1. Business Model & Core Operations: The Technology Gatekeeper

Gaztransport & Technigaz SA (GTT) is a highly specialized engineering company, not a manufacturer, that occupies a unique and powerful position within the global energy supply chain. The company’s core business is the design and licensing of advanced cryogenic membrane containment systems, which are essential for the maritime transportation and storage of liquefied gases, most notably Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG).¹ GTT’s mission is to develop cutting-edge technological solutions that enhance energy efficiency, enabling its clients to navigate the challenges of the ongoing energy transition.³ This focus on high-value intellectual property (IP), rather than capital-intensive manufacturing, underpins a uniquely profitable and scalable business model.

The company’s position in the value chain is that of a critical technology gatekeeper. While its direct customers are the shipyards that build LNG carriers, the demand for its systems is driven by the end-users—the ship-owners and global gas companies who specify GTT’s technology for their newbuild vessels.⁴ This creates a powerful “pull” dynamic, cementing GTT’s technology as the industry standard. The company does not fabricate the tanks itself; instead, it licenses its patented designs and provides indispensable engineering services, technical support, and training to shipyards under Technical Assistance and Licensing Agreements (TALAs).¹ This asset-light approach is fundamental to its financial structure and investment profile.

The entire business model functions as a highly efficient tollbooth on the expanding global trade of LNG. With a dominant market position and a revenue stream based on royalties, every new LNG carrier constructed with its technology represents a high-margin revenue event. This structure provides direct exposure to the LNG super-cycle without the commensurate capital expenditure, operational leverage, and cyclical margin pressure faced by the shipyards themselves. However, this powerful model is predicated entirely on the strength and longevity of its intellectual property. The finite 20-year lifespan of patents means that the company’s formidable competitive moat is not permanent.⁷ Consequently, GTT’s significant and continuous investment in research and development is not merely a growth driver but a defensive necessity to perpetually refresh its patent wall and stay ahead of emerging competitive threats.

Key Products: Mark III, NO96, and Other Containment Systems

GTT’s product portfolio is centered on two main families of membrane containment systems: the Mark series and the NO series. These are not standalone, self-supporting tanks but sophisticated cryogenic liners that are integrated with and directly supported by the ship’s inner hull structure.⁹ The primary competitive advantage of these membrane systems over alternative designs, such as spherical Moss tanks, is their prismatic shape, which conforms to the vessel’s hull, thereby optimizing cargo volume and reducing both construction and operational costs.⁹

Mark III Systems

The Mark III system is a modular technology composed of a primary corrugated stainless steel membrane (1.2 mm thick) that contains the LNG cargo at -163°C. This primary barrier is supported by prefabricated insulation panels made of reinforced polyurethane foam, which themselves contain a complete secondary membrane made of a composite material known as Triplex. This secondary barrier provides a crucial layer of redundancy.11

A critical performance metric for these systems is the Boil-Off Rate (BOR), which measures the percentage of cargo volume that evaporates per day. Continuous innovation at GTT has focused on improving thermal efficiency to minimize this loss. The original Mark III system had a BOR of 0.15% V/day. Through systematic enhancements, primarily by increasing the thickness of the insulation, GTT has introduced improved versions ¹¹:

• Mark III Flex: Introduced in 2011, it reduced the BOR to a range of 0.10% to 0.085% V/day by increasing insulation thickness from 270 mm to 400 mm.¹¹
• Mark III Flex+: Introduced in 2017, this version offers a guaranteed BOR of just 0.07% V/day, achieved by further increasing insulation thickness to 480 mm.¹¹ This reduction in cargo loss represents a significant economic saving for ship-owners.

NO96 Systems

The NO96 system is distinguished by its use of two identical, independent membranes made of Invar®, a 36% nickel-steel alloy prized for its extremely low coefficient of thermal expansion. Each membrane is 0.7 mm thick, with the secondary membrane providing 100% redundancy. These membranes are supported by an insulation structure composed of prefabricated plywood boxes filled with an insulating material.15

Similar to the Mark III family, the NO96 system has undergone significant evolution to improve its thermal performance and adapt to market needs:

• NO96 Perlite: The original design used perlite as the insulating material, with a BOR of 0.15% V/day.¹⁵
• NO96 GW: This evolution replaced perlite with glass-wool, lowering the BOR to 0.125% V/day.¹⁵
• NO96 L03 and L03+: These versions introduced a combination of glass-wool and polyurethane foam, further reducing the BOR to 0.11% and 0.10% V/day, respectively.¹⁵
• NO96 Super+: The latest innovation in this family, NO96 Super+ replaces the traditional plywood boxes with insulating Reinforced Polyurethane Foam (R-PUF) panels. This design achieves a guaranteed BOR of 0.085% V/day for a standard 174,000 m³ LNG carrier, cementing its position as a top-tier, high-performance system.¹⁶

Revenue Model: Licensing, Royalties, and Services

GTT’s asset-light business model generates revenue from several distinct streams, with royalties from newbuilds forming the vast majority of its income.¹⁹ This structure allows for immense operating leverage, as incremental revenue carries very high margins. The H1 2025 financial results provide a clear breakdown of these streams ²⁰:

• Newbuilds (€364.8 million in H1 2025): This is the core revenue driver, consisting of licensing fees and royalties paid by shipyards for each vessel or storage unit constructed using GTT’s technology. This segment grew 34.6% year-over-year and can be further broken down:

• LNG and Ethane Carriers: Royalties from these vessels amounted to €345.7 million.
• Floating Units: Royalties from Floating Storage and Regasification Units (FSRUs) and Floating LNG (FLNG) units contributed €3.3 million and €4.3 million, respectively.
• LNG as Fuel: Royalties from commercial vessels using LNG as fuel (e.g., container ships) totaled €11.5 million.

• Services (€12.0 million in H1 2025): This segment, which grew 10.8% year-over-year, includes a range of high-value technical support activities such as engineering studies, consultancy, operational assistance, maintenance support, and training for crews and shipyard personnel.¹
• Digital (€9.4 million in H1 2025): A key growth area for the company, this segment saw revenues increase by 35.9% year-over-year. It comprises solutions from subsidiaries like Ascenz Marorka, which provide data analysis, vessel performance optimization, and safety systems to ship-owners.²⁰
• Electrolysers (€2.5 million in H1 2025): This revenue is generated by GTT’s subsidiary Elogen, which manufactures electrolysers for the production of green hydrogen. This segment represents a strategic diversification but is currently facing market challenges, with revenue down 59.1% year-over-year.²⁰

Intellectual Property Portfolio and Patent Protection

GTT’s quasi-monopoly is built upon a fortress of intellectual property. The company’s strategy is one of relentless innovation and patent filing to protect its technology and maintain its leadership position.⁴ As of the end of 2023, GTT’s portfolio contained 3,295 patents, with 64 new patents filed during that year alone.⁴ This momentum continued into 2024, with 66 new patent applications filed, securing its position as a top innovator in France.²³

This continuous cycle of innovation and patenting is crucial because standard utility patents, which cover GTT’s technologies, generally have a protection term of 20 years from the date of filing.⁷ While GTT’s foundational concepts have existed for decades, the company protects its modern systems by patenting the incremental innovations that deliver performance improvements, such as the specific foam compositions, membrane corrugations, and support structures found in systems like Mark III Flex+ and NO96 Super+. The expiration of older, foundational patents is a long-term risk that makes the protection of these newer, value-added features paramount to sustaining the business model.

