locations become occupied. Market saturation is a distant but certain eventuality, and the market may begin to price in this slowdown well before it occurs, leading to a de-rating of the stock.24
Valuation Risk
- Dino Polska’s premium valuation is a risk in itself. The stock consistently trades at high multiples, such as a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio often exceeding 30x.41 This valuation is explicitly predicated on the market’s expectation of continued high growth and superior returns. Any failure to meet these lofty expectations—whether due to slowing growth, margin compression, or execution missteps—could trigger a significant de-rating of the stock. In this scenario, investors face the dual risk of lower earnings and a lower multiple being applied to those earnings, a combination that can lead to substantial capital loss.53
Valuation Analysis
Valuing a high-growth company like Dino Polska requires a multi-faceted approach that considers its premium multiples in the context of its superior growth and returns, the underlying value of its assets, and forward-looking cash flow projections.
Historical & Peer Multiple Analysis
Dino Polska consistently trades at a significant valuation premium to the broader European grocery retail sector. Its trailing-twelve-month (TTM) P/E ratio of approximately 33x is notably higher than the industry average of around 26x.41 Similarly, its price-to-book (P/B) ratio is substantially elevated compared to peers.55 On an EV/EBITDA basis, its multiple of ~12x appears closer to some peers like Tesco (~14x), but these comparisons can be distorted by differences in accounting for leases (IFRS 16) and capital structures.18
Looking at its own history, the stock’s current valuation is also rich. A P/E of ~33x is above its 10-year historical average of approximately 30x, suggesting that by its own standards, the stock is expensively valued on this metric.54
The justification for this persistent premium is rooted in the company’s superior financial metrics. A rational market is willing to pay a higher multiple for Dino because its growth and return profile is fundamentally different from that of a typical, mature European grocer. Where peers generate low-single-digit growth, Dino has historically delivered revenue and earnings growth in the 20-30% range.44 Where peers generate an ROIC in the high-single or low-double digits, Dino has consistently produced an ROIC in the 20-24% range.10
Therefore, the market is pricing Dino not as a standard grocer, but as a high-quality growth company. The premium multiple is the price investors are willing to pay for access to this superior growth and return profile. This also explains the stock’s sensitivity to changes in its growth outlook. The recent LFL slowdown directly challenges the growth narrative that underpins the premium valuation, which is why it is the central point of the current investment debate.
Metric | Current (TTM) | 5-Year Avg. | Biedronka (Jeronimo Martins) | European Grocery Peer Group |
P/E Ratio | ~33.0x | ~29.9x | ~16-18x (Group) | ~15-26x |
EV/EBITDA | ~12.0x | ~13-15x | ~7-8x (Group) | ~6-9x |
P/S Ratio | ~1.7x | ~1.8x | ~0.5x (Group) | ~0.3-0.6x |
P/B Ratio | ~7.7x | ~8.0x | ~3-4x (Group) | ~1.5-3.0x |
Note: Multiples are approximate and subject to market fluctuations. Peer group data is illustrative and can vary widely. Jeronimo Martins’ multiples reflect the consolidated group, not just Biedronka. Sources: 18
Sum-of-the-Parts (SOTP) Considerations
A formal sum-of-the-parts valuation is complex, but it is crucial to acknowledge the “hidden” value embedded in Dino’s balance sheet, specifically its extensive, owned real estate portfolio. As of March 2025, the company reported total assets of approximately $3.31 billion USD (PLN ~13 billion), a significant portion of which is property, plant, and equipment.57
This real estate portfolio provides a tangible valuation floor that is not fully captured by traditional earnings-based multiples like P/E or EV/EBITDA. In a hypothetical scenario where the retail operations were to falter, the underlying real estate would still hold substantial value. This asset base reduces the long-term downside risk of the investment and provides an extra layer of security that is absent in competitors with leased-heavy models.
