The Gemini Report – Investment Deep Dives

Investment Research Report: Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (NYSE: MMC)

All investment deep dives on this site have been written by Google Gemini with light human editing. Nothing on this site constitutes investment advise. All materials on this site are for informational purposes only.

The Gemini Report - Investment Deep Dives
The Gemini Report – Investment Deep Dives
Investment Research Report: Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (NYSE: MMC)
Loading
/

Executive Summary

This report provides a deep-dive investment analysis of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC), the world’s preeminent professional services firm, uniquely positioned at the intersection of risk, strategy, and people. The core investment thesis posits that MMC represents a superior long-term investment opportunity, characterized by a portfolio of market-leading businesses, a resilient and capital-light operating model, and a disciplined capital allocation strategy that consistently generates substantial shareholder value. The company’s durable competitive advantages are rooted in the unparalleled brand strength and global scale of its four subsidiaries: Marsh, Guy Carpenter, Mercer, and Oliver Wyman. This integrated structure enables MMC to offer holistic solutions to the most complex challenges facing corporations and public entities today, fostering deep, lasting client relationships that are difficult for competitors to replicate.

MMC’s financial performance is distinguished by its remarkable consistency and resilience. The company has achieved 17 consecutive years of adjusted operating margin expansion, a testament to its operational excellence and ability to generate significant operating leverage. This financial discipline, combined with a business model that produces strong, recurring revenue streams, results in substantial free cash flow generation. Management has demonstrated a shareholder-aligned approach to deploying this capital, balancing strategic acquisitions with a programmatic return of capital through consistent dividend growth and share repurchases.

The company is exceptionally well-positioned to capitalize on powerful secular tailwinds. In an increasingly volatile world, demand for sophisticated risk advisory and insurance solutions is non-discretionary and growing. Concurrently, the global focus on human capital—from managing healthcare costs to navigating the future of work—provides a long runway for growth in its consulting businesses.

Valuation analysis indicates that while MMC trades at a premium to the broader market, this is justified by its superior profitability, lower earnings volatility, and consistent growth profile. When benchmarked against its direct peers, MMC’s balanced approach of strong organic growth, steady margin improvement, and strategic M&A stands out. Key risks to the thesis include sensitivity to a severe global macroeconomic downturn, M&A integration challenges, and persistent competitive pressures. However, the firm’s diversified revenue base and the essential nature of its services provide a significant buffer against these risks. Consequently, this report concludes with a favorable recommendation, identifying MMC as a high-quality, blue-chip compounder suitable as a core holding in a long-term, growth-oriented portfolio.

I. Company Profile: A Global Leader in Risk, Strategy, and People

Introduction to Marsh & McLennan’s Integrated Model

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) is a global professional services firm that provides a broad range of advice and solutions to clients in the critical and interconnected areas of risk, strategy, and people.1 With a corporate heritage that traces back to the founding of Marsh in 1871, the company has evolved into a unique and powerful conglomerate of four distinct, market-leading businesses.4 This structure is not merely a holding company of disparate assets but a deliberately integrated platform designed to address the multifaceted challenges of a modern global enterprise. The firm’s stated purpose is to “build the confidence to thrive through the power of perspective,” which it achieves by bringing together experts from across its subsidiaries to make organizations more successful and societies more resilient.1

A critical examination of this corporate structure reveals a significant competitive advantage. It creates a “one-stop-shop” for complex corporate needs that smaller, more specialized competitors cannot replicate. This integrated model fosters stickier client relationships and generates significant cross-selling opportunities between the Risk & Insurance Services and Consulting segments. For instance, a large multinational client navigating the complex transition to a low-carbon economy faces not just a strategic challenge (an Oliver Wyman engagement) but also new physical and liability risks (a Marsh engagement), reinsurance needs (a Guy Carpenter engagement), and the necessity to reskill its workforce (a Mercer engagement). MMC is uniquely structured to address all these facets holistically, creating higher switching costs for clients. While a competitor might be able to underbid one piece of business, displacing MMC across multiple, deeply embedded service lines is a far more formidable challenge. This dynamic underpins a more durable, recurring revenue stream than is apparent from analyzing each segment in isolation.

Overview of the Four Market-Leading Businesses

MMC’s global operations are conducted through four premier brands, each a leader in its respective field:

  • Marsh: As the world’s leading insurance broker and risk advisor, Marsh provides data-driven risk advisory services and insurance solutions to a vast array of commercial and consumer clients.5 With a history of pioneering the discipline of risk management, Marsh leverages its global scale and deep industry expertise to identify, quantify, mitigate, and transfer risk for its clients.4 Its offerings span numerous specialty practices, including cyber, political risk, aviation, and construction, providing tailored solutions that help clients reduce their total cost of risk.1
  • Guy Carpenter: A leading global risk and reinsurance specialist, Guy Carpenter develops advanced risk, reinsurance, and capital strategies that enable clients to grow profitably and pursue emerging opportunities.2 The firm acts as an intermediary for insurance companies, helping them manage their own risk portfolios by placing reinsurance coverage and providing sophisticated analytics, catastrophe modeling, and capital advisory services.6
  • Mercer: Mercer is a global leader in advising clients on health, wealth, and career-related matters.2 It helps organizations manage and optimize their human capital, offering consulting services and solutions in employee health and benefits, retirement and investment management, and talent strategy.10 Mercer holds a #1 market position as a health and benefits broker and as an Outsourced Chief Investment Officer (OCIO), underscoring its leadership in critical areas of human resources management.6
  • Oliver Wyman: A top-tier global management consulting firm, Oliver Wyman combines deep industry knowledge with specialized expertise in strategy, operations, risk management, and organizational transformation.2 It provides high-impact, project-based advisory services to a diverse client base, competing directly with the world’s most elite strategy consultancies.6

Analysis of Global Scale and Client Base

The scale of MMC’s operations is a cornerstone of its competitive moat. The company employs more than 90,000 colleagues who advise clients in over 130 countries, generating annual revenue of over $24 billion.1 This extensive global footprint is critical for serving multinational clients that require consistent, high-quality service and localized expertise across diverse regulatory and cultural environments.

