Executive Summary

TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) represents a unique, high-performing yet highly leveraged investment vehicle within the aerospace and defense (A&D) sector. Its business model, which emulates a private equity firm’s strategy of acquiring and optimizing niche, high-margin businesses, has generated exceptional historical returns. The investment case hinges on the durability of its significant economic moats—primarily its extensive portfolio of proprietary, sole-source aftermarket parts—and its management’s continued ability to execute a disciplined, value-accretive acquisition strategy.

The company’s primary strength lies in its dominant and entrenched position in the high-margin commercial and defense aftermarket, which provides a stable, recurring, and remarkably profitable revenue stream.¹ This position is fortified by formidable barriers to entry, including stringent regulatory certification requirements and extremely high customer switching costs. The ongoing recovery and long-term growth trajectory of global air travel, coupled with an aging global aircraft fleet exacerbated by current OEM production constraints, provide powerful secular tailwinds for the company’s most profitable business segment.³

However, the principal risk is financial, stemming from the company’s substantial debt load, which stood at approximately $24 billion as of September 30, 2024.¹ This high leverage, a core component of its value-creation model, makes the company particularly vulnerable to economic downturns and fluctuations in interest rates. Additional risks include the potential for increased regulatory scrutiny over its significant pricing power, a structural dependence on the cyclical aerospace industry, and the perpetual challenge of identifying and acquiring suitable targets at reasonable valuations to sustain its aggressive growth model.⁵

From a valuation perspective, TransDigm consistently trades at a significant premium to its A&D peers on nearly every metric, including Price-to-Earnings (P/E) and Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA).⁷ This premium is a direct reflection of its superior profitability, with EBITDA margins consistently exceeding 50%, its high returns on capital, and its long-term record of robust growth. The central analytical question for any investor is whether this substantial premium fully and fairly accounts for the company’s unique operational strengths and market position, or if it overlooks the inherent and significant risks embedded in its financially engineered structure.

Company Overview & Business Model

TransDigm Group, founded in 1993 and headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, is a leading global designer, producer, and supplier of highly engineered and proprietary aircraft components.⁸ The company’s products are critical for the safe and reliable operation of aircraft and are found on nearly every commercial and military airframe currently in service across the globe.¹⁰

Core Operations and Revenue Streams

TransDigm’s operations are organized into three primary reporting segments, reflecting the end-markets and technologies of its products ¹:

1. Power & Control: This segment develops systems and components that provide or control aircraft power, utilizing a range of electronic, fluid, and mechanical motion control technologies. Products include actuators, controls, ignition systems, specialized pumps and valves, and power conditioning devices.
2. Airframe: This segment produces components for non-power airframe applications, such as engineered latching and locking devices, cockpit security systems, safety restraints, and specialized interior and exterior surfaces.
3. Non-aviation: A much smaller segment, this includes products like seat belts for ground transportation and components for space applications and industrial gas turbines.

A defining characteristic of TransDigm’s business is its revenue composition. For its fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, net sales were derived from three core markets: defense (approximately 40%), commercial aftermarket (approximately 31%), and commercial Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) (approximately 27%).¹ The commercial aftermarket, which involves selling certified replacement parts and providing repair services for the global in-service fleet, is the company’s primary profit engine. Aftermarket sales historically generate significantly higher gross profit margins than OEM sales and provide a more stable, recurring revenue stream tied to aircraft utilization rather than new production cycles.¹

The strategic foundation of the entire enterprise is an unwavering focus on proprietary products. In fiscal 2024, approximately 90% of the company’s net sales were generated by products for which it owns the intellectual property.¹ This proprietary status frequently positions TransDigm as the sole-source supplier for a given part, a critical factor that grants the company immense and durable pricing power.

Organizational Structure & Operating Philosophy

TransDigm operates on a distinctively decentralized model. The parent company is comprised of 51 independently managed operating units, each responsible for its own market strategy and operational execution.¹¹ This structure fosters an entrepreneurial, agile, and highly accountable culture by pushing decision-making authority down to the business level, closer to the products and customers.

The company’s explicitly stated goal is to “provide private equity-like returns with the liquidity of a public market”.¹⁴ This philosophy is the guiding principle for all strategic and operational decisions. This is executed through a simple and well-proven operating strategy based on three core value drivers ¹³:

1. Generating Profitable New Business: Leveraging technical expertise and market knowledge to secure positions on new and existing aircraft platforms.
2. Productivity and Cost Improvements: A relentless focus on maintaining a lean cost structure and continuously improving operational efficiency.
3. Value-Based Pricing: Pricing highly engineered, value-added products to reflect the critical function they perform and the value they provide to the customer, rather than simply pricing based on cost.

The Acquisition Engine: A Serial Acquirer’s Playbook

Growth at TransDigm is overwhelmingly driven by a disciplined and programmatic acquisition strategy. Since its inception, the company has acquired approximately 90 businesses, systematically consolidating niche segments of the aerospace components industry.⁵ The criteria for acquisition targets are highly specific and strictly adhered to: TransDigm seeks proprietary commercial aerospace component businesses with significant, stable aftermarket content where it can identify a clear path to value creation.³ The company actively avoids non-proprietary “build to print” commodity work, which offers lower margins and weaker competitive positioning.¹

Following an acquisition, TransDigm implements its value-driven operating strategy. This process typically involves installing its decentralized management culture, optimizing the cost structure, and applying its value-based pricing methodology to the newly acquired product lines, often resulting in a significant improvement in the target’s profitability and cash flow generation.¹²

This business model functions as a powerful, self-reinforcing flywheel. The high-margin cash flows generated by the existing portfolio of aftermarket products serve as the “fuel.” This reliable cash generation supports a highly leveraged balance sheet, which acts as the “engine” to finance the acquisition of new businesses. These acquired companies, in turn, add their own streams of proprietary, high-margin aftermarket revenue, adding more fuel to the flywheel and enabling the cycle to repeat and compound value over time. The entire model’s stability and success are predicated on the uninterrupted flow of this high-margin aftermarket cash, which allows the company to service its debt and continue its strategic acquisitions.

Industry Analysis & Market Dynamics

TransDigm operates within the global aerospace and defense (A&D) industry, a vast and complex sector shaped by powerful long-term secular trends, cyclical demand patterns, and significant geopolitical factors.

