I. Executive Summary

Investment Thesis

This report presents a comprehensive investment analysis of Starbucks Corporation (SBUX), the premier global roaster, marketer, and retailer of specialty coffee. The central investment thesis posits that while the company is currently navigating significant near-term headwinds—including operational inefficiencies, persistent macroeconomic pressures, and a rapidly intensifying competitive landscape—its foundational strengths remain formidable. The combination of unparalleled brand equity, immense global scale, and a deeply integrated digital ecosystem provides a durable economic moat. The strategic “Back to Starbucks” turnaround plan, spearheaded by a new and proven leadership team, represents a credible, albeit challenging, pathway to reinvigorate growth and restore profitability. Consequently, for investors with a long-term horizon and a tolerance for near-term volatility, SBUX presents a compelling value creation opportunity, with the investment’s success being highly contingent on the disciplined and effective execution of its strategic pivot.

Key Findings Synopsis

A thorough analysis of Starbucks’ operational, financial, and strategic positioning reveals several critical findings that form the basis of this report’s recommendation:

• Operational Strain and Financial Deterioration: Recent financial results from fiscal year (FY) 2024 through the first three quarters of FY25 starkly illustrate a business under significant operational stress. Key performance indicators have deteriorated, most notably evidenced by declining global comparable store sales, driven by negative transaction growth in the pivotal U.S. market. This top-line weakness, coupled with strategic investments in labor and heightened promotional activity, has led to severe operating margin compression, a significant departure from the company’s historical profitability profile.¹
• The “Back to Starbucks” Strategic Pivot: The appointment of CEO Brian Niccol in late 2024 marked the beginning of an ambitious turnaround strategy aimed at addressing the root causes of the company’s underperformance. This plan is centered on enhancing operational speed to “win the peak,” reinvesting in the in-store “third place” experience to improve brand relevance, and driving product innovation. While the strategy is sound and necessary, it carries substantial execution risk and will continue to pressure margins and free cash flow in the near term.⁴
• Intensifying Competitive Encroachment: Starbucks’ formidable economic moat is facing its most significant test in years. The company is being challenged on multiple fronts: value-oriented Quick-Service Restaurant (QSR) competitors like McDonald’s and Dunkin’ are competing on price and convenience, while a burgeoning segment of agile, experience-focused players, including Dutch Bros and a vast network of independent cafes, are gaining visit share by offering a more artisanal and localized experience.⁷
• Valuation Contingent on Turnaround Success: The company’s stock currently trades at a premium to many of its large-cap QSR peers, reflecting a degree of market optimism for a successful turnaround under new leadership. A multi-faceted valuation analysis suggests that at current levels, the stock is pricing in a reasonably successful, though not flawless, execution of the “Back to Starbucks” plan. The valuation is therefore highly sensitive to future performance, making the stock vulnerable to a significant de-rating if operational metrics fail to show tangible improvement over the coming quarters.¹⁰

Valuation Summary

The valuation of Starbucks Corporation was assessed using a combination of comparable company analysis and a qualitative review of discounted cash flow (DCF) drivers. The stock’s current trading multiples, including a trailing Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 37.6x and an Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio of approximately 21.9x, are elevated relative to current financial performance but are more aligned with historical averages and the company’s long-term growth potential.¹³ The peer comparison indicates a persistent valuation premium over competitors like McDonald’s and Restaurant Brands International, which the market justifies based on Starbucks’ superior brand equity and international growth prospects. The intrinsic value is heavily dependent on management’s ability to restore positive comparable store sales growth and recapture historical operating margin levels.

Final Recommendation

Based on this comprehensive analysis, the investment recommendation for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) is a Hold with a constructive long-term outlook. The current valuation appears to fairly balance the significant risks associated with the ongoing operational turnaround against the potential rewards of a successful execution. While the strategic direction under new leadership is promising, the lack of tangible evidence of a recovery in key financial metrics—particularly U.S. transaction growth and margin stabilization—warrants caution. Investors should closely monitor the key performance indicators outlined in this report over the next several quarters for signs of a definitive inflection point before committing new capital.

II. Business & Operational Profile

Business Model & Revenue Architecture

Starbucks Corporation, formed in 1985, is the world’s premier roaster, marketer, and retailer of specialty coffee, operating a global empire built on a multi-faceted business model.¹⁴ The company’s revenue architecture is structured across three distinct business segments, each with a unique role in driving growth and profitability.

• Segment Breakdown:

1. North America: This is the company’s largest and most mature segment, encompassing the United States and Canada. It serves as the primary engine of revenue and cash flow, accounting for approximately 75% of the company’s total net revenues in fiscal 2024.¹⁴ The performance of this segment, particularly the U.S. market, is paramount to Starbucks’ overall financial health and its ability to fund global expansion and shareholder returns.
2. International: This segment includes all operations outside of North America and represents the company’s primary long-term growth vector. China stands as the cornerstone of this segment and is the company’s second-largest market globally, with all stores being company-operated to ensure maximum brand control.¹⁴ The segment’s performance is a key determinant of the company’s future growth trajectory.
3. Channel Development: This segment operates as a high-margin, capital-light business focused on selling packaged coffee, tea, and ready-to-drink (RTD) beverages through channels outside of the company’s retail stores. Its cornerstone is the Global Coffee Alliance, a perpetual global licensing agreement with Nestlé, which markets and distributes Starbucks-branded products in consumer packaged goods (CPG) and foodservice channels worldwide.¹ This segment provides a stable and profitable revenue stream with minimal capital investment.

• Ownership Structure: Starbucks employs a hybrid ownership model, maintaining a strategic balance between company-operated and licensed stores. As of the third quarter of fiscal 2025, the global portfolio consisted of 53% company-operated stores and 47% licensed stores.¹ This dual approach allows for direct operational control, brand consistency, and innovation testing in key strategic markets (e.g., U.S., China) through company-operated stores. Simultaneously, the licensing model facilitates rapid, capital-efficient expansion and leverages local market expertise through trusted partners in other regions.

Global Footprint & Store Portfolio

Starbucks’ global presence is a core component of its economic moat and brand power.

• Scale and Reach: As of June 29, 2025, the company operated 41,097 stores across 87 markets, a scale that is unmatched in the specialty coffee segment.¹ This vast physical footprint provides significant brand visibility and a formidable barrier to entry for competitors.
• Strategic Markets: The store portfolio is heavily concentrated in its two largest markets. The United States, with 17,230 stores, and China, with 7,828 stores, collectively comprised 61% of the company’s global portfolio at the end of Q3 FY25.¹ This concentration makes the company’s performance highly sensitive to the specific economic conditions, consumer trends, and competitive pressures within these two nations.
• Store Formats: The company’s real estate portfolio is diverse, including traditional cafes designed to be a “third place” between home and work, highly efficient drive-thru locations, and smaller-footprint concepts such as pickup-only stores. A key element of the current “Back to Starbucks” strategy involves a dual focus: enhancing the experiential quality of traditional cafes while simultaneously expanding convenient formats like drive-thrus to cater to the full spectrum of consumer needs.⁵

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): A Recent Downturn

The company’s recent operational performance, as measured by its most critical KPIs, reveals a clear and concerning downturn that precipitated the current strategic overhaul.

