The Gemini Report – Investment Deep Dives

Investment Research Analysis: Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (NYSE: ABG)

All investment deep dives on this site have been written by Google Gemini with light human editing. Nothing on this site constitutes investment advise. All materials on this site are for informational purposes only.

The Gemini Report - Investment Deep Dives
The Gemini Report – Investment Deep Dives
Investment Research Analysis: Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (NYSE: ABG)
Loading
/

1.0 Company Overview

1.1 Business Model: A Diversified Automotive Retail Platform

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (NYSE: ABG) is a Fortune 500 company and one of the largest automotive retailers in the United States, with corporate headquarters located in Duluth, Georgia.1 The company’s business model is structured as a diversified automotive retail and service platform. The core of its operations is the sale of new and used vehicles through a network of franchised dealerships. This primary revenue source is strategically complemented by more stable, higher-margin, and less cyclical business lines, including automotive parts and service (“fixed operations”) and the sale of finance and insurance (F&I) products.1

This diversified model is a fundamental aspect of the company’s strategy, designed to mitigate the inherent cyclicality of the new vehicle sales market, which is sensitive to macroeconomic conditions. Historically, a majority of the company’s gross profit is generated not from the sale of vehicles, but from the more predictable and recurring revenue streams of its fixed operations and F&I segments.4 Asbury operates an extensive physical footprint that includes franchised new vehicle dealerships and a network of freestanding collision repair centers, allowing it to capture a broad spectrum of the vehicle ownership lifecycle, from initial purchase to ongoing maintenance and eventual trade-in.4 As of the second quarter of 2025, following the completion of a major acquisition, the company’s network had expanded to include 175 new car dealerships, which hold 230 distinct franchises, and 40 collision centers.7

The company’s overarching corporate strategy is built upon two foundational pillars: first, driving operational excellence through process standardization, talent retention, and leveraging scale to improve cost efficiencies; and second, deploying capital to its highest risk-adjusted returns through a disciplined and transparent allocation strategy that balances acquisitions, investments in the business, and returns to stockholders.2

1.2 Operational Segments: Dealerships and Total Care Auto (TCA)

Asbury Automotive Group reports its financial performance and manages its operations through two distinct segments: Dealerships and Total Care Auto (TCA).5 This structure allows for a clear delineation between its traditional retail operations and its vertically integrated, high-margin financial products business.

The Dealerships segment constitutes the vast majority of the company’s revenue and is the primary customer-facing component of the business. This segment encompasses all activities traditionally associated with an automotive dealership group. This includes the sale of new vehicles sourced from original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), the sale of used vehicles acquired through trade-ins and auctions, and the comprehensive parts and service operations that provide vehicle maintenance, repair, and collision services. Furthermore, the Dealerships segment is responsible for the point-of-sale arrangement of third-party vehicle financing and the sale of various F&I products.5 For the six-month period ending June 30, 2025, the Dealerships segment was the dominant revenue generator, recording sales of $8.36 billion.9

The Total Care Auto (TCA) segment represents a strategic vertical integration into the F&I value chain. TCA is Asbury’s proprietary provider of F&I products, which are then sold to consumers through the Dealerships segment. Key products offered by TCA include vehicle service contracts (VSCs), guaranteed asset protection (GAP) insurance, and prepaid maintenance plans.5 By owning the F&I product provider, Asbury is able to capture a larger portion of the profit from these high-margin products, rather than paying a significant share to third-party providers. For the first six months of 2025, the TCA segment contributed $163.6 million in revenue.9 A core component of Asbury’s future growth strategy involves the systematic rollout of TCA’s product offerings across its entire dealership portfolio. The recently acquired Koons platform, for instance, is slated for TCA integration in the fourth quarter of 2025, representing a significant future growth and margin enhancement opportunity.5

1.3 Geographic Footprint and Strategic Brand Mix

Asbury maintains a geographically diversified operational footprint, with dealerships located across 14 states. The company has historically concentrated its presence in key high-growth markets, with significant operations in Florida, Texas, and Georgia.5 This regional focus allows for operational synergies in areas such as marketing and management oversight.

In recent years, the company has executed a series of transformative acquisitions that have both expanded and strategically repositioned its geographic presence and brand portfolio. The acquisition of Jim Koons Automotive in late 2023 significantly bolstered Asbury’s presence in the lucrative Washington-Baltimore metropolitan area.5 More consequentially, the landmark acquisition of The Herb Chambers Companies in July 2025 provided Asbury with a commanding entry into the New England market, a region where it previously had no presence.5

These acquisitions are central to a deliberate strategy of “portfolio rebalancing,” aimed at shifting the company’s revenue and profit mix towards more premium and luxury brands.7 Following the integration of the Herb Chambers portfolio, Asbury’s revenue mix has been recalibrated to approximately 35% luxury brands, 38% import brands, and 27% domestic brands.7 This represents a significant evolution from its pre-COVID composition and reflects a strategic belief that a greater concentration in the luxury segment can provide enhanced financial stability. This is not merely an effort to capture higher-priced vehicle sales, but a calculated defensive maneuver. Management has characterized the New England market served by Herb Chambers as a “defensive position” that is “very stable” and “performs well in a downturn”.10 The underlying logic is that luxury vehicles, with their advanced technology and higher-cost components, tend to generate more consistent and higher-margin service and parts business throughout their lifecycle. By increasing its exposure to these brands, Asbury is effectively increasing the weighting of its most stable and counter-cyclical profit center—fixed operations—thereby improving the overall quality and predictability of its consolidated earnings stream, particularly through periods of economic uncertainty.

1.4 Management Team and Corporate Governance

Asbury’s executive leadership team is headed by President and Chief Executive Officer David W. Hult, a seasoned executive with over two decades of operational experience in the automotive retail sector.16 The senior management team is composed of individuals with deep industry expertise in operations, finance, and human resources.

