Executive Summary

Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) stands as a cornerstone of the North American economy, operating one of the two premier freight rail franchises in the western United States. Its vast, irreplaceable network functions as a critical artery for global and domestic supply chains, providing a wide competitive moat and significant pricing power. The company’s performance is fundamentally a function of its disciplined operational execution under the Precision Scheduled Railroading (PSR) model, balanced against the inherent cyclicality of the industrial economy it serves. For years, the investment thesis has centered on this operational efficiency, strong free cash flow generation, and consistent capital returns to shareholders.

However, Union Pacific is now at a strategic inflection point. The company has announced a proposed merger with Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC), a transformative transaction that would create the first single-line transcontinental railroad in U.S. history. This potential combination represents the single most significant catalyst and risk for the company. It offers the prospect of fundamentally reshaping the North American competitive landscape, creating an unparalleled network to capture secular growth from intermodal and cross-border trade, and unlocking substantial revenue and cost synergies. Simultaneously, the merger is fraught with considerable regulatory hurdles under a more stringent oversight framework, as well as significant integration and operational risks.

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of Union Pacific’s current strategic position and future prospects. It examines the company’s financial health, which remains robust despite recent macroeconomic headwinds from inflation and a muted industrial economy. Operationally, the return of CEO Jim Vena, a renowned PSR practitioner, has driven a marked improvement in key service and efficiency metrics, suggesting a renewed focus on disciplined execution. The analysis identifies nearshoring and intermodal transport as key secular growth drivers that leverage UNP’s unique geographic footprint, particularly its access to all major U.S.-Mexico gateways. The proposed Norfolk Southern merger is evaluated not merely as a consolidation play, but as a strategic response to the limits of standalone PSR efficiency gains—a pivot toward growth through network superiority. The report concludes by assessing the company’s valuation, which appears to reflect the market’s deep uncertainty regarding the binary outcome of the merger, creating a complex risk-reward profile for prospective investors.

Company Analysis: The Union Pacific Franchise

Business Model & Network Advantage

Union Pacific’s core business is the transportation of freight by rail across a network that is a foundational component of the U.S. economy.¹ The company’s primary strategic asset is its extensive and largely irreplaceable rail network, which spans approximately 32,500 route miles across 23 states in the western two-thirds of the United States.² This network constitutes an exceptionally high barrier to entry; the capital cost, regulatory approvals, and land acquisition required to replicate such a system today are prohibitive, forming the basis of the company’s durable competitive moat.

The strategic positioning of this network is a key differentiator. It connects major population centers and industrial hubs with critical points of international trade, including major ports on the Pacific and Gulf Coasts.³ Crucially, Union Pacific is the only railroad that serves all six major gateways between the United States and Mexico, positioning it as a primary artery for burgeoning cross-border trade.³ This direct access to international trade flows, particularly from Asia via West Coast ports and from Mexico, is a fundamental pillar of the company’s long-term strategic value.

Revenue and Customer Composition

Union Pacific’s revenue streams are diversified across a wide array of economic sectors, which are categorized into three primary commodity groups. As of the full-year 2023, freight revenues of $22.6 billion were sourced from Industrial products (37%), Bulk commodities (32%), and Premium services (31%).¹ This diversification provides a degree of stability, though the company’s overall performance remains closely tied to the broader health of the industrial economy.

• Industrial: This segment, the largest by revenue, generated $8.2 billion in 2023, flat compared to the prior year.¹ It encompasses the transportation of chemicals and plastics, metals and minerals, forest products, and industrial equipment. Volumes in this segment are highly correlated with manufacturing activity, industrial production, and construction, making it sensitive to economic cycles.
• Bulk: This segment produced $7.4 billion in revenue in 2023, a 2% decrease from 2022.¹ It includes agricultural products (such as grain and fertilizer), food and refrigerated goods, and energy products (primarily coal). Performance is driven by factors such as the strength of the U.S. harvest, global food demand, and energy consumption patterns. The segment faces a long-term headwind from the secular decline in coal for electricity generation, a trend evident in the 19% decline in coal shipments reported in the company’s 2024 10-K, which was partially offset by a 7% increase in grain shipments.³
• Premium: This segment, which generated $7.0 billion in revenue in 2023 (a 6% decline), is the most service-sensitive and competes most directly with the trucking industry.¹ It consists of two main components: intermodal, which involves the movement of shipping containers and truck trailers that can be transferred between ship, rail, and truck; and finished automotive vehicles. This segment is driven by consumer spending, international trade volumes, and automotive production schedules.

