Executive Summary

Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) stands at a critical inflection point, navigating a profound transformation within the U.S. telecommunications sector. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the company’s strategic positioning, financial health, and operational performance amidst a landscape defined by intense competition and shifting consumer behaviors. The central thesis of this analysis is that Charter is executing a deliberate and capital-intensive pivot from its legacy business model toward a converged connectivity framework, with its Spectrum Mobile offering serving as the primary engine for growth and customer retention. This strategy is designed to counteract secular pressures in the traditional video market and combat escalating competition in its core broadband segment from fiber overbuilders and 5G Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) providers.

The recently announced merger with Cox Communications represents a transformative catalyst for Charter. If approved, the transaction promises to create the nation’s largest broadband provider, delivering significant scale advantages in programming, marketing, and network technology. However, it also introduces substantial integration risks and will require significant management focus to realize projected synergies.

Financially, Charter is navigating a period of peak capital intensity. Aggressive investments in its network evolution to DOCSIS 4.0, a multi-billion-dollar rural expansion initiative, and the buildout of its own mobile network infrastructure are temporarily suppressing free cash flow. These expenditures are deemed strategically necessary to fortify the company’s long-term competitive posture. While subscriber trends in the core broadband product remain challenged, the explosive growth in mobile and a marked stabilization in video customer losses demonstrate early validation of the company’s bundling strategy.

Ultimately, Charter’s future performance and its ability to create shareholder value will be contingent on a distinct set of factors: the successful and timely integration of Cox Communications; the ability to leverage its mobile and revamped video offerings to return the core broadband segment to sustainable positive growth; and the disciplined execution of its capital expenditure program to transition from a period of peak investment to one of robust free cash flow generation.

U.S. Telecommunications Landscape: A Sector in Transformation

To accurately assess Charter Communications, one must first understand the macroeconomic and industry-specific context in which it operates. The U.S. telecommunications market is undergoing a fundamental reshaping, driven by powerful crosscurrents of technological disruption, evolving consumer preferences, and a fluid regulatory environment. These forces are simultaneously creating new avenues for growth and posing existential threats to legacy business models.

Market Dynamics & Growth Trajectory

The U.S. Telecom market remains a vast and essential component of the economy. It is a mature sector but continues to exhibit modest growth, with its size estimated at approximately $459 billion in 2025 and projected to expand to $550 billion by 2030, representing a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.67%.¹ The broader global Internet Services market, of which broadband is a key component, is forecast to grow at a more robust CAGR of 8.2% through 2030, highlighting the increasing centrality of connectivity.²

However, this top-line growth masks significant underlying pressures. Global telecom service revenue growth is projected to slow to a mere 2.9% CAGR through 2028, a rate that trails projected inflation.³ This indicates severe commoditization pressure, particularly in core connectivity services, which forces providers to constantly innovate and seek new sources of value to protect margins. The primary drivers of market expansion are the continued deployment of 5G networks, an insatiable consumer appetite for data—with average monthly consumption per smartphone projected to reach 12.5 GB in 2024—and substantial government investment in digital infrastructure, most notably the $65 billion allocated through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) to close the digital divide.⁴

The Triad of Disruption: Cord-Cutting, Fiber Overbuild, and 5G FWA

Charter and its cable peers are contending with three powerful, simultaneous disruptive forces that are fundamentally altering the competitive dynamics of their core broadband and video businesses.

The Secular Decline of Traditional Video (Cord-Cutting)

The erosion of the traditional pay-TV model is an entrenched, long-term trend that continues to accelerate. The number of U.S. households subscribing to cable TV has collapsed from a peak of 105 million in 2010 to an estimated 68.7 million in 2025.⁶ This has pushed the cable TV penetration rate down from a high of 88% to below 50% of households over the same period.⁷ Projections suggest this trend will continue unabated, with the number of cord-cutting households (80.7 million) expected to significantly surpass traditional pay-TV households (54.3 million) by 2026.⁸

The principal catalyst for this mass migration is economic. Over 86% of consumers who have “cut the cord” cite the high price of traditional cable bundles as their primary motivation.⁷ The proliferation of lower-cost, flexible, and content-rich streaming services has provided a compelling alternative. This shift in consumption was starkly illustrated in July 2022, when streaming viewership surpassed cable TV viewership for the first time, a milestone that cemented the new media hierarchy.⁶

Faced with a consistent, high-single-digit annual decline in cable subscribers and a corresponding 9.9% year-over-year drop in its own video revenue in Q2 2025, Charter’s strategy has evolved.⁶ The company’s recent agreements to bundle premier streaming services like Hulu and Disney+ into its Spectrum TV packages, often at no additional cost, represent a fundamental strategic pivot.¹⁰ As articulated by CEO Chris Winfrey, the objective is to transform the video product into a “competitive advantage for our Internet and mobile sales”.¹² This approach effectively signals a move to sacrifice video-specific margins and average revenue per user (ARPU) to enhance the overall value proposition of the connectivity bundle. In this new paradigm, video is no longer a primary profit center but a strategic tool for customer retention and a defensive moat around the high-margin broadband business.

The Competitive Threat of Fiber Overbuild

For years, cable operators like Charter enjoyed a near-monopolistic position in providing high-speed internet across much of their footprint. That era has definitively ended with the aggressive expansion of Fiber-to-the-Home (FTTH) networks by telecommunications companies and new entrants. As of the end of 2024, FTTH infrastructure is now accessible to nearly 80 million U.S. homes, covering more than half of all residences in the country. This represents a dramatic buildout from just 60 million homes passed in 2022.¹³ This rapid deployment has been significantly accelerated by federal and state government subsidies, chiefly the $42.5 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program, which prioritizes fiber projects.⁴

Fiber has established itself as the premier broadband technology in the minds of consumers and in the marketplace. It is now the largest broadband segment by revenue, commanding a 36.82% market share in 2024.¹⁵ Market studies consistently show that in areas where consumers have a choice between fiber and traditional hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC) cable, fiber is winning the majority of new subscribers and is a primary driver of churn away from cable providers.¹⁴ The competitive landscape is becoming increasingly dense, with the percentage of U.S. homes having access to two or more competing FTTH providers nearly doubling from approximately 4% in 2022 to 7% in 2023.¹³