The company’s corporate governance is overseen by a ten-member Board of Directors. In a move to promote strong oversight and accountability, the roles of Chairman and CEO are held by separate individuals. Thomas J. Reddin serves as the Non-Executive Board Chair.16 The board is characterized by a high degree of independence, with 90% of its members classified as independent directors, the sole exception being the CEO, Mr. Hult.16

The composition of the board reflects a diverse range of skills and experiences that are highly relevant to Asbury’s business and the evolving automotive landscape. This includes directors with direct automotive OEM executive experience, such as William D. Fay, formerly of Toyota; deep expertise in finance, capital markets, and investment management from Joel Alsfine; and critical knowledge in modern business challenges such as cybersecurity from Shamla Naidoo and multi-channel retail strategy from Bridget Ryan-Berman.16 The company’s executive compensation program is explicitly designed to align management’s interests with those of shareholders through a “pay-for-results” framework. A substantial portion of executive incentive compensation is tied to the achievement of specific, pre-defined performance metrics, including EBITDA targets, adjusted EPS growth relative to peers, and the successful execution of key strategic objectives, most notably the integration of major acquisitions.16

2.0 In-Depth Financial Analysis

2.1 Historical Performance and Growth Trajectory (2019-2025)

Asbury Automotive Group has exhibited a robust long-term growth profile, driven by a combination of strong operational execution and an aggressive, large-scale acquisition strategy. Between 2019 and the second quarter of 2025, the company has achieved a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in revenue of 19%, while adjusted earnings per share (EPS) has grown at an even more impressive 24% CAGR over the same period.7 This track record highlights management’s ability to not only grow the top line but also to translate that growth into enhanced shareholder returns.

The most recent financial results from the second quarter of 2025 continued this trend of top-line expansion, though they also revealed emerging pressures on profitability. Total revenue for the quarter was $4.37 billion, representing a 3% year-over-year increase.9 On a GAAP basis, diluted EPS was $7.76, a dramatic increase from $1.39 in the prior-year period. However, this headline growth figure is highly misleading. The significant year-over-year increase in GAAP net income—from $28.1 million in Q2 2024 to $152.8 million in Q2 2025—is primarily attributable to a large, non-cash asset impairment charge of $135.4 million that was recorded in the second quarter of 2024, which created an artificially low base for comparison.9 A more accurate reflection of underlying performance is the adjusted EPS, which normalizes for such one-time items. For Q2 2025, adjusted EPS was $7.43, a 13% increase from the $6.40 reported in Q2 2024 and a figure that surpassed analyst consensus expectations.10

Table 1: Five-Year Financial Summary

(In millions, except per-share data)

Metric20242023202220212020
Total Revenue$17,188.6$14,802.7$15,433.8$9,837.7$7,131.8
Gross Profit$2,948.6$2,755.8$3,100.6$1,902.2$1,223.4
Income from Operations$868.4$986.3$1,272.6$791.8$370.8
Net Income$430.3$602.5$997.3$532.4$254.4
Diluted EPS$21.50$28.74$44.61$26.49$13.11
Total Assets$10,173.6$8,021.4$8,021.4$8,002.6$3,676.3
Total Debt$4,848.3$3,221.3$3,329.2$3,614.5$1,210.7
Shareholders’ Equity$3,362.4$2,957.5$2,957.5$2,698.8$905.5
Cash from Operations$719.1$987.0$696.0$1,163.7$652.5
Capital Expenditures$(158.3)$(107.9)$(107.9)$(82.0)$(48.8)
Free Cash Flow$560.8$879.1$588.1$1,081.7$603.7
Source: Compiled from 2024, 2023, and 2021 10-K filings. Total Debt calculated as Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt + Long-Term Debt. Free Cash Flow calculated as Cash from Operations less total Capital Expenditures. Data for 2023 and 2022 sourced from 2023 10-K.5

2.2 Profitability and Margin Profile Analysis

Asbury has maintained a strong consolidated gross profit margin, which was reported at 17.2% in the second quarter of 2025.10 However, this aggregate figure obscures important underlying shifts in segment-level profitability. The gross profit per unit (GPU) for new vehicles, which reached unprecedented highs during the pandemic due to severe inventory shortages, is now in a period of normalization. Management has guided that it expects new vehicle GPUs to trend back towards a more historical range of $2,500 to $3,000 over time, a significant decline from the peak levels seen in 2021 and 2022.11

On the operating level, the company has demonstrated a consistent ability to manage costs effectively. The adjusted operating margin stood at a healthy 5.8% in Q2 2025.10 A critical metric for operational efficiency in the auto retail industry is Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses as a percentage of gross profit. In this area, Asbury has shown consistent and impressive discipline. For the second quarter of 2025, the company’s same-store adjusted SG&A as a percentage of gross profit was 63.2%. This represents a sequential improvement from the first quarter of 2025 and a year-over-year improvement of more than 100 basis points compared to the second quarter of 2024.10 Management has indicated that despite these strong results, they still see opportunities to further reduce the SG&A profile over the long term, particularly as synergies from recent acquisitions and efficiencies from the Tekion DMS rollout are realized.10

2.3 Segment Performance Deep Dive: Unpacking the Revenue and Profit Drivers

A granular analysis of Asbury’s individual business segments reveals a mixed performance landscape, with the strength and stability of its fixed operations offsetting headwinds in its more cyclical vehicle sales businesses.