The composition of UNP’s revenue reveals a deep and unavoidable linkage to the cyclicality of the U.S. industrial and agricultural economies. The performance of the Industrial and Bulk segments is a direct reflection of the underlying health of these core sectors. However, the Premium segment, and particularly international intermodal traffic, represents a distinct opportunity for secular growth. Its drivers are less tethered to domestic industrial production and more influenced by global trade patterns, consumer demand for imported goods, and strategic supply chain decisions. This was demonstrated in 2024, when a surge in international intermodal volumes of over 19% helped offset weakness elsewhere in the business, showcasing this segment’s ability to act as a separate and powerful growth engine.⁴

Furthermore, the strategic value of UNP’s network, especially its comprehensive access to all six Mexico gateways, is evolving from a simple competitive advantage into what is arguably the company’s most important long-term growth driver. The macroeconomic trend of “nearshoring”—the relocation of manufacturing from Asia to North America—is fundamentally increasing the volume of goods flowing across the U.S.-Mexico border.⁵ UNP is not merely a participant in this trend but a primary enabler and beneficiary. The company’s capital investments in enhancing the capacity and efficiency of these border crossings are therefore not just routine maintenance but are critical growth expenditures that will directly facilitate and capture future volumes. This positions the company to capitalize on a multi-decade supply chain realignment, providing a powerful offset to secular challenges in other parts of its business, most notably coal.

Industry Dynamics and Competitive Landscape

The North American Rail Oligopoly

The freight rail industry in the United States is a mature, nearly $80 billion market characterized by a stable oligopoly.⁷ The industry is dominated by a small number of Class I railroads, defined by the Surface Transportation Board (STB) as those with operating revenues exceeding a specified threshold ($490 million or more).⁷ The immense capital required to build and maintain a rail network, combined with the powerful network effects of an established system, creates insurmountable barriers to entry for new competitors. This structure allows for rational pricing and generally high returns on invested capital for the incumbents.

Union Pacific’s primary competitor is BNSF Railway, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway. In the western U.S., UNP and BNSF operate as a duopoly, controlling the vast majority of transcontinental freight rail lines and often sharing trackage rights.² In the eastern U.S., the dominant players are CSX Corporation (CSX) and Norfolk Southern (NSC). The Canadian railroads, Canadian National (CN) and Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC), also represent significant competitors, particularly on north-south trade corridors connecting Canada, the U.S., and Mexico. The entire industry operates under the close economic regulation of the STB, which has authority over freight rates, service standards, and, most critically, mergers and acquisitions.⁸

The PSR Revolution

Over the past decade, the North American rail industry has been transformed by the near-universal adoption of Precision Scheduled Railroading (PSR). Pioneered by the late railroad executive E. Hunter Harrison, PSR is an operating philosophy that fundamentally shifts the focus from the legacy practice of moving entire trains to the more granular and disciplined movement of individual railcars on a fixed, passenger-like schedule.¹⁰ The core objectives of PSR are to maximize asset utilization by running longer trains with fewer locomotives and railcars, minimize the time cars spend idle in classification yards (known as “dwell”), and relentlessly drive down the operating ratio (operating expenses as a percentage of revenue).¹²

For the industry, PSR has been a resounding financial success, leading to dramatic improvements in operating margins, free cash flow, and shareholder returns. However, the implementation of PSR has not been without significant controversy and criticism. Shippers have frequently complained of poorer and less flexible service, while labor unions have raised concerns about safety and working conditions resulting from longer trains and substantial workforce reductions.¹¹ The intense focus on efficiency has, at times, reduced the network’s resilience, leaving it vulnerable to widespread disruption when faced with unexpected surges in demand or labor shortages, as was evident across the industry in 2022 and 2023.¹⁴

