I. Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive fundamental analysis of the North American Less-Than-Truckload (LTL) trucking industry from an equity investor’s perspective. The core analytical conclusion is that the LTL sector represents a compelling investment theme for long-term investors, underpinned by an oligopolistic market structure, significant and durable barriers to entry, and demonstrated pricing power. While the industry is inherently cyclical and tied to the broader economy, powerful secular tailwinds are fundamentally altering shipment characteristics and bolstering baseline demand. The recent market exit of a major competitor has further entrenched the market power of the remaining carriers, creating a favorable environment for market share consolidation and sustained margin stability.

The North American LTL market is a mature, approximately $85 billion industry poised for steady growth that is expected to outpace GDP, driven by the relentless expansion of e-commerce, a resurgence in industrial activity, and the strategic nearshoring of supply chains.¹ The industry’s competitive moat is formidable, built upon a capital-intensive and technologically complex hub-and-spoke terminal network that is exceptionally difficult for new entrants to replicate.³ This has resulted in a highly concentrated market where the top carriers control the vast majority of capacity, fostering a rational pricing environment that stands in stark contrast to the fragmented and volatile Full-Truckload (FTL) market.⁶

Within this attractive industry structure, operational excellence emerges as the paramount differentiator. A carrier’s ability to efficiently manage its network, measured by the key metric of Operating Ratio (OR), is the primary driver of profitability and dictates the valuation premium awarded by the market. Carriers such as Old Dominion Freight Line serve as the industry benchmark for operational and financial performance.⁸ Concurrently, the accelerating adoption of technology—including advanced route optimization, dock automation, and real-time tracking systems—is becoming a critical lever for achieving efficiency gains, reducing costs, and mitigating persistent labor challenges.⁶

The primary risks to this favorable outlook include a severe and prolonged economic recession that would significantly depress freight volumes, a sharp and sustained spike in fuel costs that cannot be fully passed through to customers via surcharges, disruptive regulatory changes affecting labor or emissions standards, and the long-term, albeit distant, technological threat of autonomous vehicles.¹³

II. Industry Structure and Economic Linkages

Market Overview & Growth Trajectory

The North American Less-Than-Truckload (LTL) industry is a vital and substantial component of the continent’s logistics infrastructure. The market’s size is estimated to be approximately $84.6 billion in 2024, with forecasts projecting it to exceed $120 billion by 2030. This implies a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in the range of 4% to 6%, suggesting a steady expansion that is likely to track or slightly exceed broader economic growth.¹ The United States constitutes the largest portion of this market, with total revenue of $52.3 billion in 2023.¹⁹ This consistent growth provides a stable foundation for revenue expansion among the established carriers.

Data Source	Base Year Market Size (2024/2025)	Forecast Year Market Size (2030)	Forecast CAGR
Mordor Intelligence (U.S.)	$114 Billion (2025E)	$139.6 Billion	4.13% (2025-2030)
Grandview Research (North America)	$84.6 Billion (2024E)	$120.6 Billion	6.1% (2025-2030)
Verified Market Research (U.S.)	$55.4 Billion (2024E)	N/A	5.8% (2025-2032)
Sources: 1

The LTL sector occupies a specific and critical niche within the broader freight ecosystem. It is designed to handle shipments that are too large for the parcel network but too small to require a full truckload, typically ranging from 150 to 15,000 pounds.²⁰ This distinguishes it from its counterparts:

• Parcel Carriers (e.g., UPS, FedEx Express): Specialize in small packages, generally under 150 pounds, and operate vast, high-velocity sorting networks. Parcel shipments experience significantly more handling touchpoints (an average of 17) compared to LTL, leading to a higher risk of damage.²¹
• Full-Truckload (FTL) Carriers (e.g., Knight-Swift): Transport shipments large enough to fill an entire trailer, typically over 20,000 pounds. FTL operates on a simple point-to-point model, with minimal freight handling between origin and destination, resulting in faster transit times for large, dedicated loads.²⁰
• LTL Carriers: Utilize a complex hub-and-spoke network of terminals to consolidate freight from multiple shippers onto a single trailer for the long-haul portion of the journey, and then deconsolidate it for final delivery. This network model is the source of LTL’s efficiency for smaller shipments but also represents the industry’s primary barrier to entry.²⁴

Characteristic	Parcel	Less-Than-Truckload (LTL)	Full-Truckload (FTL)
Shipment Size/Weight	Under 150 lbs	150 – 15,000 lbs	20,000+ lbs
Cost Structure	Per package, dimensional weight	Pay for space used (by class/density)	Flat rate per mile for entire truck
Delivery Speed	Fast (1-5 days)	Slower (2-7 days), multiple stops	Fast (1-5 days), direct route
Handling	High (avg. 17 touchpoints)	Moderate (multiple terminal transfers)	Minimal (loaded once, unloaded once)
Network Model	High-velocity hub-and-spoke	Consolidation hub-and-spoke	Point-to-point
Sources: 20

Secular Growth Driver 1: E-commerce

The structural shift towards e-commerce is a powerful and enduring tailwind for the LTL industry. In 2023, U.S. e-commerce sales reached $1.09 trillion, accounting for 15.6% of total retail sales, a figure that continues to grow steadily.²⁶ This trend has a direct and profound impact on LTL demand by altering the nature of supply chains. Instead of large, infrequent FTL shipments to a few major retail distribution centers, e-commerce requires smaller, more frequent LTL shipments to a dispersed network of fulfillment centers, sorting hubs, and even directly to retail stores for “buy online, pick up in-store” models.¹ The Wholesale and Retail Trade segment, which is most directly affected by e-commerce, now comprises approximately 35% of the entire U.S. LTL market.¹

This growth in e-commerce does more than just increase shipment volume; it fundamentally increases the complexity and, therefore, the value of sophisticated LTL networks. E-commerce freight is often less uniform than traditional business-to-business (B2B) freight, including irregularly shaped and bulky items like furniture, exercise equipment, and appliances that are difficult to handle and stow efficiently.²⁹ This shift away from standardized pallets places a premium on carriers with advanced technological capabilities, such as automated dimensioning systems and intelligent load-building software, that can accurately price and efficiently handle this more complex freight mix. Consequently, the rise of e-commerce is not merely a volume driver but a catalyst that widens the competitive gap between technologically advanced carriers and their less sophisticated rivals, reinforcing the value of high-quality networks.