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis Perspective
Analyst models using a discounted cash flow methodology yield a wide range of potential intrinsic values, highlighting the sensitivity of such models to their underlying assumptions. Some publicly available DCF analyses present a very bullish case. One detailed 2-stage DCF model, for example, projects a fair value for Dino’s stock of zł842 per share.58 Compared to a current share price of around zł504, this would imply the stock is significantly undervalued.58
This optimistic valuation is driven by forecasts of very strong free cash flow (FCF) generation over the next decade, with FCF projected to grow from approximately zł1.1 billion in 2026 to over zł6.0 billion by 2035.58 These projections are, in turn, based on continued store expansion and improving profitability as new stores mature.
However, it is imperative to recognize that DCF valuations are extremely sensitive to their inputs. A more bearish set of assumptions—for example, a lower long-term LFL growth rate, sustained margin compression from competition, a slower pace of store openings, or a higher discount rate to reflect increased risk—would result in a substantially lower calculated intrinsic value. The wide gap between the current market price and some of these bullish DCF targets suggests that the market is either using more conservative assumptions or applying a higher discount rate than these models.
Synthesis & Key Questions Revisited
This comprehensive analysis of Dino Polska SA provides a foundation for addressing the key questions confronting investors. The company presents a clear dichotomy between a stellar operational track record and a demanding valuation in an increasingly challenging market.
- What drives Dino’s premium valuation vs. peers?
Dino’s premium valuation is not arbitrary; it is a direct reflection of its demonstrably superior financial and operational performance. The market awards this premium for a combination of factors: (1) a history of exceptional, high-double-digit growth in both revenue and earnings, which far outpaces its mature European peers; (2) best-in-class capital efficiency, evidenced by a high and stable Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of over 20%; (3) a long, visible runway for reinvesting capital at these high rates of return through its store expansion program; and (4) a defensible competitive moat built on its unique business model focused on underserved rural markets and supported by the structural cost advantage of owned real estate. - How sustainable is the current growth trajectory given market maturity?
This is the central risk to the investment thesis. The sustainability of the growth rate is questionable. While there appears to be significant whitespace for 5-10 more years of aggressive store expansion in absolute terms, the overall percentage growth rate will inevitably slow due to the law of large numbers as the store base matures. The more immediate threat is the sharp deceleration in LFL sales growth. This slowdown puts the entire burden of top-line growth onto new store openings and simultaneously pressures margins through operational deleverage, as fixed costs rise against a stagnant revenue base in existing stores. The long-term sustainability of growth depends critically on Dino’s ability to return to a state of stable, positive LFL growth and to maintain the high ROI of its new store investments in a more competitive environment. - What are the key inflection points that could accelerate or decelerate performance?
Several key metrics serve as critical inflection points. For acceleration, a return to sustained positive LFL growth (e.g., above 2-3%) would be a powerful bullish catalyst, signaling that the current slowdown was indeed temporary. Similarly, a stabilization or re-expansion of EBITDA margins would indicate that Dino is successfully navigating the price wars and managing costs. For deceleration, continued stagnation or a decline in LFL sales would be a major bearish signal, suggesting a structural problem. Further margin compression would confirm this negative trend. Finally, any significant slowdown in the announced pace of new store openings could signal that market saturation is arriving faster than analysts currently expect, which would likely trigger a re-evaluation of the company’s long-term growth prospects. - How does the company’s rural focus position it for long-term demographic trends?
This focus is a core strategic strength. While Poland as a whole is urbanizing, a substantial portion of the population (historically around 40%) continues to reside in smaller towns and rural areas.4 In many of these communities, Dino is the dominant, and sometimes only, modern grocery retailer. This has allowed the company to build deep customer loyalty and a strong local brand presence. As disposable incomes continue to rise across all of Poland, including in these non-urban areas, Dino is perfectly positioned as the incumbent retailer to capture this organic growth in spending power. - What operational leverage exists in the business model?