The firm’s client base is exceptionally diversified, serving corporations in numerous industries, small and mid-size businesses, governments and other public entities, not-for-profit organizations, and high-net-worth individuals.7 This diversification across client type, industry, and geography provides a significant degree of stability and resilience to the company’s revenue streams, mitigating the impact of economic downturns in any single sector or region. Geographically, revenue is well-balanced, with the United States accounting for 49%, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) for 32%, Asia Pacific for 11%, and Canada and Latin America for 4% each, based on trailing twelve months data as of June 30, 2025.6 This global presence not only supports multinational clients but also allows MMC to capitalize on growth opportunities in emerging markets.

II. Segment Deep Dive: Analyzing the Dual Pillars of Profitability

Marsh & McLennan operates through two primary reporting segments: Risk & Insurance Services (RIS) and Consulting. These two pillars, while distinct in their service offerings and revenue models, have a symbiotic and counter-cyclical relationship that enhances the overall resilience and stability of the consolidated enterprise. The steady, annuity-like revenue generated by the RIS segment provides a robust financial foundation that supports continued investment and growth in the more project-based, and potentially more economically sensitive, Consulting segment. During periods of economic stress, when demand for high-end strategy consulting might soften as corporations curtail discretionary spending, the non-discretionary nature of risk management and insurance brokerage often bolsters the RIS segment. This structural balance makes MMC’s consolidated earnings stream less volatile than that of a pure-play consulting firm or a smaller, less-diversified insurance broker, a quality that warrants a premium valuation.

A. Risk & Insurance Services (RIS): The Resilient Growth Engine

The Risk & Insurance Services segment is the larger of the two pillars and serves as the company’s primary growth and cash flow engine. Comprising the operations of Marsh and Guy Carpenter, this segment accounted for approximately 64% of MMC’s total revenue for the trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2025, with Marsh contributing 54% and Guy Carpenter 10%.6

  • Business Model & Revenue Drivers: The segment’s revenue is generated primarily from commissions, which are typically calculated as a percentage of the insurance premiums placed on behalf of clients, and fees for advisory and consulting services.12 A smaller but meaningful revenue stream comes from fiduciary interest income earned on client funds (premiums and claims) that are held temporarily before being remitted to insurers. The revenue model is characterized by its highly recurring nature, underpinned by strong client retention rates and the non-discretionary need for businesses to maintain insurance coverage.6
  • Market Leadership & Scale: The scale of the RIS segment is a formidable competitive advantage. Marsh is the world’s #1 ranked insurance broker, placing over $160 billion in global premiums annually.11 This immense volume provides significant negotiating leverage with insurance carriers, enabling Marsh to secure favorable terms and pricing for its clients. Furthermore, this scale has allowed the company to build proprietary data and analytics platforms, such as the Global Risk Insight Platform (GRIP), which offer clients unique market insights that smaller competitors cannot replicate.15 Guy Carpenter holds a top-tier position in the reinsurance brokerage market, providing critical risk transfer solutions to insurance carriers worldwide. The segment’s expertise is vast, with nearly three dozen specialty and industry practices covering areas from aviation and marine to cyber and political risk.2
  • Performance Analysis: The RIS segment has demonstrated exceptional and sustained performance. The 2022 Annual Report noted that the segment was experiencing its “strongest period of growth in nearly two decades”.16 This momentum has been driven by a combination of strong client retention, new business generation, and a favorable insurance pricing environment. The segment’s profitability is robust, benefiting from significant operating leverage as revenue growth consistently outpaces expense growth.

B. Consulting: The Value-Added Human Capital Partner

The Consulting segment, which includes Mercer and Oliver Wyman, provides specialized, fee-for-service advisory work and represents a critical source of intellectual capital and strategic client relationships for the firm. This segment accounted for approximately 36% of MMC’s total revenue for the trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2025, with Mercer contributing 23% and Oliver Wyman 13%.6

  • Service Offerings & Client Value Proposition: The segment’s value proposition is centered on providing deep, specialized expertise and data-driven insights that help clients address their most pressing strategic and human capital challenges.9 Mercer focuses on long-term, often recurring, client needs in Health (designing and managing employee benefit programs), Wealth (advising on retirement plans and investment management), and Career (talent strategy and workforce transformation).6 Oliver Wyman engages in high-value, project-based management and economic consulting, helping C-suite executives navigate complex strategic issues, from market entry and M&A to operational efficiency and risk management.2
  • Growth Drivers & Market Positioning: The Consulting segment is propelled by powerful secular trends. Rising healthcare costs, the increasing complexity of global investment and retirement systems, the intense “war for talent,” and the constant need for businesses to adapt to technological and competitive disruption create sustained demand for Mercer and Oliver Wyman’s services.16 Both businesses hold market-leading positions. Mercer is ranked as the #1 Health & Benefits broker and the #1 Outsourced CIO globally, highlighting its dominance in key consulting domains.11 Oliver Wyman is consistently ranked among the world’s top strategy consulting firms, competing effectively with peers such as McKinsey & Company, Boston Consulting Group, and Bain & Company.18
  • Performance Analysis: The Consulting segment has also been a strong performer. The 2022 Annual Report highlighted that Mercer’s growth was its strongest since 2008, while Oliver Wyman had delivered a second consecutive year of double-digit growth.16 This performance underscores the segment’s ability to capitalize on favorable industry trends and the high value clients place on its advisory services.

III. Industry Landscape and Secular Tailwinds

Marsh & McLennan is uniquely positioned to capitalize on the convergence of major trends shaping its two core industries: insurance brokerage and management consulting. The most complex challenges confronting global enterprises today—such as the adoption of artificial intelligence, the transition to a sustainable economy, and the re-architecting of global supply chains—are not siloed issues. They are deeply interconnected problems of both risk and strategy. A company cannot formulate an effective AI strategy (an Oliver Wyman engagement) without concurrently addressing the new liabilities and insurance requirements it creates (a Marsh engagement). Similarly, building a resilient global supply chain (an Oliver Wyman project) is inseparable from modeling and insuring against the new disruption risks involved (a Marsh and Guy Carpenter solution). MMC’s integrated structure allows it to provide both the strategic “how-to” from its Consulting arm and the financial “what-if” protection from its Risk & Insurance Services segment. This synergistic capability enables MMC to capture a larger share of a client’s total advisory and risk budget than any of its competitors, creating a durable competitive advantage in an evolving marketplace.