Secular Growth Driver 2: Cross-Border Trade & Nearshoring

A significant reshaping of global trade patterns is providing another secular tailwind for the North American LTL sector. In 2023, Mexico surpassed China to become the largest exporter of goods to the United States, with exports totaling $475.6 billion.¹ This shift is part of a broader trend of “nearshoring” or “reshoring,” where companies move their manufacturing and supply chains closer to home to enhance resilience, reduce transit times, and mitigate geopolitical risks associated with trans-Pacific trade.²⁷

Data from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) quantifies this trend: from 2019 to 2023, the number of commercial trucks entering the U.S. from Mexico increased by 14.2%, while trucks from Canada decreased by 2.7%.³¹ This creates a more durable and less volatile source of demand compared to freight driven by Asian imports. Freight originating from trans-Pacific routes is subject to the high volatility of ocean shipping rates, port congestion, and international geopolitical tensions. In contrast, freight moving within integrated North American supply chains generates more predictable, consistent, and repeatable LTL movements. This structural shift provides a more stable baseline of industrial LTL demand that is less susceptible to global maritime disruptions, structurally benefiting carriers with strong cross-border capabilities and dense terminal networks along the U.S.-Mexico border.

The Freight Cycle and Economic Sensitivity

The LTL industry is inherently cyclical, with its fortunes closely tied to the health of the broader economy, particularly the industrial sector. Freight demand is a derived demand; goods are moved only when they are being produced and consumed. As such, LTL freight volumes exhibit a strong correlation with key macroeconomic indicators such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the ISM Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI), and Industrial Production.¹² Given that U.S. domestic manufacturing accounts for an estimated 60% of for-hire truck tonnage, the health of the industrial economy is a critical variable for LTL carriers.³³ A PMI reading above 50 indicates expansion in the manufacturing sector, which typically translates to higher freight volumes. The PMI’s move to 50.3 in February 2025, after 26 consecutive months of contractionary readings below 50, signaled a potential positive inflection point for industrial freight demand.¹²

Several freight-specific indices serve as crucial, high-frequency indicators for investors monitoring the industry’s health. The BTS’s Transportation Services Index (TSI) measures the monthly volume of freight and passenger services. Crucially, research has shown that changes in the freight TSI tend to occur before changes in the broader economy, establishing it as a valuable leading economic indicator.³⁴ Similarly, the Cass Freight Index, which tracks North American freight volumes and expenditures, provides a real-time snapshot of market activity. Within the Cass Shipments Index, LTL movements account for approximately 25% of the total.³⁸

The trucking market moves in relatively predictable cycles of supply and demand, typically lasting two to three years.³⁹

• Inflationary Phase (Demand > Supply): When freight demand outstrips available truck capacity, spot and contract rates rise. This leads to higher profitability for carriers, who then invest in new equipment and hire more drivers.
• Deflationary Phase (Supply > Demand): The new capacity eventually overshoots demand, leading to an oversupply of trucks. This places downward pressure on rates as carriers compete for a smaller pool of freight. Less profitable carriers may exit the market, reducing capacity.
• Equilibrium: Eventually, capacity rationalization and/or a recovery in demand brings the market back into balance, setting the stage for the next cycle.

Recent data suggests the market is emerging from a prolonged freight recession that began in 2022, with key metrics like spot rates and tender rejections showing signs of bottoming and beginning a recovery.⁷ Understanding the current position within this cycle is fundamental to accurately forecasting carrier earnings and performing a sound valuation.

III. Competitive Landscape and Operational Economics

Market Concentration and the Post-Yellow Landscape

The North American LTL industry is best characterized as a rational oligopoly, a structure that has been further solidified by recent market events. The market is highly concentrated due to formidable barriers to entry. In 2023, the top 25 LTL carriers in the U.S. generated $47.7 billion in revenue, accounting for over 90% of the total $52.3 billion market.¹⁹ The top ten carriers alone, often referred to as the “billion-dollar club,” dominate the landscape, with FedEx Freight leading in revenue.⁶ This concentration fosters a rational pricing environment. Unlike the highly fragmented FTL market, where thousands of small carriers compete fiercely on price, the major LTL players exhibit strong pricing discipline. They consistently implement General Rate Increases (GRIs) and have demonstrated an ability to maintain or even increase yields (revenue per unit of weight) during periods of soft freight demand.⁷ This discipline is a cornerstone of the industry’s attractive and resilient profitability profile.

A pivotal event that reshaped the competitive landscape was the August 2023 bankruptcy of Yellow Corporation. As one of the top five carriers, Yellow’s exit removed a significant amount of capacity from the market and, critically, eliminated a competitor known for historically aggressive pricing strategies. This event presented what analysts have called a “once-in-a-generation” opportunity for the remaining carriers to acquire Yellow’s extensive network of terminal properties at auction.⁶

The primary beneficiaries of these auctions were XPO, Estes Express Lines, and Saia, who collectively acquired a large number of strategically located terminals.⁶ This event acted as a powerful accelerant for industry consolidation. It allowed the surviving carriers to achieve a dual benefit: the market’s pricing structure improved with the removal of a major discounter, and the strongest players were able to enhance their primary competitive advantage—their terminal network—at a fraction of the cost and in a fraction of the time it would have taken to build new facilities from the ground up. This rapid, cost-effective expansion of their network moats enhances their route density and operating leverage, which should translate into higher returns on invested capital over the medium term.

Barriers to Entry: The Network is the Moat

The LTL industry’s oligopolistic structure is protected by substantial and durable barriers to entry, the most significant of which is the network itself.

• Capital Intensity: Building a competitive LTL network is immensely capital-intensive. It requires massive investment in a geographically dispersed portfolio of real estate for pickup-and-delivery terminals and larger consolidation hubs.³ A single major hub can feature over 100 loading docks and represents a significant financial outlay.⁵ In addition to real estate, carriers must invest in a large fleet of tractors, trailers (particularly the 28-foot “pup” trailers common in LTL), and material handling equipment like forklifts.
• Route Density and Network Economics: Profitability in LTL is not just about having terminals; it is about the density of freight flowing between them. Route density refers to the concentration of shipments moving within a defined geographic area or lane.⁴⁷ High density is the key to operational efficiency. It allows carriers to run fully loaded trailers on their linehaul routes, minimize costly empty miles, and optimize pickup-and-delivery (P&D) routes. An incumbent carrier with an established, dense network has a powerful, self-reinforcing cost advantage that a new entrant cannot replicate without years of investment and volume acquisition. This network effect is the industry’s most formidable competitive moat.
• Technology and Labor: Modern LTL operations are technologically complex. They require sophisticated Transportation Management Systems (TMS) for planning and execution, proprietary algorithms for route optimization, and advanced systems for real-time freight tracking and dock management.³ Building or acquiring this technological stack is a significant hurdle. Furthermore, assembling and managing a large, skilled workforce of drivers and dockworkers is a major operational challenge, particularly in the context of a persistent nationwide driver shortage.²⁹

The LTL Operating Model: Hub-and-Spoke Economics

The LTL operating model is fundamentally different from the point-to-point model of FTL shipping. It relies on a sophisticated hub-and-spoke system designed to efficiently aggregate and distribute thousands of individual shipments.⁵ The process typically involves several steps:

1. Pickup: A local P&D driver collects freight from multiple shippers in a specific geographic area.
2. Origin Terminal (Spoke): The collected freight is brought to a local service center, or “spoke,” where it is unloaded, sorted by destination, and consolidated with other shipments.
3. Linehaul: The consolidated freight is loaded onto a long-haul trailer and transported to a larger, central sorting facility, or “hub.”
4. Breakbulk (Hub): At the hub, trailers from multiple spokes are unloaded. The freight is sorted again and re-loaded onto outbound trailers destined for other hubs or destination terminals.
5. Destination Terminal (Spoke): The freight arrives at the destination terminal, where it is unloaded and sorted for local delivery.
6. Delivery: A local P&D driver delivers the individual shipments to their final destinations.