2. Industry Dynamics & Market Environment: Riding the LNG Super-Cycle

GTT’s performance is intrinsically linked to the powerful secular trends shaping the global Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) market. The company is positioned to be a prime beneficiary of a multi-decade “super-cycle” driven by the global energy transition, geopolitical realignment, and tightening environmental regulations. Understanding these macroeconomic and industry-specific tailwinds is crucial to assessing GTT’s growth trajectory.

Global LNG Market Size, Growth Trajectory, and Key Drivers

The global LNG market is undergoing a period of profound and sustained expansion. Global trade reached 411.24 million tonnes (MT) in 2024, a 2.4% increase over the previous year.²⁵ Forecasts point to an acceleration of this growth. One market analysis projects the LNG market to expand from 511 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) in 2025 to 763 MTPA by 2030, which represents a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.35%.²⁶ Industry major Shell forecasts a demand increase of approximately 60% by 2040.²⁷

This robust growth is underpinned by several powerful, long-term drivers:

• The Energy Transition: A primary driver is the global shift away from coal, particularly in the power generation sectors of fast-growing Asian economies. Natural gas offers a practical and scalable way to significantly reduce CO2, sulfur, and particulate matter emissions compared to coal, positioning LNG as a critical “transition fuel”.²⁶
• Geopolitical Energy Security: The war in Ukraine triggered a fundamental and likely permanent shift in global energy flows. European nations have aggressively moved to replace Russian pipeline gas with seaborne LNG, creating a massive new source of structural demand for LNG and the vessels required to transport it.²⁹
• Industrial and Transport Fuel: LNG is increasingly being adopted as a fuel for industrial processes and, critically, for maritime transport itself, as the shipping industry seeks cleaner alternatives to traditional bunker fuel.²⁸

LNG Carrier Orderbook Trends and Capacity Utilization

The surge in LNG demand has ignited an unprecedented wave of shipbuilding orders for LNG carriers. The current newbuilding orderbook is the largest of any shipping segment, representing a staggering 44% of the existing fleet capacity.³¹ The year 2024 was a landmark for alternative-fuelled vessel orders, with 264 LNG-powered vessels ordered, more than doubling the 130 orders placed in 2023.³²

This ordering boom provides GTT with exceptional revenue visibility. As of June 30, 2025, the company’s orderbook stood at 308 units, including 280 LNG carriers. This backlog represents €1.7 billion in secured, high-margin revenue that will be recognized over the coming years as these vessels are constructed.²² This visibility extends for the next four to five years.⁶ Looking further ahead, GTT’s own long-term forecast anticipates cumulative orders for more than 450 LNG carriers between 2025 and 2034.²²

While the long-term outlook is exceptionally strong, the market is facing some short-term headwinds. A surge of new vessel deliveries in 2024 and 2025 is projected to increase fleet capacity by 17%, temporarily outpacing the 7% growth in trade volumes. This imbalance has led to a sharp decline in spot charter rates for LNG carriers in early 2025.³¹ However, this is widely viewed as a temporary absorption phase before the next wave of liquefaction capacity comes online.

A crucial demand driver that extends beyond the current growth cycle is the impending “replacement wave.” Stringent new environmental regulations from the International Maritime Organization (IMO), particularly the Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII), are set to render a significant portion of the older, less-efficient steam-turbine LNG fleet economically unviable. It is estimated that over 350 older vessels could be impacted as early as 2028, creating a substantial replacement market on top of the growth market.²² This dynamic could smooth out the historical cyclicality of shipbuilding and extend the high-demand environment for GTT’s technology well into the next decade.

Regulatory Environment Affecting LNG Transportation and Safety Standards

The LNG shipping industry operates within a stringent regulatory framework designed to ensure the highest levels of safety and environmental protection. GTT’s technologies must receive approvals from international classification societies such as DNV, Bureau Veritas, and Lloyd’s Register, which certify that the designs meet rigorous standards for maritime transport.⁶ International conventions like the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) and the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) provide the overarching legal structure.³³

The most impactful regulations today are environmental. The IMO’s mandates to reduce sulfur and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions have been a primary catalyst for the adoption of LNG as a marine fuel.³⁴ Furthermore, the European Union’s “Fit for 55” legislative package is set to bolster this trend by requiring major European ports to provide LNG bunkering infrastructure by the end of 2025, removing a key barrier to adoption.³²

Technology Evolution and Geopolitical Factors

The technological frontier in LNG containment is the relentless pursuit of thermal efficiency. The evolution of LNG carrier propulsion systems is inextricably linked to this pursuit. The industry’s shift from traditional steam turbines to modern, highly efficient dual-fuel engines (e.g., X-DF, ME-GI) means that less boil-off gas is required to power the vessel. In the past, a higher BOR was acceptable as the evaporated gas was essentially “free” fuel. Today, with more efficient engines, any excess boil-off represents a direct loss of valuable cargo. This dynamic has dramatically increased the economic value of GTT’s low-BOR technologies like Mark III Flex+ and NO96 Super+, making them integral to a modern, efficient LNG carrier design.¹⁴ GTT’s ability to deliver these performance gains is a key pillar of its value proposition.

Geopolitics are a powerful shaper of LNG trade flows and, by extension, demand for GTT’s technology. The expansion of liquefaction capacity is concentrated in a few key regions:

• The United States: The US is a primary engine of LNG supply growth. The recent lifting of a government moratorium on new export project permits has reignited investment decisions, with projects like CP2 and Corpus Christi moving forward and creating direct demand for new carriers.²¹
• Qatar: QatarEnergy’s massive North Field expansion project is another cornerstone of future supply, which will require a dedicated fleet of newbuild vessels to transport the additional volumes.³⁶
• China: On the demand side, China’s national policies, including a strategic shift from coal to gas, position it as the most important driver of LNG import growth for the foreseeable future.²⁶

3. Competitive Landscape: A Quasi-Monopoly Under Watch

Gaztransport & Technigaz commands a dominant, quasi-monopolistic position in the market for cryogenic containment systems for newbuild LNG carriers. This market leadership is protected by formidable barriers to entry, but it is not without competitive threats, which are monitored closely by the company and investors alike.