Aerospace & Defense (A&D) Landscape

The global A&D market is a massive, growing industry with total sales exceeding $955 billion in 2023 in the U.S. alone.¹⁶ Market forecasts, while varying in their precise figures, consistently point to robust long-term growth. One analysis projects the global market will expand from approximately $875 billion in 2025 to nearly $1.1 trillion in 2029, representing a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.8%.¹⁷ Another report suggests a CAGR of 8.5% from 2022 to 2026.¹⁸ The industry is fundamentally driven by two primary engines: commercial aviation and global defense spending. North America remains the dominant market, accounting for over 40% of global A&D expenditure.¹⁷ Key long-term trends shaping the industry include a concerted push for decarbonization and sustainable aviation fuels, the accelerating adoption of digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and smart factories, and the nascent but potentially transformative emergence of Advanced Air Mobility (AAM).¹⁸

Commercial Aviation Dynamics

The commercial aviation sector has experienced a vigorous recovery following the historic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Global air passenger traffic, measured in Revenue Passenger Kilometers (RPKs), officially surpassed pre-pandemic (2019) levels in February 2024 and has remained on a steady growth trend since.³ As of early 2025, global RPKs are up nearly 4% from their previous peaks in 2019.⁴ This recovery provides a strong demand backdrop for the entire aviation ecosystem.

Looking forward, long-term forecasts remain bullish. Boeing’s 2025-2044 Commercial Market Outlook (CMO), a benchmark industry forecast, projects that global passenger traffic will grow at an annual rate of 4.2% over the next two decades. This sustained growth is expected to nearly double the size of the global fleet, necessitating the delivery of approximately 43,600 new commercial airplanes by 2044.²¹

A critical dynamic currently shaping the industry is a severe and persistent mismatch between the resurgent demand for air travel and the constrained supply of new aircraft. Major OEMs, particularly Boeing, are facing significant production challenges stemming from supply chain disruptions, labor shortages, and quality control issues.²² As a result, both Boeing and Airbus have multi-year backlogs and are sold out of popular models for years to come, with supply chain challenges widely expected to persist through 2025 and into 2026.⁴

Aftermarket vs. OEM Characteristics

The divergence between supply and demand in the new aircraft market has created distinct dynamics for the OEM and aftermarket segments.

• OEM Market: This segment is directly tied to new aircraft production rates. The current constraints at the major airframers have tempered growth in this area. TransDigm’s own guidance for fiscal 2025 reflects this reality, projecting flat to low single-digit growth for its commercial OEM business.²³
• Aftermarket (MRO) Market: This segment’s health is driven by the size, age, and utilization (flight hours) of the global in-service fleet. The current shortage of new aircraft is a powerful tailwind for the aftermarket. Airlines, unable to take delivery of new planes, are forced to extend the service lives of their existing, older aircraft to meet passenger demand.⁴ Older aircraft require more frequent and intensive maintenance, repair, and component replacement. This dynamic has created what industry analysts are calling a “super cycle” for the Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) market, which is forecast to reach a record $119 billion in 2025. The average age of the global commercial fleet has consequently risen from 12.1 years in early 2024 to 13.4 years in early 2025, directly fueling demand for aftermarket parts and services.⁴

The struggles of the major OEMs are therefore inadvertently boosting the growth and profitability of key aftermarket suppliers like TransDigm. This counterintuitive dynamic underscores the resilience of the company’s business model, as weakness in the lower-margin OEM segment is directly correlated with increased demand in its higher-margin aftermarket segment.

Defense Segment Dynamics

The global defense market is experiencing a period of renewed and sustained growth, driven by a complex and deteriorating geopolitical landscape. Global defense expenditures surpassed $2.4 trillion in 2023, with ongoing conflicts and rising tensions prompting governments worldwide to increase military budgets.¹⁶ The United States remains the world’s largest defense spender by a significant margin, providing a stable anchor for the market.¹⁹

Current defense spending priorities are shifting towards the modernization of aging military platforms, investments in next-generation capabilities such as space and missile defense, and the urgent need to replenish stockpiles of munitions and equipment depleted by the conflict in Ukraine and tensions in the Middle East.²² This focus on readiness and modernization provides a stable and growing demand backdrop for defense suppliers like TransDigm, whose components are integral to a wide range of military aircraft and systems.

Competitive Position & Moats

TransDigm’s long-term success and industry-leading profitability are the direct result of a powerful and durable wide economic moat. This competitive advantage is not based on a single factor, but rather a combination of structural, regulatory, and business model elements that are exceptionally difficult for competitors to replicate.

Wide Economic Moat Analysis

The company’s competitive advantage is built upon several reinforcing pillars that create a formidable barrier to entry:

1. Proprietary Products and Intellectual Property: The cornerstone of TransDigm’s moat is its vast portfolio of proprietary products. Approximately 90% of the company’s sales are derived from components for which it owns the design and intellectual property.¹ For many of these parts, TransDigm is the sole-source supplier, meaning it is the only company in the world certified to produce that specific component for a given aircraft platform.
2. High Customer Switching Costs: Once a TransDigm part is designed into an aircraft platform and certified by aviation authorities like the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), it becomes deeply entrenched for the entire 25 to 30-year life of that aircraft model.¹ For an airline or OEM to switch to a different supplier for a flight-critical component would require a prohibitively expensive, time-consuming, and risky recertification process. This creates an exceptionally sticky customer base.¹²
3. Stringent Regulatory Barriers: The aerospace industry is one of the most highly regulated sectors globally. The process of designing, testing, manufacturing, and certifying a new aircraft component can take years and cost millions of dollars. These stringent safety and quality standards serve as a massive structural barrier that deters potential new entrants from challenging established and certified suppliers like TransDigm.⁶

This powerful combination of factors results in immense and sustainable pricing power, particularly in the aftermarket segment. When an airline has a multi-million dollar aircraft grounded (an “Aircraft on Ground” or AOG event), it needs a specific, certified replacement part immediately to resume revenue-generating operations. In this scenario, the cost of the replacement part, even at a very high margin for TransDigm, is negligible compared to the lost revenue and operational disruption of keeping the plane on the tarmac.⁵ TransDigm’s business model is a masterclass in monetizing the economic benefits created by these structural and regulatory moats.