The core of LTL profitability lies in optimizing this complex network. The key levers for efficiency are maximizing the weight and cubic capacity (“cubing out”) of linehaul trailers, minimizing the number of times a pallet is handled to reduce labor costs and the risk of damage, and optimizing P&D routes to reduce mileage and driver time.⁴⁷ Technology is indispensable in this optimization process. Route optimization software is now used by over half of all U.S. logistics businesses to streamline delivery routes.¹¹ Advanced TMS platforms and connected dock management systems use real-time data to improve load planning, provide customers with accurate tracking, and prevent misdirected freight.⁴⁸

Labor and Pricing Dynamics

Labor is the largest single cost component for LTL carriers. The industry continues to grapple with a chronic driver shortage, driven by demographic factors such as an aging workforce, high turnover rates in the broader trucking sector, and the challenging lifestyle associated with driving.⁴⁹ This persistent labor tightness exerts constant upward pressure on wages, benefits, and recruiting costs. While LTL driving jobs are often considered more attractive than long-haul FTL roles because they allow drivers to be home more frequently, the shortage remains a significant constraint on capacity and a primary driver of cost inflation.²⁹ Since the deregulation of the trucking industry in the 1980s, unionization rates have declined significantly.⁵⁹ However, unions, particularly the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, remain a major factor for certain carriers, most notably ArcBest’s ABF Freight. A unionized workforce entails a different cost structure, with potentially higher wages and benefits, and more rigid work rules compared to non-union competitors like Old Dominion.⁴

LTL pricing is complex but has proven to be a source of significant strength for the industry. Historically, pricing is determined by a freight classification system maintained by the National Motor Freight Traffic Association (NMFTA), which categorizes goods based on four characteristics: density, stowability, handling, and liability.²⁴ A major catalyst for the industry is the NMFTA’s planned overhaul of this system, set to take effect in July 2025. This change will transition the industry to a more standardized, density-based rating framework.¹² This shift is a significant and perhaps underappreciated tailwind for carrier profitability. The current system contains ambiguities that can be exploited, leading to shippers misclassifying freight to obtain lower rates. The move to a more objective, density-based system will remove much of this ambiguity, allowing carriers to more accurately and appropriately charge for the trailer space a shipment consumes, not just its weight. This is particularly beneficial for handling the growing volume of light, bulky e-commerce freight. Carriers with the most advanced technology, such as automated dimensioning scanners that can instantly and accurately capture a shipment’s dimensions and weight, will be best positioned to capitalize on this change, likely leading to a structural improvement in yields. In addition to this regulatory change, carriers are increasingly adopting dynamic pricing models, which use AI and machine learning to adjust rates in near real-time based on available capacity, demand, and other market factors, further enhancing their ability to maximize revenue.⁶²

IV. Analysis of Key Public Carriers

The North American LTL market is dominated by a group of publicly traded carriers, each with a distinct competitive position, operational focus, and investment profile. The market often applies a “barbell” valuation structure, awarding a significant premium to the proven, best-in-class operator while applying a more cautious, “show-me” valuation to companies in the midst of operational turnarounds or aggressive growth phases. The investment debate for these latter companies centers not on the attractiveness of the industry itself, but on their ability to execute their strategies and close the performance gap with the industry leader.

Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL)

• Competitive Position: Old Dominion is the undisputed premium operator and quality leader in the LTL industry. The company’s strategy is built on providing superior service, which allows it to command premium pricing. Its service metrics are consistently the best in the industry, including an on-time delivery rate of over 99% and a cargo claims ratio of just 0.1%.⁶⁴ This reliability is a powerful competitive differentiator. ODFL operates a single, integrated, non-union network of 261 service centers across 48 states, which provides seamless service and operational control.⁶⁶ The company’s strategic philosophy is to prioritize service and pricing discipline, even at the cost of short-term volume, a strategy that has proven highly successful through multiple freight cycles.⁹
• Financial Performance: ODFL’s operational excellence translates directly into superior financial results. The company consistently generates the industry’s lowest (best) Operating Ratio, a key measure of efficiency calculated as Operating Expenses / Revenue. ODFL’s OR is frequently in the low-to-mid 70s, a level its competitors have yet to achieve.⁹ This efficiency drives best-in-class operating margins, return on invested capital (ROIC), and robust free cash flow generation. In 2023, ODFL generated revenue of $5.8 billion.¹⁹ Despite the recent freight recession, the company has successfully maintained its market share while simultaneously increasing yields, demonstrating its strong pricing power.⁹
• Capital Allocation: Management has a long and successful track record of disciplined capital allocation. The company’s priorities are organic network expansion, continuous investment in technology to maintain its service edge, and returning capital to shareholders through a consistent dividend and active share repurchase program.⁶⁶

XPO, Inc.

• Competitive Position: Following the spin-off of its logistics and brokerage businesses, XPO is now a pure-play LTL carrier and one of the top four players in North America by revenue, which was approximately $4.7 billion in 2023.¹⁹ The company has been a primary beneficiary of the Yellow terminal auctions, aggressively acquiring 28 service centers to expand its network footprint and improve route density.⁴⁶ The core of XPO’s strategy is its “LTL 2.0” plan, a comprehensive initiative focused on improving service quality, network efficiency, and yield management.
• Financial Performance: XPO has been executing a significant operational turnaround. A key focus has been reducing its reliance on costly third-party purchased transportation for linehaul movements, which has fallen from over 20% of miles a few years ago to under 7% recently.⁷⁰ This, along with other network fluidity initiatives, has driven substantial improvement in its Operating Ratio, which reached 82.9% in the second quarter of 2025.⁷⁰ The company has delivered nearly 400 basis points of margin improvement through the recent industry downturn, and management sees a “massive runway ahead” for further gains.⁷⁰
• Capital Allocation: With its corporate structure now simplified to a pure-play LTL carrier, capital allocation is focused on paying down debt, executing share repurchases, and making organic investments in the LTL network to support the LTL 2.0 plan.⁶⁸

Saia, Inc.