A. The Insurance Brokerage Ecosystem (2025 Outlook)

The global insurance brokerage industry is undergoing a period of dynamic change, driven by a complex interplay of market forces, technological innovation, and an expanding risk landscape.

  • Key Growth Drivers: A primary driver of revenue for brokers is the insurance pricing cycle. A “hard” market, characterized by rising premium rates, directly translates to higher commission revenues for brokers, even without an increase in the volume of policies sold.19 Beyond pricing, the fundamental driver of long-term growth is the increasing complexity of risk. The proliferation of sophisticated cyber threats, the tangible financial impacts of climate change, and heightened geopolitical instability are expanding the universe of risks that organizations must manage, creating sustained demand for expert advice and innovative risk transfer solutions.1
  • Dominant Trends: The industry is being reshaped by two powerful trends. First, consolidation through mergers and acquisitions remains a defining feature. The landscape is highly fragmented, particularly in the middle market, and both large strategic players like MMC and private equity-backed firms are aggressively acquiring smaller brokers to gain scale, add specialized capabilities, and expand their geographic footprint.19 Second,
    technology and digitalization are transforming every aspect of the value chain. The adoption of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and advanced data analytics is enabling more sophisticated risk modeling, automating claims processes, and delivering more personalized and efficient client service. Firms that invest heavily in these technologies are creating a significant competitive advantage.20
  • Challenges: The industry is not without its challenges. “Social inflation”—a term describing the rising costs of insurance claims driven by increased litigation, larger jury awards, and broader definitions of liability—is putting upward pressure on premiums, particularly in casualty lines, and can affect the availability of coverage.20 Additionally, the global regulatory environment is becoming more complex, with new rules emerging around cybersecurity, data privacy, and the use of AI in underwriting and claims.21

B. The Management Consulting Market (2025 Outlook)

The management consulting market remains robust, fueled by the relentless pace of change and the need for organizations to adapt to a new competitive landscape.

  • Key Growth Drivers: Demand is particularly strong in several key areas that represent fundamental strategic imperatives for modern corporations. Digital transformation remains a top priority, as companies across all sectors invest in technology to improve operations, enhance customer experience, and create new business models. Closely related is the explosive growth in demand for AI strategy and implementation, as organizations seek to harness the power of artificial intelligence while managing its risks.17 Other significant growth areas include
    supply chain resilience, as companies re-evaluate their global supply networks in the wake of recent disruptions, and cost optimization, as businesses seek to improve efficiency in an environment of economic uncertainty.28
  • Dominant Trends: The consulting market is experiencing a pronounced shift toward specialization. The era of the generalist consultant is waning, as clients increasingly seek deep, domain-specific expertise to solve complex, narrowly defined problems. This trend has benefited boutique firms and specialized practices within larger, multi-service firms.17 The
    competition for talent is another defining characteristic of the industry. Consulting firms’ primary asset is their human capital, and the battle to attract, develop, and retain top-tier talent is intense. This is reflected in high compensation levels, particularly for individuals with expertise in high-demand fields like AI and data science, who can command significant salary premiums.28
  • Challenges: The industry faces several headwinds. Clients are becoming more price-sensitive and are increasingly demanding alternative fee arrangements, such as outcome-based pricing, that tie consulting fees to the achievement of specific results.29 There is also a growing trend of clients
    building in-house strategy and transformation teams, which can reduce their reliance on external consultants for certain types of work.29

IV. Competitive Benchmarking: A Peer Group Analysis

While MMC, Aon, Willis Towers Watson, and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. are often grouped together as the largest players in the insurance brokerage and professional services space, a closer examination reveals distinct strategic archetypes. MMC and Aon operate as highly integrated global platforms, leveraging scale and a broad service portfolio. AJG has pursued a disciplined and highly successful M&A roll-up strategy, focusing on consolidating the brokerage market. WTW, following its terminated merger with Aon and subsequent strategic restructuring, has emerged as a focused margin improvement and turnaround story.

Among these different approaches, MMC’s strategy appears to be the most balanced. It combines strong and consistent organic growth with a proven ability to expand margins, supplemented by a disciplined capital allocation program that includes strategic “tuck-in” M&A, consistent dividend growth, and programmatic share repurchases. This balanced model has generated a superior and more predictable financial profile over the long term. For a risk-averse, long-term investor, MMC’s strategy of steady, compounding growth is arguably more attractive than AJG’s M&A-dependent model, which carries inherent integration risk, or WTW’s turnaround narrative, which may have less long-term visibility. This positions MMC as a potential “core” holding for investors seeking exposure to the professional services sector.

  • Aon plc (AON): Headquartered in Dublin, Ireland, Aon is MMC’s most direct competitor in terms of global scale, client base, and integrated service model.31 The company operates through two primary capabilities: Risk Capital (encompassing commercial risk solutions and reinsurance solutions) and Human Capital (including health, wealth, and talent solutions).32 Aon’s “Aon United” strategy is philosophically similar to MMC’s collaborative approach, aiming to bring the full resources of the firm to bear on client problems.31
  • Willis Towers Watson plc (WTW): WTW is a major global advisory, broking, and solutions company with deep roots in both risk management and human capital consulting, serving clients in 140 countries.37 The company has undergone significant strategic changes in recent years, including the termination of its proposed merger with Aon in 2021 and the subsequent divestiture of its reinsurance brokerage arm (Willis Re) to Arthur J. Gallagher.38 Following this restructuring, the company has focused on its “Grow, Simplify, and Transform” strategy, which has yielded strong results in terms of organic revenue growth and margin expansion.37
  • Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG): Headquartered in Illinois, AJG is distinguished by its highly active and successful M&A strategy.41 The company has completed hundreds of acquisitions over the past decade, building a formidable presence in the insurance brokerage and risk management sectors, with a particular strength in the U.S. middle market.43 While it offers a range of benefits and HR consulting services, its business is more heavily weighted toward its brokerage and risk management segments compared to MMC and Aon.12

The following table provides a concise, data-driven comparison of MMC against its direct competitors, allowing for a rapid assessment of relative performance, profitability, and valuation. This snapshot is essential for understanding how MMC’s operational excellence translates into its financial profile and whether its market valuation is justified relative to its peers.