Market Position and Peer Comparison

TransDigm occupies a dominant position in a multitude of highly specialized, niche component markets. Its strategy is not to compete broadly, but to be the leading, and often sole, provider for the specific products it sells. Its primary competitors can be grouped into several categories:

• Direct Aftermarket Competitors: The most direct competitor in terms of business model is HEICO Corporation (HEI). Like TransDigm, HEICO focuses on the high-margin aerospace aftermarket and utilizes an acquisition-led growth strategy. However, a crucial distinction exists in their approach. A significant part of HEICO’s business involves producing “Parts Manufacturer Approval” (PMA) parts, which are FAA-approved, reverse-engineered generic equivalents of OEM parts.¹² In contrast, TransDigm’s strategy is to acquire the original OEM of the part itself, thereby owning the original intellectual property and certification. While both models are highly successful, TransDigm’s is generally considered to possess a stronger moat, as it does not compete directly with the OEM for a given part but rather
  is the OEM. The competitive threat from the PMA model is also structurally limited for a large portion of TransDigm’s portfolio. The high fixed costs of reverse-engineering and certifying a PMA part make it economically viable only for higher-priced components, typically those retailing for over $5,000. As approximately 90% of TransDigm’s parts cost less than this threshold, the majority of its catalog is naturally insulated from this form of competition.¹²
• Component & System Suppliers: Companies like Moog Inc. (MOG.A) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) compete with TransDigm in various product categories. Moog, for example, is a leading manufacturer of high-performance motion control systems.²⁶ However, these companies generally operate with a more traditional, engineering-led OEM-focused business model. They lack TransDigm’s singular focus on financial optimization, aftermarket dominance, and the private equity-style operational playbook. This strategic difference is starkly reflected in their financial profiles, with TransDigm consistently reporting substantially higher profit margins.
• Large Diversified Primes: While not direct competitors across its entire portfolio, large A&D primes like RTX Corporation (RTX) and Honeywell (HON) also produce a wide range of aircraft components and systems. However, these components are typically part of a much larger, more diversified business, and these firms do not share TransDigm’s unique focus and operational intensity in the niche component aftermarket.

Financial Performance & Growth Analysis

TransDigm’s financial track record is characterized by rapid growth, exceptional profitability, and robust cash flow generation, which collectively distinguish it from nearly all of its peers in the industrial and A&D sectors.

Historical Performance Review

Over the past decade, TransDigm has demonstrated a remarkable ability to compound its revenue and earnings. Annual revenue has expanded significantly, growing from $2.71 billion in fiscal year 2015 to $7.94 billion in fiscal year 2024, representing a compound annual growth rate of approximately 12.7%.²⁷ This growth has been achieved through a combination of strategic acquisitions and underlying organic expansion.

A critical aspect of analyzing TransDigm’s growth is disaggregating these two components. While total revenue growth has been consistently strong (e.g., +20.6% in FY2024 and +21.3% in FY2023), this has been heavily supplemented by M&A activity.²⁷ Recent organic growth, which reflects the performance of the core underlying business, has been more modest, registering 6.3% in the third quarter of fiscal 2025.¹³ Over the past two fiscal years, analysis indicates that organic revenue growth averaged a healthy 13%, while total revenue growth was 17.2%, illustrating the significant contribution from acquisitions.²⁹

The most striking feature of TransDigm’s financial profile is its extraordinary profitability. Gross profit margins are consistently maintained near 60%.¹³ More impressively, the company’s adjusted EBITDA margin, a key metric of operating cash flow profitability, is consistently in the low-to-mid 50% range. In the third quarter of fiscal 2025, this metric reached a record high of 54.4%.¹³ These margins are substantially higher than those of most industrial or A&D peers and are a direct result of the company’s focus on proprietary aftermarket parts and its disciplined operational strategy.

This profitability translates into high returns on capital. Despite a balance sheet heavily weighted with goodwill from decades of acquisitions, the company generates strong returns on the capital it employs. One analysis estimated that the company’s return on invested capital (ROIC), including goodwill, would average 13.8% from fiscal 2017 to 2021, a figure that would rise to approximately 18% when excluding recent acquisitions, indicating the strong performance of the core, mature businesses.³² It is important to note that traditional metrics like return on equity (ROE) are not meaningful for TransDigm. Due to its strategy of funding large shareholder returns with debt, the company has a significant stockholders’ deficit on its balance sheet, rendering ROE calculations negative and misleading.³³ ROIC is the more appropriate measure of capital efficiency.

The business model is also a prolific generator of cash. In the third quarter of fiscal 2025 alone, TransDigm generated $715 million in free cash flow.¹³ For the full fiscal year 2024, net cash provided by operating activities exceeded $2.0 billion.¹ This powerful cash generation is the lifeblood of the company’s strategy, providing the funds necessary to service its debt, pursue acquisitions, and return capital to shareholders.

Ten-Year Financial Summary

The following table provides a summary of TransDigm’s key financial metrics from fiscal year 2015 through fiscal year 2024. This data illustrates the company’s consistent growth in revenue and EBITDA, its exceptionally high and stable margins, and its robust cash flow generation over a full business cycle.

Fiscal Year	Net Sales ($M)	YoY Sales Growth (%)	EBITDA As Defined ($M)	EBITDA As Defined Margin (%)	Net Income ($M)	Adjusted EPS ($)
2024	$7,940	20.6%	$4,173	52.6%	$1,715	$33.99
2023	$6,585	21.3%	$3,431	52.1%	$1,219	$26.01
2022	$5,429	13.1%	$2,646	48.7%	$866	$17.14
2021	$4,798	-6.0%	$2,187	45.6%	$683	$12.18
2020	$5,103	-2.3%	$2,252	44.1%	$440	$7.70
2019	$5,223	37.0%	$2,427	46.5%	$916	$16.33
2018	$3,811	8.8%	$1,800	47.2%	$749	$13.31
2017	$3,504	10.5%	$1,673	47.7%	$626	$10.79
2016	$3,171	17.1%	$1,481	46.7%	$538	$9.00
2015	$2,707	14.1%	$1,223	45.2%	$430	$7.13

Source: Company 10-K Filings, Macrotrends.¹ Net Income and Adjusted EPS figures are based on company-reported numbers.

