Executive Summary & Investment Thesis

This report provides a comprehensive investment analysis of Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. (NYSE: KNSL), a specialty insurance company operating exclusively within the U.S. Excess & Surplus (E&S) lines market. The core investment thesis is that Kinsale represents a best-in-class operator whose durable competitive advantages—rooted in a proprietary technology platform, disciplined centralized underwriting, and a rigorous low-cost culture—justify its premium valuation. While the E&S market cycle is moderating from a period of historic growth and competitive pressures are intensifying, Kinsale’s structural advantages position it to continue delivering superior underwriting profitability, high returns on equity, and robust growth in book value per share over the long term.

The primary drivers supporting this thesis are threefold. First, Kinsale’s technology-first approach enables an industry-leading expense ratio, providing a permanent margin advantage that allows for either more competitive pricing or higher profitability on every risk underwritten. Second, its unwavering commitment to in-house underwriting, with no delegated authority, insulates it from the agency risks and potential misaligned incentives currently pressuring segments of the E&S market. Third, a highly experienced and cohesive management team has proven its ability to execute this strategy flawlessly, generating consistent, top-tier results.

The company’s valuation remains a key consideration. Kinsale has historically and continues to trade at a significant premium to its peers on key metrics such as price-to-earnings (P/E) and price-to-book (P/B). This analysis concludes that the premium is warranted by its substantially higher return on equity (ROE) and lower combined ratio. However, this high valuation also introduces risk; any material degradation in growth or profitability could lead to multiple compression.

The primary risks to this thesis include a more severe or prolonged cyclical downturn in the E&S market, a failure to maintain its underwriting discipline in the face of heightened competition, and the inherent volatility of catastrophe losses. Despite these risks, the analysis concludes with a favorable outlook. Kinsale’s superior business model is built to outperform across market cycles, and the company is well-positioned to capitalize on the long-term secular growth of the specialty insurance market.

Corporate Profile: A Modern Architect in Specialty Insurance

Business Model: The Pure-Play E&S Specialist

Kinsale Capital Group, Inc., founded in 2009 and headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, has established itself as a formidable pure-play specialty insurance company.¹ The company went public in July 2016 and its common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol KNSL.⁴ Its operational focus is exclusively on the U.S. excess and surplus (E&S) lines market, a segment of the property and casualty industry that provides coverage for risks that the standard, or “admitted,” insurance market is unwilling or unable to insure.²

The company’s market niche is precisely defined: it targets hard-to-place risks for small and mid-sized businesses.² These risks are often characterized by their complexity, uniqueness, high-risk operations, location in litigious venues, or a poor loss history.⁵ This specialized focus allows Kinsale greater flexibility in setting premium rates and structuring policy forms, as the E&S market is subject to less stringent regulation than the admitted market.

The core objective of Kinsale’s business model is the creation of long-term stockholder value through a disciplined, multi-pronged approach: generating consistent and attractive underwriting profits, securing steady investment returns from its investment portfolio, and managing its capital base prudently.² This philosophy emphasizes profitability over sheer premium volume, a hallmark of disciplined insurance operations. By adhering to this model, Kinsale has organically grown its stockholders’ equity at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 22.5% between 2013 and early 2016, and its gross written premiums at a CAGR of 18.9% over a similar period, demonstrating the efficacy of its strategy from its early days.⁵

Strategic Differentiators: The “Kinsale Edge”

Kinsale’s success and superior financial results are not accidental; they are the product of a purpose-built system where several strategic differentiators are deeply interconnected and mutually reinforcing. These elements constitute the “Kinsale Edge” and separate it from many of its competitors.

The most significant differentiator is the company’s treatment of technology as a core competency. From its inception, Kinsale was designed to be highly entrepreneurial and efficient, leveraging a proprietary, modern technology platform to drive daily operations.³ This platform is not merely a back-office support function but a central element of its strategy. It enhances data collection and analysis, which in turn improves risk selection, pricing accuracy, and claims management.⁵ This technological advantage is the primary driver of the company’s industry-leading low expense ratio, a key metric in insurance profitability.⁷ This efficiency is quantitatively evident; Kinsale operates with a lean staff of approximately 667 employees, a fraction of the workforce at larger competitors with comparable or even smaller market capitalizations.⁸ This streamlined structure directly translates into a lower expense base, providing a durable competitive advantage that manifests as either more competitive pricing or a higher margin on every policy underwritten.

A second cornerstone of Kinsale’s strategy is its disciplined, centralized underwriting. A key policy, and a point of significant differentiation, is the company’s refusal to delegate underwriting authority to outside parties.⁷ All underwriting decisions are made in-house by a team of highly experienced professionals, ensuring strict control over risk appetite and adherence to established guidelines. This stands in stark contrast to many competitors who utilize a network of Managing General Agents (MGAs) to source and underwrite business. The MGA model can introduce principal-agent conflicts, where the agent’s incentive to generate commission volume may not perfectly align with the long-term profitability goals of the capital provider. As recent market commentary from Kinsale’s own management suggests, this model is a source of aggressive and potentially unsustainable pricing in the market.⁹ By keeping all underwriting control in-house, Kinsale effectively insulates itself from this specific agency risk, prioritizing the quality and profitability of its book of business above all else.

This disciplined underwriting is complemented by vigorous expense management. The company’s entrepreneurial culture, combined with the efficiencies gained from its technology platform, fosters a vigilant control over expenses.³ This focus is a critical component of its ability to generate superior underwriting margins and is reflected in its consistently low expense ratio.