The business model possesses significant operational leverage due to the high proportion of fixed and semi-fixed costs associated with operating a physical store network.11 This leverage was a powerful tailwind during the years of high LFL growth, allowing profits to grow much faster than revenue. However, it has now become a headwind with LFL sales stagnating, as evidenced by the margin compression seen in 2024.2 In the current environment, future profitability improvements will be less dependent on LFL growth and more reliant on the company’s ability to leverage its increasing scale in purchasing and logistics to generate cost efficiencies that can offset store-level cost inflation.
Works cited
- dinopl (pldinpl00011) – GPW Main Market – Company factsheet, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.gpw.pl/company-factsheet?isin=PLDINPL00011
- Preliminary selected financial and operational results of the “DINO POLSKA” S.A. Group in 2024, accessed July 22, 2025, https://grupadino.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/DINO-POLSKA-S.A.-Group-preliminary-2024-results.pdf
- Writeup: Dino Polska S.A. — SVN Capital, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.svncapital.com/news/dino-polska
- Dino Polska SA (DNP.WA) DOMINATING GROCERY RETAIL IN SMALL-TOWN POLAND – Sohra Peak Capital Partners, accessed July 22, 2025, https://sohrapeakcapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Dino-Polska-Sohra-Peak-Capital-Partners-May-2022-1.pdf
- Dino Polska: Owner-Operated Compounder With Long Runway | MOI Global, accessed July 22, 2025, https://moiglobal.com/christopher-karlin-dino-polska-202401/
- Case Study of Good Retail: Dino Polska – ProjectMetrics, accessed July 22, 2025, https://projectmetrics.co.uk/case-study-of-good-retail-dino-polska
- Dino Polska S.A. (WSE:DNP): Buy, 800 PLN 5-year price target with 13.5% IRR – Columbia Business School, accessed July 22, 2025, https://business.columbia.edu/sites/default/files-efs/imce-uploads/DNP.pdf
- Dino Polska… : r/ValueInvesting – Reddit, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ValueInvesting/comments/1faxuzx/dino_polska/
- Lidl shows resilience against Biedronka and Dino – Trademagazin, accessed July 22, 2025, https://trademagazin.hu/en/reziliensnek-tunik-a-lidl-lengyelorszagban-a-biedronkaval-es-a-dinoval-szemben/
- Dino Polska (WSE:DNP) Statistics & Valuation Metrics – Stock Analysis, accessed July 22, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/quote/wse/DNP/statistics/
- „DINO POLSKA” S.A. – Strategy, accessed July 22, 2025, https://grupadino.pl/en/strategy/
- Management Board Activity Report for DINO POLSKA SA and the DINO POLSKA SA Group in 2023, accessed July 22, 2025, https://grupadino.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Dino-Polska-Management-Boards-Activity-Report-for-2023.pdf
- „DINO POLSKA” S.A. – The history, accessed July 22, 2025, https://grupadino.pl/en/the-history/
- Dino Polska recaps business performance in Q1 2025, accessed July 22, 2025, https://grupadino.pl/en/dino-polska-recaps-business-performance-in-q1-2025/
- Dino Polska SA – results presentation, accessed July 22, 2025, https://grupadino.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Dino-Polska-S.A.-1Q-2025-results-presentation.pdf
- Dino Polska (DNP) Investor Relations Material – Quartr, accessed July 22, 2025, https://quartr.com/companies/dino-polska-s-a_14525
- Dino Polska Deep Dive – Pari Passu, accessed July 22, 2025, https://restructuringnewsletter.com/p/pp-dino-polska-deep-dive
- Dino Polska’s Q1 Mixed Results: Navigating Challenges to Unlock Long-Term Growth Potential – AInvest, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.ainvest.com/news/dino-polska-q1-mixed-results-navigating-challenges-unlock-long-term-growth-potential-2506/