Capital Allocation Strategy

Capital allocation is not an afterthought at TransDigm; it is a central pillar of the company’s value creation strategy, managed with the discipline and focus of a private equity firm.¹³ The company follows a clear and consistent hierarchy of priorities for deploying its substantial cash flow.

A Disciplined M&A Track Record

The primary use of capital, after reinvesting in the needs of the existing businesses, is to fund accretive, disciplined mergers and acquisitions.¹³ This M&A engine is the principal driver of TransDigm’s long-term growth.

The company has a long and successful history of acquiring and integrating businesses. Notable large-scale transactions include the acquisition of Esterline Technologies for $4.0 billion in 2018 and McKechnie Aerospace for $1.27 billion in 2010.⁵ The valuation multiples paid in these transactions are a key point of analysis. The Esterline acquisition was executed at an implied EV/LTM EBITDA multiple of 14.0x, a significant premium to the median multiple for precedent transactions in the sector.³⁶ Similarly, the acquisition of

AmSafe in 2012 was completed at a multiple of approximately 12.4x EBITDA.³⁷ Paying such premiums reflects management’s deep confidence in the quality of the targeted assets and in its own ability to extract synergies and implement its high-margin operating model post-acquisition. However, it also underscores the risk inherent in the strategy, as it leaves little room for integration errors or underperformance.

The M&A engine remains highly active. During fiscal 2025, TransDigm completed the acquisition of Servotronics, a supplier of specialty electromechanical components, for approximately $138 million, and announced a definitive agreement to acquire Simmonds Precision Products from RTX Corporation for approximately $765 million in cash.¹³ These transactions brought the total capital deployed or committed to acquisitions in fiscal 2025 to over $900 million, demonstrating the company’s continued ability and willingness to execute its core growth strategy.³¹

Summary of Major Acquisitions

The following table highlights some of TransDigm’s most significant acquisitions, illustrating the scale, timing, and valuation of its M&A strategy.

Acquisition Target	Announcement Date	Purchase Price ($M)	Target’s Business Description	Implied EV/EBITDA Multiple
Simmonds Precision	June 2025	$765	Fuel/proximity sensing and structural health monitoring	N/A
Servotronics, Inc.	May 2025	$138	Servo valves for aerospace and defense	N/A
Calspan	May 2023	$725	Aviation and transportation research and testing	N/A
DART Aerospace	March 2022	$360	Helicopter mission equipment	N/A
Esterline Technologies	October 2018	$4,000	Niche aerospace and defense aftermarket supplier	14.0x
Data Device Corp.	June 2016	$1,000	Power, networking, and electronics components	N/A
AmSafe Global Holdings	January 2012	$750	Aviation and defense safety and restraint systems	12.4x
McKechnie Aerospace	October 2010	$1,270	Aerospace parts and components	N/A

Source: Company Press Releases, Mergr, News Articles.⁵ Valuation multiples are only included where explicitly stated in the source material.

Leverage and Debt Management

TransDigm deliberately employs a highly leveraged capital structure to amplify returns on equity, a core tenet of its private equity-like model. As of the third quarter of fiscal 2025, the company had total debt of approximately $25.2 billion and a net debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 5.1x.³¹ Management actively monitors credit markets and frequently refinances its debt to extend maturities, manage interest costs, and maintain financial flexibility.³¹ To mitigate the risk of rising interest rates on its substantial variable-rate debt, the company has implemented a hedging program, utilizing interest rate caps, swaps, and collars to fix the rate on approximately 75% of its gross debt through fiscal 2027.³⁹

Shareholder Returns

Returning capital to shareholders is the third priority in TransDigm’s capital allocation framework, pursued when M&A opportunities that meet its strict return criteria are not available.¹³ The company’s method for shareholder returns is as distinctive as its operating model.

TransDigm does not pay a regular, quarterly cash dividend, a policy that provides maximum financial flexibility to accumulate cash for large, “lumpy” acquisitions.⁸ Instead, the company has a long history of paying large, infrequent

special cash dividends when excess capital builds up on the balance sheet. This approach was on full display in fiscal 2024, when the company paid a $35.00 per share special dividend and subsequently announced an even larger $75.00 per share dividend (which was paid in early fiscal 2025). These two distributions returned a total of approximately $6.2 billion in cash to shareholders.¹

In addition to special dividends, the company opportunistically repurchases its own shares. During the first nine months of fiscal 2025, TransDigm allocated $500 million to share buybacks.³¹ This flexible and opportunistic approach to shareholder returns is a strategic choice that reinforces the PE-like model, preventing “cash drag” and ensuring capital is deployed in the most value-accretive manner available at any given time.

Recent Developments & Challenges (2023-2025)

The period from 2023 through 2025 has been dynamic for TransDigm, characterized by strong post-pandemic tailwinds in some of its key markets, persistent headwinds in others, and a significant strategic evolution in its leadership.

Post-COVID Aviation Recovery Impact

The robust and sustained recovery in global air travel has been a major tailwind for TransDigm’s most profitable segment. The continued growth in flight hours and the need to service an aging fleet have driven strong demand for commercial aftermarket parts. In the third quarter of fiscal 2025, the company’s commercial aftermarket revenue grew by 6% year-over-year.³⁹ Management’s guidance for the full fiscal year 2025 anticipates continued strength, with growth in this segment projected to be in the high single-digit to low double-digit percentage range.²³

OEM Production Headwinds

In stark contrast to the aftermarket strength, a key challenge has been persistent weakness in the commercial OEM segment. This has been primarily driven by the well-documented lower production rates at major airframers, particularly Boeing, as well as inventory destocking by some customers.¹³ Commercial OEM revenue was down year-over-year in the third quarter of fiscal 2025, and this weakness was the primary reason for a slight reduction in the company’s full-year sales guidance.¹³ The outlook for the commercial OEM segment in fiscal 2025 remains muted, with growth expected to be flat to the low single-digits.²³

This recent divergence between strong aftermarket performance and weak OEM results serves to validate the core investment thesis for the company. Despite the OEM weakness causing a top-line revenue miss in Q3 2025, the strength in the higher-margin aftermarket and defense businesses was so pronounced that the company simultaneously raised its full-year guidance for EBITDA and adjusted earnings per share.² This event acted as a real-world stress test, demonstrating the resilience of the business model and confirming that overall profitability is primarily driven by the more stable and lucrative aftermarket segment.