Finally, Kinsale utilizes a focused distribution channel. The company markets and sells its broad array of insurance products through a carefully selected network of independent insurance brokers across all 50 states and the District of Columbia.⁵ This model leverages the market access and relationships of these brokers. However, as detailed in the company’s risk factor disclosures, this strategy also creates a degree of concentration, with five brokers accounting for 63.4% of gross written premiums in 2023, making the maintenance of these key relationships critical to its continued success.¹⁰

Management and Corporate Governance

The execution of Kinsale’s strategy is entrusted to a highly experienced and cohesive leadership team. Many members of the management team, including Chairman and CEO Michael Kehoe, President and COO Brian Haney, and CFO Bryan Petrucelli, have worked together for decades in the E&S market, including at previous firms like James River Insurance.⁵ This long-standing collaboration and deep domain expertise represent a significant intangible asset, fostering a consistent corporate culture and a shared understanding of the nuances of specialty risk underwriting.

The company’s executive compensation program is designed to align management’s incentives directly with the interests of shareholders. As detailed in the company’s proxy statement, the most important financial performance metric used to link compensation to performance is “actual underwriting profit”.¹¹ This metric is the primary determinant of the bonus pool for the annual cash incentive program, ensuring that variable compensation is directly tied to the core driver of the business model’s success. This is supplemented by equity awards, which further align the executive team with long-term value creation for shareholders.¹¹ This clear and direct link between underwriting results and executive pay reinforces the company’s disciplined culture.

In terms of capital return, Kinsale has established a policy of paying a regular quarterly dividend.⁴ The company has a track record of consistently increasing this dividend, with eight consecutive years of growth.⁸ While the current dividend yield is modest, the consistent growth serves as a strong signal of management’s confidence in the company’s earnings power and its commitment to returning capital to shareholders.⁸ As a holding company, Kinsale’s ability to pay these dividends is dependent on distributions from its insurance subsidiary, which are subject to regulatory oversight and statutory limits based on policyholder surplus and net income.¹⁰

Industry Analysis: The Excess & Surplus Market Landscape

Market Dynamics: Navigating a Moderating Hard Market Cycle

The U.S. E&S insurance market, where Kinsale exclusively operates, has been in a period of historic expansion. The market has registered six consecutive years of double-digit growth, culminating in a compound annual growth rate of 21% over the past five years.¹³ For full-year 2024, total E&S direct premiums written reached nearly $100 billion, and are projected to exceed that milestone in 2025.¹³ This robust growth has been fueled by a “hard market” cycle, a period characterized by rising premium rates, stricter underwriting standards, and reduced capacity from standard carriers, which forces more complex risks into the E&S channel.

However, the momentum of this cycle is clearly decelerating. The market’s overall growth rate slowed to 13.4% in 2024, down from 14.5% in 2023 and significantly below the peak growth of 32.3% recorded in 2021.¹⁴ Industry analysts anticipate that this trend of more moderate expansion will continue into 2025.¹³ Despite this slowdown, the fundamental conditions of a hard market are expected to persist in 2025, with carriers continuing to demand elevated premiums and maintain disciplined underwriting standards for many types of risks.¹³

This dynamic creates a nuanced operating environment. The market is shifting from a period where broad, property-driven rate increases lifted all participants to one where underwriting skill and specialization are becoming more critical differentiators. The slowdown in growth is not uniform across all lines of business. It is most pronounced in commercial property lines, particularly in catastrophe-exposed geographies, where a significant influx of capital is now chasing business and pushing rates down after several years of sharp increases.¹⁴ In contrast, E&S liability premium growth, after a brief slowdown in 2023, re-accelerated to double-digit levels in 2024.¹⁴ This divergence highlights a crucial shift: casualty and other specialty lines are becoming the primary engines of growth in the current phase of the market cycle. E&S carriers with a diversified portfolio and deep expertise in complex casualty lines are therefore better positioned to navigate this evolving landscape than those focused purely on property catastrophe risk.

Secular Tailwinds and Cyclical Headwinds

The E&S market is influenced by a combination of long-term secular trends that support its growth and shorter-term cyclical pressures that can create headwinds.

The most powerful secular tailwind is the increasing complexity of risk in a modern economy. This complexity is driven by several factors. First, the rising frequency and severity of natural catastrophes, such as hurricanes, wildfires, and convective storms, make property risks more difficult for standard carriers to price and manage, pushing homeowners and businesses to seek coverage in the E&S market.¹³ Second, the phenomenon of “social inflation”—the trend of larger jury awards, more aggressive litigation tactics, and broader definitions of liability—has dramatically increased the potential cost of casualty claims, making the specialized underwriting expertise of the E&S market essential.¹³ Third, the constant emergence of new technologies and business models creates novel risks, such as cyber liability, that the admitted market is often slow to address, leaving the innovative and flexible E&S market to fill the void.¹³

Against these powerful tailwinds, the industry faces several cyclical headwinds. The most immediate is the intensification of competition. As the property market stabilizes, an abundance of capital is leading to increased price competition, which is now depressing rates in some segments.¹⁴ This was confirmed by the AmWINS E&S pricing index, which reported an overall rate decrease of 2.4% in the second quarter of 2025, driven by a steep 20% decline in commercial property pricing in certain high-exposure zones.⁹

A more structural headwind is the looming talent gap. The insurance sector is confronting a significant human capital challenge, with nearly 50% of its workforce over the age of 50 and high retirement rates expected in the coming decade.¹⁷ Simultaneously, the industry has a growing need for data scientists, analytics experts, and technology professionals, but demand for these skills far outpaces the available supply.¹⁷ This talent shortage could constrain the ability of legacy carriers to innovate and adapt. This industry-wide challenge, however, may paradoxically benefit a modern, technology-centric firm like Kinsale. Having been built from the ground up with a proprietary technology platform, Kinsale operates with a much smaller, more efficient workforce than its peers.⁸ This model is less dependent on large-scale hiring and is inherently more attractive to the tech-savvy talent the rest of the industry is struggling to recruit, potentially turning an industry headwind into a source of sustainable competitive advantage.

Emerging Risks and Opportunities

The E&S market is at the forefront of insuring emerging risks, creating both challenges and significant growth opportunities.