Modal Competition and Consolidation

Rail’s primary mode of competition is the trucking industry. Trucks offer greater flexibility and superior transit times for shorter-haul and time-sensitive freight, while rail holds a distinct advantage in fuel efficiency and cost-effectiveness for moving heavy, bulk commodities over long distances.⁷ On average, a train is four times more fuel-efficient than a truck, capable of moving one ton of freight over 470 miles on a single gallon of fuel.⁷

The rail industry has a long history of consolidation, which has culminated in the current oligopolistic structure. The most recent major transaction was the 2023 acquisition of Kansas City Southern by Canadian Pacific, creating CPKC, the first railroad with a single-line network connecting Canada, the U.S., and Mexico. The proposed merger between Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern represents what could be the final and most significant wave of consolidation. Such a deal would create the first truly transcontinental U.S. railroad and would almost certainly trigger a strategic response from its primary competitors, BNSF and CSX, potentially leading to an industry ultimately dominated by two massive east-west networks.¹⁶

The widespread adoption of PSR has fundamentally altered the competitive dynamics within the rail industry. With all major players pursuing similar operating strategies focused on cost control and asset efficiency, the primary basis of competition has shifted from distinct service offerings to the quality of operational execution. This has created a fragile equilibrium, where the entire interconnected network is more susceptible to systemic disruption. A significant service failure at one railroad can quickly cascade, causing congestion and delays that impact shippers and other carriers across the continent. This increased fragility has, in turn, attracted more intense scrutiny from the STB, which is now placing a greater emphasis on service reliability and performance metrics, creating a more challenging regulatory environment for the entire industry.¹⁴

Against this backdrop, the proposed UNP-NSC merger can be viewed as a direct strategic consequence of PSR reaching a point of diminishing returns. After years of aggressive cost-cutting and efficiency gains, the incremental benefits of further tightening operations have become smaller. The next logical step to generate a quantum leap in shareholder value is no longer through internal optimization but through a transformational expansion of the network itself. The merger’s strategic rationale, heavily weighted toward revenue synergies from creating a superior single-line service product, signals a clear pivot from a strategy of pure efficiency to one of growth through network dominance.¹⁹ It is an acknowledgment that having extracted most of the value from running a more efficient railroad, the greatest opportunity now lies in running a fundamentally better and more competitive one.

Financial and Operational Performance Deep Dive

Five-Year Financial Review

An examination of Union Pacific’s financial performance over the past five years reveals a company that has maintained strong profitability and cash flow generation despite a challenging and often volatile macroeconomic environment.

Fiscal Year (in millions, except per share data and ratios)	2019	2020	2021	2022	2023	2024
Operating Revenue	$21,708	$19,533	$21,804	$24,875	$24,119	$24,250
Operating Income	$8,554	$8,112	$9,338	$9,917	$9,082	$9,713
Operating Ratio	60.6%	58.5%	57.2%	60.1%	62.3%	59.9%
Net Income	$5,917	$5,345	$6,523	$6,998	$6,379	$6,747
Diluted EPS ($)	$8.38	$7.88	$9.95	$11.21	$10.45	$11.09
Cash from Operations	$8,683	$8,393	$8,421	$9,010	$8,233	$9,346
Capital Expenditures	$3,178	$2,873	$2,943	$3,454	$3,700	$3,400
Free Cash Flow (calculated)	$5,505	$5,520	$5,478	$5,556	$4,533	$5,946
Sources: 1

Operating revenues have been relatively stable, fluctuating with economic activity and commodity prices. The decline in 2020 reflected the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, while the growth in 2021 and 2022 was driven by economic recovery, strong pricing, and higher fuel surcharge revenues. The 3% revenue decline in 2023 to $24.1 billion was primarily attributable to lower fuel surcharges and a 1% decrease in total carloads.²¹

The most telling metric of the PSR era is the operating ratio. UNP achieved significant improvement, driving the ratio down from 60.6% in 2019 to an impressive low of 57.2% in 2021.¹ However, the inflationary pressures of 2022 and 2023, particularly in fuel and labor, caused the ratio to deteriorate back to 62.3% in 2023.²² The subsequent improvement to 59.9% in 2024 demonstrates a successful effort to regain control over costs and enhance efficiency.⁴ Net income and earnings per share have followed a similar trajectory, peaking in 2022 before declining in 2023 due to margin compression, and then recovering in 2024. Throughout this period, the company has remained a powerful cash generator, with cash from operations consistently exceeding $8 billion annually.