• Comparable Store Sales (Comps): This metric, which measures sales growth at stores open for at least 13 months, is a vital indicator of underlying business health. After years of positive growth, global comps have turned negative. In Q3 FY25, global comps declined by 2%, following a 1% decline in Q2 FY25 and a 7% decline in Q4 FY24.¹ This negative trend, particularly in the U.S. where comps fell 2% in Q3 FY25, is a primary concern for investors and a central focus of the turnaround plan.¹
• Average Ticket vs. Transactions: A deeper look into the composition of comparable sales reveals a troubling dynamic. While the average ticket (the amount spent per customer) has shown modest increases, this has been primarily driven by pricing actions taken to offset inflation. The more critical component, comparable transactions, has been persistently negative, declining 4% in the U.S. in Q3 FY25 and 10% in Q4 FY24.¹ This indicates a loss of customer traffic, a reduction in visit frequency, or both, signaling that customers are visiting less often even if they spend slightly more when they do.
• Store Growth: Despite the operational challenges, Starbucks continues to expand its global footprint, opening a net 308 new stores in Q3 FY25.¹ However, the strategic emphasis is shifting from raw unit growth toward ensuring the profitability and strategic fit of new locations, with a focus on smaller, more capital-efficient formats in mature markets.¹⁶

Digital Ecosystem & Loyalty Program

Starbucks’ digital platform is a cornerstone of its business model and a significant competitive advantage.

• Starbucks Rewards: The loyalty program is a powerful tool for driving customer frequency and engagement. As of the end of fiscal 2024, the program boasted 33.8 million 90-day active members in the U.S., an increase of 4% year-over-year.³ This large and engaged user base provides a wealth of data that Starbucks can leverage for personalized marketing and tailored offers, creating a virtuous cycle of customer retention.
• Digital Sales Penetration: The Starbucks mobile app, which facilitates mobile ordering and payment, is a critical component of the customer experience. It enhances convenience, increases throughput during peak hours, and further integrates customers into the company’s digital ecosystem. Management has signaled that a new, enhanced app and a refreshed Rewards program are key innovation pillars for 2026, underscoring the strategic importance of the digital platform.⁴

The strength of this digital ecosystem, however, is being tested. The fact that transaction counts are declining even with a large and growing loyalty base suggests that digital convenience and rewards alone are insufficient to counteract perceived weaknesses in the core value proposition, such as service speed or in-store ambiance. The planned digital refresh in 2026 is therefore not merely an incremental upgrade; it is a critical defensive and offensive maneuver aimed at re-engaging and retaining high-value customers who are increasingly being courted by competitors offering compelling alternatives.

Supply Chain & Sourcing Strategy

The company’s approach to its supply chain provides significant control over quality and reinforces its premium brand positioning.

• Vertical Integration: Starbucks operates a sophisticated global supply chain, managing key stages from the sourcing of green coffee beans to roasting at its five global facilities and final distribution. This level of integration affords the company significant control over the quality and cost of its most critical input, though it also creates direct exposure to the volatility of the coffee commodity market.¹⁷
• Ethical Sourcing: A key element of the brand’s identity is its commitment to ethical sourcing, institutionalized through its C.A.F.E. (Coffee and Farmer Equity) Practices program. This program, developed in partnership with Conservation International, provides a set of comprehensive social, economic, and environmental criteria that suppliers are required to meet. This strategy not only helps ensure a long-term, sustainable supply of high-quality arabica beans but also resonates strongly with an increasingly ESG-conscious consumer base, reinforcing the brand’s premium image.¹⁸

III. Industry Analysis & Competitive Positioning

Global Coffee & QSR Market Dynamics

Starbucks operates at the intersection of two large and dynamic global markets: the specialty coffee market and the broader Quick-Service Restaurant (QSR) industry.

• Market Size & Growth: The global coffee market is a substantial and growing sector. Projections indicate the market will expand from approximately $74 billion in 2025 to nearly $96.5 billion by 2029, representing a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.9%.²⁰ The overarching QSR market is even larger, with forecasts suggesting it will reach $1.25 trillion by 2033, fueled by persistent consumer demand for convenience and on-the-go food and beverage options.²¹
• Key Drivers & Trends: Several macro trends are shaping the competitive dynamics within these industries and directly influencing Starbucks’ strategy:

• Premiumization: There is a clear and sustained consumer trend toward higher-quality, specialty, and ethically sourced coffee products. Consumers are increasingly educated about coffee origins and are willing to pay a premium for a superior product and experience, a trend that has historically benefited Starbucks.²²
• Convenience & Technology Integration: The modern QSR consumer prioritizes speed and convenience. Digital ordering platforms, mobile applications, and efficient delivery services are no longer differentiators but table stakes. Furthermore, technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automation are being rapidly adopted to optimize kitchen operations, personalize marketing, and improve service speed.²¹
• Health & Wellness: Consumer preferences are shifting toward healthier and more functional options. This includes a growing demand for beverages with added benefits (e.g., protein), lower-caffeine alternatives, and greater transparency regarding ingredients and nutritional information.²⁵
• Sustainability and Ethical Sourcing: Environmental and social responsibility have become significant factors in consumer purchasing decisions, particularly among Millennial and Gen-Z demographics. Brands that demonstrate a genuine commitment to ethical sourcing and sustainable practices can build stronger customer loyalty.²⁷

Competitive Landscape: A Multi-Front War

Starbucks faces a complex and increasingly aggressive competitive environment, fighting a multi-front war against a diverse set of rivals.

• Direct QSR Competitors:

• Dunkin’: Now a private company under the Inspire Brands umbrella, Dunkin’ positions itself as a more accessible, value-driven alternative to Starbucks, built on a brand promise of speed and convenience. With a formidable U.S. footprint of over 9,500 locations, it competes directly with Starbucks on coffee, breakfast items, and afternoon snacks, often at a lower price point.²⁸ Its franchise-heavy model allows for rapid adaptation and localized marketing.¹⁸
• McDonald’s (McCafé): McDonald’s represents a powerful competitive threat due to its unparalleled global scale (over 41,000 locations), deep financial resources, and mastery of operational efficiency.²⁸ The McCafé line has successfully democratized espresso-based beverages, offering them at a significant value discount to Starbucks. The recent launch of the beverage-led, small-format concept CosMc’s indicates a more direct and ambitious push into the specialty beverage market, targeting Starbucks’ core customer base.²⁸
• Tim Hortons: As a subsidiary of Restaurant Brands International (QSR), Tim Hortons is the dominant player in the Canadian market and is expanding its presence in the U.S..³¹ It competes on a value and convenience proposition similar to Dunkin’ and benefits from the operational scale and franchising expertise of its parent company.²⁸
• Emerging & Niche Threats:

• Fast-Growing Chains: A new wave of beverage-focused chains, most notably Dutch Bros, is expanding at a rapid pace. These brands are effectively capturing a younger demographic by focusing on customizable cold beverages, exceptional service speed, and a vibrant, energetic brand culture. Data indicates these chains are successfully siphoning visit share from the larger, more established players.⁷
• Independent Coffee Shops: The large and fragmented segment of independent, local coffee shops poses a significant collective threat. These establishments compete effectively on authenticity, artisanal quality, and a unique, community-focused ambiance. Recent data shows that small and medium-sized coffee brands are not only increasing their overall visit share but are disproportionately winning longer-duration, experience-oriented visits, a direct challenge to Starbucks’ “third place” concept.⁷

This competitive dynamic creates a “squeeze” on Starbucks. The company is simultaneously being attacked from below on price and convenience by large-scale QSRs and from above on experience and authenticity by a growing cohort of specialty and independent players. This market reality explains the dual nature of the “Back to Starbucks” strategy, which must concurrently improve operational speed to defend against the former while enhancing in-store ambiance to fend off the latter. Failure on either of these fronts could result in a sustained erosion of market share and pricing power.