Cyber Liability remains a premier growth area. The market is poised for continued expansion, with forecasts predicting annual premium increases of 15-20% to reach approximately $23 billion by the end of 2026.¹³ This growth is driven by heightened cyber threats, including ransomware and social engineering, as well as increased regulatory scrutiny. The rise of generative AI introduces new complexities, as threat actors leverage it for more sophisticated attacks, forcing underwriters to balance competitive pricing with heightened scrutiny of an insured’s cybersecurity posture.¹³

The Construction sector presents a mixed but compelling opportunity. While the commercial construction market is expected to see modest growth of 2% in 2025, the residential market is projected to grow by a much stronger 12%, driven by housing shortages.¹³ This bifurcation requires specialized underwriting to navigate the distinct risk profiles of each sub-sector.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) represents a transformative opportunity for the industry, with the potential to dramatically improve efficiency in underwriting, pricing, and claims processing.¹⁷ However, its adoption has been challenging, with many AI initiatives at legacy carriers stalling due to difficulties integrating with older systems.¹⁷ This again highlights the advantage held by newer, more technologically agile companies that can more readily adopt and leverage these powerful new tools.

Financial and Operational Performance Review

Kinsale’s financial and operational track record is central to its investment case. The company has consistently delivered a combination of high growth and superior profitability that is rare in the insurance industry. An examination of its key performance indicators reveals a highly efficient and disciplined value-creation engine.

Underwriting Excellence: Deconstructing the Combined Ratio

Sustained underwriting profitability is the foundation of Kinsale’s success. The primary measure of this is the combined ratio, which is the sum of the loss ratio (losses and loss adjustment expenses as a percentage of net earned premiums) and the expense ratio (underwriting and acquisition expenses as a percentage of net earned premiums). A ratio below 100% indicates an underwriting profit.

Kinsale has a remarkable history of producing exceptionally low combined ratios. For the second quarter of 2025, the company reported a combined ratio of 75.8%, with a year-to-date ratio of 78.8%.¹⁸ These figures are consistent with its historical performance, which has often been in the mid-to-high 70s.² This level of underwriting margin is best-in-class and significantly better than the industry average.

The company’s loss ratio for the second quarter of 2025 was 55.1%.¹⁸ Notably, this result included 3.9 percentage points of net favorable development of loss reserves from prior accident years.⁹ This recurring favorable development is a strong indicator of a conservative initial reserving philosophy, where the company sets aside more than enough in reserves to cover ultimate claim costs. This prudence, particularly on long-tail casualty lines where management has noted increased conservatism due to inflation concerns, is a key element of its risk management.⁹

The second component of the combined ratio, the expense ratio, is where Kinsale’s technological advantage is most apparent. The expense ratio for the second quarter of 2025 was an impressively low 20.7%, an improvement from 21.1% in the prior-year period.⁹ This figure is substantially lower than that of most competitors and is a direct result of the efficiencies gained from its proprietary technology platform and lean operational structure.

Growth Trajectory: Analysis of Gross Written Premiums

Kinsale has demonstrated an impressive ability to grow its business since its founding. Gross written premiums (GWP) have expanded from $125.3 million in 2013 to over $1.7 billion in recent reporting periods, showcasing significant market share gains.⁵

More recently, the headline GWP growth rate has moderated, increasing by 4.9% in the second quarter of 2025.¹⁸ However, this aggregate figure masks the underlying strength of the business. The slowdown is almost entirely attributable to a strategic pullback in the commercial property division, where intense competition has driven rates down. Premiums in that division declined by 16.8% in the quarter.⁹

When the commercial property division is excluded, Kinsale’s GWP growth was a robust 14.3% in the second quarter of 2025.⁹ This demonstrates the continued strong demand and execution in the majority of its business lines. This growth is supported by strong submission flow from its broker partners, which increased by 9% overall in the quarter despite the decline in property submissions.⁹ This resilience highlights the benefit of Kinsale’s diversified E&S portfolio and its ability to pivot towards more profitable lines of business in a dynamic market.

Investment Portfolio Strategy and Performance

Complementing its underwriting profits, Kinsale generates significant earnings from its investment portfolio. The company’s strategy is to produce steady and reliable investment returns, primarily from a conservatively managed portfolio of fixed-income securities.²

Net investment income has become an increasingly important contributor to the bottom line, particularly in the recent rising interest rate environment. In the second quarter of 2025, net investment income grew by a strong 29.6% year-over-year to $46.5 million.¹⁸ This growth is a function of both higher yields on its portfolio and the continued growth of its asset base, which is fueled by the company’s “float.”

Float is the substantial sum of premiums collected from policyholders that has not yet been paid out in claims. This capital can be invested for the benefit of shareholders. At the end of the second quarter of 2025, Kinsale’s float totaled $2.9 billion, a significant increase from $2.5 billion at the end of 2024.⁹ The consistent generation of underwriting profits and premium growth ensures that this float continues to expand, providing an ever-larger base of assets to generate investment income. As of March 31, 2024, the company’s balance sheet showed that the vast majority of its investment portfolio was held in fixed-maturity securities.²¹

Profitability and Shareholder Value Creation

The ultimate measure of an insurance company’s performance is its ability to generate high returns on the capital entrusted to it by shareholders. On this front, Kinsale’s performance is exceptional. The company consistently generates an industry-leading return on equity (ROE). For the first six months of 2025, Kinsale produced an annualized operating ROE of 24.7%.⁹ This level of return is a direct result of its superior underwriting and efficient use of capital, and it is a key driver of long-term value creation.

This high ROE translates into strong earnings growth. For the second quarter of 2025, net income increased by 44.9% year-over-year, with diluted earnings per share (EPS) rising 45.1% to $5.76.⁹ The company’s preferred non-GAAP metric, diluted operating EPS, also showed strong growth of 27.5%.²⁰

This sustained profitability drives rapid growth in the intrinsic value of the company, which for an insurer is best measured by book value per share. In a remarkable demonstration of value creation, Kinsale’s book value per share increased by 16% in the first half of 2025 alone.⁹ This compounding of book value at a high rate is the primary mechanism through which the company delivers long-term returns to its stockholders.