This direct technological challenge from fiber is the primary impetus for Charter’s massive, multi-billion-dollar capital investment in its network evolution. The company’s strategic plan to upgrade its entire HFC plant to DOCSIS 4.0, a technology that promises to deliver multi-gigabit symmetrical download and upload speeds, is a direct and necessary competitive response.¹² With Charter currently experiencing net losses in broadband subscribers, this upgrade is not optional; it is a fundamental requirement to achieve technological parity with fiber and defend its most profitable business segment from further erosion.¹⁷

The Rise of 5G Fixed Wireless Access (FWA)

Perhaps the most disruptive competitive force to emerge in recent years is 5G Fixed Wireless Access. Initially dismissed by some industry observers as a niche or rural-only solution, FWA has rapidly scaled into a mainstream competitor. By 2025, FWA service has achieved a 12% penetration rate among U.S. households, a threefold increase since 2023, with the subscriber base growing by 47% in the last year alone to reach nearly 12 million homes.¹⁸

Crucially, FWA is not just competing on price; it is winning on customer satisfaction. Respected industry benchmarks from J.D. Power and the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) show that FWA offerings from T-Mobile and Verizon are tying with or even surpassing the satisfaction scores of both fiber and cable internet providers.¹⁸ This high level of customer approval has translated into staggering market share gains. In 2023, FWA providers added 34 times more net subscribers per quarter than the entire cable industry combined, a clear indicator of its disruptive power.²³

The success of FWA challenges the long-held industry assumption that wireline networks possess an unassailable advantage in speed and reliability. It has introduced a formidable third competitor into many markets that were previously duopolies between the local cable and telephone company. This new competitive pressure is a primary factor behind the recent broadband subscriber losses reported by Charter and its cable peers, forcing them to compete more aggressively on both price and value.¹⁶ This dynamic further reinforces the strategic importance of Charter’s converged mobile-broadband bundle as a key differentiator.

Regulatory Crosswinds: The Post-Net Neutrality Era and M&A Scrutiny

The regulatory landscape for broadband providers underwent a significant shift in January 2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit struck down the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) 2024 Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet Order.²⁴ The court ruled that the FCC exceeded its statutory authority by attempting to reclassify broadband internet as a Title II “telecommunications service,” which would have subjected it to common-carrier utility-style regulation.²⁶

This decision effectively eliminates federal-level net neutrality rules, which prohibited internet service providers (ISPs) from blocking, throttling, or creating paid “fast lanes” for internet traffic.²⁷ For Charter, this ruling is a near-term positive, as it removes a significant layer of regulatory overhang and reduces compliance costs. It provides the company with greater flexibility in network management and the potential to develop new pricing and service tiers. However, it also creates long-term uncertainty. The debate over net neutrality now shifts to the U.S. Congress and individual state legislatures. This could result in a complex and inefficient patchwork of state-level regulations, as states like California already have their own net neutrality laws in place.²⁶

With the net neutrality issue largely settled at the agency level for the time being, the primary regulatory focus for Charter will be the antitrust review of major corporate actions. For the proposed Charter-Cox merger, the consensus among policy analysts is that the deal is likely to receive regulatory approval.²⁹ Because the transaction represents a geographic expansion into non-overlapping markets rather than an in-market consolidation that reduces consumer choice, it is less likely to trigger significant antitrust objections. Nevertheless, the FCC retains broad authority to review transactions for public interest benefits and could impose certain conditions on the deal’s approval, potentially related to non-competition issues or other policy priorities of the current administration.³⁰

Charter Communications: Corporate & Strategic Analysis

Against the backdrop of a rapidly evolving industry, Charter Communications has embarked on a clear and decisive strategic path. The company is leveraging its extensive network assets and established customer relationships to transition its business model, focusing on converged connectivity solutions to drive future growth and enhance shareholder value.

Corporate Profile & Business Segments

Charter Communications, Inc. is one of the largest broadband connectivity companies and cable operators in the United States, conducting business under the consumer-facing brand name Spectrum.³¹ Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, the company serves over 31.2 million residential and business customer relationships (excluding mobile-only customers) across its footprint.¹⁷

The company’s operations are centered around a suite of core services:

• Spectrum Internet: The company’s flagship product, providing high-speed broadband internet access to residential and commercial customers.
• Spectrum TV: A traditional video service offering a wide range of linear channels and on-demand content, which is being evolved to integrate popular streaming applications.³¹
• Spectrum Voice: A landline telephone service providing local and long-distance calling.³¹
• Spectrum Mobile: A mobile service that operates as a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO), utilizing the networks of established wireless carriers to provide cellular service to its customers.³¹
• Spectrum Business: A dedicated division that provides a tailored suite of connectivity and communications solutions for small, medium, and large enterprise customers.³¹

Leadership & Vision: CEO Christopher Winfrey’s Strategic Direction

The architect of Charter’s current strategy is President and CEO Christopher L. Winfrey. Appointed to the role in October 2022, Winfrey has been a long-tenured executive at the company, having served as Chief Financial Officer since 2010. His deep financial expertise and strategic acumen were instrumental during the company’s transformative acquisitions of Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks in 2016, which established Charter as a major industry player.³³

Winfrey’s strategic vision, as clearly articulated in the company’s Q2 2025 earnings conference call, is centered on the concept of “converged connectivity”.⁹ This strategy de-emphasizes the sale of individual products in favor of offering a seamless, integrated bundle of high-speed internet and mobile services. The core tenet of this approach is to provide superior value to the consumer—faster speeds at a better price—thereby increasing customer loyalty and reducing churn. This vision is supported by a commitment to significant, long-term investments in three key areas: network evolution to maintain a technological edge, rural footprint expansion to capture new growth opportunities, and a 100% U.S.-based, employee-focused service model designed to create an unmatched customer experience.¹¹