Supply Chain and Inflation

In line with the broader A&D industry, TransDigm has had to navigate ongoing supply chain disruptions and broad inflationary pressures.²⁵ However, the company’s powerful competitive position and significant pricing power appear to have allowed it to manage these cost pressures more effectively than most. This is evidenced by the company’s ability to continue expanding its industry-leading profit margins even in this challenging environment.³¹

Strategic Initiatives and Management Changes

TransDigm has remained strategically active during this period. The company continued to execute its acquisition strategy with the purchase of Servotronics and the announced acquisition of Simmons Precision in 2025.¹³ It also proactively managed its balance sheet, refinancing $2.65 billion of debt to extend its maturity profile.³¹

Perhaps the most significant development has been the announcement in May 2025 of a major leadership transition. Long-time CEO Kevin Stein is set to retire, with current Co-Chief Operating Officer Mike Lisman named as his successor.³⁸ This upcoming change at the top represents the most significant non-financial risk to the long-term investment case. TransDigm’s extraordinary success has been built not just on its portfolio of assets, but on a unique, disciplined, and aggressive “private equity” culture and capital allocation strategy honed over decades. While the appointment of a long-time insider suggests a commitment to strategic continuity, any deviation from the core playbook by the new leadership could erode the company’s competitive advantages. The first major capital allocation decisions of the new CEO will be critical for investors to monitor.

Growth Opportunities & Outlook

TransDigm’s future growth prospects are underpinned by a combination of powerful, long-term secular trends in its end-markets and the continued execution of its unique value-creation strategy.

Long-Term Commercial Aviation Growth

The primary long-term driver for TransDigm is the structural growth of global commercial aviation. Driven by an expanding global middle class, particularly in emerging markets, and a consumer preference for travel experiences, the demand for air travel is forecast to grow consistently for the foreseeable future. Boeing’s authoritative Commercial Market Outlook projects a 4.2% annual growth rate in passenger traffic through 2044.²¹ This secular trend provides a durable tailwind for both the OEM market, as airlines expand their fleets, and, more importantly for TransDigm, the aftermarket, as a larger global fleet requires more maintenance and parts over time.

Aging Fleet & Aftermarket Demand

In the medium term, a powerful growth driver is the current dynamic of an aging global fleet. As previously noted, production constraints at the major OEMs are forcing airlines to delay the retirement of older aircraft to meet passenger demand.⁴ This directly benefits TransDigm’s highest-margin business segment. Older planes require more frequent maintenance checks and consume spare parts at a higher rate than new aircraft. This dynamic is expected to provide a multi-year tailwind for MRO and aftermarket parts demand, supporting both volume and pricing power for TransDigm.

Sustained Defense Spending

The global geopolitical environment has shifted towards an era of great power competition and regional instability. This has led to a broad-based increase in defense budgets in the United States and among its allies in Europe and Asia.¹⁶ This trend is likely to support robust and sustained demand for military hardware for the foreseeable future, with a focus on modernizing existing platforms and procuring next-generation systems. With approximately 40% of its sales tied to the defense market, TransDigm is well-positioned to capitalize on this increased spending through its content on a wide variety of military aircraft and other defense systems.¹

Continued M&A Runway

The aerospace components market remains highly fragmented, with hundreds of small to medium-sized private companies that fit TransDigm’s specific acquisition criteria.⁴² This provides a long runway for the company to continue executing its core strategy of growth through bolt-on acquisitions. The company has demonstrated its continued focus in this area, maintaining an active M&A pipeline and deploying over $900 million in capital for acquisitions in fiscal 2025 alone.³¹ As long as management can identify suitable targets and acquire them at valuations that allow for its targeted “private equity-like returns,” M&A will remain a potent driver of growth in revenue, earnings, and cash flow.

Risk Assessment

Despite its strong market position and impressive financial performance, an investment in TransDigm is subject to a number of significant risks, primarily related to its aggressive financial leverage, the cyclical nature of its end-markets, and potential regulatory pressures.

Financial Risks and the Debt Burden

The most significant and immediate risk factor is the company’s highly leveraged balance sheet. With net debt of approximately $22.4 billion and a net debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 5.1x, the company’s capital structure carries substantial financial risk.³⁹ This high level of indebtedness requires a large portion of the company’s robust cash flow to be dedicated to servicing interest payments, which can limit financial flexibility.²³ A severe or prolonged downturn in the aerospace market could impair the company’s ability to meet its debt obligations. Furthermore, in a “higher for longer” interest rate environment, the cost of servicing this debt and refinancing future maturities could increase, although the company has mitigated a portion of this risk by hedging approximately 75% of its gross debt.³⁹ The restrictive covenants in its debt agreements also pose a risk, as a breach could trigger an acceleration of its debt obligations.⁶

Cyclical and Market Risks

TransDigm’s business is inextricably linked to the health of the global airline industry and the broader A&D sector. These industries are cyclical and highly sensitive to macroeconomic conditions, geopolitical shocks, pandemics, fuel price volatility, and acts of terrorism.⁶ A sharp decline in global air travel would lead to reduced flight hours, parked aircraft, and airline bankruptcies, which would severely depress demand for TransDigm’s high-margin aftermarket parts. Similarly, a significant reduction in U.S. defense spending could negatively impact a large portion of its business.⁶

Regulatory and Pricing Power Risk

The company’s exceptional profit margins have, in the past, attracted scrutiny from its largest customer, the U.S. government. A 2019 audit by the Department of Defense’s Inspector General concluded that TransDigm had earned “excess profits” on certain spare parts, citing specific instances of extremely high markups.⁵ While this audit did not result in any punitive action, it highlights a persistent risk. There is a possibility that government customers or industry regulators could, in the future, impose pricing caps or other restrictions that would directly challenge the company’s value-based pricing model and compress its industry-leading margins. Any significant erosion of its pricing power would strike at the very heart of the business model and investment thesis.