---

Table 1: Kinsale Capital Group – 5-Year Financial Summary

Metric	2020	2021	2022	2023	2024
Gross Written Premiums ($M)	$530.4	$849.2	$1,288.0	$1,720.0	$1,900.0
Net Income ($M)	$91.2	$153.7	$161.4	$309.2	$414.8
Loss Ratio (%)	51.5%	55.4%	58.2%	57.1%	56.1%
Expense Ratio (%)	24.1%	22.0%	21.0%	20.8%	20.3%
Combined Ratio (%)	75.6%	77.4%	79.2%	77.9%	76.4%
Return on Equity (%)	22.0%	25.9%	20.1%	25.9%	32.3%
Book Value per Share ($)	$17.98	$26.00	$34.69	$52.79	$63.75

Note: Data is compiled and synthesized from various sources for illustrative purposes, including 10-K filings, investor presentations, and financial data aggregators.² Figures for 2023 and 2024 are based on available data which may represent trailing-twelve-month or full-year estimates.

This table quantifies Kinsale’s exceptional performance profile. It showcases a consistent, high-double-digit growth rate in GWP, demonstrating significant and sustained market share gains. The combined ratio has remained remarkably stable and at a best-in-class level, consistently below 80%, which is the gold standard for underwriting profitability. The table also deconstructs this ratio, revealing a stable and well-managed loss ratio and a steadily declining expense ratio, which is a testament to the scaling benefits of its technology-driven model. Finally, the table illustrates how this powerful combination of growth and underwriting profit translates directly into a return on equity that has consistently been above 20%, driving a rapid and impressive compounding of book value per share for investors.

Competitive Positioning and Peer Benchmarking

Kinsale operates in a highly competitive segment of the insurance market. Its ability to generate superior returns is contingent on maintaining its competitive advantages against a field of well-established and formidable rivals. A thorough benchmarking analysis is therefore essential to contextualize its performance and valuation.

The Competitive Arena: Profiling Key E&S Players

Kinsale’s primary competitors are other specialty insurance carriers with significant operations in the E&S market. The most relevant peers for comparison include W.R. Berkley Corporation (WRB), RLI Corp. (RLI), and Markel Corporation (MKL).¹⁹ Other notable players in the space include Ryan Specialty (RYAN), American Financial Group (AFG), and AXIS Capital (AXS).⁸

W.R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) is a large, diversified commercial lines insurance holding company founded in 1967.²⁴ It is a major force in the E&S market and became the largest E&S liability writer in 2024.¹⁴ Unlike Kinsale’s centralized model, WRB operates through a decentralized structure of nearly 60 distinct, specialized operating units, each with a high degree of autonomy.²⁶ This structure allows it to react quickly to changing market conditions in various niche markets.²⁷ For the full year 2024, WRB reported strong results, with GWP growing 9.6% to $14.2 billion and a consolidated combined ratio of 90.3%.²⁸

RLI Corp. (RLI) is another long-tenured specialty insurer known for its consistent track record of underwriting profitability.²³ The company operates through three main segments: Casualty, Property, and Surety, focusing on unique and hard-to-place risks where it can compete on coverage and service rather than price.³⁰ RLI distributes its products through a variety of channels, including wholesale and retail brokers and independent agents.³⁰ In 2024, its specialty admitted operations produced $1.1 billion in GWP, while its E&S operations wrote $848 million.³¹

Markel Corporation (MKL) is a diverse financial holding company that operates a unique “three-engine” business architecture, which has earned it comparisons to a smaller version of Berkshire Hathaway.³² Its three engines are: specialty Insurance (including E&S and reinsurance), Investments (managing the company’s float), and Markel Ventures (a portfolio of non-insurance businesses).³⁴ For 2024, its Insurance segment reported a gross premium volume of $9.4 billion, while the Reinsurance segment reported $1.2 billion.³⁴

Quantitative Peer Analysis: A Tale of the Metrics

When benchmarked quantitatively against these high-quality peers, Kinsale’s operational superiority becomes starkly evident.

On profitability and returns, Kinsale consistently leads the pack. Its annualized operating ROE of 24.7% for the first half of 2025 and reported full-year ROE of 32.3% for 2024 significantly outperform peers.² For comparison, W.R. Berkley, a very strong performer in its own right, reported an operating ROE of 22.4% for 2024.²⁸ Kinsale’s net margin of nearly 26% is also substantially higher than that of other specialty insurers.¹²

The most significant differentiator is the underwriting margin. Kinsale’s combined ratio in the mid-70s is truly best-in-class.¹⁸ W.R. Berkley reported a combined ratio of 90.2% for 2024, while Markel’s was 94% for the first nine months of 2018.²⁸ This gap of approximately 1,500 to 2,000 basis points in underwriting profitability is a massive and durable competitive advantage for Kinsale.

In terms of growth, Kinsale was among the fastest-growing E&S writers in 2024, alongside larger players like The Hartford and Chubb.¹⁴ While its headline growth has moderated recently due to the strategic pullback in commercial property, its underlying growth of over 14% in its other divisions remains very strong.⁹

This superior performance commands a premium valuation. Kinsale’s P/E ratio of approximately 24-26x is significantly higher than that of WRB (around 16x), RLI (around 19-22x), and MKL (around 12x).⁸ This valuation gap reflects the market’s recognition of Kinsale’s superior profitability and growth prospects.

The Rise of MGAs and Fronting Companies: A New Competitive Threat

A significant recent development in the competitive landscape is the increased activity and aggressive pricing from MGAs and fronting carriers, particularly in the commercial property market.⁹ A fronting carrier is a licensed insurer that issues policies on behalf of an MGA or another entity, retaining little to no risk itself and ceding the vast majority of it to reinsurers.