Market Position & Economic Moat

Despite these pressures, Starbucks maintains a strong market position underpinned by several key competitive advantages that form its economic moat.

• Brand Strength: The Starbucks brand is one of the most valuable and globally recognized in the consumer discretionary sector. It is synonymous with premium coffee and a consistent customer experience, which has historically allowed the company to command premium pricing and cultivate a deeply loyal customer base.¹⁸
• Scale & Real Estate: The company’s vast global network of over 41,000 stores creates immense economies of scale in purchasing, marketing, and supply chain management. Its sophisticated real estate strategy, which secures high-traffic, high-visibility locations, serves as a significant and durable barrier to entry.¹⁶
• Operational Efficiency & Supply Chain: The company’s vertically integrated supply chain and extensive operational infrastructure provide cost advantages and a level of quality control that is difficult for smaller competitors to replicate.¹⁸
• Technology & Digital Platform: The Starbucks Rewards program and the integrated mobile ordering and payment app create a powerful digital ecosystem. This platform not only enhances customer convenience and loyalty but also generates a rich stream of data that can be used for personalization, effectively creating high switching costs for its most engaged customers.¹⁶

IV. Financial Performance & Health

Revenue Growth Trajectory (FY15-FY25)

An examination of Starbucks’ revenue over the past decade reveals a story of strong, consistent growth followed by a recent and abrupt deceleration.

• Historical Growth: From fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2023, the company demonstrated a robust growth profile, with annual revenues expanding from $19.2 billion to $36.0 billion.³⁵ This expansion was driven by a successful formula of consistent positive comparable store sales and aggressive global unit growth. The only significant interruption during this period was in fiscal 2020, a direct result of the global COVID-19 pandemic.³⁵
• Recent Stagnation: The growth narrative shifted dramatically in fiscal 2024. Full-year revenue growth flattened to a mere 0.56%, with total revenues reaching $36.18 billion.³⁵ This trend of anemic growth has continued into fiscal 2025. While Q3 FY25 revenues increased by 4% to $9.5 billion, this top-line growth was entirely attributable to new store openings, which masked the underlying weakness of negative comparable store sales.¹ This slowdown represents a significant structural break from the company’s historical growth algorithm and is the central challenge that management must address.

Profitability Metrics & Trends

In tandem with the revenue slowdown, the company’s profitability has come under severe and sustained pressure.

• Margin Compression: The most alarming trend in Starbucks’ recent financial performance is the sharp contraction in its profit margins. In Q3 FY25, the GAAP operating margin collapsed by 680 basis points year-over-year to just 9.9%.¹ This erosion of profitability is the result of a “perfect storm” of factors: financial deleverage from negative comparable sales, significant strategic investments in store partner wages and benefits, and increased promotional activity to drive traffic. For the full fiscal year 2024, the operating margin contracted by a less severe but still significant 130 basis points to 15.0%.³
• Historical Margins: This recent performance stands in stark contrast to the company’s historical profitability. Starbucks has traditionally maintained best-in-class operating margins, frequently in the high-teens, such as 19.7% in 2016 and 16.9% in 2019.³⁷ The current margin profile, in the low-double-digits, reflects the substantial costs of the ongoing turnaround and the challenging operating environment.
• Net Profit Margin: The net profit margin has mirrored the decline in operating profitability. For the trailing twelve months (TTM) ending in mid-2025, the net margin stood at 7.17%, a significant reduction from the 11.47% achieved in fiscal 2023.³⁸

The significant decline in operating margin is not merely a temporary cyclical dip; it represents a structural reset of the company’s cost base. Management’s explicit strategy involves substantial and ongoing investments in labor and the in-store experience to regain competitive footing. Therefore, financial models should not assume a rapid, V-shaped recovery to historical high-teen margin levels. The “new normal” for Starbucks’ profitability is likely to be structurally lower for the medium term as it prioritizes reinvestment to defend its market position.

Return & Capital Efficiency

Despite recent challenges, the underlying business continues to generate healthy returns on the capital invested in its operations.

• Return on Invested Capital (ROIC): ROIC has historically been a key strength for Starbucks, reflecting its efficient use of capital to generate profits. While this metric has declined from its peaks, it remains at a healthy level. As of the most recent data, the TTM ROIC stands at a respectable 12.8% to 15.6%, indicating that the core business operations continue to generate returns well in excess of the company’s cost of capital.⁴⁰
• Return on Equity (ROE): Starbucks’ reported Return on Equity is consistently and deeply negative, with the TTM ROE as of July 2025 at -41.05%.⁴² This figure can be highly misleading to investors. The negative ROE is not a result of unprofitability but is a financial artifact of the company’s capital allocation history. Years of aggressive share repurchase programs have led to a large treasury stock balance, which has pushed the book value of shareholders’ equity into a deficit position. Because the denominator in the ROE calculation (
  NetIncome/Shareholder′sEquity) is negative, the resulting ratio is not a meaningful indicator of operational performance. Investors should disregard the ROE metric and focus on ROIC as the more accurate measure of the company’s capital efficiency.

Cash Flow Generation

Starbucks remains a formidable cash-generating enterprise, though recent performance has shown a contraction.

• Operating Cash Flow: In the last twelve months, the company generated $4.90 billion in cash from operations.¹³ However, the pressures on profitability are flowing through to cash flow. For the first nine months of fiscal 2025, operating cash flow was $3.37 billion, a 26% decrease from the same period in the prior year, reflecting the decline in net income and changes in working capital.⁴³
• Free Cash Flow (FCF): Consequently, free cash flow has also tightened. TTM free cash flow was $2.25 billion.¹³ For the first nine months of FY25, FCF was approximately $1.5 billion after accounting for $1.85 billion in capital expenditures.⁴³ This reduction in FCF generation limits the company’s immediate flexibility for large-scale shareholder returns and underscores the importance of a successful operational turnaround.

Balance Sheet Analysis

The company’s balance sheet reflects a mature company that has historically prioritized returning capital to shareholders.

• Debt Levels: As of the end of Q3 FY25, total debt stood at $17.32 billion.⁴³ On a TTM basis, total debt was $27.91 billion.¹³ The company maintains a moderate leverage profile, with a Net Debt-to-EBITDA ratio of approximately 3.17x.¹³ The company has a strong credit rating and ready access to capital markets, as evidenced by a successful $1.75 billion bond issuance in May 2025.¹
• Shareholders’ Deficit: As previously discussed, the company has a negative shareholders’ equity balance, which stood at -$7.69 billion at the end of Q3 FY25.⁴³ This is a direct result of the company’s long-standing policy of returning capital to shareholders via share repurchases, which have accumulated to a value exceeding the company’s retained earnings. For a consistently profitable and cash-generative company like Starbucks, this is an accounting outcome rather than a sign of financial distress.

