I. Executive Summary

The North American automotive dealership industry, a mature and inherently cyclical sector, stands at a critical juncture. It is characterized by a resilient business model underpinned by a formidable regulatory moat, yet it faces profound transformative pressures from aggressive consolidation, evolving consumer behavior, and significant technological disruption. The sector’s primary competitive advantage stems from a deeply entrenched network of state franchise laws that largely prohibit vehicle manufacturers from selling directly to consumers. This legal framework has historically insulated dealers from disintermediation and fostered a stable, albeit fragmented, competitive environment.

The primary bullish thesis for the sector is rooted in the ongoing wave of consolidation. Large, publicly traded dealership groups are leveraging superior access to capital, sophisticated operational platforms, and economies of scale to acquire smaller, independent operators at accretive multiples. This M&A-driven growth is complemented by the dealers’ diversified revenue streams. The highly profitable and less cyclical Parts & Service (P&S) and Finance & Insurance (F&I) segments provide a crucial ballast, generating stable cash flows that mitigate the volatility of new and used vehicle sales, particularly during economic downturns.

Conversely, the bearish perspective is anchored by significant long-term secular threats. The transition to electric vehicles (EVs) poses a fundamental risk to the lucrative P&S business, as EVs require substantially less routine maintenance than their internal combustion engine (ICE) counterparts. Simultaneously, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), inspired by direct-to-consumer (DTC) pioneers like Tesla, continue to invest in digital retail capabilities and experiment with “agency” sales models, which threaten to erode the dealer’s role and profit margins over time. Furthermore, the industry is currently navigating the downswing of a cycle after a period of unprecedented profitability fueled by post-pandemic inventory shortages. The normalization of vehicle supply, coupled with a higher interest rate environment, is exerting sustained pressure on vehicle gross margins and increasing inventory carrying costs.

Ultimately, the investment merits of any publicly traded dealership group will be determined by its strategic and operational execution in this complex environment. The ability to pursue a disciplined acquisition strategy, effectively integrate new stores, and extract synergies will be paramount. Success will also depend on optimizing the high-margin P&S and F&I segments to navigate the challenges and opportunities of the EV transition. Generating robust, through-cycle free cash flow to fund both acquisitive growth and shareholder returns remains the definitive measure of long-term value creation in this evolving sector.

II. Industry Dynamics and Competitive Landscape

An analysis of the North American auto dealership sector requires a foundational understanding of its market structure, the powerful forces driving its evolution, and its inherent sensitivity to the broader economic environment. The industry is a complex ecosystem shaped by regulation, fragmentation, and cyclicality.

A. Market Structure and Economic Moat

The North American automotive market is a cornerstone of the economy. The U.S. auto dealership market alone was valued at approximately $257.30 billion in 2024, with projections indicating a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 4% through 2031.¹ The wider North American automotive market, encompassing manufacturing and related services, was valued at over $535.7 billion in 2023 and is forecast to grow at a 5.0% CAGR.² This data points to a mature and stable, yet slow-growing, end market where significant growth for individual dealership groups must be achieved through market share capture rather than organic market expansion.

The industry’s most potent competitive advantage is not operational but regulatory. In a unique arrangement, all 50 U.S. states have enacted a comprehensive set of franchise laws that meticulously govern the contractual relationship between automotive manufacturers and their dealers.³ These laws serve as a powerful barrier to entry, effectively prohibiting OEMs from selling new vehicles directly to consumers in most jurisdictions. This state-mandated franchise system creates a “narrow economic moat” for dealers by insulating them from direct competition with the very entities that supply their core product.⁵ The system fosters intra-brand price competition—where multiple Ford dealers in a market compete against one another for a customer’s business—which benefits consumers on pricing and financing options.³ For manufacturers, it provides a capital-light distribution and service network, as local dealers have collectively invested over $200 billion in physical infrastructure.³

Despite the presence of large public companies, the dealership landscape remains remarkably fragmented. As of 2024, there are nearly 17,000 franchised light-vehicle dealerships in the United States.⁶ The ten largest dealership groups own a mere 9.3% of these locations, and a staggering 92% of all dealers own between one and five stores.⁷ This high degree of fragmentation provides a long and attractive runway for continued consolidation by larger, well-capitalized public and private entities seeking to gain scale and market share.

B. Consolidation: The Race for Scale and Regional Dominance

The auto dealership industry is in the midst of a transformative consolidation wave, described as a “seismic shift” from historical norms.⁸ Over the past three-and-a-half years, more than 2,000 dealerships have been acquired, a transaction rate nearly double the historical average.⁸ The year 2024 was particularly active, setting a record with 438 completed transactions that involved 510 dealership rooftops.⁹

The strategic impetus behind this M&A frenzy is twofold: the pursuit of regional dominance and the drive for operational efficiency.⁸ By acquiring clusters of stores within a specific geographic market, consolidators can establish significant market power, leading to optimized inventory management, enhanced pricing leverage, and the ability to cross-sell services more effectively. This strategy creates “super-regional” players capable of dictating terms with both suppliers and consumers.⁸ On the efficiency front, scale allows larger groups to centralize back-office functions such as IT, human resources, and marketing, thereby reducing overhead costs. They can also negotiate more favorable terms with vendors and lenders, further enhancing profitability.⁸

The acquirer landscape has shown dynamic shifts. While large public companies like Lithia Motors have historically been aggressive consolidators, their pace tempered in mid-2024 as they shifted focus toward divesting underperforming assets to optimize their portfolios.¹¹ This strategic pause created a significant opportunity for private, family-owned groups, which have emerged as the dominant force in the M&A market. These private buyers now account for nearly half of all buy-sell transactions and acquired 95% of all dealerships sold in 2024.¹⁰ This divergence may suggest a difference in valuation expectations, risk tolerance, or strategic priorities between public and private capital pools. The result of this ongoing consolidation is the emergence of a “barbell” industry structure. At one end are the large, sophisticated public and private groups that leverage scale, data analytics, and professional management. At the other end are the small, often family-owned, dealers who may lack a clear succession plan or the substantial capital required for OEM-mandated facility upgrades and necessary technology investments.⁷ This latter group forms a continuous and motivated pool of sellers, fueling the M&A pipeline for the foreseeable future.