During the Q2 2025 earnings call, Kinsale’s management team explicitly called out this segment of the market as a source of intense competition. They noted that some of these fronting companies were posting “unsustainable gross loss ratios of 100% or higher” for 2024, which strongly suggests under-reserving and potential future financial distress.⁹ Management drew a parallel to the 2008 mortgage crisis, highlighting the misalignment of interests between the originators of the risk (the MGAs, who are compensated on volume) and the ultimate bearers of that risk (the reinsurers and other capital providers).⁹

This dynamic creates both a near-term challenge and a long-term opportunity for Kinsale. In the short term, the aggressive pricing from these competitors is depressing rates and has forced Kinsale to scale back its writings in the commercial property line to maintain its underwriting discipline. However, in the long term, if these unsustainable business models falter, it could lead to a significant market disruption. Such an event would likely trigger a “flight to quality,” where brokers and insureds would seek out financially sound and disciplined underwriters like Kinsale, potentially leading to a surge in submission flow and an opportunity to gain significant market share at more rational pricing. Kinsale’s strict policy of no delegated underwriting authority directly shields it from the operational and financial risks inherent in this model.

---

Table 2: E&S Peer Group – Comparative Metrics (2024 / TTM)

Metric	Kinsale (KNSL)	W.R. Berkley (WRB)	RLI Corp. (RLI)	Markel (MKL)
Market Cap ($B)	$10.7	$27.0	$6.1	$24.7
GWP Growth (YoY)	6.3% (1H 2025)	9.6% (FY 2024)	N/A	5.0% (FY 2024)
Combined Ratio	78.8% (1H 2025)	90.2% (FY 2024)	88.0% (FY 2024)	98.0% (FY 2024)
Expense Ratio	20.3% (1H 2025)	28.5% (Q4 2024)	~35% (Implied)	~35% (Implied)
Loss Ratio	58.5% (1H 2025)	61.7% (FY 2024)	~53% (Implied)	~63% (Implied)
Net Margin	25.9%	12.3%	N/A	16.5%
Operating ROE	24.7% (Ann. 1H 2025)	22.4% (FY 2024)	N/A	14.1%

Note: Data is compiled and synthesized from various sources for illustrative purposes, including earnings releases, 10-K filings, and financial data aggregators.¹² Ratios for RLI and MKL are estimated based on available data and may not be directly comparable. GWP Growth for KNSL is for the first half of 2025 vs. 2024.

This table provides the quantitative foundation for Kinsale’s best-in-class reputation. It starkly illustrates the magnitude of the company’s outperformance relative to its highly respected peers. While all are strong companies, Kinsale’s combined ratio is over 1,000 basis points lower than W.R. Berkley’s and nearly 2,000 basis points lower than Markel’s. The table further breaks this down, showing that this advantage stems from both a well-managed loss ratio and, most critically, a substantially lower expense ratio. This superior underwriting performance, in turn, drives a significantly higher operating ROE. This data provides the clear, objective evidence that underpins the argument that Kinsale’s premium valuation is not arbitrary but is directly tied to its demonstrably more efficient and profitable operating model.

Valuation Analysis

The central question for any potential investor in Kinsale is whether its superior operational performance justifies its consistently premium valuation. The stock has always commanded high multiples relative to its peers, and while these have compressed from their historical peaks, they remain elevated. This section analyzes the valuation from historical, relative, and intrinsic perspectives.

Historical Context: Justifying the Premium

Since its IPO in 2016, Kinsale’s stock has been awarded a premium valuation by the market in recognition of its exceptional growth and profitability. An analysis of its historical valuation multiples provides important context for its current trading levels.

The company’s historical average P/E ratio over the last nine years stands at a lofty 38.25.³⁵ This average encompasses a wide range, with the multiple peaking at over 91x in the quarter following its IPO and reaching a low near 24x in mid-2024, as the market began to price in moderating growth.³⁵ Similarly, the price-to-book (P/B) ratio, a key valuation metric for insurance companies, has been consistently high. At the end of 2024, the P/B ratio was 7.39, compared to 8.10 at the end of 2022 and 5.56 at the end of 2019.⁴¹

This sustained premium valuation has been fundamentally supported by the company’s best-in-class financial metrics. Investors have been willing to pay a higher multiple for Kinsale’s stock because of its ability to consistently deliver a combination of high-double-digit growth in premiums and book value, coupled with an underwriting margin and return on equity that are in the top echelon of the entire property and casualty industry.

Relative Valuation: KNSL vs. Peers

When compared to its direct competitors, Kinsale’s valuation premium is stark.

As of August 2025, Kinsale’s trailing-twelve-month (TTM) P/E ratio is in the range of 24x to 26x.¹⁹ This is a significant premium to its high-quality peer group. For comparison, W.R. Berkley trades at a P/E of approximately 16x, RLI Corp. trades at around 19-22x, American Financial Group at about 14.5x, and Markel at a P/E of roughly 12x.⁸

The disparity is even more pronounced on a P/B basis. As of August 2025, Kinsale’s P/B ratio is approximately 6.8x.⁴¹ This is more than double the P/B ratio of W.R. Berkley (around 2.9-3.0x) and RLI Corp. (around 3.5-3.8x), and more than four times that of Markel (around 1.4x).³⁹

While these multiples appear high in isolation, they must be considered in the context of the company’s profitability. A price-to-earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio, which adjusts the P/E for earnings growth, offers one way to normalize the valuation. One source calculates Kinsale’s PEG ratio at 1.16, which suggests that the valuation may be more reasonable when its high growth rate is factored into the equation.⁸

Intrinsic Value Drivers and Future Outlook

The intrinsic value of an insurance company is primarily driven by its ability to grow its book value per share at a high rate over a long period. This, in turn, is a function of its sustainable return on equity. Kinsale’s ability to consistently generate an ROE in excess of 20% is the fundamental underpinning of its valuation.² As long as the company can continue to deploy capital at these high rates of return, its intrinsic value will continue to compound rapidly.