The Convergence Play: Integrating Mobile and Broadband

The centerpiece of Charter’s growth strategy is Spectrum Mobile. The company has established itself as the fastest-growing mobile provider in the United States, a remarkable achievement for a relative newcomer to the wireless market. In the second quarter of 2025, Charter added another 500,000 mobile lines, bringing its total to 10.9 million. This represents a year-over-year growth rate of nearly 25%.¹²

The strategic importance of the mobile business extends far beyond the direct revenue it generates, which itself saw robust growth of 24.9% year-over-year.¹⁷ The primary function of Spectrum Mobile is to serve as a powerful retention tool for the company’s core, high-margin internet product. By bundling attractively priced mobile service with broadband, Charter creates a “stickier” customer relationship. The economic incentive to remain a Spectrum customer increases, and as a result, customers who subscribe to these converged bundles exhibit demonstrably lower churn rates.¹²

Charter’s mobile service operates on an MVNO model, which means it does not own a nationwide cellular network. Instead, it leases network access from established carriers. Historically, this has been an exclusive relationship with Verizon. More recently, Charter announced a multi-year agreement with T-Mobile to provide 5G network access for its business customers, a move that provides strategic flexibility and enhances its offerings in the commercial segment.¹⁰

This mobile strategy represents a masterful leveraging of an existing asset—the broadband customer relationship—to successfully penetrate a new market with a highly compelling value proposition. The financial trajectory of the mobile business is equally significant. After years of being a drag on cash flow due to startup costs and device subsidies, management has confirmed that the mobile segment, measured as EBITDA less capital expenditures, is now cash-flow positive.¹² This transition marks a critical turning point, establishing mobile as a “real tailwind” to overall free cash flow growth and providing a vital second engine of growth for the company as the broadband market matures and competition intensifies.

Network Evolution and Rural Expansion Initiatives

Charter is currently in the midst of a peak capital investment cycle, with projected capital expenditures of approximately $11.5 billion for 2025.¹² This massive spending program is allocated across three distinct but complementary strategic initiatives designed to secure the company’s long-term competitive position.

First is the comprehensive Network Evolution project. This is a multi-stage, multi-year upgrade of Charter’s existing HFC plant to the next-generation DOCSIS 4.0 standard. This upgrade is critical as it will enable the network to deliver multi-gigabit symmetrical speeds, effectively matching the performance capabilities of competing fiber networks and neutralizing a key marketing advantage of fiber providers.¹²

Second is the Rural Construction Initiative. This is an offensive growth strategy involving a multi-billion-dollar investment to build out over 100,000 miles of new fiber-optic infrastructure. The goal is to deliver gigabit-speed internet access to more than 1.7 million currently unserved or underserved homes and businesses, primarily in rural areas.¹¹ This initiative allows Charter to enter new, non-competitive markets to find pockets of subscriber growth, often with the support of government subsidies that improve the return on investment.

Third is the buildout of Mobile Infrastructure. Charter is actively deploying Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) small cells in strategic locations throughout its footprint. This initiative is part of a long-term plan to transition from a pure MVNO to a “Hybrid Mobile Network Operator” (HMNO).¹² By building its own targeted wireless infrastructure in high-traffic areas, Charter can offload a greater percentage of its mobile data traffic from its MVNO partners’ networks onto its own. While this requires upfront capital, it significantly improves the long-term economics and margins of the mobile business by reducing wholesale payments to Verizon and T-Mobile.

This three-pronged investment strategy demonstrates a balanced approach. The network evolution is a defensive necessity to protect the core business. The rural buildout is an offensive search for new growth. The mobile infrastructure investment is a strategic move to enhance the profitability of its fastest-growing segment. While this period of elevated spending is depressing near-term free cash flow, it represents a calculated investment in a more defensible, technologically advanced, and profitable long-term future.

Operational & Financial Performance Deep Dive (Q2 2025)

A granular analysis of Charter’s most recent quarterly results provides critical insight into the efficacy of its corporate strategy. The key performance indicators from the second quarter of 2025 reveal a company in transition, with strong momentum in its growth initiatives helping to offset persistent pressures in its legacy and core businesses.

Subscriber Dynamics: A Segment-by-Segment Analysis

The subscriber metrics for the quarter ending June 30, 2025, clearly illustrate the ongoing strategic shift within Charter’s business mix.

• Internet: The company reported a net loss of 117,000 residential and small business internet customers. While this represents an improvement from the 149,000 customers lost in the same quarter of the prior year, the comparison is not straightforward. The Q2 2024 figure was negatively impacted by an estimated 50,000 customer disconnects directly related to the termination of the federal government’s Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) subsidies.⁹ Adjusting for this one-time event suggests that the underlying trend of subscriber losses in the core broadband segment remains a significant challenge. As of the end of the quarter, Charter served a total of 29.9 million internet customers.¹⁷
• Mobile: The mobile segment continued to be the standout performer. Charter added a robust 500,000 new Spectrum Mobile lines during the quarter. Although this was slightly below the 557,000 lines added in Q2 2024, it brought the total mobile subscriber base to 10.9 million, a substantial increase of nearly 24% year-over-year.⁹ This sustained, high-velocity growth underscores the success of the company’s converged offering.
• Video: The video segment delivered a surprisingly positive result. Charter lost only 80,000 total video customers, a dramatic fivefold improvement compared to the loss of 408,000 customers in the prior-year period.⁹ Management attributed this significant stabilization to the successful rollout of new, simplified pricing and packaging in late 2024 and the early benefits from integrating major programmers’ streaming applications directly into its video bundles.¹⁷

These subscriber figures collectively paint a vivid picture of Charter’s strategic realignment. The core broadband product, the primary profit engine of the company, is under significant pressure from intensified competition and the loss of government subsidies. The mobile product has unequivocally become the primary driver of customer relationship growth. Meanwhile, the strategic changes to the video product appear to be successfully stemming the tide of cord-cutting, transforming what was a major liability into a more stable, albeit low-growth, component of the overall bundle. The central question arising from these trends is whether the powerful momentum in mobile and the newfound stability in video can ultimately be leveraged to reverse the negative trajectory in the crucial broadband segment.