• Competitive Position: Saia has pursued a strategy of aggressive growth, transforming itself from a strong regional carrier into a national competitor. Since the beginning of 2017, the company has opened 69 new terminals, expanding its direct service footprint to all 48 contiguous states.⁷³ Like XPO, Saia was a key acquirer of former Yellow terminals, using them to fill in geographic gaps and accelerate its national build-out.⁴⁵ The company aims to compete by offering a superior service offering at a competitive price point.⁷³
• Financial Performance: This expansion strategy has successfully driven above-market revenue growth, evidenced by a 10-year revenue CAGR of 9.7%.⁷³ Saia’s revenue in 2023 was $2.88 billion.¹⁹ However, this rapid growth has required substantial capital investment, with over $2 billion invested since 2021 and another $600-650 million planned for 2025.⁷³ This has led to an increase in the company’s debt levels. The key question for investors is whether this significant investment in growth can be translated into sustained margin improvement and operating leverage as the network matures.
• Capital Allocation: Saia’s capital allocation framework is heavily weighted towards growth investments, primarily for terminal expansion, fleet modernization, and technology upgrades. The company does not currently pay a dividend, choosing instead to reinvest all available capital back into the business to fund its expansion.⁷³

ArcBest (ABF Freight)

• Competitive Position: ArcBest is a diversified logistics company whose largest segment is ABF Freight, a long-standing national LTL carrier. A key differentiating feature of ABF Freight is its unionized workforce, with employees represented by the Teamsters.⁴ This creates a fundamentally different operating model and cost structure compared to its non-union peers. The parent company, ArcBest, also operates a significant and growing asset-light logistics segment, which provides services like truckload brokerage and expedited shipping.⁷⁵
• Financial Performance: ABF Freight’s collective bargaining agreement with the Teamsters results in a structurally higher cost base for wages and benefits, as well as more rigid work rules. This is reflected in a consistently higher Operating Ratio compared to non-union carriers like ODFL. ABF Freight’s revenue in 2023 was $2.8 billion.¹⁹ The company’s financial performance is heavily influenced by the outcome of its periodic labor contract negotiations.¹⁸ The market generally applies a valuation discount to ArcBest relative to its high-performing non-union peers to account for this structural difference in profitability and operational flexibility.
• Capital Allocation: ArcBest’s capital allocation strategy must balance the needs of its capital-intensive, asset-based LTL segment with the growth opportunities in its asset-light businesses. The company returns capital to shareholders through a quarterly dividend and share repurchases.⁷⁷

TFI International (TForce Freight)

• Competitive Position: TFI International is a large, Canadian-based diversified transportation and logistics company. It became a major player in the U.S. LTL market through its 2021 acquisition of UPS Freight, which it subsequently rebranded as TForce Freight.⁴⁶ TFI’s strategy for TForce Freight is centered on a comprehensive operational turnaround of the former UPS network. A key element of this strategy is a shift towards a more asset-light model, emphasizing increased use of brokerage and reducing reliance on company-owned assets to improve returns.⁸⁰
• Financial Performance: The U.S. LTL segment has been a work in progress, historically struggling with profitability. TForce Freight reported a high Operating Ratio of 94.0% in the second quarter of 2025.⁷⁹ However, management has demonstrated an ability to drive sequential improvement, with the OR improving significantly from 98.9% in the first quarter of 2025.⁸⁰ The performance of the parent company is diversified across its LTL, Truckload, and Logistics segments.⁸³
• Capital Allocation: TFI International has a long and successful history as a disciplined acquirer of transportation assets. The current focus for the LTL segment is on improving the operational efficiency and financial returns of the TForce Freight network. The company is committed to returning capital to shareholders, evidenced by its dividend and a significant share repurchase program.⁸⁰

Metric (TTM)	Old Dominion (ODFL)	XPO, Inc.	Saia, Inc.	ArcBest (ARCB)	TFI Int’l (TFII)
LTL Revenue (USD B)	$5.8	$4.7	$2.9	$2.8	$2.4 (U.S. LTL)
Revenue Growth (YoY)	-6.0%	+0.6%	+3.2%	-4.8%	-19.7% (U.S. LTL)
Operating Ratio (OR)	74.6% (Q2’25)	82.9% (Q2’25)	87.8% (Q2’25)	~95% (Asset-Based)	94.0% (U.S. LTL Q2’25)
Operating Margin	25.4%	17.1%	12.2%	~5%	6.0%
ROIC	4.66%	N/A	N/A	4.66%	N/A
Net Debt/EBITDA	0.09x	2.5x	0.4x	1.47x	~1.5x
Note: Data compiled from multiple sources including.9 OR figures are for the most recent reported quarter where available to reflect current performance. Other metrics are on a Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) basis where possible. TFI revenue is for U.S. LTL segment only. ROIC for ARCB is for the consolidated company. Exact comparable metrics can vary based on reporting standards.

V. Valuation Framework for a Cyclical Industry

Valuing companies in a cyclical industry like LTL trucking requires a nuanced approach that looks beyond single-period financial results. The inherent volatility in freight volumes and earnings across the economic cycle can lead to misleading conclusions if standard valuation metrics are applied without proper context. Therefore, a robust framework must incorporate multiple methodologies and, most importantly, normalize for cyclical effects to ascertain a company’s true, sustainable earning power.

Valuation Methodologies

A comprehensive valuation of an LTL carrier should be triangulated using several methods:

• Multiples-Based Analysis: This is the most common approach for relative valuation. The primary multiples used are Price-to-Earnings (P/E) and Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA).⁸⁵ These ratios are used to compare a company’s valuation against its direct peers and its own historical trading ranges. The broad transportation and logistics industry sees EV/EBITDA multiples ranging from 5x to 9x, though premium LTL operators can command higher multiples.⁸⁷ Other multiples like Price-to-Sales (P/S) can be useful, especially when earnings are depressed at the bottom of a cycle, but they are less precise as they do not account for profitability.⁸⁵
• Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis: A DCF model provides an estimate of a company’s intrinsic value by projecting its future free cash flows and discounting them back to the present.⁸⁹ For an LTL carrier, a DCF analysis is particularly insightful as it forces an analyst to make explicit assumptions about the key long-term value drivers. These include long-term revenue growth (linked to forecasts for industrial production and pricing power), sustainable mid-cycle operating margins (normalized OR), capital expenditures (for fleet renewal and terminal expansion), and an appropriate discount rate, or Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC), that reflects the inherent cyclicality and operational risk of the business.⁹¹

Normalizing for the Cycle

The single greatest challenge in valuing a cyclical company is avoiding the “valuation trap.” Using valuation multiples based on earnings at the peak of a freight cycle can make a stock appear deceptively cheap (low P/E) just before its earnings collapse. Conversely, using multiples based on depressed earnings at the bottom of a cycle can make a stock look prohibitively expensive (high P/E) just before its earnings are set to recover sharply.⁹²

To mitigate this, financial metrics must be “normalized” to reflect a sustainable, mid-cycle level of profitability. Several techniques can be employed:

• Through-the-Cycle Averaging: The most effective method is to analyze key performance metrics, particularly operating margins (or the inverse, Operating Ratio) and return on invested capital (ROIC), over a full freight cycle, which typically spans five to seven years. By averaging these metrics, an analyst can derive a more realistic and sustainable level of earnings power to use as the basis for valuation, stripping out the distortions of peak and trough conditions.⁹⁴
• Scenario Analysis in DCF: A DCF model should incorporate different scenarios (e.g., recession, base case, strong recovery) with varying assumptions for volume growth and margins. This provides a range of potential intrinsic values and helps quantify the impact of cyclicality on the company’s valuation.