MetricMMCAONWTWAJG
Market Capitalization~$103.5B 47~$80.7B 31~$31.7B 48~$77.7B 49
Total Revenue (TTM)$25.8B 50$16.8B 50$9.9B 38$11.4B 45
Organic Revenue Growth (FY 2024)7% 546% 565% 407% 44
Adj. Operating / EBITDAC Margin (FY 2024)25.4% (Adj. OI) 5431.5% (Adj. OI) 5623.9% (Adj. OI) 4031.4% (Adj. EBITDAC) 44
P/E Ratio (Forward)22.0x 5922.2x 5919.8x 5927.4x 59
EV/EBITDA Ratio (TTM)15.9x 6018.1x 6113.9x 6222.0x 63
Dividend Yield (Forward)1.70% 590.80% 591.10% 590.86% 59
5-Yr Dividend Growth (CAGR)12.82% 5910.04% 596.48% 597.27% 59

Note: Data is based on the latest available full-year (FY 2024) and trailing-twelve-month (TTM) figures from provided sources. Market capitalization is approximate and subject to market fluctuations. Margin definitions (Adjusted Operating Income vs. Adjusted EBITDAC) may differ slightly between companies.

V. Financial Analysis and Capital Allocation

A deep analysis of Marsh & McLennan’s financial history reveals a company with a durable and high-quality earnings stream, supported by a robust balance sheet and a disciplined approach to capital allocation. The firm’s capital-light business model is a key strength, allowing it to convert a high percentage of its earnings into free cash flow, which in turn fuels both organic and inorganic growth initiatives while consistently returning capital to shareholders.

Historical Financial Performance Review

MMC’s long-term financial track record is exemplary. The company has demonstrated a consistent ability to grow revenue, expand profitability, and increase earnings per share through various economic cycles. Key highlights of its performance include:

  • Consistent Revenue Growth: The company has achieved 13 consecutive years of underlying revenue growth, showcasing the resilient demand for its services.16 For the full year 2024, MMC reported 8% revenue growth, with 7% on an underlying basis, continuing its strongest stretch of growth in over two decades.54
  • Sustained Margin Expansion: A hallmark of MMC’s operational excellence is its ability to grow revenue faster than expenses. This has resulted in an extraordinary 17 consecutive years of adjusted operating margin expansion, a feat that is rare among large-cap companies and indicates strong cost control and significant operating leverage.6
  • Double-Digit EPS Growth: The combination of revenue growth, margin expansion, and effective capital management has translated into strong bottom-line results. For the full year 2024, adjusted EPS grew 10%, marking the fourth consecutive year of 10%+ growth.14 Over the past 15 years, the company has consistently delivered adjusted EPS growth.16

The following table provides a multi-year, granular view of the performance of MMC’s two core operating segments. This data is indispensable for understanding the fundamental drivers of the business, assessing the consistency of each segment’s growth and profitability, and building a more accurate forward-looking financial model. The time-series view clearly illustrates the acceleration of growth in the RIS segment post-2020 and the steady, high-margin performance of the Consulting segment, validating the strategic narrative of a balanced and resilient enterprise.

(in millions USD)202020212022202320245-Yr CAGR
Risk & Insurance Services Revenue$10,300 65$12,100 66$12,645 67$14,089 67$15,395 6710.6%
Risk & Insurance Services Operating Income$2,300 65$3,100 66$3,089 67$3,945 67$4,365 6717.4%
RIS Operating Margin22.3%25.6%24.4%28.0%28.4%
Consulting Revenue$7,000 65$7,800 66$8,139 67$8,709 67$9,133 676.9%
Consulting Operating Income$1,000 65$1,500 66$1,553 67$1,666 67$1,770 6715.3%
Consulting Operating Margin14.3%19.2%19.1%19.1%19.4%
Total Revenue$17,224 65$19,820 66$20,720 67$22,736 67$24,458 679.1%
Total Operating Income$3,100 65$4,300 66$4,280 67$5,282 67$5,817 6717.0%

Note: Operating Income figures are based on GAAP as reported in company financial statements. Revenue for RIS includes fiduciary interest income. Total Revenue and Operating Income may not sum perfectly due to corporate/elimination line items.

Balance Sheet, Cash Flow, and Returns

MMC operates a capital-light business model, meaning it does not require significant investment in physical assets or inventory to generate revenue. This structure is highly efficient and allows for the conversion of a large portion of net income into free cash flow.6 The company’s balance sheet is strong, providing the financial flexibility to pursue strategic initiatives. The firm’s ability to generate high returns on capital is a key indicator of its profitability and management’s effectiveness. For the full year 2024, MMC’s return on equity (ROE) was 30.4%, a figure that compares favorably to most of its peers and demonstrates the high profitability of its asset base.68 Similarly, its return on invested capital (ROIC) for 2024 was 11.6%, indicating efficient use of both debt and equity capital to generate profits.70

Capital Allocation Strategy

MMC’s management has consistently followed a disciplined and balanced capital allocation strategy focused on creating long-term shareholder value.11 The strategy prioritizes reinvestment in the business to drive organic growth, followed by strategic acquisitions and the return of capital to shareholders. In 2024, the company expects to deploy approximately $4.2 billion across these priorities.11

  • Dividends: The company has a strong track record of returning capital to shareholders via dividends, having increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years.59 This consistent growth signals management’s confidence in the stability and long-term growth of the company’s cash flows.
  • Share Repurchases: MMC utilizes a programmatic share repurchase plan to offset dilution from equity-based compensation and to opportunistically reduce its share count.10 In 2022, the company completed $1.9 billion in share repurchases, the largest annual amount in its history.16
  • Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A): M&A is a key component of MMC’s growth strategy, used to add talent, enhance capabilities, and increase scale. The company has a proven track record as a disciplined acquirer.14 2024 marked the largest year for acquisitions in the company’s history, highlighted by the $7.75 billion acquisition of McGriff Insurance Services.55 This demonstrates a willingness to execute large, strategic transactions when the right opportunity arises.