Financial Health Assessment: Revenue, Profitability, and Margin Analysis

Charter’s consolidated financial results for the second quarter reflected the countervailing forces of its business segments, resulting in relatively flat overall performance.

• Total Revenue: Total revenues for the quarter increased by a modest 0.6% year-over-year, reaching $13.8 billion.¹⁷
• Revenue Mix: The composition of this revenue reveals the underlying strategic shift. Growth was propelled by a 24.9% surge in Residential Mobile Service revenue and a 2.8% increase in Residential Internet revenue. This growth was almost entirely offset by a steep 9.9% decline in high-margin Video revenue, a direct consequence of the ongoing trend of cord-cutting.⁹ This mix shift—substituting lower-margin mobile revenue for higher-margin video revenue—presents a challenge for overall profitability.
• Profitability: Despite the challenging revenue mix, Charter demonstrated effective cost management. Net Income attributable to shareholders increased by 5.7% to $1.3 billion. Adjusted EBITDA, a key measure of operating profitability, grew by 0.5% to $5.7 billion. Critically, the company was able to maintain its Adjusted EBITDA margin, which remained flat year-over-year at a healthy 41.4%.¹⁷

The flat top-line and EBITDA growth highlight the central financial challenge Charter currently faces. The company is successfully growing its mobile business, but this growth is not yet substantial enough to fully offset the decline in its legacy video business and the competitive pressures on broadband. Maintaining stable margins in such a transitional environment is a notable operational achievement, but it also underscores the difficulty of accelerating overall profit growth until the strategic initiatives reach greater scale.

Capital Allocation & Cash Flow

Charter’s capital allocation strategy in the second quarter was characterized by continued heavy investment in its network and a commitment to returning capital to shareholders.

• Capital Expenditures: Capital expenditures for the quarter totaled $2.9 billion, which was roughly flat compared to the prior year. A significant portion of this spending, $1.0 billion, was specifically directed toward line extensions as part of the company’s rural buildout initiative.¹⁷ In a notable update, management revised its full-year 2025 capital expenditure guidance downward from $12.0 billion to approximately $11.5 billion, citing shifts in the timing of network evolution spending and lower-than-anticipated line extension costs.¹²
• Free Cash Flow (FCF): Free cash flow, a critical measure of a company’s financial health, decreased to $1.0 billion for the quarter, down from $1.3 billion in Q2 2024. The company attributed this decline to three primary factors: an unfavorable change in working capital related to the financing of mobile devices, and the specific timing of cash tax and cash interest payments during the quarter.¹⁷
• Shareholder Returns: Charter remained committed to its shareholder return program, repurchasing 4.5 million shares of its Class A common stock for a total of $1.7 billion during the quarter.¹⁷

The decline in free cash flow, even with stable EBITDA, underscores the highly cash-intensive nature of Charter’s current strategic phase. The rapidly growing mobile business, while now a positive contributor to EBITDA, requires substantial working capital to finance customer handset purchases. This, combined with the massive capital expenditure program for network upgrades and rural expansion, places significant demands on the company’s cash generation. However, a significant positive development has emerged on the fiscal front. Recent federal tax legislation, which restored favorable provisions for bonus depreciation and interest deductibility, is expected to create a substantial cash tax tailwind of approximately $1 billion in 2026.¹² This unexpected benefit will provide crucial additional capital to help fund the company’s strategic investments and support its free cash flow profile.

Balance Sheet Scrutiny: Leverage and Debt Profile

Charter, like most companies in the capital-intensive cable and telecommunications industry, operates with a significant amount of debt on its balance sheet. An analysis of its most recent filings provides a snapshot of its financial leverage.

As of the end of the first quarter of 2025, Charter reported total current liabilities of $13.7 billion against current assets of $5.0 billion. The company’s long-term debt stood at $92.0 billion.³⁶ This leverage is a key component of its capital structure, allowing it to fund its extensive network infrastructure.

The proposed merger with Cox Communications will have a material impact on the company’s debt profile. As part of the transaction, the combined entity will assume approximately $12 billion of Cox’s outstanding debt.³⁴ In anticipation of this, Charter’s management has outlined a clear post-merger leverage strategy. The company will target a net debt-to-EBITDA ratio in the range of 3.5x to 4.0x. Following the close of the transaction, management plans to prioritize deleveraging, with the goal of reducing the leverage ratio to the midpoint of that target range within a two to three-year timeframe.¹² This disciplined approach to leverage will be a key factor for investors to monitor throughout the integration process.

Transformative Catalyst: The Cox Communications Merger

On May 16, 2025, Charter Communications announced a transaction that has the potential to reshape the U.S. broadband landscape. The definitive agreement to acquire Cox Communications is more than a simple acquisition; it is a transformative move designed to significantly enhance Charter’s scale, competitive positioning, and future growth prospects.

Transaction Overview & Strategic Rationale

The deal values Cox Communications at an enterprise value of approximately $34.5 billion, a valuation based on Charter’s own trading multiple of 6.44x its 2025 estimated Adjusted EBITDA.¹⁷ The complex transaction structure will result in Cox’s parent company, Cox Enterprises, becoming a major shareholder in the combined entity, holding an approximate 23% stake.³⁴ Within a year of the deal’s closing, the combined company will adopt the Cox Communications name, a nod to the strong brand equity of the Cox name. However, Charter’s consumer-facing Spectrum brand will be rolled out across the legacy Cox markets to create a unified product and service identity.²⁹

The strategic rationale behind this blockbuster merger is multifaceted and compelling:

• Scale and Market Leadership: The combination will create the undisputed largest broadband provider in the United States. On a pro-forma basis, the new company will have a network that passes 69.5 million homes and businesses and serves 35.9 million broadband subscribers, eclipsing its closest competitor, Comcast.³⁰ This enhanced scale provides significant leverage in negotiations with programmers for video content, with hardware vendors for network equipment and customer premises devices, and potentially with MVNO partners for wireless network access.
• Footprint Expansion and Efficiency: The merger is a geographic expansion, not an in-market consolidation. Charter will gain entry into several key, high-growth markets where it currently has no presence, including Phoenix and Las Vegas. It also adds states like Virginia, Kansas, and Oklahoma that are adjacent to Charter’s existing footprint, creating a more contiguous and operationally efficient 46-state network.²⁹
• Enhanced Runway for Mobile Growth: Perhaps the most significant strategic benefit is the creation of a vast new territory to deploy Charter’s highly successful Spectrum Mobile strategy. Cox Communications has been a late entrant into the mobile market and has only approximately 200,000 mobile customers within its base of over 6 million customer relationships.²⁹ This represents a massive, untapped cross-selling opportunity for Charter to rapidly grow its mobile subscriber base by introducing the Spectrum One converged bundle to millions of new households.
• Synergies: The merger is expected to generate significant financial and operational synergies. Cost synergies will be realized through the elimination of duplicative corporate overhead and the application of economies of scale in marketing, programming, and procurement. Revenue synergies are anticipated from the aggressive cross-selling of Spectrum Mobile and the deployment of Charter’s proven pricing and packaging strategies across the Cox footprint.³⁴ Furthermore, analysts expect that Cox’s mobile customers can be migrated to Charter’s more advantageous MVNO agreement, leading to improved mobile segment margins.³⁰

Pro-Forma Market Position and Competitive Implications

The creation of a significantly larger Charter will have profound implications for the competitive dynamics of the U.S. telecommunications industry. The deal solidifies the cable industry’s position as it contends with the national scale of its primary competitors: the major telecommunications companies (AT&T, Verizon) and the wireless giant (T-Mobile), all of whom are aggressively competing in the broadband market with their fiber and FWA products.

The transaction effectively establishes a duopoly at the top of the U.S. cable and broadband market, with the newly enlarged Charter and Comcast controlling a substantial majority of the market share.³⁷ While this concentration of market power will undoubtedly attract close regulatory scrutiny, it could also lead to a more rational competitive environment between the two largest players.

This merger is both a defensive and an offensive maneuver. Defensively, it provides Charter with the increased scale and financial firepower necessary to better withstand the competitive onslaught from telco fiber overbuilds and the rapid growth of FWA. Offensively, it hands the company a large, fertile new territory in the Cox footprint, which is significantly underpenetrated in mobile. This provides a clear and immediate path to deploy its most successful growth strategy—the converged mobile and broadband bundle—to a new and substantial customer base. The acquisition is not merely about getting bigger; it is about acquiring the ideal platform to accelerate its most promising growth initiative.

Synergies and Integration Risks

While the strategic logic of the merger is compelling, its ultimate success will hinge on the effective realization of synergies and the mitigation of significant integration risks.

On the synergy front, in addition to the expected cost and revenue benefits, there are also potential long-term network efficiencies. Cox has already completed a “mid-split” upgrade across much of its network, which enhances upload speeds and provides a foundation for future upgrades.²⁹ This means that the eventual cost for the combined company to upgrade the Cox footprint to the full DOCSIS 4.0 standard will likely be lower and can be executed on a more deliberate timeline, allowing for better alignment of back-office systems and pricing strategies before undertaking the major network investment.²⁹

However, the risks associated with a merger of this scale are substantial. Integrating two large, complex organizations with distinct corporate cultures, IT systems, and operational processes is a monumental task. Any missteps in the integration process could lead to customer service disruptions, employee attrition, and a failure to achieve projected synergies. The regulatory approval process, while expected to be successful, is not without risk. As noted, the FCC could impose operational or financial conditions on the deal that could diminish its value.³⁰ Finally, undertaking this massive integration effort at the same time that the company is navigating a period of peak capital expenditure and facing the most intense competitive environment in its history will place enormous strain on management’s execution capabilities.

Competitive Arena & Peer Benchmarking

Charter Communications operates in a fiercely competitive environment, facing threats from a diverse set of well-capitalized rivals. A comparative analysis of Charter against its key peers in the cable, telecommunications, and wireless sectors is essential to contextualize its performance, strategy, and market valuation.

The Cable Duopoly: Charter vs. Comcast

Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is Charter’s most direct and analogous competitor. Both companies share a similar business model, centered on a high-speed HFC network, and face nearly identical strategic challenges from cord-cutting, fiber overbuild, and FWA competition. Prior to the Cox merger, the two companies were of roughly equal size. Post-merger, Charter is poised to become the larger of the two in terms of broadband subscribers, with a projected 35.9 million compared to Comcast’s 32.2 million.³⁰ Both companies are pursuing a nearly identical convergence strategy, leveraging an MVNO model to bundle mobile service with broadband to reduce churn and enhance customer value. In recent quarters, both have experienced net losses in broadband subscribers, though Comcast’s losses have been more pronounced, suggesting Charter’s operational execution may be slightly stronger in the current environment.³⁰

The Telco Challengers: AT&T and Verizon

AT&T (T) and Verizon Communications (VZ) represent Charter’s primary wireline and wireless competition. Their primary weapon in the wireline space is their extensive and expanding fiber-optic networks. AT&T Fiber, in particular, has established itself as a market leader, consistently ranking at the top of ISP customer satisfaction surveys and aggressively expanding its footprint to pass more than 30 million locations.²² This direct fiber competition is a major source of pressure on Charter’s broadband subscriber base.

Simultaneously, both AT&T and Verizon are leveraging their vast 5G wireless networks to compete directly for home internet customers via their FWA products. These services have proven to be highly popular with consumers, gaining significant market share and earning high marks for customer satisfaction.¹⁸ Unlike the cable companies, AT&T and Verizon are highly diversified, with their massive mobile businesses serving as their primary profit centers.

The Wireless Disruptor: T-Mobile

T-Mobile (TMUS) has emerged as a formidable and disruptive force in the U.S. telecommunications market. Following its acquisition of Sprint, T-Mobile is the market share leader in the U.S. mobile industry.⁴² More importantly for Charter, T-Mobile has been the most aggressive and successful provider of 5G FWA. Its T-Mobile 5G Home Internet service now covers an estimated 64% of U.S. households and, remarkably, ties with AT&T Fiber for first place in ACSI’s customer satisfaction rankings for ISPs.¹⁸ The rapid uptake of T-Mobile’s FWA service has been a primary driver of the competitive pressure and subscriber losses experienced by Charter and the broader cable industry. The recent strategic agreement for Charter to utilize T-Mobile’s network for its business mobile services creates a complex “frenemy” dynamic, where the two companies are simultaneously partners and fierce competitors.¹⁰

Table 1: Peer Valuation Multiples

The following table provides a comparative snapshot of how the market values Charter relative to its key peers, based on standard valuation multiples. These ratios offer insight into market expectations for growth, profitability, and risk.