The company’s future growth runway appears robust. The E&S market continues to benefit from secular tailwinds of increasing risk complexity, and Kinsale’s focus on the highly fragmented small-account segment provides ample room for market share gains.⁷ Furthermore, its expansion into new product lines, such as the recently launched homeowners product in catastrophe-prone states, opens up new avenues for growth.⁹

The primary risk to the valuation is a potential de-rating of its multiples. The current valuation leaves little room for operational missteps. If the moderating E&S cycle and intensifying competition were to cause Kinsale’s growth to slow to market-average rates, or if its combined ratio were to deteriorate towards peer levels, its substantial valuation premium would become difficult to justify. Such a scenario could lead to significant multiple compression, resulting in stock price underperformance even if the business continues to perform well on an absolute basis. The investment debate, therefore, centers on an investor’s conviction in the durability of Kinsale’s competitive advantages and its ability to continue executing at a level that merits its premium multiples.

---

Table 3: Valuation Analysis – Historical and Peer Comparison

Metric	Kinsale (KNSL)	W.R. Berkley (WRB)	RLI Corp. (RLI)	Markel (MKL)
Current P/E Ratio (TTM)	~25.0x	~16.1x	~20.8x	~11.7x
5-Year Average P/E Ratio	34.2x	16.0x	18.5x	51.7x
Current P/B Ratio (TTM)	~6.8x	~2.9x	~3.5x	~1.4x
5-Year Average P/B Ratio	~7.1x	~2.1x	~4.1x	~1.3x
Operating ROE	24.7%	22.4%	~20% (Est.)	14.1%

Note: Data is compiled and synthesized from various sources for illustrative purposes, including financial data aggregators.³⁵ Averages and current ratios are based on available data as of August 2025 and may vary slightly between sources. Markel’s 5-year average P/E is skewed by periods of negative earnings.

This table directly addresses the central valuation question. It clearly shows the significant valuation premium that Kinsale commands over its peers on both P/E and P/B metrics. By including the 5-year average multiples, it provides crucial historical context, indicating that while Kinsale’s current P/E ratio has come down, its P/B ratio remains near its historical average premium. Most importantly, the juxtaposition of the valuation multiples with the operating ROE creates a “valuation versus quality” framework. This allows for a visual connection between Kinsale’s ~6.8x P/B ratio and its ~25% ROE, compared to W.R. Berkley’s ~2.9x P/B and ~22% ROE. This presentation makes the argument that an investor is “paying up for quality” and facilitates a more nuanced discussion about whether the size of the premium is justified by the superior returns on shareholder capital.

Comprehensive Risk Assessment

A thorough investment analysis requires a clear-eyed assessment of the risks that could potentially impair the company’s financial performance and stock value. Kinsale, like all insurance enterprises, is exposed to a range of risks inherent to its business model and the markets in which it operates. These risks can be categorized into insurance and underwriting, market and competitive, and investment, operational, and regulatory risks.

Insurance and Underwriting Risks

Inadequate Loss Reserves: The most fundamental risk for any property and casualty insurer is the possibility that the reserves established for future claim payments will prove to be inadequate.¹⁰ The process of setting loss reserves is based on complex actuarial estimates, not exact calculations. Actual ultimate losses can differ materially from these estimates due to unforeseen trends in claims inflation, changes in legal or social environments (“social inflation”), and the long-tail nature of many casualty insurance lines, where claims can emerge many years after a policy has expired. If reserves prove deficient, Kinsale would be required to increase them, which would reduce its net income and stockholders’ equity.¹⁰

Catastrophe Exposure: As a writer of property insurance, Kinsale is exposed to significant losses from natural and man-made catastrophic events, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, wildfires, and terrorist attacks.¹⁰ The increasing frequency and severity of severe weather events, potentially linked to global climate change, represent a growing challenge for the industry. A single large catastrophic event or an unusual accumulation of smaller events could cause substantial losses and adversely affect Kinsale’s financial condition.¹⁰

Reinsurance Risk: Kinsale mitigates its exposure to large losses by purchasing reinsurance from other insurance companies. However, this practice introduces two key risks. First is reinsurance counterparty credit risk: a reinsurer may become insolvent or otherwise fail to pay the claims it owes, leaving Kinsale responsible for the full amount of the original loss.¹⁰ Second is the risk that reinsurance may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. A hardening of the reinsurance market could lead to higher costs or reduced availability of coverage, forcing Kinsale to either retain more risk on its own balance sheet or reduce the amount of business it writes.¹⁰ The company recently increased its net retention on its catastrophe and casualty reinsurance treaties, a move that increases its exposure to large losses but also allows it to retain more of its underwriting profits.⁹

Market and Competitive Pressures

Cyclicality of the E&S Market: The property and casualty insurance industry is cyclical, characterized by periods of intense price competition (a “soft market”) and periods of rising rates and disciplined underwriting (a “hard market”). This cyclicality is often more pronounced in the E&S market.¹⁰ A prolonged soft market could put significant pressure on Kinsale’s premium growth and underwriting margins, making it more difficult to achieve its target returns.

Intense Competition: Kinsale faces intense competition from other specialty insurers, standard carriers, and diversified financial services companies, many of which have greater financial resources.¹⁰ As discussed, a recent source of acute competitive pressure has been the aggressive pricing from MGAs and fronting companies, which has negatively impacted rates in the commercial property market.⁹ An inability to compete effectively on service, terms, and price without sacrificing underwriting discipline is a key risk.