VI. Governance, Leadership, and Shareholder Alignment

Strong corporate governance and experienced leadership are critical pillars supporting MMC’s long-term success and are key to aligning the interests of management with those of shareholders. The company’s governance framework is robust, and its executive team is comprised of seasoned industry veterans with deep expertise across the firm’s diverse operations.

Executive Leadership Assessment

The company is led by President and Chief Executive Officer John Q. Doyle, a highly regarded executive with over 35 years of experience in the insurance and risk management industry.74 Before assuming the CEO role, Mr. Doyle served as Group President and COO and was previously the President and CEO of Marsh. His deep understanding of the firm’s largest business segment and the broader industry landscape provides strong and stable leadership.74 The executive committee includes the long-tenured leaders of each of the four primary business segments—Martin South at Marsh, Dean Klisura at Guy Carpenter, Pat Tomlinson at Mercer, and Nick Studer at Oliver Wyman—ensuring operational continuity and deep expertise at the highest level of the organization.75

Board of Directors Review

MMC’s Board of Directors is structured to provide strong, independent oversight of management. As of the 2025 annual meeting, 91% of the board’s 11 directors are independent, and the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board are separate, with H. Edward Hanway serving as the Independent Chair.75 This separation is a best practice in corporate governance, promoting a healthy balance of power and enhancing the board’s oversight capabilities. The board demonstrates a commitment to diversity, with 36% of its members being women.75 The board’s six standing committees—Audit, Compensation, Directors and Governance, Finance, Business Responsibility, and Executive—are composed entirely of independent directors (with the exception of the CEO’s membership on the Finance and Executive committees), ensuring that critical functions such as financial reporting, executive compensation, and director nominations are managed with impartiality.3

Executive Compensation Analysis

The executive compensation program at MMC is thoughtfully designed to align the financial interests of senior executives with the creation of long-term shareholder value.75 An analysis of the company’s most recent proxy statement reveals a framework heavily weighted toward variable, at-risk compensation. Approximately 93% of the CEO’s target total direct compensation is variable, contingent on performance, with an average of 83% for other named executive officers.75

The structure of the annual Long-Term Incentive (LTI) awards is particularly well-aligned with shareholder interests. These awards are granted as 50% Performance Stock Units (PSUs) and 50% stock options.71 The vesting of PSUs is tied to two rigorous metrics measured over a three-year performance period: annualized adjusted EPS growth and the company’s Total Shareholder Return (TSR) relative to the constituents of the S&P 500 index.71 This structure directly rewards management for delivering both fundamental earnings growth and superior stock performance. The program’s effectiveness is evidenced by the maximum 200% payout achieved for the 2022-2024 PSU cycle, driven by strong EPS growth and top-quartile relative TSR.75

Shareholder support for this compensation framework is strong, as demonstrated by a 93% approval vote on the company’s advisory “Say on Pay” proposal at the 2024 annual meeting.75 Further aligning interests, the company maintains robust stock ownership guidelines, requiring the CEO to hold company stock valued at 6 times his base salary and other senior executives to hold 3 times their base salary.71

VII. Valuation Analysis

The valuation of Marsh & McLennan must be considered in the context of its superior quality, consistent growth, and resilient business model. While the company’s stock often trades at a premium to the broader market and some of its peers, this premium is justified by its best-in-class financial metrics, including its long history of margin expansion, strong free cash flow generation, and high returns on capital. The analysis below examines the company’s valuation from both a historical and a relative perspective.

Historical Valuation Context

An analysis of MMC’s historical valuation multiples provides a useful baseline for assessing its current market price. Over the past ten years, the company’s stock has traded at an average Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 25.8x.47 The P/E ratio has fluctuated within a range, peaking at over 34.0x in mid-2019 and reaching a low of around 18.4x in late 2015.47 The current TTM P/E ratio of approximately 25.1x is in line with this long-term historical average, suggesting that the stock is not excessively expensive relative to its own history.47

Similarly, the company’s Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) multiple provides another perspective. Over the last five fiscal years (2020-2024), MMC’s EV/EBITDA ratio has averaged 16.9x, peaking at 18.8x in 2021 and hitting a low of 15.6x in 2020.60 The current TTM EV/EBITDA multiple of approximately 15.9x is slightly below this five-year average, indicating a reasonable valuation on this basis.60

Peer Group Valuation Comparison

Comparing MMC’s valuation to its direct peers is crucial for determining its relative attractiveness. The table below consolidates key valuation metrics for MMC and its competitors. This data allows for an immediate assessment of whether MMC’s stock is attractively priced. For example, MMC’s current P/E ratio of ~25x is in line with its history and at a slight discount to its most acquisitive peer, AJG, but at a premium to AON and WTW. The subsequent analysis justifies this valuation by pointing to MMC’s superior dividend growth and consistent operational performance, which merit a premium valuation.

Valuation MetricMMCAONWTWAJG
Current P/E (TTM)25.1x 4731.3x 59253.2x 5944.9x 59
5-Year Avg. P/E26.8x 4731.0x 7824.8x 7939.3x 49
Current EV/EBITDA (TTM)15.9x 6018.1x 6113.9x 6222.0x 63
5-Year Avg. EV/EBITDA16.9x 60~22.3x*14.2x 6220.8x 63

*Note: Data is based on the latest available TTM and historical figures from provided sources. WTW’s TTM P/E is distorted by a net loss in 2024; its forward P/E is a more meaningful metric. Aon 5-year average EV/EBITDA is an estimate based on available data points.

The data indicates that MMC trades at a valuation that is broadly in line with or at a slight discount to its historical averages. Relative to its peers, its valuation appears reasonable. While AJG has a higher P/E ratio, reflecting its aggressive M&A-fueled growth, MMC’s EV/EBITDA multiple is more attractive than both AON’s and AJG’s. WTW’s valuation is somewhat distorted by its recent restructuring but appears cheaper on a forward-looking basis. Given MMC’s superior track record of consistent organic growth, margin expansion, and shareholder returns (particularly its best-in-class dividend growth), a valuation in line with its historical average and at a premium to some peers is well-justified.