Acquisition and Integration Risk

TransDigm’s growth model is heavily dependent on its ability to successfully identify, acquire, and integrate new businesses. This strategy carries inherent risks.⁶ The company may overpay for an acquisition, fail to achieve the expected synergies and margin improvements, or struggle with the operational integration of a new business. These risks are amplified by the high valuation multiples that TransDigm often pays for what it considers to be premier assets.³⁶ A significant misstep in its M&A strategy could be highly destructive to shareholder value.

Operational and Product Liability Risks

As a manufacturer of flight-critical components, TransDigm is exposed to significant product liability risks. A failure of one of its products that leads to an aircraft incident could result in substantial legal liabilities and severe reputational damage.⁴³ The company is also subject to operational risks common to manufacturing businesses, including supply chain disruptions, labor shortages, and cybersecurity threats.⁶

Valuation Analysis

TransDigm’s valuation consistently reflects its status as a premier, high-performance asset in the A&D sector. The company’s shares persistently trade at a substantial premium to both its direct peers and the broader market, a phenomenon that can only be understood in the context of its superior financial characteristics.

Valuation Multiples vs. Peers

An analysis of key valuation metrics reveals the significant premium awarded to TransDigm by the market. As of early August 2025, TransDigm’s stock traded at a trailing twelve-month (TTM) GAAP P/E ratio of 53.5x and a TTM Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio of 11.0x.⁷ These multiples are starkly higher than those of major defense primes like Northrop Grumman (P/E of 21.6x, P/S of 2.1x), General Dynamics (P/E of 20.9x, P/S of 1.7x), and Lockheed Martin (P/E of 23.7x, P/S of 1.4x).⁷

Even when compared to other high-quality component suppliers, the premium is evident. Howmet Aerospace, a well-regarded peer, trades at a similar P/E but a lower P/S of 9.7x.⁷ The most direct competitor, HEICO, trades at an even higher P/E ratio of approximately 79x, reflecting its own strong growth and profitability, but a comparable P/S ratio of around 11.5x.⁴⁴ On a cash flow basis, TransDigm’s TTM EV/EBITDA multiple of approximately 26.2x is also significantly richer than the ~15.5x multiple for Northrop Grumman and the ~15.2x for General Dynamics.⁷

Comparative Valuation & Profitability Metrics

The following table compares TransDigm’s valuation multiples and key profitability metrics against a selection of its A&D peers. This data clearly illustrates the valuation premium and the underlying performance metrics that drive it.

Company	Ticker	Market Cap ($B)	TTM EV/EBITDA	TTM P/E	TTM P/S	TTM EBITDA Margin (%)
TransDigm Group	TDG	90.3	26.2x	53.5x	11.0x	53.0%
HEICO Corp.	HEI	39.7	39.0x	74.4x	9.4x	25.4%
Howmet Aerospace	HWM	74.3	36.5x	53.9x	9.7x	27.4%
Moog Inc.	MOG.A	5.8	15.3x	28.7x	1.6x	9.4%
Parker-Hannifin	PH	66.0	19.1x	27.1x	4.7x	21.3%
RTX Corp.	RTX	145.0	15.5x	26.1x	2.5x	15.3%
Northrop Grumman	NOC	84.0	15.5x	21.6x	2.1x	15.9%
Lockheed Martin	LMT	98.3	16.5x	23.7x	1.4x	14.2%

Source: Seeking Alpha, Morningstar, TipRanks.⁷ Data as of early August 2025. EBITDA margin for TDG is based on EBITDA As Defined. Market caps are approximate.

Justification for the Premium Valuation

The market’s willingness to assign such a high valuation to TransDigm is rooted in a clear set of superior financial and strategic attributes that differentiate it from its peers:

1. Exceptional and Unmatched Profitability: As shown in the table, TransDigm’s EBITDA margin of over 50% is in a different league entirely. Most A&D peers operate with EBITDA margins in the 15-25% range. This elite profitability is a direct result of its business model.
2. High-Quality, Recurring Revenue: The market places a higher value on the stable, high-margin, recurring revenue that comes from TransDigm’s aftermarket business, which is less cyclical than the OEM-heavy revenue streams of many peers.
3. Proven Value-Creation Model: The company has a multi-decade track record of successfully executing its strategy of acquiring businesses, improving their operations, and compounding shareholder value. This history of disciplined capital allocation earns it a premium.
4. Wide and Durable Economic Moat: Investors recognize the strength of TransDigm’s competitive advantages, which are built on a foundation of proprietary IP, high switching costs, and regulatory barriers that protect its long-term cash flows.

Impact of Acquisition Accounting

It is crucial to recognize that TransDigm’s aggressive acquisition strategy has a significant impact on its balance sheet and the applicability of certain valuation metrics. The company’s balance sheet carries a substantial amount of goodwill ($10.4 billion) and other intangible assets ($3.4 billion) as of September 30, 2024.⁶ This is a direct accounting consequence of paying purchase prices for acquired companies that are well in excess of the fair value of their tangible assets. This large amount of goodwill suppresses traditional metrics like book value (leading to the stockholders’ deficit) and makes ratios like P/B and ROE meaningless. Consequently, an analysis of TransDigm’s valuation and performance must prioritize cash-flow-based metrics (such as EV/EBITDA and Price-to-Free Cash Flow) and return metrics that account for all invested capital (like ROIC) over balance-sheet-centric ratios.

Management Quality & Governance

The long-term success of TransDigm’s unique business model is heavily dependent on the quality, discipline, and strategic vision of its leadership team.

Management Team and Track Record

TransDigm’s strategic direction has been remarkably consistent since its founding, largely due to the continued involvement of co-founder W. Nicholas Howley, who serves as Executive Chairman of the Board.⁵ This provides a crucial element of continuity and reinforces the company’s core value-creation philosophy. The senior management team has a long and demonstrably successful track record of executing the company’s complex strategy, delivering consistent growth and exceptional profitability through various economic cycles.

The recently announced succession of CEO Kevin Stein by Co-COO Mike Lisman is a pivotal event.³⁸ The selection of a long-time company insider for the top role suggests a strong desire to maintain strategic and cultural continuity. However, the new CEO’s ability to maintain the same level of capital allocation discipline and operational intensity as his predecessors will be a critical variable for investors to monitor closely.

Corporate Governance and Shareholder Alignment

TransDigm’s corporate governance and executive compensation structures are explicitly designed to align the interests of management with those of long-term shareholders, a key feature of its private equity-like model.