Key Performance Indicators and Peer Benchmarking

The effectiveness of a railroad’s PSR implementation is measured through a suite of key performance indicators (KPIs) that track network fluidity and asset productivity.

The divergence between the full-year 2023 results and the performance in the fourth quarter of that year is particularly noteworthy. It suggests a significant operational inflection point that coincided with the return of Jim Vena as CEO in August 2023.²³ While the full-year 2023 metrics were mixed—showing improved velocity but a deteriorating operating ratio and declining workforce productivity—the fourth quarter saw sharp, double-digit improvements in freight car velocity (+14%) and locomotive productivity (+14%), alongside a 4% improvement in workforce productivity.²¹ This strong finish to the year indicates that operational issues faced earlier in 2023 were being aggressively addressed, establishing a much stronger operational run-rate heading into 2024. This momentum was borne out in the full-year 2024 results, which saw a 240-basis point improvement in the operating ratio to 59.9%.⁴ This was not merely a cyclical recovery but appears to be a management-driven operational turnaround.

Comparing these metrics against peers provides essential context for UNP’s competitive standing within the industry.

Key Metrics (Most Recent Full Year – 2024)	UNP	BNSF	CSX	NSC	CN	CPKC
Operating Revenue ($B)	$24.25	$23.35	$14.54	$12.12	$17.05 (CAD)	$13.29 (CAD)
Operating Income ($B)	$9.71	$7.50	$5.25	$4.07	$6.25 (CAD)	$4.89 (CAD)
Operating Ratio	59.9%	66.2%	63.9%	66.4%	63.4%	63.2%
Net Income ($B)	$6.75	$7.13	$3.47	$2.62	$4.45 (CAD)	$4.00 (CAD)
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)	~12.4%	N/A	~9.7%	~9.2%	12.9%	N/A
Note: Financials for CN and CPKC are reported in Canadian Dollars (CAD). BNSF data is derived from its standalone financial statements. CSX and NSC operating ratios are as reported in their respective 10-K filings. ROIC figures are from various data providers and are approximate.
Sources: 4

The peer comparison for the 2024 fiscal year highlights Union Pacific’s industry-leading profitability. Its operating ratio of 59.9% was the best among its direct U.S. competitors and on par with the historically efficient Canadian railroads. This superior efficiency translated into a higher return on invested capital, underscoring the effectiveness of its operational model under current leadership.

Growth Catalysts and Strategic Opportunities

Secular Tailwinds: Nearshoring and Mexico Cross-Border Trade

One of the most powerful secular tailwinds benefiting Union Pacific is the trend of “nearshoring.” Driven by a confluence of factors—including persistent U.S.-China trade tensions, a desire for more resilient and shorter supply chains following the disruptions of the pandemic, and rising labor and shipping costs from Asia—companies are increasingly relocating manufacturing operations to Mexico.⁵ This strategic shift is generating a significant and sustained increase in the volume of freight moving across the U.S.-Mexico border.