Peer Comparison and Premium Analysis

A rigorous peer comparison is essential to understand how the market values different business models and levels of operational execution within the LTL sector. This analysis reveals a clear and consistent premium awarded for quality.

Company	Market Cap (USD B)	Enterprise Value (USD B)	P/E Ratio (TTM)	EV/EBITDA (TTM)
Old Dominion (ODFL)	$30.9 B	$31.0 B	27.8x	17.4x
XPO, Inc.	$15.9 B	$18.3 B	35.9x	13.5x
Saia, Inc.	$8.1 B	$8.4 B	27.9x	13.3x
ArcBest (ARCB)	$1.7 B	$2.0 B	10.7x	7.1x
TFI Int’l (TFII)	$7.8 B	$10.5 B	15.0x	8.5x
Note: Market data as of late July/early August 2025. Sources:.71

The data clearly illustrates a strong correlation between superior, consistent operating performance and a premium valuation. Old Dominion, with its industry-leading Operating Ratio and returns, consistently trades at a significant EV/EBITDA premium to its peers.⁹⁵ The valuations of the other carriers are largely a function of the market’s perception of their ability to close this operational performance gap.

In this capital-intensive industry, Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is a more powerful indicator of value creation than simple revenue or earnings growth. Growth that is achieved through massive capital investment but generates a low return on that capital can actually destroy shareholder value. Carriers like ODFL have historically generated high ROIC, demonstrating their ability to deploy capital effectively. For a company like Saia, which is in a heavy investment phase, its future valuation will be highly dependent on whether its significant capital expenditures ultimately generate a high and sustainable ROIC. Therefore, a proper valuation framework should prioritize the quality of growth, as measured by ROIC, over the sheer quantity of growth.

VI. Investment Thesis Summary and Risk Assessment

The investment case for the North American LTL industry is built on the foundation of a rational oligopoly with high barriers to entry, which confers significant pricing power upon the incumbent carriers. This attractive industry structure is benefiting from secular tailwinds, including the growth of e-commerce and the nearshoring of supply chains, which are driving demand and increasing the value of sophisticated, technologically advanced networks. The recent exit of a major competitor has further strengthened the position of the remaining players, creating opportunities for market share gains and an even more disciplined pricing environment. While the industry’s cyclical nature presents inherent risks tied to the macroeconomic environment, the long-term structural dynamics appear favorable for well-managed carriers capable of superior operational execution.

Bull and Bear Scenarios

• Bull Case: The North American economy achieves a “soft landing” or enters a period of sustained industrial recovery, leading to a robust rebound in freight volumes. The consolidated industry structure, post-Yellow’s exit, allows carriers to capitalize on this demand by pushing through strong General Rate Increases (GRIs), leading to significant margin expansion and positive operating leverage on their high fixed-cost networks. Secular trends from e-commerce and nearshoring continue to provide a strong baseline of demand. In this scenario, carriers focused on operational improvement and network expansion, such as XPO and Saia, successfully execute their strategies, narrow the profitability gap with the industry leader, and see their valuation multiples re-rate higher as the market rewards their improved performance.
• Bear Case: A deep and prolonged industrial recession triggers a multi-year decline in freight tonnage. Despite the industry’s pricing discipline, the severe negative operating leverage from high fixed costs causes significant margin compression across the board. A sharp, sustained spike in global oil prices leads to a surge in diesel fuel costs that erodes profitability as fuel surcharges fail to keep pace with the rapid increase. Concurrently, new, more stringent emissions standards are enacted, requiring accelerated and costly fleet modernization. A disruptive labor event at a major unionized carrier could also ripple through the supply chain, further pressuring earnings for the entire sector.

Key Performance Indicators to Monitor

To track the health of the LTL industry and the performance of individual carriers, investors should focus on a core set of key performance indicators (KPIs):

• Volume/Tonnage: The most direct measure of demand. Monitor year-over-year and sequential changes in LTL tonnage per day and shipments per day.⁹
• Pricing/Yield: The measure of pricing power. Monitor revenue per hundredweight (yield), particularly on an ex-fuel surcharge basis, to gauge core pricing trends.⁷
• Profitability: The Operating Ratio (OR) is the single most important metric for assessing an LTL carrier’s efficiency and profitability. A lower OR is better.¹⁰
• Capacity: Track fleet age, the number of service centers and dock doors, and management commentary on network capacity utilization. This indicates a carrier’s ability to handle future growth and its current level of fixed costs.⁶⁶

Comprehensive Risk Analysis

A thorough investment analysis requires a clear-eyed assessment of the risks that could challenge the investment thesis. These risks can be categorized into industry-wide, company-specific, and secular factors.

Industry-Specific Risks

• Economic Cyclicality: This is the foremost risk. The LTL industry’s high sensitivity to GDP, industrial production, and overall economic health means that a significant economic downturn will inevitably lead to lower freight volumes and pressure on profitability.¹⁸
• Fuel Price Volatility: Diesel fuel is a major and volatile operating expense. While carriers use fuel surcharge programs to mitigate this risk, these programs often operate with a time lag and may not fully recover costs during periods of rapid price increases, thus compressing margins.¹⁴
• Driver Shortage: The persistent shortage of qualified truck drivers impacts the entire trucking industry. For LTL carriers, this constrains capacity growth and exerts continuous upward pressure on wage and benefit costs, which are a primary component of operating expenses.¹⁵
• Regulatory Changes: The industry is subject to extensive regulation. Potential changes to hours-of-service rules, more stringent vehicle emissions standards (such as those from the California Air Resources Board), or changes to laws governing the classification of independent contractors could significantly increase operating costs and capital expenditure requirements.¹⁵