Table 2: Segment Revenue and Gross Profit Analysis (2022-2024)

(In millions)

202420232022
Revenue
New Vehicle$8,819.3$7,600.3$7,365.6
Used Vehicle (Retail & Wholesale)$5,355.8$4,551.9$5,197.1
Parts & Service$2,347.4$2,074.2$2,074.2
Finance & Insurance, net$666.1$576.3$797.0
Total Revenue$17,188.6$14,802.7$15,433.8
Gross Profit
New Vehicle$636.9$699.5$844.0
Used Vehicle (Retail & Wholesale)$265.4$284.0$353.2
Parts & Service$1,348.0$1,147.4$1,152.6
Finance & Insurance, net$698.3$624.9$750.7
Total Gross Profit$2,948.6$2,755.8$3,100.6
Source: Compiled from 2024 and 2023 10-K filings. Used Vehicle revenue and gross profit includes both retail and wholesale operations.5
  • New Vehicles: In Q2 2025, new vehicle revenue increased by 6% year-over-year to $2.3 billion, a positive sign that reflects improving inventory availability from manufacturers and sustained consumer demand.9 However, the segment’s profitability is under pressure as gross profit per unit continues its descent from the unsustainable highs of the pandemic era.11
  • Used Vehicles: This segment is currently facing the most significant challenges. Used vehicle retail revenue declined by 3% year-over-year in Q2 2025.9 This weakness is a function of both demand- and supply-side pressures. On the demand side, higher interest rates have made financing more expensive, impacting affordability for many consumers. On the supply side, there is a constrained availability of desirable, low-mileage late-model used vehicles, a lingering effect of the reduced new vehicle sales and leasing activity during the pandemic.10
  • Parts & Service (Fixed Operations): This segment remains the bedrock of Asbury’s profitability and its most consistent growth engine. In Q2 2025, same-store parts and service gross profit grew by a robust 7%.10 The performance of this segment is underpinned by powerful secular tailwinds, including a continuously aging U.S. vehicle fleet—with the average passenger car on the road now 14.5 years old—and the increasing technological complexity of modern vehicles, which drives more repair and maintenance work to franchised dealers with specialized tools and training.10 The segment’s gross profit margin was an impressive 59.2% in Q2 2025, and its fixed absorption rate exceeded 100%. This critical metric indicates that the gross profit from the parts and service department is sufficient to cover all of the dealership’s fixed overhead expenses (such as rent, utilities, and administrative salaries), making the vehicle sales departments pure profit contributors.7
  • Finance & Insurance (F&I): The F&I segment, a historically strong contributor to profitability, showed signs of strain in the current macroeconomic environment. In Q2 2025, F&I revenue and gross profit declined by 5% and 4%, respectively.17 This is a direct result of pressure on F&I gross profit per vehicle retailed (PVR), which is being impacted by higher interest rates and a more cautious approach from lending institutions.

2.4 Balance Sheet Analysis: Assessing Financial Health and Leverage

Asbury entered the second half of 2025 with a solid liquidity position but a significantly higher debt load following its recent acquisition spree. As of June 30, 2025, the company reported total available liquidity of $1.1 billion, which was composed of $318 million in cash and floorplan offset accounts, and $798 million in availability under its credit facilities.11

The completion of the $1.45 billion acquisition of The Herb Chambers Companies in July 2025 was financed through a combination of cash, an expansion of its existing senior credit facility by $750 million, and a new ten-year real estate term loan of $546.5 million.12 This substantial new debt pushed the company’s transaction-adjusted net leverage ratio to 2.46x as of the quarter’s end.10 This level is above management’s stated target range, and as a result, deleveraging the balance sheet has become the primary capital allocation priority for the company over the next 12 to 18 months.10

2.5 Cash Flow Generation and Quality

The company has a history of strong and consistent cash flow generation, which has been instrumental in funding its growth initiatives and shareholder returns. In the second quarter of 2025, Asbury reported a robust Free Cash Flow of $275 million.11 This ability to convert earnings into cash is a key strength of its diversified business model, particularly the contributions from the high-margin, less capital-intensive fixed operations and F&I segments. While historically this cash flow has been deployed towards acquisitions and share repurchases, the near-term strategic focus will be on directing this operational cash flow towards debt reduction to bring the company’s leverage back in line with its long-term targets.10

3.0 Strategic Initiatives and Execution

3.1 M&A as a Core Growth Engine: Analysis of the Koons and Herb Chambers Acquisitions

Mergers and acquisitions are not just an opportunistic activity for Asbury; they are a core pillar of its long-term growth and capital deployment strategy.8 The U.S. automotive retail industry remains highly fragmented, creating a fertile environment for consolidation, and Asbury has positioned itself as one of the sector’s leading acquirers.22 The company has recently completed two of the most significant transactions in its history, fundamentally reshaping its scale, geographic reach, and market position.

The acquisition of Jim Koons Automotive Companies in December 2023 was the third-largest transaction in U.S. auto retail history. This deal added 20 new vehicle dealerships and six collision centers, generating approximately $3 billion in annual revenue, and provided Asbury with a powerful and consolidated presence in the attractive Mid-Atlantic region, particularly the Washington-Baltimore market.5

Building on this momentum, Asbury completed the even more transformative acquisition of The Herb Chambers Companies in July 2025. This was a landmark $1.45 billion transaction to acquire the 14th largest privately-owned dealership group in the country. The deal added 33 dealerships, 52 franchises, and approximately $3 billion in additional annualized revenue.5 The strategic rationale for this acquisition was multifaceted. First, it provided an immediate and scaled entry into the stable and affluent New England market. Second, and more importantly, it was a decisive step in the company’s strategic portfolio rebalancing, as the Herb Chambers group has a portfolio mix of over 60% luxury brands. This single transaction significantly shifted Asbury’s overall brand mix toward the premium end of the market.7

However, the integration of such large and culturally distinct organizations presents substantial operational risks. Management’s ability to successfully integrate these new platforms, achieve the expected cost synergies, and implement its standardized processes and systems will be a critical determinant of the long-term success of these acquisitions.5

3.2 Digital Transformation: Evaluating Clicklane and the Tekion DMS Rollout

In response to evolving consumer preferences for a more digital and seamless car-buying experience, Asbury has made significant investments in its technological capabilities. The company is pursuing a two-pronged digital transformation strategy centered on its proprietary e-commerce platform, Clicklane, and a company-wide transition to a modern, cloud-based Dealer Management System (DMS).