Union Pacific is uniquely positioned to capitalize on this multi-decade trend. It is the only Class I railroad serving all six major rail gateways between the two countries, effectively making its network the primary conduit for this growing trade.³ For the long-haul movement of finished goods and components that characterizes nearshoring, rail offers a compelling value proposition over trucking due to its superior cost-effectiveness and capacity.⁶ Recognizing this opportunity, UNP has been making targeted investments to enhance its cross-border capabilities, including a 10% increase in systemwide terminal capacity since 2021 to handle the anticipated volume growth.⁶

Growth Driver: Intermodal Expansion

Intermodal transportation remains a key strategic growth area for the entire rail industry, as it represents the most direct way to capture market share from long-haul trucking. North American intermodal volumes have shown resilience and growth, supported by strong import levels and steady consumer demand.³⁷ Union Pacific is actively pursuing this market by investing in new and expanded intermodal terminals in high-growth inland markets such as Phoenix, Arizona, and Kansas City, Missouri.³⁹ These investments are designed to improve the efficiency and reach of its intermodal network, making rail a more attractive option for shippers moving containers from coastal ports to inland distribution centers.

Transformational Catalyst: The Proposed Norfolk Southern Merger

The most significant and potentially transformative catalyst for Union Pacific is its proposed merger with Norfolk Southern, announced in July 2025.⁴⁰

• Strategic Rationale: The core logic of the transaction is to create the first single-line transcontinental railroad in U.S. history, seamlessly connecting UNP’s dominant western network with NSC’s extensive network in the eastern U.S..¹⁶ The primary strategic benefit is the elimination of interchanges at congested gateways like Chicago, Memphis, and New Orleans. By creating a single, integrated network, the combined entity could offer a faster, more reliable, and more cost-effective service that is vastly more competitive with long-haul trucking, potentially reducing cross-country transit times by one to two days.¹⁹
• Financial Terms: The transaction values Norfolk Southern at an enterprise value of approximately $85 billion, or $320 per share, representing a 25% premium at the time of the announcement. The deal is structured as a mix of 72% stock and 28% cash.¹⁹ The resulting combined company would be a behemoth with pro forma revenues of roughly $36 billion and an enterprise value exceeding $250 billion.⁴¹
• Synergies: Management has projected ambitious annualized synergies of $2.75 billion, to be achieved by the third year after closing. Notably, these synergies are heavily weighted toward revenue growth, with an estimated $1.75 billion expected from capturing new business (primarily from trucks) and penetrating underserved markets. An additional $1.0 billion is projected from cost savings and operational efficiencies.¹⁹ The total value creation from these synergies is estimated to be over $30 billion.⁴¹
• Regulatory Hurdles: The path to completing this merger is fraught with significant risk. The transaction is subject to review and approval by the Surface Transportation Board under its stringent 2001 merger rules. These rules require that a major rail merger must be proven to enhance competition and be in the public interest, a much higher bar than simply not harming it.²⁰ The STB has already received the notice of intent for the merger under docket number FD 36873.⁴⁴ Widespread opposition is expected from shippers concerned about reduced competition and higher rates, labor unions worried about job losses and safety, and competing railroads seeking to protect their market positions.¹⁷ The regulatory review process is statutorily defined and lengthy, with the companies targeting a closing date in early 2027.¹⁹

The nearshoring trend and the proposed NSC merger are not separate opportunities but are deeply intertwined. The merger can be understood as a strategic vertical integration of the North American supply chain. It is designed to allow UNP to capture the full, high-margin revenue stream from goods manufactured in the burgeoning industrial centers of Mexico and transport them seamlessly on a single rail line to the major consumer and industrial markets of the eastern United States. Currently, such a move requires a costly and time-consuming interchange between UNP and an eastern carrier, making trucking a strong competitor. A single, integrated network would create a powerful “Mexico-to-East-Coast” logistics product that is superior to the current rail offering and highly competitive with trucks. This transforms the merger from a simple horizontal consolidation into a strategic maneuver to dominate one of the most important emerging trade lanes in the world.

Capital Allocation and Shareholder Return Policy

Capital Expenditure Strategy

Union Pacific adheres to a disciplined capital allocation strategy focused on maintaining the safety and integrity of its network while investing selectively in projects that support growth and efficiency. For both 2024 and 2025, the company has outlined a capital expenditure plan of approximately $3.4 billion.²¹ This budget is strategically allocated between two primary categories:

• Maintenance Capital: The largest portion, nearly $2 billion in 2024, is dedicated to infrastructure renewal. This includes the replacement of rail, ties, and ballast, which is essential for ensuring the safe and reliable operation of the network.³⁹
• Growth and Efficiency Capital: The remainder is invested in projects designed to enhance productivity and capture new business. This includes modernizing the locomotive fleet for better fuel efficiency, acquiring new freight cars to support growth, extending sidings to increase network capacity for longer trains, and expanding intermodal terminals in high-growth markets.³⁹

Shareholder Returns

Returning capital to shareholders is a core component of Union Pacific’s financial strategy, executed through a combination of consistent dividends and share repurchases.