C. The New vs. Used Vehicle Marketplace

The dealership business model revolves around the sale of both new and used vehicles, each with distinct market characteristics and margin profiles. By unit volume, the used vehicle market is substantially larger, typically accounting for about three-fourths of all vehicle sales in the U.S. each year.⁶ However, new vehicles, with their higher transaction prices, constitute the largest component of a dealership’s total revenue.¹² Following the supply chain disruptions of the pandemic, new vehicle sales have rebounded from their 2022 lows. However, they remain below pre-pandemic levels, with 2025 sales forecasts converging around 15.6 million units, revised downward from earlier, more optimistic projections due to persistent affordability challenges and the potential impact of new import tariffs.⁶

The period from 2021 to 2023 was an anomaly for dealership profitability, characterized by severe inventory shortages that granted dealers unprecedented pricing power and led to record-high gross profits. As global supply chains have healed and inventory levels have normalized, this trend has reversed, leading to significant margin compression. According to the Haig Report, the average gross profit per new vehicle retailed (PVR) for publicly owned dealers was an estimated $3,298 in the fourth quarter of 2024, a figure that marked the end of a seven-quarter streak of declines.¹⁴ The average gross profit for a used vehicle has shown more stability, settling around $1,628 per unit.¹⁴ This ongoing normalization of vehicle margins represents a primary headwind for dealership earnings.

Inventory levels are a crucial indicator of the industry’s health. New vehicle inventory on dealer lots stood at 2.76 million units at the beginning of October 2024, a 25% increase year-over-year but still 20% below 2019 levels.¹⁵ The “days’ supply” metric, which measures how long it would take to sell all current inventory at the recent sales pace, reached 81 days in early October 2024, closely mirroring pre-pandemic norms of around 80 days.¹⁶ This return to normal inventory levels is a double-edged sword. While it alleviates the vehicle shortages that previously constrained sales volume, it also shifts pricing power decidedly back to the consumer. This forces dealers to increase discounts and incentives, which directly compresses gross margins. Furthermore, higher inventory levels necessitate greater borrowing under floor plan credit facilities. In a rising interest rate environment, the associated interest expense becomes a more significant drag on profitability, creating a direct headwind to the record profits seen during the period of inventory scarcity.¹⁷

D. Cyclicality and Economic Sensitivity

The automotive retail sector is a quintessential cyclical industry, highly sensitive to the fluctuations of the broader business cycle.¹⁸ Because vehicles are expensive, durable goods that are overwhelmingly financed, their sales are tightly correlated with key macroeconomic indicators, including employment rates, consumer confidence, and, most critically, interest rates.¹⁹ Historical data shows that the auto sector exhibits greater volatility than the overall economy; during recessions, real motor vehicle output has, on average, fallen nearly 12 times more than real GDP.²¹

Interest rates impact the industry through two primary channels. First, higher rates increase the monthly payments for consumer auto loans, directly affecting vehicle affordability and dampening demand.²⁰ Second, they increase the cost of dealers’ floor plan financing—the revolving lines of credit used to purchase and hold inventory from manufacturers. This directly increases a dealership’s operating expenses.

The industry also follows predictable seasonal patterns. Sales volumes typically peak in the spring months (March through May), spurred by more favorable weather and the arrival of consumer tax refunds, and again in the fall (September through November), traditionally driven by the release of new model-year vehicles.²³ The winter months, particularly January and February, tend to be the slowest sales period.²⁴ The P&S segment also exhibits seasonality, with demand for services like tire changes, inspections, and air conditioning checks peaking in the spring and fall.²⁵ While new and used vehicle sales are highly cyclical, the P&S business provides a powerful stabilizing force. Vehicle maintenance is a more non-discretionary expense for consumers. During economic downturns, consumers often delay purchasing a new vehicle and instead invest in maintaining their current one, leading to more stable, and sometimes even counter-cyclical, demand for service and parts. This resilience makes the P&S department a critical anchor for dealership profitability through the economic cycle. The “service absorption ratio”—the percentage of a dealership’s total fixed overhead expenses covered by the gross profit from its P&S departments—is arguably the single most important metric for evaluating a dealership’s financial stability and its ability to weather a downturn in vehicle sales.¹⁷ A high absorption rate signifies that the dealership can cover most or all of its fixed costs from this stable revenue stream, allowing it to remain profitable even if vehicle sales volumes decline sharply.

III. The Forces of Disruption: Technology and Evolving Business Models

Beyond cyclical pressures, the auto dealership industry is confronting a series of profound secular shifts driven by technology and evolving OEM strategies. These forces—direct-to-consumer sales, electrification, and digital retailing—present both significant long-term threats and potential medium-term opportunities that could fundamentally reshape the competitive landscape.

A. The Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Challenge and the “Agency Model” Response

The traditional franchised dealership model is facing its most direct challenge from the rise of DTC sales, a strategy pioneered and perfected by EV-native manufacturers like Tesla.⁴ The DTC model completely bypasses the independent dealer network, allowing the OEM to control every aspect of the customer journey. This approach offers consumers a transparent, no-haggle pricing structure and a streamlined, online-first purchasing process.³⁶ For the OEM, the benefits are substantial: complete control over vehicle pricing, direct ownership of the customer relationship and its associated data, and the ability to cultivate a consistent brand image without relying on third-party intermediaries.³⁷

In response to this disruptive threat, legacy OEMs and their dealer networks are cautiously experimenting with a hybrid “agency model”.³⁶ Under this framework, the dealership transitions from being a reseller to an agent of the manufacturer. The OEM retains ownership of the vehicle inventory and sets a fixed, non-negotiable price. The dealer’s role shifts to facilitating the customer experience—providing test drives, explaining vehicle features, managing the final delivery, and performing service. In return for these services, the dealer receives a fixed fee or commission per vehicle sold.³⁶ This model represents a fundamental change in the dealer’s risk profile. It effectively trades margin risk for volume risk. While dealers are no longer exposed to losses from having to discount aging inventory, their profitability becomes entirely dependent on the sales volume generated by the OEM’s marketing efforts and the adequacy of the fixed fee set by the manufacturer. This could lead to more predictable but potentially lower overall profits and significantly increases the dealer’s reliance on the OEM.