Company	Ticker	Market Cap (USD)	Enterprise Value (EV) (USD)	EV/Revenue (LTM)	EV/EBITDA (LTM)	P/E Ratio (LTM)
Charter Communications	CHTR	$52.8B	$156.6B	2.8x	7.0x (est.)	9.0x (est.)
Comcast Corporation	CMCSA	$124.9B	$215.3B	1.8x	5.6x	10.0x (est.)
AT&T Inc.	T	$197.0B	$334.7B	2.9x	7.9x	16.8x
Verizon Communications	VZ	$179.1B	$345.5B	2.6x	7.0x	10.1x
T-Mobile US	TMUS	$258.9B	$362.7B	4.3x (est.)	9.0x (est.)	22.7x

Note: Data compiled from multiple sources and may reflect slight variations based on measurement dates. LTM refers to Last Twelve Months. Estimated values are derived from provided data points where direct figures were not available.

Sources: 43

Table 2: Capital Efficiency Comparison (ROIC vs. WACC)

This table assesses a critical aspect of long-term value creation: capital efficiency. It compares each company’s Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) with its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC). A positive spread (ROIC > WACC) indicates that the company is generating returns that exceed its cost of capital, thereby creating economic value.

Company	Ticker	ROIC (TTM)	WACC	ROIC – WACC Spread
Charter Communications	CHTR	7.11%	6.62%	+0.49%
Comcast Corporation	CMCSA	8.49%	N/A	N/A
Verizon Communications	VZ	5.99%	4.95%	+1.04%
T-Mobile US	TMUS	6.79%	N/A	N/A

Note: WACC data was not available for all peers in the provided materials. ROIC is calculated using Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) income statement data.

Sources: 55

The data indicates that Charter is currently generating returns slightly in excess of its cost of capital, suggesting it is creating a modest amount of economic value. Its ROIC is comparable to that of T-Mobile but lags behind Comcast. Verizon, despite facing its own challenges, appears to have a more favorable spread between its return on capital and its cost of capital. This analysis highlights the importance for Charter to improve its capital efficiency as it deploys billions in new investments.

Concluding Analysis: Key Factors for Future Performance

The comprehensive analysis of Charter Communications reveals a company in the midst of a strategic, operational, and financial transformation. It is proactively reshaping its business to compete in a new era of converged connectivity, but this transition entails significant challenges and execution risks. The company’s future trajectory will be determined by its ability to successfully navigate a complex set of internal and external factors.

Synthesis of Strengths and Vulnerabilities

A balanced assessment of Charter’s current position highlights a distinct set of core strengths and notable vulnerabilities.

Strengths:

• Extensive, High-Quality Network: Charter possesses a vast and robust HFC network that passes millions of homes and businesses. Critically, this network has a clear and technologically viable upgrade path to DOCSIS 4.0, which will allow the company to offer multi-gigabit symmetrical speeds and maintain competitive parity with fiber networks.¹²
• Proven Mobile Growth Engine: The Spectrum Mobile business is a resounding success. It is the fastest-growing mobile provider in the country, has achieved profitability on a cash flow basis, and serves as a powerful tool for bundling, customer retention, and value creation.¹²
• Enhanced Scale Post-Merger: The pending acquisition of Cox Communications will transform Charter into the nation’s largest broadband provider. This enhanced scale will provide significant advantages in negotiations with suppliers and programmers, as well as greater efficiencies in marketing and operations.³⁰
• Experienced Management and Operational Playbook: The company is led by a seasoned management team with a proven track record of operational excellence and successful large-scale integration, as demonstrated by the Time Warner Cable acquisition.³³

Vulnerabilities:

• Challenged Broadband Subscriber Trends: The core, high-margin broadband business is facing significant headwinds, resulting in stagnant to declining subscriber numbers. This is a direct result of the intense competitive pressure from both fiber and FWA providers.¹⁷
• Secular Decline in Legacy Video: The traditional video business, while recently stabilized, remains in a state of long-term secular decline. The erosion of this historically high-margin revenue stream creates a persistent drag on overall financial performance.⁹
• Intensifying Competitive Environment: Charter faces a formidable array of well-capitalized competitors. It is simultaneously fighting a technology-based battle against fiber overbuilders and a price-and-value battle against FWA providers, leaving little room for error.¹⁶
• High Leverage and Capital Intensity: The company operates with a significant debt load and is currently in a peak investment cycle that is consuming a substantial amount of cash flow. This financial structure, while common in the industry, reduces flexibility and amplifies the risks associated with any operational missteps.¹⁷

Critical Success Factors for Long-Term Value Creation

Looking forward, the investment case for Charter Communications hinges on management’s ability to successfully execute on four critical success factors. These are the key variables that will determine whether the company’s current strategy translates into sustainable growth and long-term value creation.