VIII. Investment Thesis and Key Risks

The Bull Case

The comprehensive analysis presented in this report culminates in a compelling investment thesis for Marsh & McLennan. The bull case is predicated on five core pillars that collectively position the company for sustained, long-term value creation:

  1. Durable Market Leadership: MMC is not merely a participant in its markets; it is a leader. Its portfolio consists of four businesses—Marsh, Guy Carpenter, Mercer, and Oliver Wyman—that are each ranked #1 or #2 globally in their respective fields. This market leadership confers significant competitive advantages, including unparalleled scale, which provides negotiating leverage with suppliers (insurance carriers); proprietary data and analytics, which enhance the value of its advice; and a global brand that attracts both top-tier clients and talent.
  2. Resilient, Capital-Light Business Model: The company’s business model is exceptionally attractive. A significant portion of its revenue, particularly in the Risk & Insurance Services segment, is recurring in nature, providing a stable and predictable financial foundation. The model is also capital-light, meaning it does not require substantial ongoing capital expenditures to maintain and grow its operations. This structure results in the generation of substantial free cash flow, which is the lifeblood of shareholder value creation.
  3. Alignment with Secular Growth Tailwinds: MMC is perfectly positioned at the nexus of several powerful, long-term global trends. The increasing frequency and complexity of risks—from climate change and cybersecurity to geopolitical instability and pandemics—are making sophisticated risk management and advisory services indispensable for businesses and governments. Simultaneously, the strategic importance of human capital—managing rising healthcare costs, designing effective retirement solutions, and winning the war for talent—creates a long runway for growth in its Consulting segment.
  4. Proven Operational Excellence: The company’s financial track record is a testament to a deeply ingrained culture of operational excellence. The achievement of 17 consecutive years of adjusted operating margin expansion is a remarkable accomplishment that demonstrates a structural ability to grow earnings faster than revenue. This consistent operating leverage is a powerful engine for compounding shareholder value over time.
  5. Disciplined and Shareholder-Friendly Capital Allocation: Management has demonstrated a clear and consistent commitment to a balanced capital allocation strategy. The company has a long history of increasing its dividend, has been a consistent repurchaser of its own shares, and has successfully integrated numerous value-accretive acquisitions. This disciplined approach ensures that the firm’s robust free cash flow is deployed effectively to maximize long-term shareholder returns.

The Bear Case

A balanced investment analysis requires a thorough consideration of potential risks and counterarguments. The bear case for MMC centers on four primary concerns:

  1. Macroeconomic Sensitivity: While the company has proven resilient, its businesses are not immune to the broader economic environment. A severe and prolonged global recession could negatively impact its more discretionary revenue streams, particularly in the project-based strategy consulting work performed by Oliver Wyman. A downturn could also slow M&A activity, a key growth driver for the industry.
  2. Competitive Intensity: The professional services landscape is intensely competitive. MMC faces formidable competition from large, global peers like Aon, as well as from a host of specialized boutique firms and new, technology-driven entrants. This competition exists not only for client relationships but also for the top-tier talent that is the firm’s most critical asset.
  3. M&A Integration Risk: M&A is a core component of MMC’s growth strategy, and 2024 was a record year for acquisition spending. While the company has a strong track record of successful integration, large-scale acquisitions always carry inherent risks, including the potential for culture clashes, the failure to achieve projected synergies, and the overpayment for assets.
  4. Valuation Risk: As a high-quality industry leader, MMC’s stock typically trades at a premium valuation relative to the broader market. This implies that high expectations for future growth and profitability are already reflected in the stock price, leaving less room for error. Any significant operational misstep or a slowdown in growth could lead to a contraction in its valuation multiple, resulting in underperformance.

Comprehensive Risk Assessment

In addition to the broad thematic risks outlined above, the company discloses a range of specific risk factors in its regulatory filings and investor communications. These include, but are not limited to:

  • Geopolitical and Macroeconomic Conditions: The business can be adversely affected by wars, global conflicts, tariffs, trade policy changes, slower GDP growth, recessions, and volatility in interest rates and foreign exchange rates.6
  • Legal and Regulatory Risks: The company is exposed to potential lawsuits arising from errors and omissions (E&O) or breaches of fiduciary duty.11 It must also comply with a complex web of global regulations, including anti-corruption laws (e.g., FCPA, U.K. Bribery Act), data privacy laws, and cybersecurity regulations.6
  • Cybersecurity Threats: The increasing prevalence and sophistication of ransomware and other forms of cyber attacks pose a significant threat to the company’s operations and the security of its client and proprietary data.11
  • Talent Management: The company’s success is fundamentally dependent on its ability to attract, retain, and develop industry-leading talent in a highly competitive market.6
  • Conflicts of Interest: As a multi-service firm, MMC must carefully manage potential conflicts of interest that may arise when its services to one client could be perceived to conflict with the interests of another client or the firm’s own interests.6

IX. Strategic Outlook and Recommendations

Forward-Looking Assessment

Marsh & McLennan enters 2025 with significant momentum and a clear strategic path forward. Management has provided an outlook that projects continued mid-single-digit or better underlying revenue growth, further expansion of its adjusted operating margin, and solid growth in adjusted earnings per share.11 This outlook is underpinned by the firm’s strong market positioning, the resilient demand for its services, and the ongoing benefits from its investments in talent and technology.

The company’s strategic priorities are well-aligned with the dominant trends shaping its industries. The continued investment in data and analytics, the focus on capturing opportunities at the intersection of its businesses, and the disciplined execution of its M&A strategy should enable MMC to continue gaining market share and enhancing its competitive advantages. The recent record year of acquisitions, particularly the large-scale addition of McGriff, will significantly bolster the scale and capabilities of its Marsh McLennan Agency (MMA) platform, a key engine for growth in the U.S. middle market.72 While challenges from macroeconomic uncertainty and a dynamic insurance pricing environment persist, MMC’s diversified business mix and the non-discretionary nature of many of its services provide a strong foundation for continued growth and value creation.

Concluding Analysis and Recommendation

After a comprehensive review of Marsh & McLennan’s business model, financial performance, competitive landscape, and valuation, this report concludes with a favorable investment recommendation. MMC represents a rare combination of market leadership, operational excellence, and financial resilience. The company’s portfolio of world-class brands creates a deep and durable competitive moat, while its capital-light model and disciplined management team have produced a remarkable and sustained track record of profitable growth and shareholder returns.