Clicklane is Asbury’s digital retailing tool that allows customers to complete much of the car-buying process online, from vehicle selection and trade-in appraisal to financing and payment calculation.27 The platform is gaining meaningful traction, having facilitated over 9,500 retail vehicle sales in the second quarter of 2025, of which 46% were new vehicles.10 This performance indicates that Clicklane is not just a marketing tool but a significant sales channel that is effectively catering to the industry’s broader shift towards an omnichannel retail model.28

The more profound and complex technological initiative is the strategic migration to the Tekion DMS. A dealership’s DMS is its core operating system, managing everything from sales and inventory to service appointments and accounting. Asbury is in the process of replacing its legacy systems with Tekion’s modern, cloud-native platform. As of the second quarter of 2025, the rollout to the recently acquired Koons dealerships was 100% complete.10 CEO David Hult has candidly described this transition as a “heart transplant” for the business, acknowledging that the process was fraught with significant short-term operational challenges, including system inconsistencies and downtime during the implementation quarter.10 The transition is also impacting near-term financial results, with implementation and related costs amounting to approximately $2 million in Q2 2025.10 Despite these short-term pains, management is confident that the move to Tekion will yield substantial long-term benefits in the form of enhanced operational efficiency and significant SG&A cost reductions, with the full financial impact expected to be realized by 2027.10

The decision to undertake these two monumental tasks—a $1.45 billion acquisition integration and a company-wide overhaul of its core IT infrastructure—simultaneously creates a period of significantly elevated operational and execution risk. The successful integration of Herb Chambers requires stable and reliable systems, while the successful rollout of Tekion requires focused operational attention. Attempting both at once compounds the potential for disruption, as a delay or failure in one initiative could easily cascade and negatively impact the other. The next 18 to 24 months will therefore be a critical test of management’s execution capabilities.

3.3 Portfolio Optimization and Capital Allocation Strategy

Asbury’s capital allocation strategy is not solely focused on growth through acquisition; it also involves a disciplined approach to portfolio management and optimization. Concurrent with its large-scale acquisitions, the company is actively divesting non-core or underperforming dealerships to streamline its portfolio and recycle capital. During the second quarter of 2025, Asbury divested nine stores that generated approximately $619 million in annualized revenue.10

The net proceeds from these divestitures, estimated to be between $250 million and $270 million, are being strategically redeployed. In the current environment, these funds are being used to partially offset the purchase price of the Herb Chambers acquisition and, more broadly, to support what is now the company’s foremost capital allocation priority: deleveraging the balance sheet. Management has clearly communicated that reducing leverage will take precedence over other capital uses, such as large-scale share repurchases or further major acquisitions, for the next 12 to 18 months.10

4.0 Industry and Competitive Landscape

4.1 Macroeconomic Backdrop and Automotive Retail Sector Trends

Asbury Automotive Group operates within a dynamic and evolving U.S. automotive retail sector that is being shaped by several powerful macroeconomic and secular trends.

  • Industry Consolidation: The U.S. auto dealership landscape is highly fragmented, with the vast majority of dealerships still owned by small, private groups.23 However, the industry is undergoing a period of rapid consolidation. The top 10 dealership groups now control an all-time high of 9.3% of the market, and the top 150 groups account for over 24% of total retail sales.23 Large, well-capitalized public companies like Asbury are at the forefront of this trend, leveraging their scale and access to capital to acquire smaller players and achieve greater operational efficiencies.4
  • Affordability Headwinds: A challenging macroeconomic environment, characterized by higher interest rates and persistent inflation, has created significant affordability headwinds for consumers. The rising cost of financing has made monthly payments on new and used vehicles more expensive, which is pressuring consumer demand and compressing margins, particularly in the more price-sensitive used vehicle segment.31
  • Evolving Consumer Behavior: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated a fundamental shift in how consumers shop for and purchase vehicles. An omnichannel approach, where customers conduct extensive research, compare prices, and even arrange financing online before visiting a physical dealership for a test drive and final transaction, has become the norm.28 This trend validates Asbury’s strategic investments in digital retailing platforms like Clicklane. Concurrently, there has been a notable post-pandemic shift in consumer sentiment towards valuing personal vehicle ownership for safety and convenience, which provides a supportive backdrop for overall demand.28
  • The Electric Vehicle (EV) Transition: The automotive industry is in the early stages of a multi-decade transition towards electrification. While the long-term trend is clear, the near-term pace of consumer adoption faces challenges related to price, charging infrastructure, and range anxiety.31 For dealers like Asbury, this transition presents both opportunities and risks. On the one hand, EVs may require less frequent routine maintenance, potentially impacting a key part of the service business. On the other hand, Asbury’s own data from Q2 2025 suggests that battery electric vehicles (BEVs) generate significantly higher revenue per repair order ($851) compared to traditional internal combustion engine vehicles ($553), which could offset lower service frequency with higher-value repair work.7
  • The Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Model: The DTC sales model, pioneered by EV manufacturers like Tesla, represents a potential long-term structural threat to the traditional franchised dealership system. This model bypasses the dealership network, allowing manufacturers to sell directly to consumers, which could disintermediate retailers like Asbury.38 However, this threat is currently mitigated by two significant factors: strong consumer preference, with the majority of buyers still wanting to purchase in-person at a dealership, and a robust legal framework of state franchise laws that protect incumbent dealers from direct competition by their OEM partners.33

4.2 Competitive Benchmarking: ABG vs. Public Peers

Asbury is a major player in the U.S. auto retail market, but it competes against a peer group of publicly traded companies that are, in some cases, significantly larger in scale. Its primary competitors include Lithia Motors (LAD), AutoNation (AN), and Penske Automotive Group (PAG).41

Based on the most recent full-year revenue data, Asbury, with revenues of $14.8 billion in 2023, ranks behind Lithia ($31.0 billion), Penske ($29.5 billion), and AutoNation ($26.9 billion).43 This size disparity underscores a critical dynamic in the industry: the “scale imperative.” As the industry consolidates, size confers significant advantages in purchasing power, access to capital, and the ability to spread fixed costs over a larger revenue base. This dynamic both fuels Asbury’s own M&A strategy and, simultaneously, makes it a plausible acquisition target for one of its larger rivals seeking to further consolidate the top tier of the market. This dual role as both a consolidator and a potential target is a key strategic tension for the company.