Direct Competitors and Alternative Technologies

While GTT’s membrane technology is the industry standard, several alternative systems exist and compete for market share, particularly from entities seeking to reduce their reliance on GTT’s licensing model.

• Korean In-House Systems: The most credible and persistent competitive threat originates from the major South Korean shipyards—Hanwha Ocean (formerly DSME), Hyundai Heavy Industries (HHI), and Samsung Heavy Industries (SHI). Motivated by the desire to avoid paying substantial royalties to GTT on every LNG carrier they build, these yards have invested heavily in developing their own proprietary containment systems.³⁶ Key examples include:

• KC-1 and KC-2: Developed by the state-owned Korea Gas Corporation (Kogas) in collaboration with the three major shipyards, the KC-1 system has been installed on a small number of vessels. However, it has a reported Boil-Off Rate (BOR) of 0.12% V/day, which is significantly higher than the 0.07%-0.085% BOR offered by GTT’s latest Mark III Flex+ and NO96 Super+ systems, making it less economically attractive.³⁶
• Solidus: Developed by DSME in partnership with German chemical giant BASF, this system was designed to offer improved thermal performance and has received approvals from classification societies. However, it has yet to gain significant commercial traction.³⁶
• Other Competing Technologies:

• Moss Spherical Tanks: The traditional competitor to membrane systems, these large, spherical, self-supporting tanks are produced primarily by Norwegian and Japanese companies. While known for their robustness, they are less space-efficient than GTT’s prismatic membrane designs, resulting in lower cargo capacity for a given vessel size.³⁶
• SPB (Self-supporting Prismatic-shape IMO type B) and LNT A-BOX: These are other alternative prismatic tank designs that compete with GTT, though they have captured only a very small fraction of the market.⁴
• Competition in Adjacent Markets: In the growing market for using LNG as a fuel for other vessel types (like container ships), the competitive landscape is more fragmented. GTT’s membrane solution faces intense competition from simpler, lower-cost Type C tanks, which are essentially pressurized cylindrical tanks that are easier to manufacture and install for smaller fuel volumes.⁴

Market Share, Barriers to Entry, and Competitive Moats

GTT’s market share in its core business of newbuild LNG carriers is overwhelming. Historically, its technology has been used on approximately three-quarters of the global LNG carrier fleet.³⁶ Analysis of recent order flow confirms that this dominance persists, with GTT’s systems being the default choice for nearly all major ship-owners and gas companies.¹⁰

This market position is defended by several powerful and interlocking moats:

• The “Trust Moat”: Perhaps more powerful than any patent is the trust GTT has cultivated over 60 years of operational excellence.⁴ LNG projects represent multi-billion dollar investments with asset lives exceeding 20 years. For ship-owners, financiers, and insurers, the risk of a catastrophic failure in a containment system is unacceptable. GTT’s technology has an unparalleled track record of safety and reliability, validated by millions of operating hours at sea. A decision-maker who chooses an unproven competing system that subsequently fails faces immense career and financial repercussions. This deeply ingrained risk aversion creates a powerful inertia that favors the incumbent, GTT, even if a competitor offers a lower upfront cost.
• Technological Leadership and Intellectual Property: GTT’s vast portfolio of over 3,200 patents creates a formidable legal barrier to imitation.⁴ The continuous innovation, leading to tangible performance benefits like lower BOR, serves as a moving target for competitors. The economic savings from a lower BOR on a GTT system can often outweigh the royalty cost, neutralizing the primary value proposition of a competing system.
• High Switching Costs and Ecosystem Integration: GTT is deeply embedded in the entire LNG value chain. It maintains long-standing, collaborative relationships with all key stakeholders: shipyards, classification societies, ship-owners, and charterers.¹ Shipyards are trained and certified to build GTT’s systems, and designs are pre-approved by classification societies, streamlining the construction process. Switching to a new system would require significant retraining, new certification processes, and introduces logistical and design risks.

The emergence of competition has acted as a powerful catalyst for GTT’s own innovation. The threat from Korean yards has arguably forced GTT to accelerate its R&D efforts, leading to the development of next-generation systems like Mark III Flex+ and NO96 Super+. By consistently pushing the performance frontier, GTT widens its technological gap, making it even harder for competitors to catch up and offer a compelling alternative. In this way, the competitive threat paradoxically reinforces GTT’s long-term leadership.

Customer Concentration and Switching Costs

A key structural risk for GTT is its high degree of customer concentration. Its direct revenue comes from a small handful of major shipyards located almost exclusively in South Korea and, increasingly, China.⁴ This concentration is a double-edged sword. While it simplifies customer relationship management, it also gives these powerful buyers significant bargaining leverage and, as noted, provides them with the primary motivation to develop in-house alternatives to reduce royalty expenses. The risk that a major customer, particularly a state-influenced Chinese shipyard, could mandate its own domestic technology for a series of newbuilds represents a tangible threat to GTT’s addressable market.

4. Financial Performance Analysis: A Profile of Exceptional Profitability

GTT’s financial profile is a direct and compelling reflection of its asset-light, IP-centric business model. The company exhibits exceptionally high profitability, robust cash flow generation, and best-in-class returns on capital, setting it apart from nearly all other firms in the industrial and energy sectors.

Revenue Growth Patterns

The company’s revenue growth is strong but inherently cyclical, moving in tandem with the multi-year investment cycles of the global LNG industry. Following a period of high order intake, revenue recognition ramps up as vessels progress through construction, creating a lag between orders and financial results.

• FY 2019: Revenue reached €288.2 million, a solid increase of 17.2% year-over-year.³⁷
• FY 2020: Growth accelerated significantly, with revenue climbing 38% to €396.4 million, reflecting the strong order flow from the preceding years.³⁸
• FY 2022: Revenue moderated to €307.3 million, a temporary decline resulting from an unfavorable base effect in the order cycle.⁶
• FY 2023: Revenue rebounded to €428 million, signaling the start of the next upswing.⁴⁰
• FY 2024: The company reported record revenue of €641 million, a remarkable 50% increase year-over-year, as the massive order book from 2022-2023 began to convert into recognized sales.⁴⁰
• H1 2025: The strong momentum continued into the first half of 2025, with revenue of €388.7 million, up 32% from the prior-year period, demonstrating the powerful and visible growth trajectory fueled by the backlog.²⁰

Profitability Metrics: Exceptional Margins

GTT’s margins are the clearest indicator of its business model’s strength. With a largely fixed cost base composed of personnel and R&D, incremental revenue from new licenses drops to the bottom line at a very high rate.

• EBITDA Margin: The company consistently operates with EBITDA margins above 60%. This expanded impressively in the first half of 2025 to 68.0%, up from 60.1% in H1 2024, highlighting the significant operating leverage as high-margin royalty revenues grew.²⁰
• Net Margin: Net profit margins have also been exceptionally high, typically around 50%. The net margin in H1 2025 was 46.2%, a slight compression from 57.8% in the prior year, which was primarily attributable to a one-time non-current operating expense of €48.2 million related to the strategic restructuring of its Elogen hydrogen subsidiary.²⁰ This event underscores the potential for the company’s diversification efforts to introduce volatility and one-off costs that can impact reported profitability. While the core business is a paragon of stability, the growth ventures carry higher execution risk.