The bull case for the company is compelling and multifaceted, resting on the firm’s structural advantages and its alignment with powerful secular growth trends in risk and human capital management. While the bear case and associated risks are not insignificant, they are well-understood and, to a large extent, mitigated by the company’s diversification, scale, and financial strength. The current valuation appears fair, reflecting the company’s high quality but not demanding an unrealistic level of future growth.

Recommendation: ACCUMULATE. Marsh & McLennan is classified as a high-quality, blue-chip compounder that warrants a core, long-term position within a diversified equity portfolio. The stock is suitable for investors seeking consistent growth, a rising stream of dividend income, and a lower-than-market risk profile.

Works cited

  1. Marsh McLennan, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.marshmclennan.com/
  2. 10-K – SEC.gov, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/62709/000006270916000040/mmc1231201510k.htm
  3. DEF 14A – SEC.gov, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/62709/000119312525066228/d878421ddef14a.htm
  4. ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 – SEC.gov, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/62709/000006270918000007/mmc1231201710k.htm
  5. mmc-20241231 – SEC.gov, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/62709/000006270925000015/mmc-20241231.htm
  6. Marsh McLennan Investor Presentation, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.marshmclennan.com/content/dam/mmc-web/files-for-download/investors/2025/pdf-2025-marsh-mclennan-2q-investor-presentation.pdf
  7. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. – SEC.gov, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/62709/000114544306000555/d18669_10k.htm
  8. DEF 14A – Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. – SEC.gov, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/62709/000119312522092794/d310397ddef14a.htm
  9. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MMC) Investor Relations Material – Quartr, accessed August 23, 2025, https://quartr.com/companies/marsh-mclennan-companies-inc_6263
  10. Definitive Proxy Statement – SEC.gov, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/62709/000119312519091672/d624844ddef14a.htm
  11. MMC External Investor Presentation 3Q24 – Marsh McLennan, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.marshmclennan.com/assets/v2/investors/2024/mmc-external-investor-presentation-3q24.pdf
  12. Form 10-K – SEC.gov, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/354190/000119312506023110/d10k.htm
  13. MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. SEC 10-Q Report – TradingView, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.tradingview.com/news/tradingview:e8954f4876947:0-marsh-mclennan-companies-inc-sec-10-q-report/
  14. Marsh McLennan Investor Presentation, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.marshmclennan.com/web-assets/files-for-download/investors/2025/pdf-2024-4q-mmc-external-investor-presentation.pdf
  15. Aon plc – SEC.gov, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/315293/000104746913001494/a2212713z10-k.htm
  16. Marsh McLennan 2022 Annual Report, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.marshmclennan.com/assets/v2/investors/2022/MarshMcLennan2022AnnualReport.pdf
  17. Consulting industry trends in 2025, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.paconsulting.com/newsroom/inside-business-consulting-industry-trends-in-2025-7-january-2025
  18. The Strategy Consulting Industry: Firms, Trends & Compensation (2025) – StrategyU, accessed August 23, 2025, https://strategyu.co/the-strategy-consulting-industry-firms-trends-compensation-2025/
  19. Insurance: US Deals 2025 midyear outlook: PwC, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/financial-services/library/insurance-deals-outlook.html
  20. The 5 Commercial Insurance Trends We’re Watching in Q1 2025 | AJG United States, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.ajg.com/news-and-insights/the-5-commercial-insurance-trends-were-watching-in-q1-2025/
  21. Insurance brokerage industry trends for 2025 – Embroker, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.embroker.com/blog/insurance-brokerage-industry-trends/
  22. 2024 Business Responsibility Report – Marsh McLennan, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.marshmclennan.com/web-assets/files-for-download/pdf-2024-marsh-mclennan-business-responsibility-report.pdf
  23. 2025 insurance M&A outlook | Deloitte US, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/Industries/financial-services/articles/insurance-m-and-a-outlook.html
  24. Q1 2025 M&A Trends: Specialty Insurance Brokerage Market Update – MarshBerry, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.marshberry.com/resource/q1-2025-ma-trends-specialty-insurance-brokerage-market-update/
  25. Form 10-K – SEC.gov, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/354190/000119312515047308/d853008d10k.htm
  26. 2025 Insurance Agency Technology Trends | EZLynx, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.ezlynx.com/blog/posts/2025-insurance-agency-technology-trends/
  27. 2025 global insurance outlook | Deloitte Insights, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/financial-services/financial-services-industry-outlooks/insurance-industry-outlook.html
  28. Consulting Market Overview – June 2025 – Management Consulted, accessed August 23, 2025, https://managementconsulted.com/consulting-industry-monthly-market-review-june-2025/
  29. Consulting Market Overview – July 2025 – Management Consulted, accessed August 23, 2025, https://managementconsulted.com/consulting-industry-monthly-market-review-july-2025/
  30. Consulting Industry Trends and Outlook for 2025 – Expert Network Calls, accessed August 23, 2025, https://expertnetworkcalls.com/71/consulting-industry-trends-outlook-2025
  31. Investor Relations | Aon, accessed August 23, 2025, https://ir.aon.com/
  32. About Aon, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.aon.com/about-aon/about-aon.jsp
  33. EDGAR Filing Documents for 0001628280-25-006093 – SEC.gov, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/315293/000162828025006093/0001628280-25-006093-index.htm
  34. Aon: Better Decisions, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.aon.com/en/
  35. Corporate Information – Aon, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.aon.com/en/about/leadership-and-governance/corporate-information
  36. 2025 Investor Day – Investor Relations | Aon, accessed August 23, 2025, https://ir.aon.com/investor-day
  37. Investor Relations Overview | Willis Towers Watson, accessed August 23, 2025, https://investors.wtwco.com/
  38. Willis Towers Watson – Wikipedia, accessed August 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willis_Towers_Watson
  39. Willis Towers Watson – AnnualReports.com, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/Company/willis-towers-watson