- Dino Polska Q1 2025 presentation: store expansion accelerates …, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/dino-polska-q1-2025-presentation-store-expansion-accelerates-amid-slowing-lfl-sales-93CH-4048798
- Dino Polska: Evolution of the Polish Competitive Landscape | In Practise – InPractise, accessed July 22, 2025, https://inpractise.com/articles/dino-polska-vs-biedronka
- Poland Retail Sector – USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, accessed July 22, 2025, https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Poland+Retail+Sector_Warsaw_Poland_8-5-2019.pdf
- Challenges for the Polish retail sector | Nieuwsbericht – Agroberichten Buitenland, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.agroberichtenbuitenland.nl/actueel/nieuws/2025/01/02/challenges-for-the-polish-retail-sector
- Poland Retail Market Size by Sector and Channel Including Online Retail, Key Players and Forecast to 2027 – Market Research, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.marketresearch.com/GlobalData-v3648/Poland-Retail-Size-Sector-Channel-35498813/
- Winning In Polish Grocery – Oliver Wyman, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.oliverwyman.com/our-expertise/insights/2017/may/winning-in-polish-grocery.html
- The distribution network in Poland – Lloyds Bank Trade, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.lloydsbanktrade.com/en/market-potential/poland/distribution
- Why does Poland overwhelmingly have foreign-owned discount food stores? – Reddit, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/poland/comments/1eldi5m/why_does_poland_overwhelmingly_have_foreignowned/
- Exploring the Top 10 Supermarket Retail Chains in Poland for 2025, accessed July 22, 2025, https://shopfittingmanufacturer.com/top-10-supermarket-retail-chains-in-poland/
- PepsiCo regains listings at Poland grocery major Biedronka – Just …, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.just-food.com/news/pepsico-regains-listings-at-poland-grocery-major-biedronka/
- Poland Retail Market, Consumer Insights and Competitive …, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.globaldata.com/store/report/poland-retail-market-analysis/
- European Grocery Market Insight – Savills Poland, accessed July 22, 2025, https://en.savills.pl/research_articles/265150/364620-0
- POLAND’S MODERN RETAIL MARKET*, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.realestate.bnpparibas.pl/sites/poland/files/2024-11/AAG%20Retail%20Q3%202024%20ENG.pdf
- POLAND’S MODERN RETAIL MARKET*, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.realestate.bnpparibas.pl/sites/poland/files/2024-08/AAG%20Retail%20Q2%202024%20ENG_Final.pdf
- MARKETBEAT RETAIL POLAND Q1 2023 – Cushman & Wakefield, accessed July 22, 2025, https://assets.cushmanwakefield.com/-/media/cw/marketbeat-pdfs/2024/q1/emea/poland-marketbeat-retail-q1-2024-en_v2.pdf?rev=4b156a5080e74bd6af19d4648e6b93c0
- Development prospects for the e-commerce market in Poland in …, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/pl/en/publications/2022/development-prospects-for-the-e-commerce-market-in-poland-in-2018-2027.html
- Poland: Biedronka is the leader of the e-grocery market, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.discountretailconsulting.com/post/poland-biedronka-is-the-leader-of-the-e-grocery-market
- Grocery profitability outlook – Europe – NET, accessed July 22, 2025, https://pubblestorage.blob.core.windows.net/07cd7300/customer/embed/2025/2/b90ab6d3-a451-4cec-9e0d-df787d4cc5fa.pdf
- Interim Report of the DINO POLSKA SA Group for H1 2024, accessed July 22, 2025, https://grupadino.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/DINO-POLSKA-Management-Report-for-1H-2024.pdf
- Top 10 Supermarket Retail Chains In Poland | ESM Magazine, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.esmmagazine.com/retail/top-10-supermarket-retail-chains-in-poland-237524