The table below provides a five-year summary of GTT’s key financial metrics, illustrating the trend of strong growth and superior profitability.

Metric	2020	2022	2023	2024
Consolidated Revenue (€M)	396.4	307.3	428.0	641.4
Revenue Growth (%)	+38%	–	+39%	+50%
Consolidated EBITDA (€M)	242.7	161.1	235.0	388.0
EBITDA Margin (%)	61.2%	52.4%	54.9%	60.5%
Consolidated Net Income (€M)	198.9	–	170.3	347.8
Net Margin (%)	50.2%	–	39.8%	54.2%
Dividend per Share (€)	4.29	3.10	4.36	7.50

Note: Data for 2021 was not available in the provided sources. 2023 revenue and EBITDA are derived from FY2024 growth figures. 2023 Net Income is from H1 2024 report comparing to H1 2023. 2024 figures are from full-year results. Data compiled from.⁶

Return on Capital and Cash Flow Generation

The combination of high profits and a minimal capital base results in extraordinary returns on capital, placing GTT in an elite class of businesses.

• Return on Equity (ROE): A normalized ROE of 86.4%.⁴⁵
• Return on Invested Capital (ROIC): A normalized ROIC of 82.3%.⁴⁵
• Return on Assets (ROA): A normalized ROA of 49.0%.⁴⁵

These figures are exceptionally high and reflect a business that requires very little incremental capital to grow. The company is a powerful cash-generating machine. In the fourth quarter of 2024, cash from operations surged 103% year-over-year to €108.1 million.⁴⁶ This strong cash generation allows GTT to fund its growth initiatives, M&A, and generous dividend policy entirely from internal resources.

Debt Levels and Financial Leverage

GTT maintains a fortress balance sheet. The company consistently holds more cash and cash equivalents than total debt, operating with a net cash position.²² As of December 2024, the company had €343.7 million in cash and short-term investments against total liabilities of €353.3 million, confirming a negligible leverage profile.⁴⁶ Its interest coverage ratio is an extremely high 406.3x, indicating that financial risk from debt is virtually non-existent.⁴⁵

5. Growth History & Future Opportunities: Beyond the Core

While GTT’s core business of licensing containment systems for LNG carriers provides a stable and highly profitable foundation, the company’s long-term growth strategy is a multi-pronged effort focused on innovation in its core market, expansion into logical adjacencies, and strategic bets on future energy technologies.

Historical Order Intake and Backlog Evolution

The evolution of GTT’s order book provides the clearest picture of its historical growth and future revenue visibility. The backlog has expanded dramatically in recent years, fueled by the LNG super-cycle.

• At the end of 2020, the core business order book stood at 147 units.³⁸
• By the end of 2022, this had nearly doubled to 274 units for the core business, supplemented by another 70 units for the burgeoning LNG as fuel segment.⁶
• The backlog peaked in mid-2024 at 342 units.⁴³
• As of June 30, 2025, the order book comprised 308 units, which, despite being a slight decrease from the peak due to a high rate of vessel deliveries, still represents a massive €1.7 billion in secured, high-margin future revenue.²¹

This substantial and contracted backlog de-risks a significant portion of the company’s financial forecasts for the next several years and provides the financial firepower to fund its diversification strategy. This “funding bridge” is a crucial strategic advantage, allowing GTT to invest patiently in long-term growth initiatives from a position of financial strength, without needing to access external capital markets and dilute shareholders.

New Technology Development and R&D Investments

Innovation is the lifeblood of GTT’s business model, serving both as a defensive moat and a primary growth engine. The company consistently reinvests approximately 10% of its revenues back into R&D, a significant commitment that has averaged over the last decade.⁴ This investment fuels a prolific patenting program, with 62 new patents filed in 2024 alone.⁴⁰

R&D efforts are focused on several key areas:

• Improving Core Technology: Continuously enhancing the thermal performance (i.e., lowering the BOR) of its Mark III and NO96 systems to maintain a competitive edge.
• New Gas Applications: Developing containment solutions for other liquefied gases, such as ethane and, most strategically, liquid hydrogen.⁶ GTT has already received approvals in principle for liquid hydrogen transport systems, positioning it for a potential future hydrogen economy.⁶
• Digital Offerings: Creating and acquiring digital tools for the maritime industry.

Adjacent Market Opportunities

GTT is pursuing a “barbell” diversification strategy, balancing lower-risk expansion into adjacent markets with higher-risk ventures into nascent technologies.

• Low-Risk Adjacency: Digital Services: This is a logical “land and expand” strategy. Leveraging its deep relationships with ship-owners and its expertise in maritime technology, GTT is building a significant digital services business. This has been accelerated through strategic M&A:

• Ascenz Marorka: Acquired to provide “smart shipping” solutions, including vessel performance monitoring and optimization software.⁵
• Danelec: Acquired in H1 2025 for €194 million, Danelec is a leader in maritime digitalization, particularly in Voyage Data Recorders (VDRs or “black boxes”).²⁰ This acquisition makes GTT a global leader in vessel performance management and gives it a foothold on 15% of the global fleet’s VDR market.²¹ This segment is growing rapidly, with revenues up 36% in H1 2025, and boasts attractive gross margins of 57%.²⁰

• High-Risk Venture: Green Hydrogen (Elogen): GTT’s most ambitious diversification is its entry into the green hydrogen market through the acquisition of Elogen, a designer and manufacturer of proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysers.⁴⁴ This is a long-term, high-risk, high-reward bet on the future of the hydrogen economy. This venture is far from GTT’s core competency and requires significant capital investment in manufacturing. The high risk of this strategy has already materialized, with the company taking a €45 million charge in H1 2025 to halt the construction of a planned “gigafactory” and restructure the subsidiary amid a challenging market environment.²⁰ While it represents a potentially massive long-term option, it also introduces significant volatility and capital risk to the investment case.
• Other Core Adjacencies: GTT continues to apply its core technology to other segments of the LNG value chain, including Floating Storage and Regasification Units (FSRUs), Floating LNG (FLNG) production units, and onshore storage tanks.² The LNG as Fuel segment is a particularly important growth vector, where GTT’s membrane tanks compete to become the fuel tanks for the next generation of ocean-going vessels. The company has secured 129 orders in this segment to date.²²

6. Capital Allocation Strategy: Shareholder-Focused and Disciplined

GTT’s capital allocation strategy is a cornerstone of its investment thesis, characterized by a disciplined approach that balances rewarding shareholders with significant cash returns, reinvesting in its technological moat, and funding strategic growth initiatives. This strategy is enabled by the company’s highly cash-generative, asset-light business model.