The primary bulwark defending the traditional model against a widespread shift to DTC or agency structures remains the powerful state franchise laws.³ These regulations, which have been in place for nearly a century, create significant legal and political hurdles for legacy OEMs wishing to disintermediate their existing dealer networks. While EV startups have successfully challenged these laws in several states, a complete federal overhaul is considered highly unlikely in the near term, providing a crucial protective buffer for incumbent dealers.

B. Electrification’s Double-Edged Sword for Service Revenue

The industry-wide transition to electric vehicles represents the most significant long-term technological disruption for dealerships. The conventional wisdom posits a severe threat to the P&S department, which is the primary profit center for most dealers. Because EVs have far fewer moving parts, no internal combustion engine, and do not require routine services like oil changes, fluid flushes, or spark plug replacements, they are expected to drastically reduce the frequency of maintenance visits over the vehicle’s lifetime.³² This potential erosion of the high-margin, stable P&S business is a central component of the bearish thesis on the sector.

However, current real-world data presents a compelling and more nuanced counter-narrative for the medium term. While maintenance frequency may decrease, the complexity and cost of EV repairs are proving to be substantially higher than for ICE vehicles. Publicly traded dealer groups have consistently reported that the average revenue generated per EV repair order is significantly greater. For example, Asbury Automotive Group reported an average repair order for a battery-electric vehicle (BEV) of $865, compared to just $517 for an ICE vehicle. Penske Automotive Group cited an even starker difference, with an average BEV repair order of $1,300 versus $700 for an ICE vehicle.³⁹ This premium is driven by the advanced technology in EVs, including complex battery systems, high-voltage electronics, and sophisticated software that requires specialized diagnostic equipment and highly trained technicians to service.

This complexity creates a new competitive moat for franchised dealers. Independent repair shops may lack the capital to invest in the necessary training and equipment, or the access to proprietary OEM software, making it difficult for them to compete in the EV repair market. This could allow dealers to capture a larger share of EV service work, potentially offsetting the lower frequency of visits with higher revenue and margin per visit. The gradual pace of adoption, with J.D. Power projecting EV retail share to hold at 9.1% in 2025 before rising to 26% by 2030, gives dealers a window to adapt their service operations.⁴⁰ Nevertheless, the ultimate long-term threat may not be the reduction in mechanical maintenance but the rise of Over-the-Air (OTA) software updates. As vehicles become more like computers on wheels, a growing number of issues can be diagnosed and fixed remotely via software patches sent directly from the OEM, bypassing the dealership’s service bay entirely. This could disintermediate the dealer from a growing category of high-margin, software-related service work.

C. Digital Retailing and the Omnichannel Imperative

The consumer purchasing journey has been irrevocably altered by digitalization, a trend that was massively accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Customers now expect the ability to perform significant portions of the vehicle transaction process online, from browsing inventory and comparing prices to applying for financing and valuing their trade-in.¹ Market data suggests that the revenue share of purely physical dealerships is set to decline from 80% in 2023 to 70% by 2032, with hybrid online-physical models capturing that share.¹²

The most forward-thinking dealership groups are not viewing this as a battle between online and in-person sales, but rather as an opportunity to create a seamless “omnichannel” experience. This integrated approach allows a customer to begin their journey online, save their progress, and then visit a dealership for a test drive and final consultation without having to repeat steps or re-enter information. This fusion of digital convenience and physical interaction has been shown to dramatically improve customer satisfaction.⁴²

Successfully implementing an omnichannel strategy, however, requires substantial and ongoing investment in technology. This includes sophisticated dealer management systems (DMS), customer relationship management (CRM) platforms, data analytics capabilities for inventory management and demand forecasting, and user-friendly digital retail tools.⁴⁴ This high cost of entry creates a significant scale advantage for the larger public and private dealer groups. They can afford to develop proprietary platforms (such as Lithia’s Driveway or AutoNation’s digital storefront) and deploy them across hundreds of locations, amortizing the investment and creating a superior, consistent customer experience that smaller, independent dealers struggle to match. This growing technological gap is another powerful force that will likely accelerate industry consolidation. The industry’s deep reliance on these complex, often third-party, systems was starkly illustrated by the CDK Global cyber incident in June 2024, which crippled operations at thousands of dealerships and highlighted the significant operational and financial risks associated with cybersecurity vulnerabilities.⁴⁵

IV. Analysis of Publicly Traded Dealership Groups

The North American auto retail landscape is dominated by a handful of publicly traded consolidators. While they share a common business model, their strategic priorities, operational execution, and financial performance vary significantly. This section provides a detailed comparative analysis of the leading players: Lithia Motors (LAD), Penske Automotive Group (PAG), AutoNation (AN), Group 1 Automotive (GPI), Asbury Automotive Group (ABG), Sonic Automotive (SAH), and AutoCanada (ACQ.TO).

A. Business Model and Strategy Deep Dive

A surface-level view groups these companies together, but a deeper analysis reveals that they represent distinct strategic bets on different facets of the automotive market.

Revenue and Gross Profit Mix: The diversified business model is a hallmark of the industry, but the composition of revenue and, more importantly, gross profit, reveals each company’s core profit drivers. For example, Sonic Automotive’s 2024 results show that new (46%) and used (36%) vehicles accounted for 82% of revenue. However, their contribution to gross profit was a mere 26% (18% new, 8% used). In stark contrast, the higher-margin Fixed Operations (P&S) and F&I segments generated only 18% of revenue but contributed a massive 74% of total gross profit (42% Fixed Ops, 32% F&I).⁴⁷ This dramatic divergence underscores the critical role of these ancillary businesses in driving overall profitability and is a consistent theme across the peer group.