Company-Specific Risk Factors

• Execution Risk: For carriers like XPO, Saia, and TFI International that are pursuing significant operational turnaround or network expansion strategies, there is a risk that these initiatives may fail to deliver the expected improvements in service, efficiency, and profitability.¹⁷
• Labor Relations: For unionized carriers such as ArcBest’s ABF Freight, periodic contract negotiations with the Teamsters union represent a recurring risk. A failure to reach an agreement could lead to work stoppages, while a new contract could result in a significant increase in labor costs.¹⁵
• Customer Concentration: While generally diversified, the loss of one or more large customers could have a material impact on a carrier’s freight volumes and network density.¹⁸
• Cybersecurity: LTL carriers rely heavily on complex IT systems for routing, tracking, and billing. A significant cybersecurity breach could cause major operational disruptions, result in the loss of sensitive data, and lead to significant financial and reputational damage.¹⁶

Secular Trends Impact

• E-commerce Demands: While a powerful growth driver, the nature of e-commerce freight also presents challenges. The shift towards smaller, more frequent, and irregularly shaped shipments, combined with increasing customer expectations for faster delivery times, puts significant pressure on the efficiency and capacity of LTL networks.²⁸
• Autonomous Vehicles: In the long term, the development of autonomous trucking technology represents a potentially massive disruption. While widespread adoption is likely more than a decade away, it could eventually fundamentally alter the industry’s cost structure, competitive landscape, and labor dynamics.¹¹
• Sustainability and Electrification: There is increasing regulatory and investor pressure on transportation companies to reduce their carbon footprint. The transition to electric or alternative-fuel vehicles will require enormous capital expenditures for fleet replacement and the build-out of charging infrastructure, representing a significant future call on capital.¹⁰⁷