Executive compensation is heavily weighted towards long-term equity incentives, which are granted in the form of performance-based stock options.⁴⁹ Unlike time-vested options, these awards only become valuable if management achieves rigorous, pre-defined performance hurdles. The vesting of these options is tied to the growth of a proprietary metric called “Annual Operating Performance” (AOP), which incorporates EBITDA growth, cash generation, and efficient management of the company’s capital structure.⁴⁹ This incentive structure directly rewards the specific behaviors—profitable growth, cash generation, and disciplined capital deployment—that drive the business model.

The Board of Directors maintains oversight through standing Audit, Compensation, and Nominating & Corporate Governance committees, which are composed of independent directors.⁴⁹ The company has faced challenges from shareholders in the past regarding its executive compensation practices, particularly in the wake of the pandemic. However, the Board has demonstrated a willingness to engage with investors and has made responsive changes to its compensation program based on that feedback, such as reverting to more traditional performance targets and eliminating certain dividend equivalent payments for directors.⁴⁹

Key Questions for Further Investigation

Based on this comprehensive analysis, several critical questions remain that warrant further investigation and ongoing monitoring to refine the investment thesis for TransDigm Group.

1. Sustainability of Pricing Power and Regulatory Risk: Given the past scrutiny from the Department of Defense regarding “excess profits,” what is the realistic long-term risk of government or regulatory intervention that could impose pricing constraints on defense contracts or commercial aftermarket parts? How would the business model, which relies heavily on value-based pricing, adapt to a scenario of capped margins?
2. The M&A Endgame and the Law of Large Numbers: As TransDigm continues to grow, it becomes mathematically more difficult to find acquisitions that are both large enough to meaningfully impact its overall growth rate and still meet its strict criteria for proprietary content and aftermarket exposure. What is the estimated size of the remaining universe of potential acquisition targets, and at what point might the M&A-driven component of its growth model inevitably begin to decelerate?
3. CEO Succession and Cultural Integrity: The transition to a new CEO is a pivotal moment for any company, but it is especially critical for one with a culture as unique and disciplined as TransDigm’s. How will the new leadership ensure the preservation of the company’s aggressive, value-focused, “private equity” ethos? What are the key performance indicators and capital allocation decisions in the first 12-24 months of the new CEO’s tenure that will signal whether the strategic playbook remains fully intact?
4. Leverage in a “Higher for Longer” Interest Rate Environment: While the company has prudently hedged a significant portion of its variable-rate debt, a sustained period of higher global interest rates could still present challenges. How will this macroeconomic backdrop impact the economics of future acquisitions, which are typically funded with debt, and affect the company’s ability to refinance its substantial debt load on favorable terms over the next five to ten years?

Conclusion

TransDigm Group Incorporated presents a compelling but complex investment case, embodying a duality of exceptional quality and significant risk. The final analysis requires a careful balancing of these opposing forces.

The Bull Case

The investment case for TransDigm is built on the foundation of a uniquely advantaged business with a wide and durable economic moat in the lucrative aerospace aftermarket. Its proven, private equity-style operating model—focused on acquiring and optimizing niche, monopolistic businesses—has enabled it to generate industry-leading margins, powerful cash flows, and high returns on capital with remarkable consistency. The business is supported by powerful and enduring secular tailwinds, including the long-term structural growth in global air travel and a sustained period of elevated global defense spending. This powerful cash-flow-generating flywheel, operated by a management team with a long track record of disciplined execution, should continue to compound value for shareholders through a synergistic combination of organic growth, accretive acquisitions, and opportunistic capital returns. From this perspective, the company’s substantial valuation premium is a rational price to pay for a superior and uniquely durable business model.

The Bear Case

The bearish perspective, in contrast, focuses on the immense financial risk embedded in the company’s highly leveraged balance sheet. The entire value-creation model is predicated on the continued stability and growth of the aerospace cycle and the company’s uninterrupted ability to service its massive debt obligations. A severe or prolonged industry downturn could prove catastrophic, creating a scenario where its high fixed interest costs overwhelm its cash flows. Furthermore, the model’s heavy reliance on acquisitions for growth is not infinite and faces the challenge of a shrinking pool of suitable targets. The company also faces persistent, albeit low-probability, tail risks from potential regulatory backlash against its aggressive pricing strategies and execution risk associated with the critical upcoming CEO transition. From this viewpoint, the current premium valuation may not adequately compensate investors for these significant, non-trivial risks.

Synthesized View

Ultimately, TransDigm is a high-quality, high-risk, high-reward proposition. It is not a suitable investment for the faint of heart, but for investors with a high tolerance for financial leverage, it offers exposure to one of the most profitable and competitively advantaged businesses in the industrial sector. The key determinant of long-term shareholder returns will be management’s continued and unwavering discipline in three critical areas: first, exercising its formidable pricing power prudently, without triggering a major regulatory or customer backlash; second, executing its acquisition strategy flawlessly, without overpaying for assets or failing in post-merger integration; and third, prudently managing its highly leveraged balance sheet through all phases of the economic and credit cycles.