Table 3: Competitive Benchmarking Matrix

(Data as of early August 2025, LTM = Last Twelve Months)

MetricAsbury (ABG)AutoNation (AN)Lithia (LAD)Penske (PAG)
Market Cap ($B)$4.38$7.18$7.37$11.13
Enterprise Value ($B)$9.34$16.50$22.62$19.32
LTM Revenue ($B)$17.14$27.64$37.16$30.50
LTM EBITDA ($B)$1.06$1.51$2.29$1.72
EBITDA Margin (%)6.19%5.46%6.16%5.64%
Net Debt / LTM EBITDA4.41xN/AN/AN/A
EV / LTM EBITDA8.81x10.9x9.88x11.23x
LTM P/E Ratio11.35x11.3x8.55xN/A
Source: Compiled from various financial data providers.44 LTM Revenue and EBITDA are estimates based on latest quarterly reports. Net Debt for peers not readily available in provided snippets.

4.3 Emerging Disruptors: The Impact of Electric Vehicles and Direct-to-Consumer Models

The secular trends of electrification and direct-to-consumer sales models require a proactive strategic response from traditional dealers. Asbury’s recent actions can be viewed through this lens. The strategic pivot towards luxury brands is not only a defensive play for service revenue but also positions the company at the forefront of the EV transition, as luxury OEMs are often the first to introduce new electric models. This allows Asbury to gain early experience in selling and servicing these complex vehicles, potentially creating a competitive advantage.7

Similarly, the company’s significant investments in a seamless, user-friendly omnichannel experience, powered by its Clicklane platform and the modern Tekion DMS, can be interpreted as a direct competitive response to the streamlined digital purchasing process that is the hallmark of the DTC model. By offering a “best of both worlds” approach that combines online convenience with the trust and physical presence of a dealership, Asbury aims to neutralize the primary appeal of DTC competitors while retaining its core advantages in service, trade-ins, and in-person customer support.10

5.0 Valuation Analysis

5.1 Comparable Company Analysis

A relative valuation analysis, comparing Asbury’s trading multiples to those of its direct public peers, provides a useful benchmark for assessing its market valuation. Based on the data compiled in the Competitive Benchmarking Matrix, Asbury appears to trade at a notable discount to its peers on an enterprise value basis.

Asbury’s Last Twelve Months (LTM) EV/EBITDA multiple of 8.81x is lower than that of AutoNation (10.9x), Lithia Motors (9.88x), and Penske Automotive Group (11.23x).48 On a Price-to-Earnings (P/E) basis, its LTM multiple of 11.35x is in line with AutoNation’s (11.3x) but higher than Lithia’s (8.55x).48

Several factors could contribute to this valuation discount on an EV/EBITDA basis. The market may be pricing in the significant execution risk associated with the simultaneous integration of the Herb Chambers acquisition and the company-wide Tekion DMS rollout. Additionally, the higher pro-forma leverage following the Chambers transaction could be a contributing factor, as investors may demand a higher risk premium. Conversely, the discount could also suggest that the market is not fully appreciating the long-term strategic benefits of the company’s portfolio transformation and its best-in-class operational efficiency.

5.2 Precedent Transaction Analysis

Analyzing precedent M&A transactions in the auto retail space provides context for the value of dealership assets. While specific transaction multiples for the Koons and Chambers deals were not fully disclosed, the industry context is informative. “Blue sky” multiples—a measure of the goodwill or intangible value of a dealership franchise above its tangible asset value—have remained at historically elevated levels since the pandemic, although they moderated slightly in 2024.22

Valuations are highly dependent on the specific brand franchise. Premium luxury brands, such as those Asbury has been aggressively acquiring (Lexus, BMW, Mercedes-Benz), consistently command the highest blue sky multiples in the market, often significantly higher than those for domestic or mass-market import brands.22 This suggests that as Asbury continues its strategic shift towards a more luxury-weighted portfolio, the intrinsic value of its dealership assets should, in theory, increase, potentially supporting a higher overall valuation multiple for the consolidated company over the long term.

5.3 Sum-of-the-Parts (SOTP) Valuation

A Sum-of-the-Parts (SOTP) valuation can provide a more nuanced perspective on Asbury’s intrinsic value by assessing its distinct business segments independently. This methodology is particularly relevant for Asbury due to its two reportable segments—Dealerships and Total Care Auto (TCA)—which have fundamentally different business models and risk profiles.57 The market often applies a single, blended valuation multiple to a consolidated company, which may fail to capture the full value of a distinct, higher-margin segment.

A SOTP analysis could reveal that the market is undervaluing the high-margin, vertically integrated TCA segment. The core Dealerships business is a capital-intensive retail operation, appropriately valued on an EV/EBITDA multiple. The TCA segment, however, functions more like a specialty finance or insurance company, generating fee-based revenue from the sale of financial products. Businesses of this nature typically command higher valuation multiples (such as P/E or Price-to-Book) than traditional retailers due to their different capital structures, growth profiles, and cash flow characteristics. By applying a standard auto retailer multiple to Asbury’s consolidated earnings, the market may be implicitly undervaluing the more profitable and stable earnings stream generated by TCA. A SOTP valuation that assigns a separate, higher multiple to the TCA segment could demonstrate that there is “hidden value” within the company’s current structure.