Works cited

1. United States Less than-Truck-Load (LTL) Market Size & Share …, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/united-states-less-than-truck-load-market
2. North America Less-than-truckload (LTL) Market Size & Outlook, 2030, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.grandviewresearch.com/horizon/outlook/less-than-truckload-ltl-market/north-america
3. LTL Freight – Shippers guide to Less-Than-Truckload – Translogistics Inc, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.translogisticsinc.com/blog/ltl
4. barriers to entry. Costs associated with an expansive LTL network, including investments in or costs associated with real, accessed August 1, 2025, http://www.eproxymaterials.com/interactive/arcb2015/pf/page_016.pdf
5. What is a Hub and Spoke Distribution Model? – Redwood Logistics, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.redwoodlogistics.com/insights/the-hub-and-spoke-distribution-model-and-why-it-works-for-ltl
6. Boost in LTL Industry: growth through acquisitions and technology – Optym, accessed August 1, 2025, https://optym.com/blog/boost-in-ltl-industry-growth-through-acquisitions
7. LTL pricing discipline may not hold, report says – FreightWaves, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.freightwaves.com/news/ltl-pricing-discipline-may-not-hold-report-says
8. Who are the Largest LTL Freight Companies? – Translogistics Inc, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.translogisticsinc.com/blog/who-are-the-largest-ltl-freight-companies
9. Old Dominion not changing course as downturn lingers – FreightWaves, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.freightwaves.com/news/old-dominion-not-changing-course-as-downturn-lingers
10. What is operating ratio? – FreightWaves, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.freightwaves.com/news/what-is-operating-ratio
11. Route optimisation software leads tech adoption in US logistics – e-commerce.news, accessed August 1, 2025, https://e-commerce.news/story/route-optimisation-software-leads-tech-adoption-in-us-logistics
12. 5 Key Trends Shaping the LTL Market in 2025 – Transflo, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.transflo.com/blog/5-key-trends-shaping-the-ltl-market-in-2025/
13. 5 Common LTL Shipping Challenges (and How to Handle Them) – RXO, accessed August 1, 2025, https://rxo.com/resources/shipper/cons-ltl-shipping/
14. The Impact of Rising Fuel Costs in Logistics | Atlas® International, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.atlasintl.com/blog/the-impact-of-rising-fuel-costs-in-logistics
15. 2024 ANNUAL REPORT – TFI International, accessed August 1, 2025, https://tfiintl.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/3/TFII_Annual%20Report%20-%20YE%202024-3.pdf
16. 2024-FedEx-Annual-Report.pdf, accessed August 1, 2025, https://s21.q4cdn.com/665674268/files/doc_downloads/2024/08/2024-FedEx-Annual-Report.pdf
17. Form 10-K for XPO INC filed 02/08/2024 – Investors – XPO, Inc., accessed August 1, 2025, https://investors.xpo.com/static-files/c991a522-615c-4df6-880c-510d4dfae76f
18. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE … – ArcBest, accessed August 1, 2025, https://arcb.com/sites/default/files/sec/form-10k/2023-Form-10-K.pdf
19. Top 25 Less Than Truckload (LTL) Carriers – SJ Consulting Group, accessed August 1, 2025, https://jindel.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Top-25-Less-Than-Truckload-2023.pdf
20. LTL vs FTL Shipping: Which Option Best Fits … – Riverhorse Logistics, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.riverhorselogistics.com/post/ltl-vs-ftl-shipping-which-option-best-fits-your-needs
21. Understanding LTL vs. Parcel Shipping – GETIDA, accessed August 1, 2025, https://getida.com/resources/blog/tips-to-grow-fba-business/understanding-ltl-vs-parcel-shipping/
22. Outgrowing LTL? Try FTL Freight, Partial TL and Volume LTL – Worldwide Express, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.wwex.com/shipping-resources/freight-resources/ftl-partial-tl-volume-ltl
23. Parcel vs LTL vs FTL Shipping: Understanding the Differences – Shipbots, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.shipbots.com/post/parcel-vs-ltl-vs-ftl-shipping-understanding-the-differences
24. LTL vs FTL: An Introduction to Intelligent Freight Shipping – HMD Trucking, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.hmdtrucking.com/blog/ltl-vs-ftl/
25. Freight vs. small parcel shipping, explained – TaxJar, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.taxjar.com/blog/freight-small-parcel-shipping
26. United States Less-Than-Truck-Load (LTL) Market Size, Share, Trends & Forecast, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/united-states-less-than-truck-load-ltl-market/
27. Less-Than-Truckload (LTL) Strategic Business Analysis Report 2024-2030: Growth of Urbanization and the Need for Specialized LTL Services in Cities – GlobeNewswire, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/03/05/3037162/28124/en/Less-Than-Truckload-LTL-Strategic-Business-Analysis-Report-2024-2030-Growth-of-Urbanization-and-the-Need-for-Specialized-LTL-Services-in-Cities.html
28. The Impact of E-commerce on Less-Than-Truckload (LTL) Shipping, accessed August 1, 2025, https://ielfreight.com/the-impact-of-e-commerce-on-less-than-truckload-ltl-shipping/
29. LTL Industry Poised for Growth, Digitization – Zipline Logistics, accessed August 1, 2025, https://ziplinelogistics.com/blog/ltl-industry-growth/
30. The Great Divide: Understanding LTL and Truckload Market Shifts | SupplyChainBrain, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.supplychainbrain.com/articles/36566-the-great-divide-understanding-ltl-and-truckload-market-shifts
31. BTS Data Reveals Long-term Trend Emerging in North American Freight Trucking, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.bts.gov/data-spotlight/bts-data-reveals-long-term-trend-emerging-north-american-freight-trucking
32. The Top Economic Indicators Influencing Logistics Success, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.duprelogistics.com/blog/the-top-economic-indicators-influencing-logistics-success/
33. Manufacturing malaise clouds outlook for US industrial freight – Journal of Commerce, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.joc.com/article/manufacturing-malaise-clouds-outlook-for-us-industrial-freight-6001813
34. Transportation as an Economic Indicator | BTS Data Inventory, accessed August 1, 2025, https://data.bts.gov/stories/s/Transportation-as-an-Economic-Indicator/9czv-tjte/
35. What’s the Freight Transportation Services Index telling you – Majestic Steel USA, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.majesticsteel.com/freight-transportation-services-index/
36. Transportation Services Index and Seasonally-Adjusted Transportation Data – Dataset – Catalog, accessed August 1, 2025, https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/seasonally-adjustment-transportation-data
37. December 2024 Freight Transportation Services Index | AJOT.COM, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.ajot.com/news/december-2024-freight-transportation-services-index
38. The Cass Freight Index: A Measure of North American Freight Activity, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.cassinfo.com/freight-audit-payment/cass-transportation-indexes/cass-freight-index
39. What is a Truckload Market Cycle? Learn the 7 Stages – RXO, accessed August 1, 2025, https://rxo.com/resources/research/truckload-market-cycle/
40. Common Transportation Industry Market Cycles: What They Are and What They Mean For You – Anderson Trucking Service, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.atsinc.com/blog/transportation-industry-market-cycles-explained-what-they-mean-for-you
41. Trucking Industry Forecast for 2024 – ACT Research, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.actresearch.net/resources/blog/trucking-industry-forecast-2024
42. 2025 Top Less-Than-Truckload Carriers – Transport Topics, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.ttnews.com/for-hire/ltl/2025
43. Who Are The Major Players In The LTL Industry? – Redwood Logistics, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.redwoodlogistics.com/insights/who-are-the-major-players-in-the-ltl-industry
44. LTL pricing index to hit record high in Q3 – FreightWaves, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.freightwaves.com/news/ltl-pricing-index-to-hit-record-high-in-q3
45. State of Logistics 2024: Less than truckload (LTL), accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/state_of_logistics_2024_less_than_truckload_ltl
46. LTL Players Eye Freight Market Turnaround, Industrial Upturn – TT – Transport Topics, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.ttnews.com/articles/ltl-players-eye-turnaround
47. Are You Dense? Understanding the Importance of Freight Network Density | Insights, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.ksmcpa.com/insights/are-you-dense-understanding-the-importance-of-freight-network-density/
48. ConnectedDock – Trimble Transportation, accessed August 1, 2025, https://transportation.trimble.com/products/connected-dock
49. Is the U.S. labor market for truck drivers broken? – Bureau of Labor Statistics, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2019/article/is-the-us-labor-market-for-truck-drivers-broken.htm
50. What is the Hub and Spoke Model? A Brief Explainer for Transport and Distribution, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.transvirtual.com/us/blog/what-is-the-hub-and-spoke-model-a-brief-explainer-for-transport-and-distribution/
51. Spoke–hub distribution paradigm – Wikipedia, accessed August 1, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoke%E2%80%93hub_distribution_paradigm
52. The Hidden Costs of Shipping Air: Maximizing Density for LTL Shipping Efficiency – ODFL, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.odfl.com/us/en/resources/freight-knowledge/odfl-blog/maximizing-density-LTL-shipping-efficiency.html
53. LTL Carriers – McLeod Software, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.mcleodsoftware.com/ltl-carriers/
54. Forget Self-Driving Trucks: Route Optimization is Top Tech in Logistics – Supply Chain 24/7, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.supplychain247.com/article/route-optimization-logistics-tech-2025/Final_Mile
55. Strategies for Optimizing Shipments: Less-Than-Truckload Freight – DAT, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.dat.com/resources/less-than-truckload-freight