Table 1: 10-Year Financial Summary (FY15-FY24)

Fiscal Year	Total Net Revenues ($M)	Revenue YoY Growth (%)	Operating Margin (%)	Net Income ($M)	Diluted EPS ($)	Operating Cash Flow ($M)
2024	36,176	0.56%	15.0%	3,761	3.31	6,096
2023	35,976	11.55%	16.3%	4,125	3.58	6,009
2022	32,250	10.98%	14.3%	3,283	2.82	4,397
2021	29,061	23.57%	16.8%	4,200	3.55	5,989
2020	23,518	-11.28%	6.0%	925	0.77	1,598
2019	26,509	7.24%	15.4%	3,600	2.93	6,194
2018	24,720	10.42%	15.7%	4,520	3.27	5,595
2017	22,387	5.02%	17.8%	2,880	1.97	4,611
2016	21,316	11.24%	18.1%	2,820	1.90	4,570
2015	19,163	16.51%	17.1%	2,760	1.82	3,700
Note: Financial data compiled from sources.35 Margins and cash flow figures are based on available data and may involve calculations based on reported figures.

Table 2: Segment Performance Breakdown (FY23-YTD FY25)

Fiscal Period	North America Revenue ($M)	North America Op. Margin (%)	International Revenue ($M)	International Op. Margin (%)	Channel Dev. Revenue ($M)	Channel Dev. Op. Margin (%)
Q3 FY25	6,927.0	13.3%	2,010.7	13.6%	483.8	45.1%
Q2 FY25	6,472.7	11.6%	1,867.1	11.6%	409.0	47.3%
Q1 FY25	7,071.9	16.7%	1,900.0 (est.)	12.5%	436.3	47.7%
FY 2024	27,291.9	18.7%	7,293.2 (est.)	13.0% (est.)	1,600.0 (est.)	50.0% (est.)
FY 2023	26,569.0	20.2%	7,565.0	15.0%	1,842.0	48.0%
Note: Data for FY23-Q3 FY25 compiled from sources.1 Some FY24 figures are estimated based on full-year results and quarterly trends due to lack of explicit segment breakdown in available sources.

V. Strategic Initiatives & Growth Vectors

The “Back to Starbucks” Turnaround Strategy

The “Back to Starbucks” plan, initiated by CEO Brian Niccol upon his appointment in September 2024, is the central strategic imperative for the company.⁴⁴ It is a comprehensive and multi-faceted response to the operational decay, declining customer traffic, and eroding brand perception that have characterized the company’s performance since 2022. Management has expressed confidence in the plan, stating that the turnaround is “ahead of schedule,” though the financial results have yet to fully reflect this optimism.⁴ The strategy is built on several key pillars:

• Pillar 1: Operational Excellence (Winning the Peak): At the core of the plan is the “Green Apron Service Model,” which represents a fundamental overhaul of in-store operations. The objective is to improve speed of service, order accuracy, and overall efficiency, particularly during the critical morning peak hours. This is being achieved through smarter, data-driven staffing models, the deployment of improved equipment, and the simplification of workflows for partners (employees). The ultimate goal is to consistently deliver a high-quality beverage in four minutes or less, thereby enhancing the customer experience and improving store throughput.⁴
• Pillar 2: Re-establishing the “Third Place”: This pillar is a direct acknowledgment that in its pursuit of efficiency, the company may have neglected the core brand promise of the store as a “third place.” The strategy involves reinvesting in the physical store environment to create a more welcoming and comfortable atmosphere. Tangible changes include bringing back ceramic mugs for in-store customers, adding more seating and power outlets, and redesigning stores to have a warmer, more inviting aesthetic. This is a crucial defensive move to combat the loss of longer-duration visits to competitors who excel at creating a compelling cafe ambiance.⁴
• Pillar 3: Product & Brand Innovation: The plan includes a renewed focus on reinforcing Starbucks’ credentials as a premium coffee leader. This is visible in the aggressive marketing of new, coffee-forward beverages like the Cortado and strategic investments in new coffee farms in Guatemala and Costa Rica to serve as hubs for research and development.¹⁹ Looking ahead to 2026, the company has announced a pipeline of innovation aimed at capturing evolving consumer trends, including new food items, protein-enhanced beverage modifiers, and customizable energy drinks.⁴

The appointment of Brian Niccol is itself a strategic decision. His highly successful turnaround of Chipotle was built on a similar playbook of focusing on operational basics, reinvigorating the brand, and leveraging digital innovation. The board’s choice signals a commitment to a disciplined application of proven QSR turnaround principles to address Starbucks’ specific challenges, increasing the probability of a successful execution.

International Expansion

Despite near-term challenges, international markets remain the most significant long-term growth driver for the company.

• China Focus: China continues to be the most critical international market and the company’s largest outside of the U.S. After a difficult period marked by COVID-19 lockdowns and intense competitive pressure, the market is showing signs of recovery. In Q3 FY25, comparable store sales in China turned positive, increasing 2% on the back of a strong 6% growth in transactions.¹ However, the competitive landscape has been permanently altered by the meteoric rise of local players like Luckin Coffee, which now surpasses Starbucks in store count and competes aggressively on price and digital convenience.⁹ This new reality is forcing a strategic shift. The discussion has moved from pure unit growth to a focus on profitable growth, with management actively exploring a strategic partnership to enhance operational effectiveness and navigate the complex local market.⁴⁷
• Other Markets: Beyond China, the company continues to see strong growth potential in a diversified portfolio of international markets. In Q3 FY25, international revenue surpassed $2 billion for the first time, with strong performance noted in markets such as Canada, the United Kingdom, Mexico, and Türkiye.⁴

Store Portfolio & Format Evolution

Starbucks is actively evolving its store portfolio to better align with changing consumer behaviors and improve capital efficiency.

• Drive-Thru Expansion: The company continues to prioritize the expansion of its drive-thru format. These stores cater to the demand for ultimate convenience and have consistently demonstrated higher average unit volumes (AUVs) and strong profitability.¹⁵
• New Formats: Management has signaled a long-term ambition to potentially double the U.S. store count, driven by the rollout of smaller, more capital-efficient formats.¹⁶ This strategy suggests a focus on market infill with models such as pickup-only and delivery-focused locations that can serve high-density areas with lower upfront investment and operating costs.
• Premiumization (Reserve): The Starbucks Reserve brand, which includes a small number of ultra-premium Roasteries and Reserve stores, continues to function as a “halo” for the entire brand. These locations serve as innovation labs and brand showcases, reinforcing Starbucks’ coffee authority and capturing the highest end of the specialty coffee market.

Digital Transformation

The company’s digital platform remains a key strategic asset and a focus for future investment.

• App & Loyalty Refresh: A new Starbucks app and an enhanced Mobile Order & Pay system are slated for launch in 2026. This initiative is critical for deepening engagement with the nearly 34 million active Rewards members in the U.S. and leveraging the company’s vast dataset for more effective personalization. The goal is to increase visit frequency, drive higher ticket sizes, and further solidify the digital moat against competitors.⁴

VI. Recent Challenges & Headwinds (2022-2024 Focus)

The period from 2022 to 2024 was marked by a confluence of significant challenges that disrupted Starbucks’ long-standing growth trajectory and necessitated the current strategic overhaul.