Geographic Footprint: Geographic diversification is a key strategic differentiator. Penske and Group 1 have significant international exposure. Penske operates extensively in the U.S., U.K., Germany, Italy, Spain, and Australia.⁴⁸ Group 1 has a major presence in the U.S. and the U.K., with the U.S. accounting for 77.4% of new vehicle unit sales in 2024.⁴⁵ This international footprint provides diversification against a downturn in any single economy but also exposes them to currency exchange rate risk and different regulatory environments. In contrast, Lithia, AutoNation, Asbury, and Sonic are primarily focused on the U.S. market, albeit with varying regional concentrations.⁴⁶ AutoCanada is focused on its domestic market and is in the process of divesting its U.S. operations to streamline its focus.⁵³

Brand Diversification: The mix of brands in a dealer’s portfolio is a crucial determinant of its margin profile and cyclical resilience. Penske Automotive Group is heavily weighted toward premium and luxury brands, which typically offer higher gross profit per unit but can be more sensitive to economic downturns.⁴⁸ AutoNation and Asbury maintain more balanced portfolios, with significant representation across the Domestic, Import, and Premium Luxury segments, providing a hedge against shifts in consumer preference.⁴⁶ A portfolio heavy in domestic truck and SUV brands may benefit from strong demand in those segments but could face lower overall margins compared to a luxury-focused peer.

Real Estate Strategy (Own vs. Lease): A dealer’s approach to its real estate portfolio has profound implications for its balance sheet, capital allocation, and valuation. Owning properties provides a stable operating base, protection against escalating lease payments, and a tangible asset base that can be used as collateral or monetized. AutoNation, for instance, owns a significant portion of its real estate, with a net book value of $2.8 billion as of year-end 2024.⁵¹ This owned real estate represents a “hidden” asset that may not be fully reflected in the company’s market valuation and provides a hard asset floor. Conversely, a strategy of leasing properties, as pursued by Sonic for a significant number of its locations, creates a more capital-light model.⁵² This frees up capital that can be deployed into higher-return activities like acquisitions, potentially boosting return on invested capital. However, it also creates higher operating leverage and exposes the company to the risk of rising rental costs over time. A thorough analysis requires a sum-of-the-parts approach that separately values the operating business and the underlying real estate assets.

B. Operational and Financial Performance Benchmarking

To facilitate a direct comparison of operational efficiency and financial health, the following matrix compiles key metrics for the major publicly traded dealership groups.

Metric	Lithia (LAD)	Penske (PAG)	AutoNation (AN)	Group 1 (GPI)	Asbury (ABG)	Sonic (SAH)	AutoCanada (ACQ.TO)
Market Cap	~$8.2B	~$11.5B	~$6.8B	~$5.5B	~$4.5B	~$2.2B	~$0.5B
LTM Revenue	$36.80B 54	$30.61B 55	$27.46B 56	$19.93B 45	$17.19B 46	$14.37B 52	$6.10B 53
LTM Gross Profit	$5.56B 50	$5.01B 49	$4.79B 51	$3.24B 45	$2.95B 46	~$2.0B (est.)	~$1.0B (est.)
Revenue Mix (2024)
New Vehicles	48.5% 50	54.1% (Retail Auto) 49	48.8% 51	49.3% 45	52.4% 46	46% 47	43.6% 53
Used Vehicles	31.1% 50	30.1% (Retail Auto) 49	31.6% 51	30.6% 45	32.5% 46	36% 47	37.9% 53
P&S	10.5% 50	9.9% (Retail Auto) 49	15.0% 51	13.5% 45	11.2% 46	13% 47	12.8% (P&S + Collision) 53
F&I	3.9% 50	2.5% (Retail Auto) 49	4.6% 51	4.2% 45	3.9% 46	5% 47	5.6% 53
Gross Profit Mix (2024)
New Vehicles	22.1% 50	24.9% (Retail Auto) 49	20.8% 51	22.2% 45	19.3% 46	18% 47	N/A
Used Vehicles	13.1% 50	10.0% (Retail Auto) 49	9.7% 51	10.2% 45	10.3% 46	8% 47	N/A
P&S	38.2% 50	36.3% (Retail Auto) 49	41.0% 51	42.1% 45	43.1% 46	42% 47	N/A
F&I	25.5% 50	11.1% (Retail Auto) 49	28.5% 51	25.6% 45	27.3% 46	32% 47	N/A
SSSG (Q2 2025)	N/A	-1.0% 57	N/A	+7.1% 58	+5.0% 59	+6.0% (Franchised) 60	N/A
New GPU (Q2 2025)	N/A	N/A	N/A	$3,557 58	N/A	$3,391 60	N/A
Used GPU (Q2 2025)	N/A	N/A	N/A	$1,600 58	N/A	$1,590 60	N/A
F&I PVR (Q2 2025)	N/A	N/A	N/A	$2,050 58	N/A	$2,718 60	N/A
SG&A as % of GP (LTM)	67.4% (2024) 61	70.6% (2024) 49	~73% (2024 est.)	67.2% (2024) 62	64.4% (Q3 2024) 63	71.3% (2023) 52	N/A
Service Absorption (H1 2024)	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Industry Average	–	–	–	–	–	–	69.3% 17

Note: Data is based on the latest available public filings and press releases as of July 2025. LTM = Last Twelve Months. SSSG = Same-Store Sales Growth. GPU = Gross Profit per Unit. PVR = Per Vehicle Retailed. N/A = Not Available in provided materials. Estimates are derived from segment-level data.

The matrix reveals several key performance differences. Group 1 and Asbury demonstrated strong same-store sales growth in the most recent quarter, suggesting healthy organic performance. Sonic achieved the highest F&I gross profit per retail unit, indicating strong execution in this high-margin area. Regarding cost control, Asbury and Group 1 appear to be among the most efficient operators, with lower SG&A as a percentage of gross profit.

C. Growth Strategies: Organic vs. Acquisitive

While all public dealers pursue a mix of growth strategies, their emphasis differs.

Acquisitive Growth: Lithia Motors has been the sector’s most prolific consolidator, explicitly stating a strategy to grow through acquisition and network optimization.50 In 2024 alone, Lithia acquired 146 stores, investing $1.1 billion and adding an anticipated $5.9 billion in annualized revenues.50 Asbury has also made significant strategic acquisitions, most notably the pending $1.34 billion purchase of Herb Chambers Dealerships and the completed acquisition of Jim Koons, which significantly expanded its geographic footprint and luxury brand mix.46

Organic Growth: Alongside M&A, dealers are investing heavily in organic initiatives to drive future growth. These “adjacencies” are becoming crucial differentiators.