1. Successful Integration of Cox Communications: This is the most important and immediate catalyst. The ability to seamlessly integrate Cox’s operations, network, and customer base is paramount. A successful integration will unlock the projected synergies, provide the anticipated platform for mobile growth, and validate the strategic rationale of the deal. A fumbled execution could lead to customer disruption, prolonged operational inefficiencies, and a failure to realize the merger’s full potential.
2. Returning the Broadband Segment to Growth: The ultimate litmus test for Charter’s convergence strategy will be its ability to reverse the negative trend in broadband subscribers. The company is betting that the compelling value proposition of its Spectrum One bundle—which combines high-speed internet with attractively priced mobile service and a revamped video offering—can successfully defend against churn and attract new customers in the face of relentless competition from fiber and FWA. Sustained net losses in broadband would undermine the entire investment thesis.
3. Disciplined Navigation of the Peak CapEx Cycle: Management must execute its complex and expensive network evolution and rural buildout programs on time and on budget. The market has priced in the expectation that 2025 will represent the peak year for capital intensity, after which spending will decline as a percentage of revenue.¹² A return to a lower level of capital expenditure is the primary driver for unlocking the significant free cash flow growth potential that underpins the long-term value of the company.
4. Maintaining Pricing Discipline and ARPU Growth: In an increasingly commoditized and competitive market, Charter’s ability to maintain rational pricing and continue to grow ARPU in its core broadband segment is crucial. This pricing power is necessary to offset inflationary cost pressures, fund the ongoing network investments, and protect profit margins. The intensity of competition from lower-priced FWA alternatives will severely test this discipline.