56. LTL TMS for Carriers and Shippers – PCS Software, accessed August 1, 2025, https://pcssoft.com/products/tms/ltl-tms/
57. America’s Truck Driver Shortage: Causes, Impact, and Solutions – Matrack Inc., accessed August 1, 2025, https://matrackinc.com/usa-truck-driver-shortages/
58. How the Driver Shortage Impacts Capacity – Inbound Logistics, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.inboundlogistics.com/articles/how-the-driver-shortage-impacts-capacity/
59. Why most of America’s 2 million long-haul truck drivers aren’t unionized – FreightWaves, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.freightwaves.com/news/why-most-of-americas-2-million-long-haul-truck-drivers-arent-unionized
60. Trucking Regulation, Unionization, and Labor Earnings: 1973-85 – IDEAS/RePEc, accessed August 1, 2025, https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/jhriss/v23y1988i3p296-319.html
61. New era for LTL classification in the U.S. | AlixPartners, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.alixpartners.com/insights/102kt8i/new-era-for-ltl-classification-in-the-u-s/
62. Optimize LTL Freight Management with Dynamic Pricing Models – nexocode, accessed August 1, 2025, https://nexocode.com/blog/posts/dynamic-pricing-models-for-ltl-transportation/
63. Less-than-Truckload Offers Many Opportunities | BCG – Boston Consulting Group, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.bcg.com/publications/2025/less-than-truckload-offers-opportunities
64. About ODFL | Old Dominion Freight Line, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.odfl.com/us/en/about.html
65. Old Dominion Freight Line Reports Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Per Diluted Share of $1.27, accessed August 1, 2025, https://ir.odfl.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/329/old-dominion-freight-line-reports-second-quarter-2025
66. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL), accessed August 1, 2025, https://ir.odfl.com/
67. ODFL Q2 Profit Slides 16.6% as Market Weakness Persists – TT – Transport Topics, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.ttnews.com/articles/odfl-earnings-q2-2025
68. Investors – XPO, Inc., accessed August 1, 2025, https://investors.xpo.com/
69. Form 10-K for XPO INC filed 02/07/2025, accessed August 1, 2025, https://xpologisticsinc.gcs-web.com/static-files/bbd8e1d2-c612-49af-9509-569b2ff4aaca
70. XPO sees ‘massive runway’ to push margins higher – FreightWaves, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.freightwaves.com/news/xpo-sees-massive-runway-to-push-margins-higher
71. XPO Reports Fourth Quarter 2023 Results, accessed August 1, 2025, https://investors.xpo.com/news-releases/news-release-details/xpo-reports-fourth-quarter-2023-results/
72. News – Investors – XPO, Inc., accessed August 1, 2025, https://investors.xpo.com/news-events/news/
73. Saia Q2 2025 presentation highlights long-term growth amid quarterly challenges, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/saia-q2-2025-presentation-highlights-longterm-growth-amid-quarterly-challenges-93CH-4164995
74. Investor Relations Frequently Asked Questions – Saia, accessed August 1, 2025, https://saia.com/about-us/investor-relations/investor-faqs
75. Annual Report for Fiscal Year Ending 12-31, 2024 (Form 10-K) – Public now, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.publicnow.com/view/34E64F46B509B0A60089F944950117B6A7599C56?1741038422
76. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-K ARCBEST CORPORATION, accessed August 1, 2025, https://arcb.com/sites/default/files/sec/form-10k/2022%20Form%2010-K.pdf
77. ArcBest (ARCB) Statistics & Valuation – Stock Analysis, accessed August 1, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/arcb/statistics/
78. ArcBest – Investor Relations, accessed August 1, 2025, https://investors.arcb.com/overview/
79. TFI Q2 Profit, Revenue Fall Double Digits as Tariffs Bite – TT, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.ttnews.com/articles/tfi-earnings-q2-2025
80. Sequential numbers at diversified trucking operator TFI International may mark a turnaround, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.freightwaves.com/news/sequential-numbers-at-diversified-trucking-operator-tfi-international-may-mark-a-turnaround
81. Investors – TFI International, accessed August 1, 2025, https://tfiintl.com/en/investors/
82. Earnings call transcript: TFI International Q2 2025 shows EPS beat amid revenue dip, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/transcripts/earnings-call-transcript-tfi-international-q2-2025-shows-eps-beat-amid-revenue-dip-93CH-4156250
83. Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2024 – TFI International, accessed August 1, 2025, https://tfiintl.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/TFI-Q3-2024-Presentation.pdf
84. Fourth Quarter Ended December 31, 2024 – TFI International, accessed August 1, 2025, https://tfiintl.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/2/TFI%20Q4-2024%20Presentation%20Final.pdf
85. Freight Trucking Company Valuation Multiples, accessed August 1, 2025, https://peakbusinessvaluation.com/freight-trucking-company-valuation-multiples/
86. EBITDA Multiples by Industry in 2025 – Equidam, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.equidam.com/ebitda-multiples-trbc-industries/
87. Selling a Transportation Business – Viking Mergers & Acquisitions, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.vikingmergers.com/valuation-multiples-by-industry/selling-transportation-business/
88. LTL Investment Valuation Ratios – FinancialModelingPrep, accessed August 1, 2025, https://financialmodelingprep.com/investment-valuation-ratios/LTL
89. Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Model: Definition, Formula, & Training, accessed August 1, 2025, https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/discounted-cash-flow
90. Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Explained With Formula and Examples – Investopedia, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dcf.asp
91. What Trucking Business Owners Need to Know About Business Valuations – Trout CPA, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.troutcpa.com/blog/what-business-owners-need-to-know-about-business-valuations
92. Ups and Downs: Valuing Cyclical and Commodity Companies – NYU Stern, accessed August 1, 2025, https://people.stern.nyu.edu/adamodar/pdfiles/papers/commodity.pdf
93. The Meaning of a Cyclical Industry Explained for Beginners (With Examples), accessed August 1, 2025, https://einvestingforbeginners.com/cyclical-industry-explained/
94. Valuing Cyclical Companies: Key Techniques and Metrics – Andersen in Egypt, accessed August 1, 2025, https://eg.andersen.com/valuing-cyclical-companies/
95. Old Dominion Freight Line Market Cap 2010-2025 | ODFL – Macrotrends, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/ODFL/old-dominion-freight-line/market-cap
96. Old Dominion Freight Line | ODFL Stock Price, Company Overview & News – Forbes, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/companies/old-dominion-freight-line/
97. Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL) – P/E ratio – Companies Market Cap, accessed August 1, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/old-dominion-freight-line/pe-ratio/
98. XPO Provides North American LTL Operating Data for August 2024, accessed August 1, 2025, https://news.xpo.com/3048/xpo-provides-north-american-ltl-operating-data-for-august-2024/
99. ATA Truck Tonnage Index Declined 0.1% in May | American Trucking Associations, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.trucking.org/news-insights/ata-truck-tonnage-index-declined-01-may
100. How Fuel Prices Impact Supply Chain Transportation – AFP Global Logistics, accessed August 1, 2025, https://afplus.com/impact-fuel-prices-supply-chain-transportation/
101. These US States Plan to Increase Pay & Work-Life Balance for Truckers – Tech.co, accessed August 1, 2025, https://tech.co/news/us-states-increase-pay-work-life-balance-truckers
102. Earnings call transcript: Saia Inc. beats Q2 2025 forecasts, stock surges – Investing.com, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/transcripts/earnings-call-transcript-saia-inc-beats-q2-2025-forecasts-stock-surges-93CH-4154035
103. FedEx (FDX) Stock Risk Analysis – TipRanks.com, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.tipranks.com/stocks/fdx/risk-factors
104. OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC. 10-K Cybersecurity GRC – 2025-02-25, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.board-cybersecurity.com/annual-reports/tracker/20250225-old-dominion-freight-line-inc-cybersecurity-10k/
105. How LTL Shipping Helps E-Commerce Brands Navigate Tariffs, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.sdcexec.com/transportation/ocean-ports-carriers/article/22939324/warp-how-ltl-shipping-helps-ecommerce-brands-navigate-tariffs
106. How Will E-commerce Growth Impact Our Transportation Network? Final Report, accessed August 1, 2025, https://static.tti.tamu.edu/tti.tamu.edu/documents/PRC-17-79-F.pdf
107. Less Than-Truck-Load Market Size 2025-2034, Industry Growth Report, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/less-than-truck-load-market
108. US Trucking Industry 2024: Statistics, Trends, and Forecasts – Cota Systems, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.cotasystems.com/blog/us-trucking-industry-statistics-trends-and-forecasts
109. Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL) Market Cap & Net Worth – Stock Analysis, accessed August 1, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/odfl/market-cap/
110. SAIA Stock Price and Chart — NASDAQ:SAIA – TradingView, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/NASDAQ-SAIA/
111. ArcBest Market Cap 2010-2025 | ARCB – Macrotrends, accessed August 1, 2025, https://macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/ARCB/arcbest/market-cap
112. ‘The confidence is coming back’ – TFI’s Bédard says Trump moves are priming industrial rebound – FleetOwner, accessed August 1, 2025, https://www.fleetowner.com/news/article/55306382/tfi-international-optimistic-post-obbba-as-q2-results-show-signs-of-freight-market-recovery
113. ODFL – Old Dominion Freight Line PE ratio, current and historical analysis – FullRatio, accessed August 1, 2025, https://fullratio.com/stocks/nasdaq-odfl/pe-ratio