Inflationary Pressures

The global inflationary environment had a profound impact on Starbucks’ profitability.

• Commodity Costs: The company faced a sharp increase in the cost of its primary inputs. Green coffee prices reached multi-decade highs in early 2025, and the costs of dairy, sugar, and other commodities also rose significantly.⁴⁸ While the company employs a sophisticated hedging strategy to mitigate short-term volatility, these sustained cost increases inevitably flowed through to the profit and loss statement, compressing gross margins.
• Labor Expenses: A tight labor market and a strategic decision to improve employee compensation led to significant wage inflation. Investments in higher partner wages, enhanced benefits, and increased store staffing hours have been a primary and recurring driver of the contraction in operating margins, as explicitly cited in the company’s quarterly earnings reports.¹ While these investments are a cornerstone of the “Back to Starbucks” strategy, they have created a substantial near-term drag on profitability.

Supply Chain Disruptions

While the most acute global supply chain disruptions of the pandemic era have subsided, Starbucks has continued to face internal operational challenges. Management has acknowledged issues with “unacceptably high out-of-stocks” on certain menu items, a problem that can lead directly to lost sales and a diminished customer experience.⁴⁷

China Market Challenges

The company’s second-largest and most important growth market faced a unique set of severe headwinds.

• COVID-19 Lockdowns: China’s stringent and prolonged “zero-COVID” policies resulted in widespread store closures, reduced operating hours, and severely depressed consumer mobility through 2022 and into early 2023, creating a significant drag on the International segment’s results.
• Intensified Competitive Pressure: The post-lockdown recovery in China has been complicated by a dramatic shift in the competitive landscape. Local competitors, led by the aggressive expansion of Luckin Coffee, have capitalized on the disruption. These local players compete fiercely on price, digital convenience, and product localization, leading to a challenging environment for Starbucks. This pressure was evident in the company’s financial results, with full-year comps in China declining by 8% in fiscal 2024.³

Labor Relations & Unionization

Starbucks has been the subject of a high-profile and persistent unionization campaign, led by Starbucks Workers United, which has successfully organized hundreds of U.S. stores. This movement has created significant operational and reputational headwinds, resulting in negative media attention, numerous legal challenges and proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board, and increased management distraction.¹⁸

Changes in Consumer Behavior

The post-pandemic environment has led to lasting shifts in consumer habits that have impacted Starbucks’ business model.

• Hybrid Work Patterns: The widespread adoption of hybrid and remote work models has altered traditional morning commute patterns, which have historically been a primary driver of Starbucks’ peak morning business.
• Value Consciousness: Faced with high inflation, many consumers have become more price-sensitive and have pulled back on discretionary spending. This has led some customers to trade down to lower-priced coffee alternatives or to increase their at-home coffee consumption.⁹ This trend is a likely contributor to the persistent negative transaction counts observed in the U.S. market.³

Leadership Transitions

The period was also marked by significant instability in the executive suite. Founder Howard Schultz returned for his third stint as interim CEO in April 2022, before handing the reins to Laxman Narasimhan in March 2023. Narasimhan’s tenure was unexpectedly short, and he was replaced by Brian Niccol in September 2024.⁴⁴ While such frequent leadership changes can create strategic uncertainty, the market has generally viewed the appointment of Niccol, given his successful track record at Chipotle, as a positive and stabilizing development.

VII. Management Quality & Corporate Governance

Leadership Team

The quality and experience of the leadership team are critical, particularly during a period of strategic transformation.

• Chief Executive Officer Brian Niccol: Appointed in September 2024, Brian Niccol is a highly respected and proven leader in the restaurant industry.⁴⁴ His tenure as CEO of Chipotle from 2018 to 2024 is widely regarded as one of the most successful turnarounds in the sector. At Chipotle, he stabilized the brand after a series of food safety crises and drove exceptional growth by focusing on operational excellence, digital innovation, and effective brand marketing. His experience is directly and immediately relevant to the core challenges currently facing Starbucks, making him a strong fit for the CEO role.⁵¹
• Supporting Executives: The senior leadership team comprises a blend of long-tenured Starbucks veterans and experienced external hires. Key executives include Brady Brewer (CEO, Starbucks International), Cathy Smith (EVP, Chief Financial Officer), and Sanjay Shah (EVP, Chief Supply Chain Officer), who provide a deep bench of expertise in their respective domains to support the execution of the CEO’s strategic vision.⁵²

Strategic Vision & Execution

The “Back to Starbucks” plan articulated by the new leadership provides a clear and coherent strategic roadmap for addressing the company’s current issues. The vision is grounded in a return to the company’s core strengths: operational excellence and a superior customer experience. The primary uncertainty for investors lies not in the quality of the strategy but in the team’s ability to execute this complex, multi-faceted plan across a vast and diverse global network of over 41,000 stores. Management’s early commentary indicates that progress is being made, but the financial results have yet to provide definitive validation of a successful turnaround.⁴

Board Composition & Oversight

Starbucks maintains a high-quality, independent board of directors to provide oversight and guidance to the management team.

• Board Structure and Independence: The Board is composed of nine directors, a substantial majority of whom are independent as defined by NASDAQ and SEC regulations.⁵³ The board has a policy of separating the roles of Chairman and CEO or, if the roles are combined, appointing a strong lead independent director. Following Brian Niccol’s appointment as Chairman and CEO, Mellody Hobson, the respected former chair, assumed the role of lead independent director, ensuring a powerful and independent voice in the boardroom.⁴⁴
• Board Expertise: The board is notable for its diversity and the depth of its members’ experience. It includes current and former executives from some of the world’s most successful and innovative companies, including Microsoft (CEO Satya Nadella) and Apple (Isabel Ge Mahe), who bring invaluable expertise in technology, global operations, and brand building.⁵⁴
• ESG Oversight: The board has demonstrated a commitment to formalizing its oversight of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters through the establishment of a dedicated Environmental, Partner, and Community Impact committee. This committee is tasked with overseeing the company’s progress on its social and environmental goals and related reporting.⁴⁹

Compensation Alignment

The company’s executive compensation program is designed to align the interests of management with those of long-term shareholders.

• Pay for Performance: A significant portion of executive compensation is performance-based and at-risk. The key metrics used to determine incentive payouts include Adjusted Earnings Per Share (EPS), Adjusted Net Revenue, and Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) against a peer group, ensuring that executive rewards are tied to the creation of shareholder value.⁵⁵
• CEO Compensation: The compensation package for new CEO Brian Niccol is heavily weighted toward equity and performance. His replacement equity grant of $75 million is composed of 60% performance-based restricted stock units, directly linking a substantial portion of his potential compensation to the successful execution of the turnaround strategy.⁵⁶ The 2025 proxy statement provides shareholders with a non-binding, advisory vote on executive compensation (“say-on-pay”).⁵⁷

VIII. Valuation Analysis

The valuation of Starbucks Corporation presents a complex picture. The company’s current trading multiples reflect a premium that is not supported by its recent financial performance but is instead predicated on the market’s expectation of a successful turnaround.