• Dividend Policy: The company has an exceptional track record of dividend payments, having distributed them for 123 consecutive years.⁴⁷ More recently, UNP has increased its dividend for 19 consecutive years, demonstrating a strong commitment to dividend growth.⁴⁸ The annual dividend per share grew from $3.70 in 2019 to $5.28 in 2024.⁴⁹ The company maintains a moderate dividend payout ratio, typically in the range of 46% to 50% of earnings, which allows for both a reliable return to shareholders and sufficient retained earnings for reinvestment.⁴⁸
• Share Repurchase Programs: UNP has historically been an aggressive repurchaser of its own shares. A share repurchase authorization approved in 2022 allows for the buyback of up to 100 million shares through March 2025.⁴⁷ In 2023, the company repurchased 3.5 million shares for $712 million.²¹ The company’s outlook for 2025 includes a substantial share repurchase target of $4.0 billion to $4.5 billion, signaling a continuation of this shareholder-friendly policy under its standalone strategy.⁴⁶

Impact of the Proposed Merger on Capital Allocation

The proposed acquisition of Norfolk Southern would necessitate a significant, albeit temporary, shift in this capital allocation framework. To finance the substantial cash portion of the transaction and manage the combined company’s balance sheet, share repurchases would be paused upon the deal’s closing.¹⁹ The merger would increase leverage, with the company’s debt-to-EBITDA ratio projected to rise from its current level of approximately 2.5x to around 3.3x at closing.¹⁹ A primary focus in the initial years post-merger would be on de-leveraging, with a target to reduce the debt-to-EBITDA ratio to approximately 2.8x by the second year.¹⁹

However, the long-term capital return potential is projected to be substantially enhanced. The combined entity, benefiting from significant synergies, is forecast to generate approximately $12 billion in annual free cash flow by the third year post-merger. This powerful cash generation would enable the resumption of a very large-scale share repurchase program, potentially exceeding $10 billion annually, while also supporting continued dividend growth and network investment.¹⁹

This shift in capital allocation presents a clear trade-off for shareholders. They are being asked to forgo the certainty of near-term share buybacks and accept a period of higher balance sheet leverage. In exchange, they gain exposure to the potential for owning a company with a structurally higher level of long-term earnings power and free cash flow generation. The viability of this trade-off is entirely contingent on securing regulatory approval for the merger and successfully executing the integration to realize the projected synergies.

Recent Challenges & Industry Headwinds (2022-2024)

The period from 2022 to 2024 was marked by significant challenges for Union Pacific and the entire North American rail industry, exposing vulnerabilities in the prevailing operating models.

Supply Chain Disruptions & Service Issues

The aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented stress on global supply chains. Surges in import volumes led to severe congestion at ports, which in turn created backlogs that cascaded across the inland transportation network.⁵⁴ Railroads, including Union Pacific, struggled with a lack of capacity to handle the influx of containers, leading to equipment shortages (particularly chassis for trucks), full intermodal yards, and significant delays.⁵⁴ The situation on UNP’s network became so acute in 2022 that the company resorted to a dramatic increase in the use of embargoes—a measure that restricts the acceptance of new traffic onto its network—to manage the congestion. This move, which saw embargoes rise from just 27 in 2017 to over 1,000 in 2022, was a clear signal of a service meltdown and drew sharp criticism from both shippers and the Surface Transportation Board.¹⁴

Labor Relations and Shortages

A critical factor contributing to the service disruptions was a shortage of qualified labor, especially train and engine crews. The aggressive workforce reductions undertaken during the initial implementation of PSR left the railroads with insufficient staff to handle the rebound in freight volumes.¹⁴ This issue was compounded by contentious industry-wide labor negotiations throughout 2022, which brought the nation to the brink of a debilitating rail strike before government intervention forced a resolution.¹⁴ The underlying tensions and workforce availability remain a persistent risk for the industry.