  40. WTW Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Earnings, accessed August 23, 2025, https://investors.wtwco.com/static-files/a5b46b56-2caa-45c0-a974-635c3306267f
  41. Arthur J. Gallagher (AJG) Investor Relations Material – Quartr, accessed August 23, 2025, https://quartr.com/companies/arthur-j-gallagher-co_4570
  42. Investor Relations: Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., accessed August 23, 2025, https://investor.ajg.com/home/default.aspx
  43. AJG Investor Relations – Arthur J Gallagher & Co – Alpha Spread, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nyse/ajg/investor-relations
  44. NEWS RELEASE ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. ANNOUNCES FOURTH QUARTER AND FULL YEAR 2024 FINANCIAL RESULTS ROLLING MEADOWS, IL, J, accessed August 23, 2025, https://s28.q4cdn.com/872121257/files/doc_financials/2024/q4/4Q-2024-Earnings-Release.pdf
  45. Gallagher reports growth as insurance market expands, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/us/news/breaking-news/gallagher-reports-growth-as-insurance-market-expands-522857.aspx
  46. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. – Investor Relations, accessed August 23, 2025, https://ajg2021ir.q4web.com/home/default.aspx
  47. MMC – Marsh & Mclennan Companies PE ratio, current and historical analysis – FullRatio, accessed August 23, 2025, https://fullratio.com/stocks/nyse-mmc/pe-ratio
  48. Marsh & McLennan ROE – Return on Equity 2010-2025 | MMC – Macrotrends, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/MMC/marsh-mclennan/roe
  49. AJG – Arthur J Gallagher PE ratio, current and historical analysis – FullRatio, accessed August 23, 2025, https://fullratio.com/stocks/nyse-ajg/pe-ratio
  50. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MMC) – Revenue, accessed August 23, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/marsh-and-mclennan-companies/revenue/
  51. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MMC) Revenue 2015-2025 – Stock Analysis, accessed August 23, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/mmc/revenue/
  52. Aon Revenue 2010-2025 – Macrotrends, accessed August 23, 2025, https://macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AON/aon/revenue
  53. WTW posts revenue of $9.93bn for 2024 amid segment growth – Reinsurance News, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.reinsurancene.ws/wtw-posts-revenue-of-9-93bn-for-2024-amid-segment-growth/
  54. MMC 4Q 2024 Ex 99.1 News Release – Marsh McLennan, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.marshmclennan.com/web-assets/files-for-download/investors/2025/mmc-4q-2024-news-release.pdf
  55. Marsh McLennan Reports Fourth Quarter and FY 2024 Results, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.marshmclennan.com/news-events/2025/january/marsh-mclennan-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2024-results.html
  56. printmgr file, accessed August 23, 2025, https://filecache.investorroom.com/mr5ir_aon/605/AON%202024%20Annual%20Financial%20Report_BMK.pdf
  57. Aon Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Results – Jan 31, 2025, accessed August 23, 2025, https://aon.mediaroom.com/2025-01-31-Aon-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2024-Results
  58. WTW Reports Net Loss in 2024 With Organic Revenue Growth of 5% – Insurance Journal, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2025/02/04/810652.htm
  59. MMC Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. Peers & Competitors – Seeking Alpha, accessed August 23, 2025, https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/MMC/peers/comparison
  60. EV / EBITDA For Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc (MMC) – Finbox, accessed August 23, 2025, https://finbox.com/NYSE:MMC/explorer/ev_to_ebitda_ltm/
  61. Aon PLC (AON) EV/EBITDA – Investing.com UK, accessed August 23, 2025, https://uk.investing.com/pro/NYSE:AON/explorer/ev_to_ebitda_ltm
  62. EV / EBITDA For Willis Towers Watson PLC (WTW) – Finbox, accessed August 23, 2025, https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:WTW/explorer/ev_to_ebitda_ltm/
  63. EV / EBITDA For Arthur J Gallagher & Co (AJG) – Finbox, accessed August 23, 2025, https://finbox.com/NYSE:AJG/explorer/ev_to_ebitda_ltm/
  64. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MMC) Q4 2024 Earnings Call Transcript | The Motley Fool, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-transcripts/2025/01/30/marsh-mclennan-companies-mmc-q4-2024-earnings-call/
  65. 4Q20 Ex 99.1 News Release – Marsh McLennan, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.marshmclennan.com/assets/v2/investors/2020/4Q20Ex991NewsReleaseMEDIA.pdf
  66. 4Q21 Ex 99.1 News Release – Marsh McLennan, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.marshmclennan.com/assets/v2/investors/2021/4Q21Ex99-1News-Release-Final2_48p-m-1-26-22pm.pdf
  67. The Power of Perspective – Marsh McLennan, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.marshmclennan.com/content/dam/mmc-web/files-for-download/investors/2025/pdf-2024-marsh-mclennan-investors-annual-report.pdf
  68. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MMC) Competitors and Alternatives 2025 – MarketBeat, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NYSE/MMC/competitors-and-alternatives/
  69. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. – ROE – Wisesheets, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.wisesheets.io/roe/MMC
  70. Marsh & McLennan Companies (MMC) Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) – MLQ.ai | Stocks, accessed August 23, 2025, https://mlq.ai/stocks/MMC/roic/
  71. DEF 14A – SEC.gov, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/62709/000119312521101422/d81851ddef14a.htm
  72. The Power of Perspective – Marsh McLennan, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.marshmclennan.com/web-assets/files-for-download/investors/2025/pdf-2024-marsh-mclennan-investors-annual-report.pdf
  73. MMC 3Q 2024 Ex99.1 News Release – Marsh McLennan, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.marshmclennan.com/assets/v2/investors/2024/mmc-3q-2024-news-release.pdf
  74. MMC Investor Relations – Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc – Alpha Spread, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nyse/mmc/investor-relations
  75. Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement – Marsh McLennan, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.marshmclennan.com/content/dam/mmc-web/files-for-download/investors/2025/pdf-2025-marsh-mclennan-investors-proxy-statement.pdf
  76. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. – PE Ratio – Wisesheets, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.wisesheets.io/pe-ratio/MMC
  77. Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc (1MMC) EV/EBITDA – Investing.com Canada, accessed August 23, 2025, https://ca.investing.com/pro/XMIL:1MMC/explorer/ev_to_ebitda_ltm
  78. Aon plc – PE Ratio – Wisesheets, accessed August 23, 2025, https://www.wisesheets.io/pe-ratio/AON
  79. WTW Fundamental Statistics (Willis Towers Watson Public Limited…) – Market Chameleon, accessed August 23, 2025, https://marketchameleon.com/Overview/WTW/Fundamentals-Financial-Key-Ratios/