Table 4: Illustrative Sum-of-the-Parts (SOTP) Valuation

(In millions, except per-share data; LTM as of Q2 2025)

Financial MetricValue ($)Multiple RangeImplied Segment Value ($)
Dealerships SegmentLTM EBITDA$1,0008.5x – 9.5x$8,500 – $9,500
TCA SegmentLTM Net Income$6012.0x – 15.0x$720 – $900
Total Enterprise Value$9,220 – $10,400
Less: Net Debt($4,800)($4,800)
Implied Equity Value$4,420 – $5,600
Shares Outstanding19.719.7
Implied Value Per Share$224 – $284
Note: This is an illustrative SOTP analysis. LTM EBITDA and Net Income are estimates derived from segment disclosures. Multiples are hypothetical ranges based on peer analysis for Dealerships and specialty finance comps for TCA. Net Debt is an estimate post-Chambers acquisition.

6.0 Key Risk Factors

6.1 Operational and Execution Risks

  • Third-Party System Disruptions: Asbury’s operations are heavily reliant on third-party software providers. This dependence creates a significant vulnerability, as demonstrated by the June 2024 cyber-incident at its vendor, CDK Global. The resulting outage caused widespread disruption to Asbury’s sales, service, and inventory management systems, leading to an estimated negative impact on earnings of $0.95 to $1.15 per diluted share for the second quarter of 2024.5 Future incidents of this nature could have a material adverse effect on operations.
  • Acquisition Integration Risk: The company’s strategy is heavily weighted towards growth through large-scale acquisitions. The sheer size and complexity of the recent Jim Koons and Herb Chambers acquisitions present substantial integration risk. A failure to smoothly integrate these businesses, realize projected cost synergies, or align corporate cultures could result in operational inefficiencies and negatively impact financial performance.5
  • Supply Chain Disruptions: The company’s ability to sell new vehicles and perform repairs is entirely dependent on the production and delivery schedules of its OEM partners. Asbury remains vulnerable to disruptions in this supply chain, which can be caused by a variety of factors including semiconductor shortages, geopolitical conflicts, natural disasters, or labor strikes, all of which could constrain inventory and limit revenue potential.5

6.2 Macroeconomic and Market Risks

  • Economic Sensitivity: The automotive retail industry is inherently cyclical and highly sensitive to broader economic conditions. Factors such as rising unemployment, declining consumer confidence, or a general economic recession could significantly reduce consumer demand for new and used vehicles, which are large discretionary purchases.5
  • Interest Rate Fluctuations: The current environment of elevated interest rates poses a dual threat. Higher rates increase the cost of consumer auto loans, which can dampen demand by making monthly payments less affordable. Simultaneously, they increase the company’s own interest expense on its variable-rate debt, including the floor plan financing used to purchase vehicle inventory, thereby compressing margins.5
  • Used Vehicle Market Volatility: The used vehicle market is currently normalizing from the unprecedented price highs seen during the pandemic. A faster-than-expected decline in used vehicle values could lead to significant gross margin compression and create the risk of inventory write-downs if the company is unable to sell its used vehicle inventory profitably.5

6.3 Strategic and Financial Risks

  • High Financial Leverage: Following the debt-financed acquisition of Herb Chambers, the company’s financial leverage is elevated, with a transaction-adjusted net leverage ratio of 2.46x.10 This increased debt load reduces the company’s financial flexibility and magnifies its risk profile, particularly in the event of an economic downturn. A failure to execute its deleveraging plan could constrain future growth opportunities and increase its cost of capital.
  • Dependence on OEM Relationships: Asbury’s entire business model is predicated on its franchise agreements with automotive manufacturers. Its success is intrinsically linked to the success of the brands it represents and its ability to maintain positive relationships with its OEM partners. Any adverse changes to these franchise agreements, or shifts in OEM strategy regarding vehicle allocation, incentive programs, or facility requirements, could have a material negative impact on Asbury’s operations and profitability.18

6.4 Regulatory and Technological Risks

  • State Franchise Laws: The U.S. auto retail industry is governed by a patchwork of state-level franchise laws that generally prohibit manufacturers from selling vehicles directly to consumers, thereby protecting the business model of franchised dealers like Asbury. Any significant weakening or repeal of these laws could open the door to direct competition from OEMs, which would fundamentally alter the industry’s competitive landscape and pose a long-term existential threat to the traditional dealership model.5
  • The Electric Vehicle Transition: The long-term shift to electric vehicles presents both technological and business model risks. A failure to invest in the necessary technician training, charging infrastructure, and specialized equipment could leave the company unable to effectively service the growing fleet of EVs. Furthermore, if the EV service model proves to be structurally less profitable than the traditional internal combustion engine model over the long term, it could pressure the margins of the company’s highly profitable fixed operations segment.5

7.0 Concluding Investment Thesis

This analysis provides a detailed examination of Asbury Automotive Group’s strategic positioning, financial health, and operational execution within the context of a dynamic automotive retail landscape. The following presents a synthesis of the key arguments that form the basis of an investment thesis, structured as a balanced view of the potential opportunities and risks.

The central argument for a constructive view on Asbury Automotive Group is rooted in its successful strategic transformation into a larger, more resilient, and more profitable enterprise. Through a disciplined yet aggressive M&A strategy, highlighted by the landmark acquisitions of the Koons and Herb Chambers groups, management has significantly increased the company’s scale and market presence. More importantly, these actions have deliberately re-engineered the company’s portfolio, creating a more balanced geographic footprint and a pronounced shift towards the higher-margin luxury segment. This strategic pivot is designed to enhance the contribution from the company’s most stable and profitable business line—parts and service—thereby improving the quality and durability of its earnings stream through economic cycles. This strategy is complemented by a demonstrated track record of operational excellence, evidenced by best-in-class SG&A cost control and consistent margin improvement. Furthermore, Asbury’s proactive investments in a modern, omnichannel customer experience, through its Clicklane digital platform and the strategic adoption of the Tekion DMS, position it to compete effectively in the evolving retail environment. Should management successfully navigate the near-term integration challenges and execute its stated plan of deleveraging the balance sheet, the company could be poised to unlock significant long-term shareholder value from its newly enlarged and strategically enhanced platform.