Current Trading Multiples vs. Historical Ranges

• Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio: As of August 2025, Starbucks trades at a trailing twelve-month (TTM) P/E ratio of approximately 37.3x.¹⁰ This is largely in line with its 10-year historical average P/E of 37.8x, but it is significantly elevated compared to the lows seen during periods of operational stress.¹⁰ The forward P/E ratio, based on consensus earnings estimates for the next fiscal year, is slightly lower at approximately 34.7x, indicating that the market anticipates earnings growth.¹³
• Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) Ratio: The TTM EV/EBITDA multiple stands at approximately 21.9x.¹³ This is a premium valuation for a restaurant company and suggests that investors are willing to look past the current margin compression and value the company based on its potential for a recovery in profitability.
• Price-to-Sales (P/S) Ratio: The TTM P/S ratio is approximately 2.7x.¹³ While not excessively high for a market-leading consumer brand, this multiple appears full given the recent stagnation in the company’s top-line growth.

Peer Comparison Analysis

When benchmarked against its closest large-cap QSR peers, Starbucks consistently commands a premium valuation.

• Starbucks vs. McDonald’s (MCD): Starbucks trades at a significant P/E premium to McDonald’s (37.5x vs. 26.5x). Their EV/EBITDA multiples are more comparable, with Starbucks at ~19.5x and McDonald’s at ~18.4x.¹² The vast difference in their P/S ratios (2.7x for SBUX vs. 8.4x for MCD) is a reflection of their different business models; McDonald’s highly franchised system generates lower revenue but much higher operating margins.
• Starbucks vs. QSR and YUM: Starbucks also trades at a P/E premium to Restaurant Brands International (parent of Tim Hortons), which has a P/E of 32.6x, and Yum! Brands, with a P/E of 28.4x. Similarly, its EV/EBITDA multiple is higher than QSR’s (16.9x) and comparable to YUM’s (19.1x).¹²

This consistent valuation premium is generally justified by the market due to Starbucks’ stronger global brand equity, higher perceived product quality, and historically superior growth profile, particularly in international markets. However, this premium becomes a significant risk if the company fails to restore its growth and margin advantages over these peers.

Table 4: Valuation Multiples – Peer Comparison

Company	Market Cap ($B)	TTM P/E	Forward P/E	TTM EV/EBITDA	TTM P/S	LTM Revenue Growth (%)	Dividend Yield (%)
Starbucks (SBUX)	98.7	37.6x	34.7x	21.9x	2.7x	0.6%	2.81%
McDonald’s (MCD)	216.6	26.5x	–	18.4x	8.4x	5.0%	2.35%
Yum! Brands (YUM)	40.4	28.4x	–	19.1x	5.2x	7.0%	1.90%
Restaurant Brands Int’l (QSR)	30.9	32.6x	–	16.9x	3.5x	5.0%	3.50%
Note: Data as of early August 2025. Compiled from sources.12 Forward P/E and some dividend data may vary based on source and timing.

Sum-of-the-Parts (SOTP) Valuation Considerations

An SOTP valuation methodology, which values each business segment individually, could provide a more nuanced view of the company’s intrinsic value.⁵⁸ In this framework:

• The mature North America segment could be valued using a lower EV/EBITDA multiple, comparable to other stable U.S.-centric restaurant chains.
• The higher-growth International segment would command a significantly higher multiple, reflecting its long-term expansion potential.
• The capital-light, high-margin Channel Development segment could be valued on a multiple more akin to a consumer packaged goods company, which is typically higher than that of restaurant operators.
  This approach could highlight that the market may be undervaluing the combined contribution of the high-growth International and high-margin Channel Development businesses, suggesting potential hidden value not captured by a consolidated valuation approach.

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Considerations

A DCF analysis reveals that the company’s intrinsic value is highly sensitive to a few key assumptions about the success of its turnaround.

• Key Value Drivers:

1. Revenue Growth: The model is highly dependent on the company’s ability to reignite revenue growth, primarily by returning to positive comparable store sales in the U.S. and continuing its pace of unit expansion in international markets. Analyst consensus forecasts suggest a return to approximately 6.9% annual revenue growth over the medium term.⁵⁹
2. Margin Expansion: A critical driver is the extent to which operating margins can recover from their current compressed levels. Management has expressed optimism about eventually returning to pre-COVID margin levels of around 17%.⁶⁰ The pace and magnitude of this recovery are major variables.
3. Terminal Growth Rate and Discount Rate: Standard assumptions, such as a terminal growth rate of 2.5-3.0% and a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) in the 7.5-8.5% range, would be appropriate for a company of Starbucks’ scale and maturity.

A DCF model based on these assumptions would likely indicate that the current stock price is pricing in a successful, but not flawless, execution of the turnaround plan. Significant upside from current levels would require the company to exceed consensus expectations on either the pace of its comparable sales recovery or the degree of its long-term margin expansion. The current valuation is, in essence, a “show me” story; it is not justified by current results but by faith in the brand’s resilience and the new CEO’s ability to deliver on future performance. This creates an asymmetric risk profile where a failure to execute could lead to a sharp de-rating of the stock’s premium multiples.

IX. Key Risks & Considerations

A comprehensive investment analysis requires a thorough understanding of the risks that could materially impact the company’s business, financial condition, and operating results. Starbucks faces a wide array of risks, as detailed in its regulatory filings.¹⁴

• Macroeconomic Sensitivity: As a premium brand reliant on consumer discretionary spending, Starbucks’ performance is highly sensitive to macroeconomic conditions. An economic downturn or recession could lead to reduced customer traffic, a shift to lower-priced competitors, and a general decline in sales as consumers curtail non-essential purchases.¹⁴
• Competitive Threats: The specialty coffee market is intensely competitive and becoming more so. Starbucks faces significant pressure from large QSR chains competing on price and convenience, a growing number of fast-expanding specialty chains, and a vibrant independent coffee shop scene competing on quality and experience. A failure to effectively counter these multi-pronged threats could result in a permanent loss of market share.¹⁴
• Execution Risk: The “Back to Starbucks” turnaround plan is ambitious and complex. There is significant execution risk associated with implementing operational changes across more than 41,000 global stores. A failure to successfully improve service times, enhance the in-store experience, and innovate the product pipeline could result in the strategy failing to produce the desired financial recovery.⁴⁸
• Commodity Price Volatility: The company’s profitability is directly exposed to fluctuations in the prices of key commodities, particularly high-quality arabica coffee beans, as well as dairy and sugar. A sustained and significant increase in these input costs could further compress margins, especially if the company is unable to pass on the full cost to consumers through price increases.¹⁴
• China Market Risk: The company’s heavy reliance on the China market for a significant portion of its future growth creates concentrated geographic and political risk. The business is vulnerable to shifts in U.S.-China geopolitical relations, changes in Chinese economic conditions and consumer sentiment, intense competition from well-funded local rivals, and an evolving regulatory environment.⁹
• Labor Relations: The ongoing unionization efforts in the U.S. present a multifaceted risk. A more heavily unionized workforce could lead to higher labor costs, decreased operational flexibility, and an increased risk of labor disruptions. The process itself can also generate negative publicity that damages the company’s brand and reputation as a preferred employer.¹⁴
• Brand Reputation: The Starbucks brand is one of the company’s most valuable assets. This asset is vulnerable to damage from a variety of sources, including incidents related to food safety, data security breaches, unethical business practices, or negative publicity stemming from the company’s stance on social or political issues. Any significant harm to the brand could have a rapid and material impact on sales and customer loyalty.¹⁴

X. Key Metrics to Monitor

To effectively track the progress of Starbucks’ turnaround and assess the ongoing health of the business, investors should focus on a core set of key performance indicators.