• Digital Platforms: Lithia’s Driveway and Asbury’s Clicklane are proprietary e-commerce platforms designed to create a seamless omnichannel buying experience and capture customers who prefer to transact online.⁵⁰
• Standalone Used-Vehicle Stores: To compete with national players like CarMax, several groups have launched their own used-only brands, such as AutoNation USA and Sonic’s EchoPark. These stores operate with a different cost structure and business model than traditional franchised dealerships.⁵¹
• Captive Finance Arms: Lithia’s Driveway Finance Corporation (DFC) and AutoNation Finance are strategic initiatives to internalize the highly profitable auto lending process. By originating their own loans, these companies can capture additional profit, increase customer retention, and gain valuable data on consumer credit behavior.⁵⁰ Lithia’s DFC achieved its first full year of profitability in 2024, a significant milestone demonstrating the potential of this strategy.⁶⁶

D. Capital Allocation Philosophies

The substantial free cash flow generated by the dealership model allows for a flexible approach to capital allocation. The primary decision for management teams is how to balance reinvestment in the business (via acquisitions and capital expenditures) with returning capital to shareholders.

Most of the U.S. public dealers have robust share repurchase programs, viewing their own stock as an attractive investment, particularly given the sector’s historically low valuation multiples. In 2024, AutoNation repurchased $460 million of its stock, while Lithia repurchased $366 million.⁵⁰ Penske has a long track record of consistently increasing its dividend, signaling confidence in its stable cash flow generation, and returned a total of $351.9 million to shareholders in 2024 through a combination of dividends and buybacks.⁴⁹ The scale and consistency of these capital return programs are important indicators of management’s confidence in future earnings and their commitment to shareholder value.

V. Valuation Analysis

The North American auto dealership sector has historically traded at a significant valuation discount to the broader market. This section examines the key valuation multiples, analyzes precedent M&A transactions to gauge private market values, and identifies the primary drivers that could influence the sector’s valuation moving forward.

A. Peer Group Valuation Multiples

A comparative analysis of valuation multiples provides context for the market’s perception of the dealership groups. The sector is typically valued using the Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio and the Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) multiple.

The dealership sector’s multiples are consistently low. The “Auto Vehicles, Parts & Service Retailers” industry traded at a median EV/EBITDA multiple of 7.32x as of mid-2025.⁶⁷ This stands in stark contrast to the S&P 500, which has recently traded at a P/E ratio of over 25x.⁶⁸ This persistent valuation gap is not a new phenomenon; it reflects the market’s pricing-in of several key factors:

• High Cyclicality: The industry’s deep sensitivity to economic cycles makes its earnings stream inherently more volatile and less predictable than that of the average company in the S&P 500.
• Capital Intensity: The business model requires significant capital for inventory (floor plan), real estate, and OEM-mandated facility upgrades, which can be a drag on free cash flow conversion.
• Secular Disruption Risk: The market harbors deep-seated skepticism about the long-term viability of the franchise model in the face of threats from DTC sales models and the EV transition.

This creates a classic “value versus value trap” debate for investors. The bullish argument is that these risks are overstated, the regulatory moat provided by franchise laws is durable, and the companies are generating substantial free cash flow at very low multiples, making them fundamentally undervalued. The bearish counterargument is that the industry is in a state of managed, long-term secular decline, and the low multiples are an accurate reflection of deteriorating future prospects. The investment thesis for the sector hinges on which of these narratives proves more accurate over the long term.

B. Precedent Transaction Analysis

Valuations in the private M&A market provide a crucial benchmark for the intrinsic value of dealership assets. These transactions are often valued based on a multiple of earnings plus the fair market value of the underlying real estate and other tangible assets. The intangible value, or goodwill, is commonly referred to as “blue sky.”

Analysis of recent transactions reveals that blue sky multiples vary dramatically depending on the desirability of the franchise brand, which serves as a proxy for its profitability and growth prospects. According to a 2024 report from Kerrigan Advisors, a top-tier Toyota franchise commanded a blue sky multiple in the range of 7.0x to 8.0x adjusted earnings. A highly coveted Lexus franchise could fetch a multiple as high as 10.0x. In contrast, a struggling Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep-Ram (CDJR) or Nissan franchise was valued at a much lower multiple of 2.5x to 3.25x.⁹ This wide dispersion underscores that the intrinsic value of a dealership group is a direct function of the quality of its brand portfolio.

The value of the underlying real estate provides a significant floor for transaction prices. Dealership properties are often located in prime commercial corridors with high traffic. The average value of dealership real estate has climbed by 51% since 2014, reaching an average of $13.9 million per location in 2024.⁹ This rising real estate value has helped to offset some of the decline in blue sky values from their post-pandemic peaks, keeping overall dealership enterprise values at historically high levels.⁹ This highlights the importance of a sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) valuation methodology. A simple blended multiple applied to the entire enterprise fails to capture the distinct value of the different components of the business: the new vehicle franchise, the used vehicle operation, the high-margin P&S business, and the tangible real estate assets. A more accurate valuation would assign a separate multiple to the earnings stream of each business segment and then add the appraised value of the owned real estate. Such an analysis could reveal significant hidden value, particularly for companies like AutoNation that own a large portion of their property.

C. Key Valuation Drivers and Considerations

Looking forward, several key factors will drive the valuation of publicly traded dealership groups.

• Sustainable Through-Cycle Earnings Power: The single most important valuation driver is a company’s demonstrated ability to generate consistent, predictable earnings and free cash flow across an entire economic cycle. The record profits of 2021-2023, driven by artificial supply constraints, are not sustainable. An analyst must normalize these earnings to arrive at a realistic, through-cycle earnings base upon which to apply a valuation multiple.
• Return on Invested Capital (ROIC): For a sector defined by consolidation, ROIC is a critical measure of capital allocation discipline. It quantifies how effectively management is deploying capital into acquisitions and organic growth initiatives. A company that consistently generates an ROIC that exceeds its weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is creating economic value for its shareholders.
• Catalysts for Multiple Re-Rating: Several factors could cause the market to assign a higher valuation multiple to the sector (expansion) or a lower one (contraction).