Broker Concentration: Kinsale relies on a select group of wholesale insurance brokers to distribute its products. In 2023, its top five broker relationships accounted for 63.4% of its gross written premiums.¹⁰ The loss or significant deterioration of one or more of these key relationships could materially and adversely affect the company’s ability to generate new business and could negatively impact its premium volume.¹⁰

Investment, Operational, and Regulatory Risks

Investment Risk: The company’s investment portfolio, which is primarily composed of fixed-income securities, is subject to market risks. A sharp increase in interest rates would decrease the market value of its existing bond portfolio. Conversely, a prolonged period of very low interest rates would pressure its net investment income. The portfolio is also subject to credit risk, where an issuer could default on its debt obligations, and equity price risk for the smaller portion of the portfolio invested in stocks.¹⁰

Technology & Cyber Risk: Kinsale’s business model is highly dependent on its proprietary technology platform. A major system failure, prolonged outage, or a significant cybersecurity breach could severely disrupt its operations, compromise sensitive data, and result in financial losses and reputational damage.¹⁰ The increasing sophistication of cyber threats, including those leveraging AI, represents a persistent and evolving risk.¹⁰

Regulatory Risk: The insurance industry is subject to extensive and comprehensive regulation at the state level. These regulations govern areas such as licensing, solvency and capital requirements, investment limitations, and restrictions on the payment of dividends from insurance subsidiaries to their parent holding companies.¹⁰ Changes in these regulations or a failure to comply with them could result in fines, penalties, or other adverse actions that could limit the company’s ability to conduct its business.¹⁰

Conclusion: Investment Recommendation

This comprehensive analysis of Kinsale Capital Group reveals a company with a superior, structurally advantaged business model operating effectively within a dynamic and challenging industry. The investment decision hinges on weighing the company’s demonstrable, best-in-class execution against the risks posed by a moderating market cycle and a premium stock valuation.

The Bull Case: Sustained Best-in-Class Execution

The bull case for Kinsale is predicated on the durability of its profound competitive advantages. The company’s proprietary technology platform is not just an efficiency tool; it is the engine of a low-cost operating model that provides a sustainable margin advantage over nearly all of its competitors. This structural advantage, reflected in its industry-leading expense ratio, allows Kinsale to be highly profitable even in competitive markets. This is coupled with an unwavering commitment to disciplined, centralized underwriting, which insulates the company from the agency risks that can lead to poor risk selection and adverse loss development elsewhere in the market. As long as this disciplined, technology-driven model remains intact, Kinsale should be able to continue generating superior underwriting margins and high returns on equity, regardless of the broader market cycle. The company’s focus on the fragmented small-account E&S market provides a long runway for continued growth, and the potential for market disruption caused by the failure of less-disciplined, MGA-focused competitors could serve as a catalyst to accelerate market share gains in a “flight to quality.”

The Bear Case: Valuation Risk Meets Peak Market Conditions

The bear case centers on the argument that Kinsale’s stock, despite its operational excellence, is priced for perfection, leaving no margin for error. The E&S market cycle appears to have passed its peak of pricing power, particularly in property lines. A continued moderation in premium growth, combined with intensifying competition that could begin to pressure underwriting margins, poses a significant risk to the stock’s high valuation multiples. If Kinsale’s growth rate slows to a level more in line with the overall market, or if its combined ratio begins to drift up towards peer levels, the substantial premium embedded in its P/E and P/B ratios would become unsustainable. This could lead to a significant de-rating of the stock through multiple compression, which could cause the stock to underperform even if the underlying business continues to generate solid, albeit less spectacular, results.

Final Outlook and Recommendation

The evidence strongly suggests that Kinsale’s operational superiority is not a temporary phenomenon but a structural feature of its business model. The company’s ability to consistently generate combined ratios in the mid-70s and operating returns on equity above 20% places it in an elite category of insurance underwriters. While near-term headwinds from increased competition in the commercial property market have moderated headline growth, the robust expansion in the rest of its business demonstrates the resilience of its diversified portfolio and the continued strong demand for its products.

The high valuation is a valid concern and introduces a degree of risk. However, the analysis concludes that the premium is justified by the company’s substantially superior profitability and its consistent ability to compound book value at a high rate. For long-term investors with a tolerance for the valuation risk, Kinsale Capital Group represents a compelling opportunity to own a best-in-class operator with a long runway for growth and value creation. The company’s strategic advantages are durable, and it is exceptionally well-positioned to navigate the evolving E&S market and continue delivering superior returns to shareholders over the long term.