- Dino Polska Q1 2025 presentation: store expansion accelerates amid slowing LFL sales, accessed July 22, 2025, https://uk.investing.com/news/company-news/dino-polska-q1-2025-presentation-store-expansion-accelerates-amid-slowing-lfl-sales-93CH-4089641
- Dino Polska (DNOPF) Statistics & Valuation Metrics – Stock Analysis, accessed July 22, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/quote/otc/DNOPF/statistics/
- Dino Polska SA (DNP) Financial Ratios – Investing.com, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.investing.com/equities/dino-polska-sa-ratios
- Capital Investment Trends At Dino Polska (WSE:DNP) Look Strong …, accessed July 22, 2025, https://simplywall.st/stocks/pl/consumer-retailing/wse-dnp/dino-polska-shares/news/capital-investment-trends-at-dino-polska-wsednp-look-strong
- dino polska sa capital group consolidated financial … – Grupa Dino, accessed July 22, 2025, https://grupadino.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Dino-Polska-Group-2014-2016-CONSOLIDATED-FINANCIAL-STATEMENTS.pdf
- Dino Polska (DB:5Y2) – Earnings & Revenue Performance – Simply Wall St, accessed July 22, 2025, https://simplywall.st/stocks/de/consumer-retailing/fra-5y2/dino-polska-shares/past
- This document is an unofficial translation of the official Consolidated Financial Statements of the Dino Polska S.A. Group in 20, accessed July 22, 2025, https://grupadino.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Dino-Polska-Group-2023-Consolidated-Financial-Statements.pdf
- DNP Stock Price and Chart — GPW:DNP – dinopl – TradingView, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/GPW-DNP/
- Compensation Policy for Management Board and … – Grupa Dino, accessed July 22, 2025, https://grupadino.pl/en/post_download/compensation-policy-for-management-board-and-supervisory-board-members-of-dino-polska-s-a/
- Annual Compensation Report of the DINO POLSKA S.A. Management Board and Supervisory Board in 2019 and 2020, accessed July 22, 2025, https://grupadino.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/2020-Remuneration-report.pdf
- Corporate governance statement | Grupa Dino, accessed July 22, 2025, https://grupadino.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Corporate-governance-statement-2024.pdf
- DINO POLSKA SA SUPERVISORY BOARD’S ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT FOR THE 2022 FINANCIAL YEAR Introduction, accessed July 22, 2025, https://grupadino.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/2022-Supervisory-Board-annual-activity-report.pdf
- Management Board Activity Report for DINO POLSKA SA and the DINO POLSKA SA Group in 2024, accessed July 22, 2025, https://db.srnav.com/storage/v1/object/public/document-pdfs/8ca98dd2-d58a-4bf9-a5ec-ad975e6c8aa3.pdf
- New retail supply hits its highest in almost a decade | PL – Cushman & Wakefield, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.cushmanwakefield.com/en/poland/news/2025/01/new-retail-supply-hits-its-highest-in-almost-a-decade
- Dino Polska S.A. Price: Quote, Forecast, Charts & News (DNP.WA) – Perplexity, accessed July 22, 2025, https://www.perplexity.ai/finance/DNP.WA
- Dino Polska stock – buy in July 2025? – DividendStocks.Cash, accessed July 22, 2025, https://dividendstocks.cash/stock-profile/Dino%20Polska-Stock
- Dino Polska Price to Book Value Analysis | YCharts, accessed July 22, 2025, https://ycharts.com/companies/DNOPY/price_to_book_value
- Dino Polska (WSE:DNP) Stock Forecast & Analyst Predictions …, accessed July 22, 2025, https://simplywall.st/stocks/pl/consumer-retailing/wse-dnp/dino-polska-shares/future
- Dino Polska (DNP.WA) – Total assets – Companies Market Cap, accessed July 22, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/dino-polska/total-assets/
- Dino Polska S.A.’s (WSE:DNP) Intrinsic Value Is Potentially 67 …, accessed July 22, 2025, https://simplywall.st/stocks/pl/consumer-retailing/wse-dnp/dino-polska-shares/news/dino-polska-sas-wsednp-intrinsic-value-is-potentially-67-abo