• Potential Catalysts for Expansion: A “soft landing” for the economy that avoids a deep recession; successful and accretive integration of a large acquisition; tangible evidence that the P&S business can profitably navigate the EV transition; or a successful spin-off of real estate assets that unlocks hidden value.
• Potential Catalysts for Contraction: A severe macroeconomic downturn that crushes vehicle sales; a significant legal or legislative ruling that weakens state franchise laws; or data showing a faster-than-expected decline in P&S revenue due to EV adoption.

VI. Comprehensive Risk Assessment

A thorough investment analysis requires a clear-eyed assessment of the risks facing the industry and its constituent companies. These risks can be categorized into systemic, company-specific, and long-term secular threats.

A. Systemic and Industry-Wide Risks

These are macro-level risks that affect all players in the sector.

• Macroeconomic Downturn: As a highly cyclical industry, a significant recession leading to higher unemployment and lower consumer confidence would severely depress new and used vehicle sales, which are the primary revenue drivers for all dealerships.¹⁹
• Interest Rate and Credit Environment: The sector is acutely sensitive to monetary policy. Sustained high interest rates increase the cost of both consumer auto loans and dealer floor plan financing. A tightening of credit standards by lenders could reduce the availability of financing for consumers, further constraining demand.²⁰
• Erosion of State Franchise Laws: This represents the most significant existential threat to the current business model. A successful federal or widespread state-level legislative push by OEMs to repeal or substantially weaken franchise laws would pave the way for direct-to-consumer sales, fundamentally undermining the dealer’s role as the primary sales intermediary.³
• Supply Chain and Geopolitical Risks: The global nature of the automotive supply chain makes it vulnerable to disruption. Events such as geopolitical conflicts, the imposition of tariffs, natural disasters, or pandemics can impact the production and availability of both vehicles and replacement parts, as vividly demonstrated by the recent semiconductor shortage.⁴⁴

B. Company-Specific and Operational Risks

These are risks related to the execution and management of an individual dealership group.

• Acquisition Integration Risk: For the large consolidators like Lithia and Asbury, a primary operational risk is the failure to successfully integrate acquired dealerships. This includes the risk of overpaying for assets, failing to achieve projected cost synergies, and clashing with the existing culture of the acquired stores, all of which can lead to the destruction of shareholder value.⁴⁶
• Manufacturer Relationships: The relationship between a dealer and its OEM partners is symbiotic but also fraught with tension. Dealers are highly dependent on OEMs for inventory allocation, financial incentives, and the renewal of their franchise agreements. A deterioration in this relationship can severely impact a dealer’s profitability and growth prospects. The annual OEM-Supplier Working Relations Index provides a useful proxy for the health of these relationships; the 2025 study ranked Toyota, Honda, and General Motors highest in supplier sentiment, while Nissan, Ford, and Stellantis ranked lowest.⁷¹
• Cybersecurity Vulnerability: The industry’s heavy reliance on third-party Dealer Management System (DMS) providers, such as CDK Global, creates a systemic vulnerability. A major cybersecurity incident, like the one that struck CDK in June 2024, can halt sales, service, and parts operations across thousands of dealerships simultaneously, resulting in significant financial and reputational damage.⁴⁵
• Execution Risk on Strategic Initiatives: The success of future growth depends on the effective execution of new business ventures. A failure to profitably scale adjacent businesses, such as a captive finance arm or a standalone used-vehicle brand, represents a significant risk to a company’s long-term growth narrative and could result in substantial impairment charges.⁵¹

C. Long-Term Secular Risks

These are fundamental, technology-driven shifts that could alter the industry’s structure over the next decade.

• EV Transition Impact on P&S: The most widely discussed long-term risk is the potential for the EV transition to structurally impair the profitability of the P&S segment. The reduced maintenance needs of EVs could lead to a permanent decline in high-margin service revenue, which has historically been the most stable and profitable part of the dealership business.³⁹
• OEM Disintermediation Through Technology: Even if franchise laws remain intact, OEMs can leverage technology to marginalize the dealer’s role over time. The implementation of agency sales models, the use of over-the-air (OTA) software updates for vehicle diagnostics and repairs, and the development of direct data relationships with vehicle owners could allow OEMs to capture a greater share of the automotive value chain, reducing the dealer to a lower-margin delivery and service agent.