Historical Dividend Policy and Payout Ratios

The most prominent feature of GTT’s capital allocation is its commitment to a high dividend payout. The company has a formal policy to distribute a significant portion of its earnings to shareholders, providing a strong signal of management’s confidence in the long-term sustainability of its cash flows.

For the fiscal years 2024 and 2025, GTT has explicitly targeted a dividend payout of at least 80% of its consolidated net income.²⁰ This policy transforms the stock from a pure technology growth play into a compelling high-yield growth investment, appealing to a broad range of income-focused investors. The historical dividend per share demonstrates this commitment to shareholder returns:

• 2019: €3.25 ³⁷
• 2020: €4.29 ³⁸
• 2021: €3.10 ⁴⁹
• 2022: €3.10 ⁶
• 2023: €4.36 ⁴
• 2024 (Proposed): €7.50, a substantial increase reflecting record profitability.⁴⁰

The dividend is typically distributed semi-annually, with an interim payment late in the fiscal year and a final payment after the annual general meeting in the following year.⁴⁹

R&D Spending, Capital Expenditures, and M&A

Management’s use of cash reflects a clear and disciplined “core vs. growth” mentality. The cash generated by the mature core business is viewed as belonging primarily to shareholders, hence the high dividend. However, a portion is strategically reinvested to secure the company’s future.

• R&D Spending: This is the most critical and consistent internal investment. Averaging 10% of revenue over the last decade, R&D spending is the primary tool used to maintain and expand GTT’s technological leadership and patent moat.⁴
• Capital Expenditures (Capex): Due to the asset-light licensing model, maintenance capex is extremely low. Growth capex is also modest and typically tied to specific projects or expansions of facilities like testing centers. In 2020, for example, reported capex of €21.8 million was significantly inflated by €8 million related to acquisitions, highlighting the low capital intensity of the organic business.³⁹
• M&A Activity: GTT uses acquisitions as a targeted tool to accelerate its diversification strategy. This approach is focused on acquiring specific technologies and market access rather than large-scale consolidation.

• In 2020, the company made several smaller acquisitions to bolster its digital capabilities, including Marorka (smart shipping) and OSE Engineering (artificial intelligence).³⁸
• In H1 2025, GTT executed its most significant acquisition to date, purchasing Danelec for €194 million to become a global leader in vessel performance management and the critical VDR market.²⁰ This demonstrates a willingness to deploy substantial capital for strategic, bolt-on acquisitions in lower-risk adjacent markets.

Share Repurchase Programs

GTT has an active share buyback authorization from its shareholders, which was renewed in June 2023 for a period of 18 months.⁴ However, the primary stated purpose of this program is not for capital reduction or to systematically return cash to shareholders, but rather to service obligations related to employee share purchase plans or other equity-based compensation.⁴ The company’s primary vehicle for cash returns remains its robust dividend policy.

7. Valuation Analysis: Pricing a Niche Leader

Valuing Gaztransport & Technigaz requires a nuanced approach that accounts for its unique business model, which blends the characteristics of a high-technology firm with the cyclicality of the industrial energy sector. The company consistently trades at a premium to the broader market and its ostensible peers, a valuation that is justified by its quasi-monopolistic market position, exceptional profitability, and high-visibility growth.

Current and Historical Trading Multiples

GTT’s valuation multiples are significantly higher than those of typical industrial or energy service companies, reflecting its superior financial characteristics.

• Price/Earnings (P/E) Ratio: The stock currently trades at a P/E ratio of approximately 16.7x to 17.0x trailing earnings.⁴⁴ This represents a substantial premium to the average P/E of its European Oil & Gas industry peers (10.9x) and a broader peer group (11.6x).⁵¹
• Enterprise Value/EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) Ratio: The EV/EBITDA multiple stands at approximately 14.4x.⁵¹ This metric is particularly useful for GTT as it is neutral to capital structure and strips out non-cash depreciation, offering a cleaner proxy for operating cash flow performance.⁵³
• Asset-Light Model Impact: Multiples based on assets or sales, such as Price/Book (P/B) and Price/Sales (P/S), are extraordinarily high (P/B of ~12.6x, P/S of ~9.1x).⁴⁵ These elevated ratios are a direct consequence of the asset-light business model, where a small base of assets and high-margin revenues generate substantial profits. As such, P/B and P/S are less meaningful for valuing GTT than earnings-based multiples.

The company’s valuation is ultimately a function of certainty. The market is willing to pay a significant premium for GTT’s earnings and cash flows because a large portion of them are de-risked by the massive, multi-year, and contractually secured order backlog of €1.7 billion.²² This “certainty premium” is a key differentiating factor. The size, duration, and replacement rate of this backlog are the most critical drivers of the company’s valuation multiple.

Peer Comparison Analysis

Identifying direct, publicly traded peers for GTT is challenging due to its one-of-a-kind business model. The most relevant comparables fall into the broader categories of energy equipment, services, and transportation. However, none share GTT’s combination of IP licensing, market dominance, and extreme profitability.

The table below compares GTT’s valuation multiples to a selection of companies in the energy storage and transportation sector.

Company Name	Ticker	Market Cap (€B)	P/E (TTM)	EV/EBITDA (TTM)	P/S (TTM)	Div. Yield (%)
Gaztransport & Technigaz	GTT.PA	5.8	16.8x	14.4x	9.1x	4.75%
Golar LNG Limited	GLNG	4.0	28.0x	–	16.4x	2.46%
Technip Energies N.V.	TE.PA	3.8	9.5x	5.5x	0.6x	3.90%
Kinetik Holdings Inc.	KNTK	6.2	44.5x	11.0x	1.6x	7.43%
Hess Midstream LP	HESM	7.6	15.3x	11.5x	2.5x	7.29%
Peer Average (ex-GTT)		5.4	24.3x	9.3x	5.3x	5.27%

Note: Market data is dynamic. Figures are based on available data from sources.⁴⁶ Peer average P/E is skewed by GLNG. Peer EV/EBITDA average calculated where available.

The comparison illustrates GTT’s premium valuation on an EV/EBITDA basis compared to most peers, which is justified by its vastly superior margin profile and return on capital.

Appropriate Valuation Methodologies

A combination of methodologies is most appropriate for assessing GTT’s intrinsic value:

• Discounted Cash Flow (DCF): Given the high visibility of future revenues from the existing backlog, a DCF analysis is a primary and highly relevant valuation tool. The ability to model near-term cash flows with a high degree of confidence is a significant advantage. One available analyst DCF model estimates a fair value of €209.67 per share, suggesting significant upside from current trading levels.⁵¹
• Relative Valuation vs. History: Comparing GTT’s current P/E and EV/EBITDA multiples to their own historical ranges is crucial. This provides context on whether the market is currently pricing the company at a cyclical peak or trough relative to its own historical valuation patterns.
• Dividend Discount Model (DDM): The company’s explicit and consistent high-payout dividend policy makes a DDM a viable and useful valuation cross-check.