• Same-Store Sales Growth (Global, U.S., China): This remains the single most important metric for gauging the health of the underlying business. A sustained return to positive growth, particularly in the U.S. and China, is a prerequisite for a successful investment thesis.
• Comparable Transactions: This is the most critical component of same-store sales to monitor. A definitive shift from negative to positive transaction growth would be the clearest signal that the company is successfully winning back customer traffic and increasing visit frequency.
• Operating Margin: Investors should monitor operating margin trends for signs of stabilization, followed by a gradual recovery toward the company’s long-term target of 17%. The pace of this recovery will be a key determinant of future earnings growth.
• Starbucks Rewards Member Growth & Engagement: Tracking the growth in 90-day active members and any available data on their engagement and spending patterns will provide insight into the health of the company’s most loyal customer base.
• China Store Unit Growth & Comps: It is important to continue monitoring both the pace of new store openings in China and the comparable sales performance of the existing store base to assess the long-term growth and profitability of this critical market.
• Free Cash Flow Generation: Assessing the company’s ability to convert earnings into cash is crucial for understanding its capacity to fund capital expenditures, debt service, and returns to shareholders through dividends and buybacks.

Table 3: Key Operational Metrics (Quarterly, Q1 FY24 – Q3 FY25)

Fiscal Quarter	Global Comp Sales (%)	Global Transactions (%)	Global Ticket (%)	U.S. Comps (%)	U.S. Transactions (%)	China Comps (%)	China Transactions (%)	Net New Stores
Q3 FY25	-2%	-2%	1%	-2%	-4%	2%	6%	308
Q2 FY25	-1%	-2%	1%	-2%	-4%	0%	4%	213
Q1 FY25	-4%	-6%	3%	-4%	-8%	-6%	-2%	377
Q4 FY24	-7%	-8%	2%	-6%	-10%	-14%	-6%	722
Q3 FY24	-3%	-5%	2%	-2%	-6%	-14%	-7%	526
Note: Data compiled from quarterly earnings releases.1