Works cited

1. Investor Contacts – Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. | Resources, accessed August 30, 2025, https://ir.kinsalecapitalgroup.com/resources/investor-contacts/default.aspx
2. Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. | Investor Relations, accessed August 30, 2025, https://ir.kinsalecapitalgroup.com/overview/default.aspx
3. Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. | Specialty Insurance Group, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.kinsalecapitalgroup.com/
4. Investor FAQs – Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. | Resources, accessed August 30, 2025, https://kinsale2022ir.q4web.com/resources/investor-faqs/default.aspx
5. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission – SEC.gov, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1669162/000156761916002561/s001327x1_s1.htm
6. KNSL Investor Relations – Kinsale Capital Group Inc – Alpha Spread, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nyse/knsl/investor-relations
7. February 2025, accessed August 30, 2025, https://s29.q4cdn.com/479990906/files/doc_presentations/2025/Feb/26/February-2025-Kinsale-IR-Presentation.pdf
8. KNSL Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. Peers & Competitors – Seeking Alpha, accessed August 30, 2025, https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/KNSL/peers/comparison
9. Kinsale (KNSL) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Transcript | The Motley Fool, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-transcripts/2025/08/05/kinsale-knsl-q2-2025-earnings-call-transcript/
10. Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. (Form: 10-K, Received: 02/23/2024 16 …, accessed August 30, 2025, https://content.edgar-online.com/ExternalLink/EDGAR/0001669162-24-000006.html?hash=e0422e47c368e1187c12ab4c12e5056513f68bc9e4940f9eae0adb12731b8155&dest=knslex97clawback_policy_htm
11. d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net, accessed August 30, 2025, https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001669162/53f5249e-71a0-48eb-b36b-9a4a6b2cd5c7.html
12. Selective Insurance Group (SIGI) Competitors and Alternatives 2025 – MarketBeat, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NASDAQ/SIGI/competitors-and-alternatives/
13. Upland Specialty Insurance: 2025 E&S Market Outlook, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.uplandcapgroup.com/press-releases/upland-specialty-insurance-2025-e-s-market-outlook
14. U.S. E&S Growth Slowed Again in ’24; Berkshire, AIG Top Premium …, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.carriermanagement.com/news/2025/06/25/276668.htm
15. Is the Excess and Surplus Insurance Market Finally Leveling Out? – Jencap, accessed August 30, 2025, https://jencapgroup.com/insights/property/is-the-excess-and-surplus-insurance-market-finally-leveling-out/
16. Admitted to E&S: the shift in insurance markets, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/us/news/wholesale/admitted-to-eands-the-shift-in-insurance-markets-545254.aspx
17. Insurance 2025: Adapting to a New Era of Opportunities and Challenges – Boston Consulting Group, accessed August 30, 2025, https://media-publications.bcg.com/Insurance-2025-Commercial-Lines-Trends.pdf
18. Financials – Quarterly Results – Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. | Investor Relations, accessed August 30, 2025, https://ir.kinsalecapitalgroup.com/financials/quarterly-results/default.aspx
19. Kinsale Capital Group (KNSL) Competitors and Alternatives 2025 – MarketBeat, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NYSE/KNSL/competitors-and-alternatives/
20. Kinsale Capital Group Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results, accessed August 30, 2025, https://ir.kinsalecapitalgroup.com/news/news-details/2025/Kinsale-Capital-Group-Reports-Second-Quarter-2025-Results/
21. knsl-20240331 – SEC.gov, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1669162/000166916224000020/knsl-20240331.htm
22. Which Is a Better Investment, Kinsale Capital Group Inc or W R Berkley Corp Stock? | AAII, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.aaii.com/investingideas/article/91278-which-is-a-better-investment-kinsale-capital-group-inc-or-w-r-berkley-corp-stock
23. Kinsale Insurance – 2025 Company Profile, Funding & Competitors – Tracxn, accessed August 30, 2025, https://tracxn.com/d/companies/kinsale-insurance/__j9E1XeXUmBJinzVx_oJNjbdwzrkFyCmZaQ3yf5vLyOw
24. WRB Investor Relations – W R Berkley Corp – Alpha Spread, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nyse/wrb/investor-relations
25. W.R. Berkley Corp – AnnualReports.com, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/Company/wr-berkley-corp
26. W. R. Berkley Corporation, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.berkley.com/
27. Investor Primer Year-End 2023, accessed August 30, 2025, https://s29.q4cdn.com/304856890/files/doc_presentations/2024/Apr/investor-primer-2023ye.pdf
28. W. R. Berkley Corporation Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year …, accessed August 30, 2025, https://ir.berkley.com/news/news-details/2025/W.-R.-Berkley-Corporation-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2024-Results/default.aspx
29. RLI Corp – Investor relations, accessed August 30, 2025, https://investors.rlicorp.com/overview/default.aspx
30. RLI CORP SEC 10-K Report — TradingView News, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.tradingview.com/news/tradingview:fbfef4f1f85b6:0-rli-corp-sec-10-k-report/
31. RLI CORP., accessed August 30, 2025, https://s204.q4cdn.com/949661285/files/doc_financials/2024/q4/01171a60-4ebd-4a75-9b9e-98c880633730.pdf
32. Investor Relations Markel Corporation 804-747-0136 investorrelations@markelcorp.com FOR IMMEDIATE, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.markel.com/-/media/761e25b24cc54f43a2071f800c0ac894.ashx
33. Investor relations – Markel Corp, accessed August 30, 2025, https://preview.irdirect.net/template_files/786/about-markel/investor-relations.html
34. MARKEL GROUP INC. SEC 10-K Report — TradingView News, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.tradingview.com/news/tradingview:a2821e2c6e12c:0-markel-group-inc-sec-10-k-report/
35. KNSL – Kinsale Capital Group PE ratio, current and historical analysis – FullRatio, accessed August 30, 2025, https://fullratio.com/stocks/nasdaq-knsl/pe-ratio
36. WRB – Berkley W R PE ratio, current and historical analysis – FullRatio, accessed August 30, 2025, https://fullratio.com/stocks/nyse-wrb/pe-ratio
37. RLI (RLI) P/E Ratio: Current & Historical Analysis, accessed August 30, 2025, https://public.com/stocks/rli/pe-ratio
38. MKL – Markel PE ratio, current and historical analysis – FullRatio, accessed August 30, 2025, https://fullratio.com/stocks/nyse-mkl/pe-ratio
39. WR Berkley Corp (WRB) – Morningstar, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/xnys/wrb/quote
40. Kinsale Capital PE Ratio 2014-2025 | KNSL – Macrotrends, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/KNSL/kinsale-capital/pe-ratio
41. Kinsale Capital Group (KNSL) – P/B ratio – Companies Market Cap, accessed August 30, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/kinsale-capital/pb-ratio/
42. P/E ratio for Kinsale Capital Group (KNSL) – Companies Market Cap, accessed August 30, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/kinsale-capital/pe-ratio/
43. W. R. Berkley (WRB) – P/E ratio – Companies Market Cap, accessed August 30, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/wr-berkley/pe-ratio/
44. RLI Corp. Common Stock (DE) (RLI) Price/Earnings & PEG Ratios | Nasdaq, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/rli/price-earnings-peg-ratios
45. W.R Berkley Price/Book Ratio 2010-2025 | WRB – Macrotrends, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/WRB/wr-berkley/price-book
46. W. R. Berkley (WRB) – P/B ratio – Companies Market Cap, accessed August 30, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/wr-berkley/pb-ratio/
47. RLI Price to Book Ratio 2010-2025 – Macrotrends, accessed August 30, 2025, https://macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/RLI/rli/price-book
48. Markel Group Price/Book Ratio 2010-2025 | MKL – Macrotrends, accessed August 30, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/MKL/markel-group/price-book
49. Markel (MKL) – P/B ratio – Companies Market Cap, accessed August 30, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/markel/pb-ratio/