Works cited

1. United States Auto Dealership Market Size, Share, & Forecast, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/us-auto-dealership-market/
2. www.marketresearchfuture.com, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/north-america-automotive-market-21670#:~:text=The%20North%20America%20Automotive%20market%20size%20was%20valued%20at%20USD,the%20North%20America%20Automotive%20market%3F
3. Franchise System | NADA, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.nada.org/nada/issues/franchise-system
4. State Franchise Law Carjacks Auto Buyers | Mercatus Center, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.mercatus.org/research/policy-briefs/state-franchise-law-carjacks-auto-buyers
5. Auto Dealers: 7 Narrow-Moat Companies to Know | Morningstar, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/auto-dealers-7-narrow-moat-companies-know
6. Car Sale Statistics 2025 | ConsumerAffairs®, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.consumeraffairs.com/automotive/car-sale-statistics.html
7. Car Dealership Consolidation: Industry Analysis & Trends – BofA Securities, accessed August 1, 2025, https://business.bofa.com/en-us/content/dealership-industry-consolidation.html
8. The Power of Consolidation: How Dealership Mergers Are … – AInvest, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.ainvest.com/news/power-consolidation-dealership-mergers-reshaping-automotive-investment-landscapes-2507/
9. Auto Dealership Market Hits Record 438 Transactions in 2024 – Autobody News, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.autobodynews.com/news/auto-dealership-market-hits-record-438-transactions-in-2024
10. Haig Partners Releases Q4 2024 Haig Report®: Auto Dealership M&A Activity Remains High Despite Political and Economic Headwinds – Business Wire, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250324581647/en/Haig-Partners-Releases-Q4-2024-Haig-Report-Auto-Dealership-MA-Activity-Remains-High-Despite-Political-and-Economic-Headwinds
11. Dealership Consolidation in 2025: Navigating Valuation Peaks and Strategic Shifts – AInvest, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.ainvest.com/news/dealership-consolidation-2025-navigating-valuation-peaks-strategic-shifts-2507/
12. Automotive Dealership Market Size, Trends Report 2034, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/automotive-dealership-market-24079
13. Cox Automotive Forecast: First Quarter New-Vehicle Sales Expected …, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.coxautoinc.com/news/cox-automotive-forecast-march-2025-u-s-auto-sales-forecast/
14. Q4 2024 Haig Report® Insights: New Vehicle Gross Profits Rise for First Time in Two Years – Dealership Buy-Sell Advisors, accessed August 1, 2025, https://haigpartners.com/resources/q4-2024-haig-report-insights-new-vehicle-gross-profits-rise-for-first-time-in-two-years/
15. With Steady Sales, New-Vehicle Inventory Begins to Look and Feel “Normal”, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.coxautoinc.com/market-insights/new-vehicle-inventory-september-2024/
16. Oct. new car days’ supply mirrors pre-pandemic “norm” – Car Dealership Guy News, accessed August 1, 2025, https://news.dealershipguy.com/p/oct-new-car-days-supply-mirrors-pre-pandemic-norm-2024-10-18
17. Dealership profit continues decline – The Presidio Group |, accessed August 1, 2025, https://thepresidiogroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Q2-2024-Presidio-NCM-Benchmark.pdf
18. Cyclical Industry: What It Is, Characteristics, and Examples – Investopedia, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cyclical_industry.asp
19. Do Snails Pace Auto Sales Mean the Economy is Slowing? | Rutgers Center for Real Estate, accessed August 1, 2025, https://realestate.business.rutgers.edu/news/do-snails-pace-auto-sales-mean-economy-slowing
20. What Economic Indicators Are Important for Investing in the Automotive Sector?, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/040715/what-economic-indicators-are-important-investing-automotive-sector.asp
21. No longer a smooth drive: How automobiles’ role in the US economy has evolved – Deloitte, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/economy/spotlight/automobile-impact-us-economy.html
22. Consumers With Good Credit Are Seeing Lower Rates Despite No Change in Fed Rate Policy – Cox Automotive Inc., accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.coxautoinc.com/market-insights/consumers-with-good-credit-are-seeing-lower-rates-despite-no-change-in-fed-rate-policy/
23. Seasonality in Automotive Sales – Factors, Trends and Tips | eCarsTrade, accessed August 1, 2025, https://pl.ecarstrade.com/blog/seasonality-in-car-sales
24. How Important Are Seasonal Trends in the Automotive Sector? – Investopedia, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/041715/how-important-are-seasonal-trends-automotive-sector.asp
25. Seasonal Cost Trends for Auto Service Businesses – Motorvate, accessed August 1, 2025, https://motorvate.io/blog/seasonal-cost-trends-for-auto-service-businesses
26. How to Improve a Dealership’s Service Absorption Rate – Middlesex Consulting, accessed August 1, 2025, https://middlesexconsulting.com/how-to-improve-a-dealerships-service-absorption-rate/
27. What is a dealership’s absorption rate? What does the absorption rate indicate? – Farm Equipment, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.farm-equipment.com/ext/resources/images/issues/2015/July-August/Absorption-Rate-DOY.pdf
28. What is Dealer Absorption Rate and Why is it Important? – Reputable Recruiting, accessed August 1, 2025, https://reputablerecruiting.com/what-is-dealer-absorption-rate/
29. Keep Your Service Absorption Rate Healthy. – NuVinAir, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.nuvinair.com/news/keep-your-service-absorption-rate-healthy/
30. Understanding Service Absorption: Boost Your Dealership’s Profitability with myKaarma, accessed August 1, 2025, https://blog.mykaarma.com/blog/understanding-service-absorption-boost-your-dealerships-profitability-with-mykaarma
31. SERVICE DEPARTMENT ABSORPTION: Key to Success! – IDEATE Consulting Group, accessed August 1, 2025, https://ideateconsultinggroup.com/service-department-absorption/
32. Dealership absorption rate and 2021 Repair Order Goals – TVI MarketPro3, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.tvi-mp3.com/blog/dealership-absorption-rate/
33. Calculating Net Profit and Fixed Absorption – WANADA, accessed August 1, 2025, https://wanada.org/calculating-net-profit-and-fixed-absorption/
34. 2023 Automotive Industry Guidelines – Auto Team America, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.autoteamamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ATA-Benchmarking-2023-2024-3-29-1.pdf
35. 2025 Formulas. Definitions. Guides. – Slide Guide – National Automobile Dealers Association, accessed August 1, 2025, https://slideguide.nada.org/NADASlideGuide.pdf
36. The Rise of Direct-to-Consumer Car Sales and Its Impact on …, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.jupiterchev.com/blogs/6872/the-rise-of-direct-to-consumer-car-sales-and-its-impact-on-dealerships
37. Is the Direct-to-Customer Approach Beneficial for OEMs in the Current Automotive Landscape? – Tomorrow’s Journey, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.tomorrowsjourney.co.uk/industry-insights/is-the-direct-to-customer-approach-beneficial-for-oems-in-the-current-automotive-landscape