Conversely, a more cautious perspective is warranted by the significant financial and operational risks the company has undertaken. The substantial debt incurred to finance its recent acquisitions has resulted in an elevated leverage profile, creating a degree of financial fragility that could be exposed in the event of a significant macroeconomic downturn. The concurrent execution of two monumental and complex tasks—the integration of the massive Herb Chambers organization and a company-wide overhaul of its core IT system—creates a period of heightened execution risk where a misstep in one area could cascade and disrupt the other. This operational risk is compounded by cyclical headwinds, including the normalization of vehicle gross profit margins from their post-pandemic peaks, a softening used vehicle market, and persistent affordability challenges for consumers in a high-interest-rate environment. Finally, while currently mitigated by regulation, the long-term secular threats posed by the transition to electric vehicles and the potential for a shift towards a direct-to-consumer sales model by OEMs remain significant uncertainties that could reshape the industry’s fundamental structure and profitability over the next decade. The company’s ability to navigate these multifaceted challenges will be a critical determinant of its future success.

Works cited

  1. Asbury Automotive Group (ABG) Investor Relations Material – Quartr, accessed August 3, 2025, https://quartr.com/companies/asbury-automotive-group-inc_10957
  2. © Asbury Automotive Group 2019. All rights reserved., accessed August 3, 2025, https://asburyautomotivegroupinc.gcs-web.com/static-files/6533899d-a01d-452a-a034-964763d7bffc
  3. Asbury Automotive Group Reports Record Fourth Quarter and Record Full Year 2022 Financial Results – Investor Relations, accessed August 3, 2025, https://investors.asburyauto.com/press-releases/19741
  4. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. – SEC.gov, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1144980/000104746904001587/a2126461zs-3.htm
  5. ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP INC SEC 10-K Report …, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.tradingview.com/news/tradingview:e40252d2b3ded:0-asbury-automotive-group-inc-sec-10-k-report/
  6. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. – AnnualReports.com, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/Company/asbury-automotive-group-inc
  7. Asbury Automotive Q2 2025 slides: Revenue growth accelerates …, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/asbury-automotive-q2-2025-slides-revenue-growth-accelerates-amid-portfolio-rebalancing-93CH-4157089
  8. © Asbury Automotive Group 2020. All rights reserved., accessed August 3, 2025, https://asburyautomotivegroupinc.gcs-web.com/static-files/2cd5d77f-c541-4581-a445-44bee44fc7b6
  9. ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP INC SEC 10-Q Report …, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.tradingview.com/news/tradingview:96a6c02a672ae:0-asbury-automotive-group-inc-sec-10-q-report/
  10. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) Q2 2025 Earnings Conference …, accessed August 3, 2025, https://seekingalpha.com/article/4805573-asbury-automotive-group-inc-abg-q2-2025-earnings-conference-call-transcript
  11. Earnings call transcript: Asbury Automotive Q2 2025 beats EPS forecast – Investing.com, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/transcripts/earnings-call-transcript-asbury-automotive-q2-2025-beats-eps-forecast-93CH-4157990
  12. abg-20250721 – SEC.gov, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001144980/000114498025000119/abg-20250721.htm
  13. ABG SEC Filings – Asbury Automotive Group Inc 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K Forms – Stock Titan, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.stocktitan.net/sec-filings/ABG/
  14. abg-20250721 – SEC.gov, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1144980/000114498025000119/abg-20250721.htm
  15. News & Press Releases – Investor Relations – Asbury Automotive Group, accessed August 3, 2025, https://investors.asburyauto.com/press-releases
  16. 2025 Proxy Statement – Asbury Automotive Group, accessed August 3, 2025, https://investors.asburyauto.com/documents/abg-2025-definitive-proxy-statement.pdf
  17. Asbury Automotive Group Reports Second Quarter Results – Business Wire, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250729235274/en/Asbury-Automotive-Group-Reports-Second-Quarter-Results
  18. Form 10-K for Asbury Automotive Group INC filed 03/01/2023 – Annual Reports, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/a/NYSE_ABG_2022.pdf
  19. ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. – Annual Reports, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/a/NYSE_ABG_2020.pdf
  20. FORM 10-K ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC., accessed August 3, 2025, https://investors.asburyauto.com/documents/abg-2024-10-k.pdf
  21. Shifting gears in automotive retail – NIQ, accessed August 3, 2025, https://nielseniq.com/global/en/insights/analysis/2025/shifting-gears-in-automotive-retail/
  22. The Power of Consolidation: How Dealership Mergers Are Reshaping Automotive Investment Landscapes – AInvest, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.ainvest.com/news/power-consolidation-dealership-mergers-reshaping-automotive-investment-landscapes-2507/
  23. Car Dealership Consolidation: Industry Analysis & Trends – BofA Securities, accessed August 3, 2025, https://business.bofa.com/en-us/content/dealership-industry-consolidation.html
  24. How Will Car Dealership Consolidation Impact Car Buyers? – Automoblog, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.automoblog.com/car-dealership-consolidation/
  25. Report: While profit margins fall, dealership acquisitions continue to rise | Auto Remarketing, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.autoremarketing.com/ar/analysis/report-while-profit-margins-fall-dealership-acquisitions-continue-to-rise/
  26. Form 8-K for Asbury Automotive Group INC filed 02/18/2025, accessed August 3, 2025, https://asburyautomotivegroupinc.gcs-web.com/static-files/fa25e671-9037-4624-bcce-67330775dd9c