It is plausible that the current market valuation primarily reflects the strength and visibility of the core LNG carrier business but does not fully ascribe value to the long-term growth options in the Digital and Hydrogen segments. A sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) analysis, which values each segment separately, could reveal that the market is effectively getting these growth options for free, as the consolidated earnings used in headline multiples are currently being depressed by the investment-phase losses in the Elogen subsidiary.

8. Risk Assessment: Navigating Cyclicality and Competition

An investment in Gaztransport & Technigaz is subject to a distinct set of risks stemming from its concentrated market focus, reliance on intellectual property, and exposure to the cyclical global energy industry. The company provides a transparent and detailed assessment of these risks in its regulatory filings, which can be categorized into market, competitive, legal, and operational factors.

The following matrix summarizes the key risk factors as disclosed by the company, primarily based on its 2023 Universal Registration Document.⁴

Risk Category	Specific Risk	Description	Mitigation Measures	Assessed Probability	Assessed Impact
Market & Commercial	Dependence on LNG Market Cyclicality	~80% of revenue is tied to new LNG carrier construction, which is cyclical and dependent on major energy investment decisions.	Continuous innovation to improve value proposition; diversification into LNG as fuel, digital, and hydrogen.	Low	High
	Customer Concentration	Direct revenue is concentrated among a few major shipyards in South Korea and China, creating significant bargaining power.	Maintaining strong technical relationships; technology specified by a diverse base of end-user ship-owners.	Medium	High
	Geopolitical Instability	High exposure to Southeast Asia (shipyard locations) and geopolitical tensions involving China.	Monitoring geopolitical events; diversifying shipyard partnerships where possible.	Low	Major
Technology & Competitive	Emergence of Credible Competitors	Threat from in-house systems at Korean yards (KC-1, Solidus) and other technologies seeking to avoid GTT royalties.	High R&D investment to maintain performance leadership; strong patent portfolio; long-term operational track record.	High	Moderate
	Technology Defect / Failure	A latent defect in a GTT system at sea (e.g., from “sloshing”) could lead to catastrophic reputational and financial damage.	Rigorous testing, incremental innovation, emergency support services (HEARS®), continuous operational feedback.	Low	High
Intellectual Property & Legal	Patent Expiration & Infringement	The business model is entirely dependent on a defensible IP portfolio. Patents have a finite life and can be challenged or circumvented.	Continuous filing of new patents on innovations; strict internal controls on confidential information; active legal defense.	Medium	Moderate
	Antitrust Scrutiny	Dominant market position invites regulatory scrutiny. A past ruling in Korea forced unbundling of services.	Compliance with competition laws; adapting commercial practices to regulatory requirements.	Medium	Low
Execution & Operational	Diversification Execution Risk	Inability to successfully commercialize and scale new ventures, particularly the high-risk Elogen (hydrogen) subsidiary.	Strong governance over subsidiaries; strategic partnerships; phased investment approach.	Medium	Moderate
	Human Resources	Inability to recruit and retain sufficient highly specialized engineering talent to manage the high level of activity.	Use of subcontractors; active recruitment programs; strong employer branding and compensation.	Medium	Moderate

A deeper analysis of these risks reveals critical interdependencies. The high customer concentration is not just a commercial risk; it is the primary fuel for the competitive risk. The powerful shipyards GTT relies on are the same entities with the greatest motivation and technical capability (from building hundreds of GTT systems) to develop in-house alternatives. A strategic decision by a major customer to mandate its own system could instantly remove a large portion of GTT’s addressable market.

Furthermore, while a market downturn is a cyclical risk, the most severe “black swan” risk is a latent technological defect. The entire investment case and GTT’s formidable “trust moat” are built on the assumption of flawless reliability. A sudden, unexpected material failure on a vessel at sea would be devastating to ship-owner confidence, potentially leading to widespread litigation, a halt on the use of GTT systems, and a rapid shift toward any viable competitor. While the probability is very low, the potential impact is existential, making it the single largest, however remote, threat to the company.

9. Management Quality & Corporate Governance

The quality of GTT’s leadership and the robustness of its governance structures are critical factors in its long-term success, providing the strategic direction and oversight necessary to navigate a complex and dynamic industry. The company is led by an experienced team and governed by a board with expertise directly relevant to its strategic challenges.

Leadership Team Track Record

• Philippe Berterottière (Chairman & Chief Executive Officer): Mr. Berterottière has been at the helm of GTT since 2009, providing over 15 years of stable and highly successful leadership. His tenure has overseen the company’s 2014 IPO on Euronext Paris, its significant international expansion, and the achievement of record commercial performance.⁵⁷ His prior career at high-technology industrial firms like Airbus and Arianespace endowed him with deep experience in managing complex, long-cycle, international businesses.⁶⁰ This long and successful tenure is a major source of stability and strategic consistency, though it also introduces a degree of key-man risk, making succession planning a critical long-term issue for the board to manage.
• Thierry Hochoa (Chief Financial Officer): Appointed in September 2023, Mr. Hochoa is a relatively new but highly experienced addition to the executive team. He brings over 25 years of senior finance experience from large, international companies directly relevant to GTT’s ecosystem, including Technip (energy services), Bourbon Offshore (maritime), and CMA CGM (shipping and logistics).⁵⁷ His appointment brings a fresh perspective and deep industry-specific financial expertise to the leadership team.
• Executive Committee: The broader executive committee is composed of seasoned professionals with extensive backgrounds in naval architecture, engineering, digital technology, and human resources, reflecting the diverse skills required to run the business.⁵⁷

Strategic Vision and Execution

Management has demonstrated excellent execution in its core business, successfully navigating the LNG market cycles to secure a record-breaking order book and deliver exceptional financial results.⁴ The strategic vision is clear: defend and innovate within the core LNG business while using its cash flows to fund a two-pronged diversification into the logical adjacency of digital maritime services and the long-term, high-potential venture of green hydrogen.³

Execution on this diversification strategy has been mixed. The expansion into digital services, accelerated by the acquisitions of Ascenz Marorka and Danelec, has been successful and is contributing meaningfully to growth.²⁰ However, the foray into hydrogen with Elogen has faced significant headwinds, culminating in a strategic restructuring and a material financial write-down, highlighting the high execution risk of this venture.²⁰

Board Composition and Corporate Governance

GTT’s corporate governance framework appears robust and well-aligned with best practices. The Board of Directors is structured to provide effective oversight and strategic guidance.