38. Estimating the Impacts of Direct-to-Consumer Electric Vehicle Sales – Atlas Public Policy, accessed August 1, 2025, https://atlaspolicy.com/estimating-the-impacts-of-direct-to-consumer-electric-vehicle-sales/
39. EVs boost dealership profits: A new era for auto service – CBT News, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.cbtnews.com/evs-boost-dealership-profits-a-new-era-for-auto-service/
40. 2025 To Be Reset Year for EV Sales | J.D. Power, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.jdpower.com/business/resources/e-vision-intelligence-report-january-2025
41. EVs Unplugged: New Report Shows Slowing Sales, Forecasts Growth – GearJunkie, accessed August 1, 2025, https://gearjunkie.com/motors/2025-jd-power-e-vision-intelligence-report
42. Cox Automotive Q2 2025 Dealer Sentiment Index Reveals Market Momentum Amid Tariff Concerns, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.coxautoinc.com/news/q2-2025-cadsi/
43. Dealers and Consumers Are Not Aligned on How 2025 is Trending | Digital Dealer, accessed August 1, 2025, https://digitaldealer.com/dealer-gm/dealers-and-consumers-are-not-aligned-on-how-2025-is-trending/
44. Avoiding Supply Chain Disruptions in Auto Retail: Lessons from 2025 – Digital Dealer, accessed August 1, 2025, https://digitaldealer.com/dealer-ops-leadership/avoiding-supply-chain-disruptions-in-auto-retail-lessons-from-2025/
45. GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE INC SEC 10-K Report — TradingView News, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.tradingview.com/news/tradingview:bda41aa917d33:0-group-1-automotive-inc-sec-10-k-report/
46. ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP INC SEC 10-K Report …, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.tradingview.com/news/tradingview:e40252d2b3ded:0-asbury-automotive-group-inc-sec-10-k-report/
47. Investor Relations :: Sonic Automotive, Inc. (SAH), accessed August 1, 2025, https://ir.sonicautomotive.com/
48. Investors: Penske Automotive Group, Inc., accessed August 1, 2025, https://investors.penskeautomotive.com/
49. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP …, accessed August 1, 2025, https://s203.q4cdn.com/686706497/files/doc_financials/2024/q4/Press-Release_PAG_4Q-2024-Earnings_FINAL.pdf
50. Lithia Motors Inc. (via Public) / Annual Report for Fiscal Year Ending …, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.publicnow.com/view/3F1F44BC68ADB212BFF55390F667342A72F99484?1740437219
51. AutoNation Inc. (via Public) / Annual Report for Fiscal Year Ending …, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.publicnow.com/view/22C4EDF205A79AC1176D0E04A7C0ED35AE5138DB?1739576845
52. 10-K – 02/22/2024 – Sonic Automotive, Inc., accessed August 1, 2025, https://ir.sonicautomotive.com/sec-filings/annual-reports/content/0001043509-24-000022/0001043509-24-000022.pdf
53. AutoCanada AIF – Q4 2024, accessed August 1, 2025, https://investors.autocan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/AutoCanada_AIF.pdf
54. Lithia Motors (LAD) Revenue 2015-2025 – Stock Analysis, accessed August 1, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/lad/revenue/
55. Penske Automotive Group (PAG) Revenue 2015-2025 – Stock Analysis, accessed August 1, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/pag/revenue/
56. AutoNation Revenue 2010-2025 | AN | MacroTrends, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AN/autonation/revenue
57. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP REPORTS QUARTERLY RESULTS Record Gross Profit Increases 3% to $1.3 Billion Same-St, accessed August 1, 2025, https://s203.q4cdn.com/686706497/files/doc_financials/2025/q2/PR_PAG_2Q25-Financial-Results_FINAL.pdf
58. Group 1 Automotive Reports Record Revenues and Gross Profit in the Second Quarter of 2025, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.group1corp.com/2025-07-24-Group-1-Automotive-Reports-Record-Revenues-and-Gross-Profit-in-the-Second-Quarter-of-2025
59. Asbury Automotive Q2 2025 slides: Revenue growth accelerates amid portfolio rebalancing, accessed August 1, 2025, https://ng.investing.com/news/company-news/asbury-automotive-q2-2025-slides-revenue-growth-accelerates-amid-portfolio-rebalancing-93CH-2030556
60. Sonic Automotive Reports Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results, accessed August 1, 2025, https://ir.sonicautomotive.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/333/sonic-automotive-reports-second-quarter-2025-financial
61. Lithia Motors Q2 2025 presentation: targeting $2 EPS per $1B revenue long-term, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/lithia-motors-q2-2025-presentation-targeting-2-eps-per-1b-revenue-longterm-93CH-4157084
62. Group 1 Automotive Reports 2024 Fourth Quarter Financial Results and Record Full Year Revenues of $19.9 billion – Jan 29, 2025, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.group1corp.com/2025-01-29-Group-1-Automotive-Reports-2024-Fourth-Quarter-Financial-Results-and-Record-Full-Year-Revenues-of-19-9-billion
63. Asbury Automotive Group Reports Third Quarter Results, accessed August 1, 2025, https://asburyautomotivegroupinc.gcs-web.com/node/20716/pdf
64. Dealership transactions expected to remain elevated in 2025 – Kerrigan Advisors, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.kerriganadvisors.com/in-the-news/dealership-transactions-expected-to-remain-elevated-in-2025
65. Earnings call transcript: Asbury Automotive Q2 2025 beats EPS forecast – Investing.com, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/transcripts/earnings-call-transcript-asbury-automotive-q2-2025-beats-eps-forecast-93CH-4157990
66. Lithia & Driveway (LAD) Reports Record Fourth Quarter Revenue of $9.2 billion, a 20% Increase, and the First Profitable Year for Finance Operations – PR Newswire, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lithia–driveway-lad-reports-record-fourth-quarter-revenue-of-9-2-billion-a-20-increase-and-the-first-profitable-year-for-finance-operations-302374203.html
67. EBITDA Multiples by Industry in 2025 – Equidam, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.equidam.com/ebitda-multiples-trbc-industries/
68. S&P 500 P/E Ratio – Real-Time & Historical Trends – YCharts, accessed August 1, 2025, https://ycharts.com/indicators/sp_500_pe_ratio
69. Transforming Automotive Supply Chains in 2025 – Uber Freight, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.uberfreight.com/blog/uber-freight-is-transforming-automotive-supply-chains-in-2025/
70. Supply chain quarterly update: Q1 2025 | EY – US, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.ey.com/en_us/ey-center-for-executive-leadership/supply-chain-quarterly-update
71. Toyota Soars, Honda and GM improve, but Nissan, Ford and Stellantis drop in 2025 Working Relations Index® Study | Get to Know Us | Plante Moran, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.plantemoran.com/get-to-know/news/2025/05/2025-working-relations-index-study
72. Toyota Soars, Honda and GM improve, but Nissan, Ford and Stellantis Drop in 2025 Working Relations Study – PR Newswire, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/toyota-soars-honda-and-gm-improve-but-nissan-ford-and-stellantis-drop-in-2025-working-relations-study-302458403.html