Works cited

1. US Telecom Industry Analysis | Growth Forecast, Market Size …, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/united-states-telecom-market
2. Internet Services Market and Companies Analysis Report 2025-2030 – GlobeNewswire, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/04/24/3067553/28124/en/Internet-Services-Market-and-Companies-Analysis-Report-2025-2030-Fiber-Optics-Wireless-Satellite-Cable-and-Digital-Subscriber-Line-DSL-Market-Shares-by-End-Use-and-Region.html
3. Perspectives from the Global Telecom Outlook 2024-2028 – PwC, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/tmt/telecom-outlook-perspectives.html
4. US Broadband Infrastructure | ASCE, accessed July 31, 2025, https://infrastructurereportcard.org/cat-item/broadband-infrastructure/
5. USA Telecommunication Market Demand Forecast and Consumer Trends 2028, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.kenresearch.com/industry-reports/usa-telecommunication-market
6. Cable TV Statistics (2025) – Subscribers & Streaming Data – Evoca TV, accessed July 31, 2025, https://evoca.tv/cable-tv-statistics/
7. U.S. Cable TV Subscribers 2025: Ongoing Decline & Cord-Cutting Trends, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.cablecompare.com/blog/us-cable-subscriber-statistics
8. Cord Cutting Statistics 2025 – Market Trends & Latest Data – Evoca TV, accessed July 31, 2025, https://evoca.tv/cord-cutting-statistics/
9. Charter Announces Second Quarter 2025 Results, accessed July 31, 2025, https://ir.charter.com/static-files/f6defba4-4e2e-4a6a-bc09-b42873312c4f
10. Charter Communications – Investor Relation – Spectrum, accessed July 31, 2025, https://ir.charter.com/
11. Charter Communications: Providing Seamless Connectivity, accessed July 31, 2025, https://corporate.charter.com/
12. Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) Q2 2025 Earnings Call …, accessed July 31, 2025, https://seekingalpha.com/article/4804537-charter-communications-inc-chtr-q2-2025-earnings-call-transcript
13. How US FTTH providers can navigate an evolving market | EY – US, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.ey.com/en_us/insights/telecommunications/how-us-ftth-providers-can-navigate-an-evolving-market
14. The Status of Fiber Deployment in the US: 2024 Update – NetPMD, accessed July 31, 2025, https://netpmd.com/the-status-of-fiber-deployment-in-the-us/
15. The United States Broadband Services Market Size & Outlook, 2030 – Grand View Research, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.grandviewresearch.com/horizon/outlook/broadband-services-market/united-states
16. Fiber broadband providers passed 10.3M U.S. homes in 2024 – Lightwave Online, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.lightwaveonline.com/home/article/55265098/fiber-broadband-surpasses-103m-homes-in-2024
17. Charter Announces Second Quarter 2025 Results | Charter, accessed July 31, 2025, https://corporate.charter.com/newsroom/charter-announces-second-quarter-2025-results
18. 5G Internet Is Beating Fiber in Customer Satisfaction: Here’s Why 5G …, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.cnet.com/home/internet/5g-internet-is-beating-fiber-in-customer-satisfaction-heres-why-5g-might-be-here-to-stay/
19. Report: High satisfaction for home 5G in US | Advanced Television, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.advanced-television.com/2025/04/29/report-high-satisfaction-for-home-5g-in-us/
20. As Penetration of 5G Home Internet Service Grows Among U.S. Households, New Horowitz Study Shows High Satisfaction – HispanicAd.com, accessed July 31, 2025, https://hispanicad.com/news/as-penetration-of-5g-home-internet-service-grows-among-u-s-households-new-horowitz-study-shows-high-satisfaction/
21. As Penetration of 5G Home Internet Service Grows Among U.S. Households, New Horowitz Study Shows High Satisfaction, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.horowitzresearch.com/all/penetration-of-5g-home-internet-service-grows-among-u-s-households/
22. Press Release Telecommunications Study 2024 – The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI), accessed July 31, 2025, https://theacsi.org/news-and-resources/press-releases/2024/06/04/press-release-telecommunications-study-2024/
23. 5G Home Broadband Continues to Bring Real Competition to Cable – CTIA, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.ctia.org/news/5g-home-broadband-continues-to-bring-real-competition-to-cable
24. Sixth Circuit Strikes Down FCC Net Neutrality Rules | Inside Global Tech, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.insideglobaltech.com/2025/01/06/sixth-circuit-strikes-down-fcc-net-neutrality-rules/
25. The Uncertain Future of Net Neutrality and Internet Regulation – Pryor Cashman LLP, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.pryorcashman.com/publications/the-uncertain-future-of-net-neutrality-and-internet-regulation
26. The Latest on Net Neutrality – Where Are We In 2025 – BroadbandSearch, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.broadbandsearch.net/blog/net-neutrality
27. Net Neutrality: What You Need to Know Now | Free Press, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.freepress.net/issues/free-open-internet/net-neutrality/net-neutrality-what-you-need-know-now
28. Net neutrality in the United States – Wikipedia, accessed July 31, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality_in_the_United_States
29. Charter is acquiring Cox for $34.5B: What you need to know, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.fierce-network.com/broadband/charter-acquiring-cox-345b-what-you-need-know
30. Charter-Cox Merger Provides Convergence Runway – Broadband Breakfast, accessed July 31, 2025, https://broadbandbreakfast.com/charter-cox-merger-provides-convergence-runway/
31. Charter Communications (CHTR) Investor Relations Material – Quartr, accessed July 31, 2025, https://quartr.com/companies/charter-communications-inc_5218
32. Charter Communications Inc. – AnnualReports.com, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/Company/charter-communications-inc
33. CHTR Investor Relations – Charter Communications Inc – Alpha Spread, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nasdaq/chtr/investor-relations
34. Charter & Cox Announce Definitive Agreement to Combine Companies, accessed July 31, 2025, https://corporate.charter.com/newsroom/charter-communications-and-cox-communications-announce-definitive-agreement-to-combine-companies
35. Charter Communications stock price target lowered to $355 at UBS on broadband weakness, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/analyst-ratings/charter-communications-stock-price-target-lowered-to-355-at-ubs-on-broadband-weakness-93CH-4155632
36. Form 10-Q for Charter Communications INC MO filed 04/25/2025, accessed July 31, 2025, https://ir.charter.com/static-files/28f143f4-4a78-4fd7-a39d-672b6b8e6dfc
37. Charter and Cox merger: how partners must prepare for further US telco/cableco consolidation – Canalys, accessed July 31, 2025, https://canalys.com/insights/charter-cox-merger-partners-telco-cableco-consolidation
38. Charter and Cox to merge in blockbuster $34.5 billion cable deal – CBS News, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/charter-cox-merger-cable/
39. Charter Communications and Cox Communications to Merge – Telecompetitor, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.telecompetitor.com/charter-communications-and-cox-communications-to-merge/
40. Form 10-K for Comcast Corp filed 02/03/2023 – Annual Reports, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/c/NASDAQ_CMCSA_2022.pdf
41. Investor Relations | AT&T, accessed July 31, 2025, https://investors.att.com/
42. Mobile Market Overview: Still Buoyant Into 2025 – TeleGeography Blog, accessed July 31, 2025, https://blog.telegeography.com/2025-mobile-market-summary
43. CHTR Intrinsic Valuation and Fundamental Analysis – Charter Communications Inc – Alpha Spread, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nasdaq/chtr/summary
44. Charter Communications Enterprise Value Insights – YCharts, accessed July 31, 2025, https://ycharts.com/companies/CHTR/enterprise_value
45. EV / Revenue For Charter Communications Inc (CHTR) – Finbox, accessed July 31, 2025, https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:CHTR/explorer/ev_to_revenue_ltm/
46. EV / EBITDA For Comcast Corp (CMCSA) – Finbox, accessed July 31, 2025, https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:CMCS.A/explorer/ev_to_ebitda_ltm/
47. EV / Revenue For Comcast Corp (CMCSA) – Finbox, accessed July 31, 2025, https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:CMCS.A/explorer/ev_to_revenue_ltm/
48. Comcast Corp (NASDAQGS:CMCSA) EV / EBITDA – Investing.com, accessed July 31, 2025, https://ng.investing.com/pro/NASDAQGS:CMCSA/explorer/ev_to_ebitda_ltm
49. VZ Relative Valuation – Verizon Communications Inc – Alpha Spread, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nyse/vz/relative-valuation
50. EV / EBITDA For Verizon Communications Inc (VZ) – Finbox, accessed July 31, 2025, https://finbox.com/NYSE:VZ/explorer/ev_to_ebitda_ltm/
51. EV / Revenue For Verizon Communications Inc (VZ) – Finbox, accessed July 31, 2025, https://finbox.com/NYSE:VZ/explorer/ev_to_revenue_ltm/
52. T-Mobile US Inc. (TMUS) Stock Price Today – Value Research, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.valueresearchonline.com/stocks/119038/t-mobile-us-inc-tmus/
53. T-Mobile Earnings Show You Why This Is a Stock to Hold | Nasdaq, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/t-mobile-earnings-show-you-why-stock-hold
54. T-Mobile US Inc Stock Price Today | NASDAQ: TMUS Live – Investing.com, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.investing.com/equities/metropcs-communications
55. Charter Communications (CHTR) Statistics & Valuation – Stock Analysis, accessed July 31, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/chtr/statistics/
56. CHTR (Charter Communications) ROIC % – GuruFocus, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.gurufocus.com/term/roic/CHTR
57. CHTR (Charter Communications) WACC % – GuruFocus, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.gurufocus.com/term/wacc/CHTR
58. Comcast (CMCSA) Statistics & Valuation – Stock Analysis, accessed July 31, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/cmcsa/statistics/
59. CMCSA Overview – Comcast Corporation Stock – Roic AI, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.roic.ai/quote/CMCSA
60. Comcast (CMCSA) Return on Assets (ROA) – Stocks – MLQ.ai, accessed July 31, 2025, https://mlq.ai/stocks/CMCSA/return-on-assets/
61. Return on Invested Capital For Comcast Corp (CMCSA) – Finbox, accessed July 31, 2025, https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:CMCS.A/explorer/roic/
62. VZ (Verizon Communications) ROIC % – GuruFocus, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.gurufocus.com/term/roic/VZ
63. ROIC – Verizon Communications Inc (NYSE:VZ) – Alpha Spread, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nyse/vz/profitability/ratio/return-on-invested-capital
64. Verizon Communications (VZ) Return on Equity (ROE) – MLQ.ai | Stocks, accessed July 31, 2025, https://mlq.ai/stocks/VZ/return-on-equity/
65. T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) ROIC excl. Goodwill annual & quarterly (2005–2024) – Value Sense, accessed July 31, 2025, https://valuesense.io/ticker/tmus/roic-goodwill
66. T-Mobile US – TMUS – Stock Price & News | The Motley Fool, accessed July 31, 2025, https://www.fool.com/quote/nasdaq/tmus/
67. T-Mobile US (TMUS) | Finance information – Stockcircle, accessed July 31, 2025, https://stockcircle.com/stocks/tmus
68. T-Mobile US (TMUS) Financial Ratios – Stock Analysis, accessed July 31, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/tmus/financials/ratios/