Works cited

1. Starbucks Reports Q3 Fiscal Year 2025 Results, accessed August 3, 2025, https://investor.starbucks.com/news/financial-releases/news-details/2025/Starbucks-Reports-Q3-Fiscal-Year-2025-Results/default.aspx
2. Starbucks Reports Q2 Fiscal Year 2025 Results, accessed August 3, 2025, https://investor.starbucks.com/news/financial-releases/news-details/2025/Starbucks-Reports-Q2-Fiscal-Year-2025-Results/default.aspx
3. Starbucks Reports Q4 and Full Fiscal Year 2024 Results, accessed August 3, 2025, https://investor.starbucks.com/news/financial-releases/news-details/2024/Starbucks-Reports-Q4-and-Full-Fiscal-Year-2024-Results/default.aspx
4. Starbucks Reports Q3 Fiscal Year 2025 Results, accessed August 3, 2025, https://about.starbucks.com/press/2025/starbucks-reports-q3-fiscal-year-2025-results/
5. Conference Title: Starbucks 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Date: Wednesday, 12th March 2025, accessed August 3, 2025, https://s203.q4cdn.com/326826266/files/doc_events/2025/Mar/12/2025-SBUX-Annual-Meeting-Transcript.pdf
6. Starbucks 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, accessed August 3, 2025, https://about.starbucks.com/stories/2025/starbucks-2025-annual-meeting-of-shareholders/
7. Starbucks and Dunkin’s competitors reap rewards as visits grow | Restaurant Dive, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.restaurantdive.com/news/starbucks-dunkin-small-coffee-competitors-gain-share-on-premise/744589/
8. Starbucks 2025 Market Trends: Sales, Competition & Strategies – Accio, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.accio.com/business/market_trends_of_starbucks
9. Starbucks is losing ground in US and China markets, and other premium options are moving in – Coffee Intelligence, accessed August 3, 2025, https://intelligence.coffee/2024/05/starbucks-loses-market-in-us-and-china/
10. SBUX – Starbucks PE ratio, current and historical analysis – FullRatio, accessed August 3, 2025, https://fullratio.com/stocks/nasdaq-sbux/pe-ratio
11. Starbucks PE Ratio 2010-2025 | SBUX – Macrotrends, accessed August 3, 2025, https://macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/SBUX/starbucks/pe-ratio
12. SBUX Relative Valuation – Starbucks Corp – Alpha Spread, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nasdaq/sbux/relative-valuation
13. Starbucks (SBUX) Statistics & Valuation – Stock Analysis, accessed August 3, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/sbux/statistics/
14. sbux-20240929 – SEC.gov, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/829224/000082922424000057/sbux-20240929.htm
15. SWOT Analysis of Starbucks (6 Key Strengths in 2025) – Strategic Management Insight, accessed August 3, 2025, https://strategicmanagementinsight.com/swot-analyses/starbucks-swot-analysis/
16. Starbucks’ SWOT analysis: coffee giant’s stock faces turnaround …, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/swot-analysis/starbucks-swot-analysis-coffee-giants-stock-faces-turnaround-challenges-93CH-4140868
17. sbux-20231001 – SEC.gov, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/829224/000082922423000058/sbux-20231001.htm
18. Starbucks SWOT Analysis (Updated 2025) – Marketing91, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.marketing91.com/swot-analysis-starbucks/
19. Starbucks 2025 Marketing Strategy: Back to Basics – Craver, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.craverapp.com/blog/starbucks-marketing-strategy
20. Coffee Market Report 2025 – Research and Markets, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5807049/coffee-market-report
21. Fast Food Global Forecast Report 2025: Market Will Reach a Staggering $1.25 Trillion by 2033, Driven by Increasing Number of Quick Service Restaurants (QSR) in Developed and Developing Nations – ResearchAndMarkets.com – Business Wire, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250123822178/en/Fast-Food-Global-Forecast-Report-2025-Market-Will-Reach-a-Staggering-%241.25-Trillion-by-2033-Driven-by-Increasing-Number-of-Quick-Service-Restaurants-QSR-in-Developed-and-Developing-Nations—ResearchAndMarkets.com
22. Coffee Market Size Worth USD 381.52 Billion by 2034 – GlobeNewswire, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/07/11/3113913/0/en/Coffee-Market-Size-Worth-USD-381-52-Billion-by-2034.html
23. Growth Opportunities in the Global Coffee Beans Market, 2025-2033 – Starbucks, Nescafe, The Kraft Heinz Company, Lunchin Coffee, and J M Smucker Lead the Competition – ResearchAndMarkets.com – Business Wire, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250318097962/en/Growth-Opportunities-in-the-Global-Coffee-Beans-Market-2025-2033—Starbucks-Nescafe-The-Kraft-Heinz-Company-Lunchin-Coffee-and-J-M-Smucker-Lead-the-Competition—ResearchAndMarkets.com
24. Coffee Market Size, Share & Growth | Industry Report, 2030 – Grand View Research, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/coffee-market
25. Top 2025 QSR Trends: AI , Global Flavors, And Experiential Dining” – Forbes, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/sites/garyocchiogrosso/2025/01/15/top-2025-qsr-trends-ai–global-flavors-and-experiential-dining/
26. Global Restaurant Industry Statistics 2025: Market Size, Growth Trends & Key Data, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.restroworks.com/blog/global-restaurant-industry-statistics-2025/
27. Coffee Market Trends: Expert Insights [2025] – GourmetPro, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.gourmetpro.co/blog/coffee-market-trends-expert-insights
28. Who Are Starbucks’ Main Competitors? – Investopedia, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/101315/who-are-starbucks-main-competitors.asp
29. Dunkin’ | 2024 – Restaurant Business Magazine, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.restaurantbusinessonline.com/top-500-chains-2024/dunkin
30. Starbucks: Business Model, SWOT Analysis, and Competitors 2024 – PitchGrade, accessed August 3, 2025, https://pitchgrade.com/companies/starbucks
31. Coffee Wars: Market Share Battles and Investment Opportunities from Starbucks to Startups, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.northmarq.com/insights/research/coffee-wars-market-share-battles-and-investment-opportunities-starbucks-startups
32. 2024 Form 10-K – RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC., accessed August 3, 2025, https://s26.q4cdn.com/317237604/files/doc_financials/2024/ar/b16f0901-feeb-4cff-9658-3baf738cef10.pdf
33. Restaurant Brands International Inc. Reports Full Year and Fourth Quarter 2024 Results, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.rbi.com/English/news/news-details/2025/Restaurant-Brands-International-Inc.-Reports-Full-Year-and-Fourth-Quarter-2024-Results/default.aspx
34. Starbucks SWOT Analysis (2025) – Business Model Analyst, accessed August 3, 2025, https://businessmodelanalyst.com/starbucks-swot-analysis/
35. Starbucks Revenue 2010-2025 | SBUX | MacroTrends, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/SBUX/starbucks/revenue
36. Starbucks Corporation Revenue 2015-2024 – Bullfincher, accessed August 3, 2025, https://bullfincher.io/companies/starbucks-corporation/revenue
37. Operating Margin for Starbucks (SBUX) – Companies Market Cap, accessed August 3, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/starbucks/operating-margin/
38. Starbucks Net Profit Margin 2010-2025 | SBUX | MacroTrends, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/SBUX/starbucks/net-profit-margin
39. Starbucks (NasdaqGS:SBUX) – Earnings & Revenue Performance – Simply Wall St, accessed August 3, 2025, https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/consumer-services/nasdaq-sbux/starbucks/past
40. Starbucks (BMV:SBUX) Statistics & Valuation Metrics – Stock Analysis, accessed August 3, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/quote/bmv/SBUX/statistics/
41. Starbucks (SBUX) Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) – MLQ.ai | Stocks, accessed August 3, 2025, https://mlq.ai/stocks/SBUX/roic/
42. Starbucks Corporation – ROE – Wisesheets, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.wisesheets.io/roe/SBUX
43. [10-Q] Starbucks Corp Quarterly Earnings Report – SBUX – Stock Titan, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.stocktitan.net/sec-filings/SBUX/10-q-starbucks-corp-quarterly-earnings-report-c372125a4b00.html
44. Starbucks names Brian Niccol as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, accessed August 3, 2025, https://about.starbucks.com/press/2024/starbucks-names-brian-niccol-as-chairman-and-chief-executive-officer/
45. Starbucks Coffee Company – Investor Relations, accessed August 3, 2025, https://investor.starbucks.com/ir-home/default.aspx
46. The 2025 QSR 50: Fast Food’s Leading Annual Report – QSR …, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.qsrmagazine.com/story/the-2025-qsr-50-fast-foods-leading-annual-report/
47. Starbucks Corp. (SBUX), accessed August 3, 2025, https://s203.q4cdn.com/326826266/files/doc_financials/2025/q3/SBUX-3Q25-Corrected-Transcript.pdf
48. Why Starbucks Must Deliver on Its Reinvention to Justify Its Premium Valuation – AInvest, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.ainvest.com/news/starbucks-deliver-reinvention-justify-premium-valuation-2508/
49. Starbucks introduces oversight committee to improve governance – ESG Dive, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.esgdive.com/news/starbucks-environmental-community-oversight-committee-governance/700612/
50. Howard Schultz – Wikipedia, accessed August 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Schultz
51. Brian Niccol – Starbucks Coffee Company – Governance – Board of Directors – Person Details, accessed August 3, 2025, https://investor.starbucks.com/governance/board-of-directors/person-details/default.aspx?ItemId=5490d108-aad0-46c9-bd96-e53e863b3bc2
52. Starbucks Coffee Company – Governance – Executive Leadership, accessed August 3, 2025, https://investor.starbucks.com/governance/executive-management/default.aspx
53. Corporate Governance: Starbucks Coffee Company, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.starbucks.com/about-us/corporate-governance/
54. Board of Directors Biographies – Starbucks, accessed August 3, 2025, https://content-prod-live.cert.starbucks.com/binary/v2/asset/143-81880.pdf
55. d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net, accessed August 3, 2025, https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0000829224/3cf84f06-707b-4d27-b591-2d0cdf5690ef.html
56. FORM 8-K – Starbucks Corporation, accessed August 3, 2025, https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0000829224/1b8dd1fc-dd9d-4cbc-b9b1-6ee1e0cd2c5a.pdf
57. Starbucks 2025 Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement, accessed August 3, 2025, https://s203.q4cdn.com/326826266/files/doc_financials/2024/ar/Starbucks-2025-Proxy-Statement.pdf
58. Sum-of-the-Parts Valuation (SOTP) Meaning, Formula, Example – Investopedia, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sumofpartsvaluation.asp
59. Starbucks (NasdaqGS:SBUX) Stock Forecast & Analyst Predictions – Simply Wall St, accessed August 3, 2025, https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/consumer-services/nasdaq-sbux/starbucks/future
60. Earnings call transcript: Starbucks Q3 2025 misses EPS forecast, revenue beats, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/transcripts/earnings-call-transcript-starbucks-q3-2025-misses-eps-forecast-revenue-beats-93CH-4158653
61. Starbucks Reports Q1 Fiscal Year 2025 Results, accessed August 3, 2025, https://investor.starbucks.com/news/financial-releases/news-details/2025/Starbucks-Reports-Q1-Fiscal-Year-2025-Results/default.aspx
62. Starbucks Reports Q3 Fiscal 2024 Results, accessed August 3, 2025, https://investor.starbucks.com/news/financial-releases/news-details/2024/Starbucks-Reports-Q3-Fiscal-2024-Results/default.aspx
63. Starbucks (NSQ:SBUX) Cashflow Statement (Jul 2025) – Stockopedia, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.stockopedia.com/share-prices/starbucks-NSQ:SBUX/cashflow/
64. Compare Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) with Competitors – Value Sense, accessed August 3, 2025, https://valuesense.io/ticker/sbux/compare