  27. Asbury Automotive Group, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.asburyauto.com/
  28. Cox Automotive’s Car Buyer Journey Study Shows Satisfaction With Car Buying Improved in 2023 After Two Years of Declines, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.coxautoinc.com/news/cox-automotives-car-buyer-journey-study-shows-satisfaction-with-car-buying-improved-in-2023-after-two-years-of-declines/
  29. How COVID-19 Changed the Way We Deal with Auto Dealers – Woodside Credit, accessed August 3, 2025, https://woodsidecredit.com/how-covid-19-changed-the-way-we-deal-with-auto-dealers/
  30. The New Dynamics of Car Retailing: Navigating the Post-Pandemic Shift – Ravin AI, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.ravin.ai/blog/the-new-dynamics-of-car-retailing-navigating-the-post-pandemic-shift
  31. 2025 Automotive Retail Outlook: AI, Machine Learning, and Inventory Intelligence – Lotlinx, accessed August 3, 2025, https://lotlinx.com/2025-automotive-retail-outlook/
  32. 2025 Cox Automotive Market Insights and Outlook, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.coxautoinc.com/market-insights/2025-cox-automotive-market-insights-and-outlook/
  33. Will Direct-To-Consumer Sales Kill Dealerships – Space Auto, accessed August 3, 2025, https://space.auto/will-direct-to-consumer-kill-dealerships/
  34. An empirical study on consumer automobile purchase intentions influenced by the COVID-19 outbreak – PubMed Central, accessed August 3, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9510093/
  35. How Car Values Have Changed Post-Pandemic – Inride, accessed August 3, 2025, https://inride.com/how-car-values-have-changed-post-pandemic/
  36. 2025 Global Automotive Consumer Study | Deloitte US, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/Industries/consumer/articles/global-automotive-consumer-study.html
  37. 2025 Global Automotive Consumer Study – Deloitte, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/Industries/automotive/perspectives/global-automotive-consumer-study.html
  38. The Rise of Direct-to-Consumer Car Sales and Its Impact on Dealerships – Jupiter Chevrolet, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.jupiterchev.com/blogs/6872/the-rise-of-direct-to-consumer-car-sales-and-its-impact-on-dealerships
  39. 3 claims fueling the franchise dealer vs. direct-to-consumer sales showdown, accessed August 3, 2025, https://news.dealershipguy.com/p/3-claims-fueling-the-franchise-dealer-vs-direct-to-consumer-sales-showdown-2025-07-23
  40. Economic Effects Of State Bans On Direct Manufacturer Sales To Car Buyers, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/atr/economic-effects-state-bans-direct-manufacturer-sales-car-buyers
  41. Latest SEC filings for Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (ABG) | Seeking Alpha, accessed August 3, 2025, https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ABG/sec-filings
  42. Top 150 dealership groups 2022 pdf, accessed August 3, 2025, https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/e62d8825/files/uploaded/25342035.pdf
  43. 6 Virginia Dealers Among Top in U.S. – Virginia Auto Dealer Magazine, accessed August 3, 2025, https://virginia-auto-dealer.thenewslinkgroup.org/6-virginia-dealers-among-top-in-u-s/
  44. Asbury Automotive Group (ABG) – Market capitalization – Companies Market Cap, accessed August 3, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/asbury-automotive-group/marketcap/
  45. AutoNation (AN) – Market capitalization – Companies Market Cap, accessed August 3, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/autonation/marketcap/
  46. Lithia Motors (LAD) – Market capitalization – Companies Market Cap, accessed August 3, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/lithia-motors/marketcap/
  47. Penske Automotive Group (PAG) – Market capitalization – Companies Market Cap, accessed August 3, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/penske-automotive/marketcap/
  48. Asbury Automotive Group (ABG) Statistics & Valuation – Stock Analysis, accessed August 3, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/abg/statistics/
  49. multiples.vc, accessed August 3, 2025, https://multiples.vc/public-comps/autonation-valuation-multiples
  50. P/E ratio for AutoNation (AN) – Companies Market Cap, accessed August 3, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/autonation/pe-ratio/
  51. Lithia Motors, Inc. – Enterprise Value – Wisesheets, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.wisesheets.io/enterprise-value/LAD
  52. LAD (Lithia Motors) Enterprise Value – GuruFocus, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.gurufocus.com/term/enterprise-value/LAD
  53. PAG (Penske Automotive Group) Enterprise Value – GuruFocus, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.gurufocus.com/term/enterprise-value/PAG
  54. EV / EBITDA For Penske Automotive Group Inc (PAG) – Finbox, accessed August 3, 2025, https://finbox.com/NYSE:PAG/explorer/ev_to_ebitda_ltm/
  55. Lithia Motors Stock Price Today | NYSE: LAD Live – Investing.com, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.investing.com/equities/lithia-motors-inc
  56. Dealer Survey by Kerrigan Advisors: Gauging Dealer Sentiment, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.kerriganadvisors.com/our-reports/dealer-survey
  57. Sum-of-the-Parts Valuation (SOTP) Meaning, Formula, Example – Investopedia, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sumofpartsvaluation.asp
  58. Sum of the Parts Valuation – When a Company Has Many Business Segments, accessed August 3, 2025, https://einvestingforbeginners.com/sum-of-the-parts-valuation-daah/
  59. Sum-of-the-Parts Analysis – Macabacus, accessed August 3, 2025, https://macabacus.com/valuation/sotp
  60. How to Value Diversified Companies With Sum of the Parts (SOTP) Valuation | StableBread, accessed August 3, 2025, https://stablebread.com/sum-of-the-parts-valuation/
  61. Automotive aftermarket industry trends 2025: Key insights | S&P Global, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.spglobal.com/automotive-insights/en/blogs/automotive-aftermarket-industry-trends-2025