• Composition and Independence: As of the 2022 Universal Registration Document, the board comprised nine members, with a strong female representation of 44.5% and a commitment to maintaining a majority of independent directors.⁴⁷ The board’s composition is not merely a check-the-box exercise; it appears to be a strategic tool. Directors possess diverse and highly relevant expertise in key areas such as energy (Carolle Foissaud, formerly of Areva), digital technology (Domitille Doat Le Bigot, formerly of Danone and Cisco), and finance and M&A (Pascal Macioce of NextStage AM), which directly maps to the company’s primary strategic challenges.⁵⁸
• Board Committees: The board operates with three specialized committees—Audit and Risk Management; Compensation and Nominations; and Strategic and CSR—which are composed primarily of independent directors.⁴⁷ This structure ensures that critical issues like risk management, executive succession, and long-term strategy receive focused, independent oversight.
• Shareholder Alignment: The company’s largest shareholder is the French utility Engie SA, with a 30.4% stake, providing a stable anchor investor. The remaining shares are held by a mix of major global institutional investors.⁶³ Alignment with these shareholders is strongly evidenced by the company’s high dividend payout policy, which prioritizes the return of cash.

10. Key Metrics to Monitor: The Analyst’s Dashboard

For ongoing analysis of Gaztransport & Technigaz, a focused set of key performance indicators can serve as a dashboard to monitor the health of the business, the progress of its strategy, and the emergence of risks or opportunities. These metrics are the leading indicators that will drive the company’s financial performance and valuation.

Core Business and Backlog Health

• Quarterly Order Intake: The number of new vessel/unit orders booked each quarter, broken down by segment (LNG Carriers, VLECs, FSRUs, LNG as Fuel). This is the single most important lead indicator of future revenue growth.²¹
• Order Backlog: The total number of units in the backlog and its corresponding estimated revenue value in euros. This metric defines the company’s medium-term revenue visibility.²²
• Backlog Duration: The backlog value divided by current annual revenue, providing a rough estimate of how many years of revenue are secured. A sustained decline in this duration would signal a potential future slowdown.

Market Share and Competitive Dynamics

• Market Share in New LNG Carrier Orders: GTT’s share of all LNG carrier newbuild orders placed globally each quarter. Any sustained drop below the historical 80-90% dominance would be a significant red flag indicating successful penetration by competitors.
• Competitor Order Wins: The number of orders, if any, won by competing technologies such as KC-1, Solidus, or LNT A-BOX. This is the most direct measure of the competitive threat materializing.⁴
• LNG as Fuel Technology Adoption: The market share of GTT’s membrane solution versus Type C tanks in the LNG-fueled vessel segment. This tracks the success of a key growth initiative.

Financial Performance and Capital Allocation

• EBITDA and Net Profit Margins: Monitoring these margins for any trend of dilution. A decline could signal a shift in revenue mix towards lower-margin businesses or cost pressures.²⁰
• Dividend Policy and Payout Ratio: Any change to the stated policy of distributing at least 80% of net income would be a major strategic signal from management regarding their outlook for future cash generation.²⁰
• R&D Spending as a Percentage of Revenue: A significant deviation from the historical 10% average could indicate a change in innovation strategy or a response to competitive pressure.⁴

Growth Initiative Performance

• Digital Segment Revenue and Gross Margin: Tracking the growth and profitability of this key diversification effort, including the successful integration of the Danelec acquisition.²⁰
• Elogen Segment Performance: Monitoring revenue, EBITDA, and any new orders for the hydrogen subsidiary. This will be the key indicator of whether this high-risk venture is gaining commercial traction or continues to be a drain on capital.²⁰

A crucial, forward-looking metric that provides a cross-check on the health of the entire ecosystem is shipyard slot allocation. GTT’s management has provided forecasts on the number of construction slots that global shipyards, particularly in China, are dedicating to LNG carriers.⁶⁴ If these yards begin to pivot and allocate more of their future capacity to other vessel types, such as container ships or tankers, it would serve as a powerful early warning signal that the shipyards themselves foresee a peak in the LNG ordering cycle, likely preceding any slowdown in GTT’s own order intake. This third-party validation of future demand is an invaluable metric for any analyst to monitor.