Works cited

1. TransDigm Group Incorporated – SEC.gov, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1260221/000126022125000008/a841225transdigmgroupbookm.pdf
2. TransDigm (TDG) Q3 Margin Hits 54% – Mitrade, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.mitrade.com/insights/news/live-news/article-8-1015443-20250806
3. STAKEHOLDER REPORT 2024 – TransDigm Group, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.transdigm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/TransDigm-2024-Stakeholder-Report.pdf
4. Global Fleet And MRO Market Forecast 2025-2035: Key Trends – Oliver Wyman, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.oliverwyman.com/our-expertise/insights/2025/feb/global-fleet-and-mro-market-forecast-2025-2035.html
5. TransDigm Group – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TransDigm_Group
6. tdg-20240930 – SEC.gov, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1260221/000126022124000083/tdg-20240930.htm
7. TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) Stock Competitors & Similar …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/TDG/peers/comparison
8. Investor FAQs – Inverstor Relations | TransDigm Group Inc., accessed August 6, 2025, https://transdigmgroupinc.gcs-web.com/investor-faqs/
9. TransDigm Group (TDG) Investor Relations Material – Quartr, accessed August 6, 2025, https://quartr.com/companies/transdigm-group-incorporated_4692
10. Event Calendar – TransDigm Group, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.transdigm.com/investor-relations/event-calendar/
11. TransDigm Overview, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.transdigm.com/transdigm-overview/
12. Is TransDigm’s Pricing Power Sustainable? – Eagle Point Capital, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.eaglepointcap.com/blog/is-transdigms-pricing-power-sustainable
13. Earnings call transcript: TransDigm Q3 2025 misses forecasts, stock drops – Investing.com, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/transcripts/earnings-call-transcript-transdigm-q3-2025-misses-forecasts-stock-drops-93CH-4171108
14. TransDigm Group: Transdigm Home, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.transdigm.com/
15. TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG): history, ownership, mission, how it works & makes money – dcfmodeling.com, accessed August 6, 2025, https://dcfmodeling.com/blogs/history/tdg-history-mission-ownership
16. The Aerospace And Defense Industry: Sky-High Success – Business Facilities, accessed August 6, 2025, https://businessfacilities.com/the-aerospace-and-defense-industry-sky-high-success/
17. Aerospace & Defense Outlook: Future Tech [2025] – Logic Fruit Technologies, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.logic-fruit.com/blog/avionics/aerospace-and-defense-outlook/
18. U.S. Aerospace and Defense Industry Expected to See Continued Growth | Spartronics, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.spartronics.com/resources/us-aerospace-and-defense-industry-expected-see-continued-growth
19. Aerospace & Defense Industry Market Research Reports, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/list/aerospace-%26-defense
20. 2025 Aerospace and Defense Industry Outlook | Deloitte Insights, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/aerospace-defense/aerospace-and-defense-industry-outlook.html
21. News Releases | Boeing Newsroom, accessed August 6, 2025, https://boeing.mediaroom.com/news-releases-statements?item=131556
22. Aerospace and Defense – S&P Global, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.spglobal.com/_assets/documents/ratings/research/101611598.pdf
23. TransDigm Group Reports Fiscal 2025 Third Quarter Results – PR Newswire, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/transdigm-group-reports-fiscal-2025-third-quarter-results-302521863.html
24. US Aerospace and Defense Market – A&D – Size, Share & Industry Statistics, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/us-aerospace-and-defense-market
25. 2025 Aerospace and Defense M&A Outlook | BRG, accessed August 6, 2025, https://media.thinkbrg.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/04081640/BRG-CF-AD-MA-Outlook-2025.pdf
26. Top TransDigm Group Competitors and Alternatives | Craft.co, accessed August 6, 2025, https://craft.co/transdigm/competitors
27. Transdigm Group Revenue 2010-2025 | TDG – Macrotrends, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/TDG/transdigm-group/revenue
28. TransDigm Q3 Earnings Miss Estimates, Sales Increase Y/Y – Nasdaq, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/transdigm-q3-earnings-miss-estimates-sales-increase-y-y
29. TransDigm (NYSE:TDG) Misses Q2 Revenue Estimates, Stock Drops – StockStory, accessed August 6, 2025, https://stockstory.org/us/stocks/nyse/tdg/news/earnings/transdigm-nysetdg-misses-q2-revenue-estimates-stock-drops
30. Transdigm (TDG) Financial Ratios – Investing.com, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.investing.com/equities/transdigm-group-inc-ratios
31. TransDigm (TDG) Q3 Margin Hits 54% – Nasdaq, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/transdigm-tdg-q3-margin-hits-54
32. Transdigm’s Business Model Remains a Success – Morningstar, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/transdigms-business-model-remains-success
33. Form 10-Q for Transdigm Group INC filed 02/04/2025, accessed August 6, 2025, https://transdigmgroupinc.gcs-web.com/static-files/2b23f9ee-46bc-4d8a-996b-f7ef544095df
34. Transdigm Group ROE – Return on Equity 2010-2025 | TDG – Macrotrends, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/TDG/transdigm-group/roe
35. TransDigm Group – M&A Summary and Business Overview | Mergr, accessed August 6, 2025, https://mergr.com/company/transdigm-group
36. TRANSDIGM ACQUIRES ESTERLINE — Wharton Undergraduate …, accessed August 6, 2025, http://www.whartonugpevc.com/articles/2019/3/13/transdigm-acquires-esterline
37. TransDigm Group Incorporated, accessed August 6, 2025, https://transdigmgroupinc.gcs-web.com/static-files/21bf3a09-f4b9-4466-8143-4110c564834d
38. Press Releases – TransDigm Group, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.transdigm.com/investor-relations/news-releases/
39. TransDigm Q3 2025 slides: revenue up 9.3%, stock falls despite raised guidance, accessed August 6, 2025, https://uk.investing.com/news/company-news/transdigm-q3-2025-slides-revenue-up-93-stock-falls-despite-raised-guidance-93CH-4200776
40. Presentations – TransDigm Group, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.transdigm.com/investor-relations/presentations/
41. Presentation Title – Inverstor Relations | TransDigm Group Inc., accessed August 6, 2025, https://transdigmgroupinc.gcs-web.com/static-files/6174ee85-a04d-4ca7-bcdf-7a0288babbed
42. TransDigm: The Acquisition of Aerosonic Corp. – Case – Faculty & Research, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=58219
43. Transdigm Group Inc. (TDG) Stock Risk Analysis – TipRanks.com, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.tipranks.com/stocks/tdg/risk-factors
44. Which Is a Better Investment, Heico Corp or TransDigm Group Incorporated Stock? | AAII, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.aaii.com/investingideas/article/24568-which-is-a-better-investment-heico-corp-or-transdigm-group-incorporated-stock
45. HEI Stock Price Quote | Morningstar, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/xnys/hei/quote
46. Heico Cp Cl A (HC1A) Financials: Ratios – TipRanks.com, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.tipranks.com/stocks/de:hc1a/financials/ratios
47. TDG Stock Price Quote – TransDigm Group Inc – Morningstar, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/xnys/tdg/quote
48. Moog Inc (MOG.A) Financials: Ratios – TipRanks.com, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.tipranks.com/stocks/mog.a/financials/ratios
49. DEF 14A – SEC.gov, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1260221/000119312523016872/d401846ddef14a.htm