Works cited

1. Gaztransport & Technigaz SA Company Profile – GlobalData, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.globaldata.com/company-profile/gaztransport-technigaz-sa/
2. GTT – Gaztransport et Technigaz | Investor Relations / Filings / Financial statement, accessed July 30, 2025, https://financialreports.eu/companies/gtt-gaztransport-et-technigaz/
3. Transparency & teamwork – GTT, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/about-us/commitments-values
4. Universal Registration Document 2023 – GTT, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/sites/default/files/GTT_2023%20UNIVERSAL%20REGISTRATION%20DOCUMENT_3.pdf
5. GTT: Home, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/
6. GTT: Full Year 2022 Results – Solid results for 2022; exceptional commercial performance offering unprecedented visibility; 2023 revenues and EBITDA expected to grow strongly | Nasdaq, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/gtt:-full-year-2022-results-solid-results-for-2022-exceptional-commercial-performance
7. Patent Duration – Smit & Van Wyk, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.svw.co.za/patent-duration/
8. How Long Does Patent Protection Last?, accessed July 30, 2025, https://patentlawyer.io/how-long-does-patent-protection-last/
9. Cutting edge technologies and unparalleled know-how – GTT, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/technologies
10. LNG Carriers | GTT, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/applications/lng-carriers
11. Mark III systems | GTT, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/technologies/markiii-systems
12. Mark III – GTT – Technology for a Sustainable World, accessed July 30, 2025, https://stg-gtt.com/mark-iii/
13. GTT Mark III Technology – YouTube, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lmMRu_pLsc
14. Boil-off rates tumble with GTT’s Mark III Flex membrane system – Riviera Maritime Media, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.rivieramm.com/news-content-hub/news-content-hub/boil-off-rates-tumble-with-gtts-mark-iii-flex-membrane-system-41116
15. NO96 system | GTT, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/technologies/no96-systems
16. NO96 Super+ – GTT – Technology for a Sustainable World, accessed July 30, 2025, https://stg-gtt.com/no96-super/
17. NO96 Super+ – GTT, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/technologies/no96-super-0
18. GTT upgrades its NO96 technology to further reduce the guaranteed Boil Off Rate, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/gtt-upgrades-its-no96-technology-to-further-reduce-the-guaranteed-boil-off-rate/
19. GTT Investor Relations – Gaztransport et Technigaz SA – Alpha Spread, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/par/gtt/investor-relations
20. Gaztransport Et Technigaz | GTT : First half 2025 results – Strong growth in revenue and EBITDA – Trivano, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.trivano.com/persbericht/gtt-first-half-2025-results-strong-growth-in-revenue-and-ebitda-645213.html
21. GTT : First half 2025 results – Strong growth in revenue and EBITDA – GlobeNewswire, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/07/29/3123469/0/en/GTT-First-half-2025-results-Strong-growth-in-revenue-and-EBITDA.html
22. GTT H1 2025 slides: revenue surges 32%, EBITDA margin expands to 68% – Investing.com, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/gtt-h1-2025-slides-revenue-surges-32-ebitda-margin-expands-to-68-93CH-4158973
23. With 66 patents filed in 2024, GTT confirms the acceleration of its innovation momentum and its technological leadership in the INPI ranking – Euronext Live Markets, accessed July 30, 2025, https://live.euronext.com/en/products/equities/company-news/2025-03-24-66-patents-filed-2024-gtt-confirms-acceleration-its
24. 2701-Patent Term – USPTO, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2701.html
25. 2025 World LNG Report – International Gas Union, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.igu.org/press-releases/2025-world-lng-report-press-release
26. LNG Market Size, Growth, Trend Analysis & Global Industry Analysis …, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/global-lng-market-industry
27. LNG Outlook 2025 | Shell Global, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.shell.com/what-we-do/oil-and-natural-gas/liquefied-natural-gas-lng/lng-outlook-2025.html
28. LNG Market – Global Industry Analysis and Forecast (2025-2032), accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/market-report/global-lng-market/117001/
29. Executive summary – Gas Market Report, Q1-2025 – Analysis – IEA, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.iea.org/reports/gas-market-report-q1-2025/executive-summary
30. Global natural gas demand growth set to accelerate in 2026 as more LNG supply comes to market – News – IEA, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.iea.org/news/global-natural-gas-demand-growth-set-to-accelerate-in-2026-as-more-lng-supply-comes-to-market
31. LNG Shipping: Short-Term Headwinds, Long-Term Growth – Clarksons, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.clarksons.com/home/news-and-insights/2025/lng-shipping-short-term-headwinds-long-term-growth/
32. LNG powers unprecedented year for orders of alternative-fuelled …, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.dnv.com/news/2025/lng-powers-unprecedented-year-for-orders-of-alternative-fuelled-vesselss/
33. Navigating LNG in Admiralty Law – Number Analytics, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-guide-lng-admiralty-law
34. LNG-Powered Vessels | Port Economics, Management and Policy, accessed July 30, 2025, https://porteconomicsmanagement.org/pemp/contents/part6/ports-and-container-shipping/long-powered-container-vessel/
35. LNG Shipping: Key Characteristics, Applications, and Challenges, accessed July 30, 2025, https://examples.tely.ai/lng-shipping-key-characteristics-applications-and-challenges/
36. Technology: Korean Competition for GTT [LNG Condensed], accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.naturalgasworld.com/technology-korean-competition-for-gtt-lng-condensed-71294
37. 1 2019 Annual Results A record level of new orders and results above expectations Highlights – GTT, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/sites/default/files/ir-pr-fy2019-27_02_2020_en_0.pdf
38. GTT: 2020 full-year results – Excellent performance and objectives achieved – Company Announcement – FT.com – Markets data, accessed July 30, 2025, https://markets.ft.com/data/announce/detail?dockey=1330-1000457343en-11LIO29B1MT6LDDUL2GI18VCEH
39. FY 2020 Results – GTT, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/sites/default/files/gtt_-_investor_presentation_-_180221_1.pdf
40. Full-Year 2024 Results – Record sales (+50%) and EBITDA (+65%) in a dynamic market, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/news/full-year-2024-results-record-sales-50-and-ebitda-65-dynamic-market
41. Finance – GTT, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/finance
42. Gaztransport & Technigaz (GTT.PA) – Revenue – Companies Market Cap, accessed July 30, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/gaztransport-technigaz/revenue/
43. GTT: First half 2024 results: Strong growth in revenues and earnings; very robust order intake momentum – Public now, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.publicnow.com/view/5D39CFAD838043FC29AB2012339A0DCB03C83FD1?1721925982
44. Gaztransport et Technigaz SA Stock Price Today | EPA: GTT Live – Investing.com, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.investing.com/equities/gtt
45. Gaztransport et technigaz SA (GTT) – Morningstar, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/xpar/gtt/quote
46. Gaztransport et Technigaz SA (GTT) Stock Price & News – Google Finance, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.google.com/finance/quote/GTT:EPA
47. Universal Registration Document – GTT, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/sites/default/files/GTT_URD_2022_UK_1.pdf
48. GTT evolves NO96 containment system – Offshore-Energy.biz, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.offshore-energy.biz/gtt-evolves-no96-containment-system/
49. Gaztransport Et Technigaz (GTT) Dividends, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.dividendmax.com/france/euronext-paris/engineering/gaztransport-et-technigaz/dividends
50. Dividends | GTT, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/finance/gtt-share/dividends
51. Gaztransport & Technigaz (ENXTPA:GTT) Stock Valuation, Peer …, accessed July 30, 2025, https://simplywall.st/stocks/fr/energy/epa-gtt/gaztransport-technigaz-shares/valuation
52. Gaztransport et Technigaz SA, GTT:PAR summary – FT.com – Markets data, accessed July 30, 2025, https://markets.ft.com/data/equities/tearsheet/summary?s=GTT:PAR
53. Valuation Multiples: Enterprise vs Equity, P/E, EBITDA, EBIT, Sales – Macabacus, accessed July 30, 2025, https://macabacus.com/valuation/multiples
54. Should You Use the EV/EBITDA or P/E Multiple? – Investopedia, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/061515/which-metric-should-i-pay-more-attention-evebitda-or-pe.asp
55. GTT Stock Price Gaztransport et technigaz SA |Morningstar, accessed July 30, 2025, https://global.morningstar.com/en-gb/investments/stocks/0P000126CV/quote
56. GZPZY Gaztransport & Technigaz SA Stock Price & Overview – Seeking Alpha, accessed July 30, 2025, https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/GZPZY/peers/comparison
57. Executive Committee | GTT, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/about-us/governance/executive-committee
58. Board of Directors & Specialized Committees – GTT, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/about-us/governance/board-directors-specialized-comittees
59. gtt.fr, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/sites/default/files/pr_-_renewal_of_philippe_berterottiere_in_his_functions_of_ceo_of_gtt_0.pdf
60. Philippe Berterottière – Wikipedia, accessed July 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippe_Berterotti%C3%A8re
61. Philippe Berterottière – 25th World LNG Summit & Awards, accessed July 30, 2025, https://www.worldlngsummit.com/speakers/2023-speakers/philippe-berterottiere/
62. Appointment of Thierry Hochoa as Chief Financial Officer – GTT, accessed July 30, 2025, https://gtt.fr/news/appointment-thierry-hochoa-chief-financial-officer
63. Gaztransport & Technigaz – Wikipedia, accessed July 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaztransport_%26_Technigaz
64. GTT predicts 40% growth in LNG carrier yard slots, accessed July 30, 2025, https://lngjournal.com/index.php/test-ticker/item/112306-gtt-predicts-40-growth-in-lng-carrier-yard-slots