Inflationary Pressures

The broader macroeconomic environment of 2022 and 2023 was characterized by significant inflation, which directly impacted the railroad’s cost structure. Fuel prices rose sharply, and while a portion of this was recovered through fuel surcharges, there is a lag effect that can pressure margins in the short term.²² The new national labor agreement resulted in higher wages and benefits costs. Concurrently, the cost of materials essential for track maintenance, such as steel and timber, also increased.⁵⁵ These combined inflationary pressures were the primary cause of the deterioration in Union Pacific’s operating ratio from its 2021 low of 57.2% to 62.3% in 2023.¹

Heightened Regulatory Scrutiny

The widespread service problems across the industry did not go unnoticed by regulators. The Surface Transportation Board has taken a much more activist stance, holding public hearings on service issues, demanding more detailed performance data from the railroads, and actively considering new regulations designed to foster competition, such as rules for reciprocal switching.⁸ This has created a more stringent and potentially less favorable regulatory environment for all Class I railroads.

The challenges of this period effectively exposed the inherent vulnerability of the hyper-efficient, lean PSR operating model. The relentless focus on minimizing resources—reducing crew numbers, locomotives, and railcars to the bare minimum required for a given volume level—created a system with insufficient “buffer capacity.” This lack of resilience made the network brittle and unable to absorb external shocks, such as a sudden surge in demand or a labor shortage. The result was a negative feedback loop where initial congestion slowed the entire network, which in turn exacerbated equipment shortages and led to further congestion and a collapse in service quality. The company’s subsequent strategic shift to explicitly include maintaining a “resource buffer” is a direct acknowledgment of the lessons learned from this difficult period and a recognition that pure efficiency must be balanced with network reliability.⁴

Operational Excellence & Efficiency Initiatives

Precision Scheduled Railroading (PSR) Implementation

Union Pacific’s core operating strategy is explicitly defined by the principles of PSR, which the company frames under the mantra of “Safety, Service, and Operational Excellence”.²¹ The return of CEO Jim Vena in 2023, a key architect of PSR’s implementation during his prior tenure as COO, signaled a definitive doubling-down on this philosophy.²³ The practical application of this strategy is visible in the company’s key operational objectives: minimizing in-transit work events and car classifications (“touches”), reducing the time cars spend idle in terminals (“dwell”), operating longer and heavier trains to maximize asset productivity, and maintaining a balanced network where locomotives and crews are in the right place at the right time.¹² The sharp improvements in operational metrics seen since late 2023 are a direct result of this renewed and rigorous focus on PSR execution.

Technology and Innovation

Union Pacific is making significant investments in technology to enhance safety, improve efficiency, and elevate the customer experience. These initiatives are critical for making the lean PSR model more resilient and sustainable.

• Automation and Predictive Maintenance: The company is deploying advanced technologies to monitor the health of its infrastructure and equipment. This includes the use of autonomous track geometry cars, which can inspect track conditions without requiring a dedicated train crew, and other sensor-based systems designed to predict potential equipment failures before they occur.³ These initiatives improve safety by reducing the risk of derailments and enhance efficiency by allowing for more proactive and less disruptive maintenance.
• Digital Customer Experience: A key focus is on improving the ease of doing business with the railroad. UNP is developing and deploying a suite of Application Programming Interfaces (APIs)—approximately 40 to date—that allow customers to integrate the railroad’s tracking and shipping data directly into their own logistics and supply chain management systems.⁴ Tools like the UPGo mobile app are designed to streamline operations at intermodal terminals by providing truck drivers with real-time information, reducing gate times and improving terminal fluidity.⁶
• Fuel Efficiency and Fleet Modernization: The company is engaged in a long-term effort to modernize its locomotive fleet. This includes investing in new, more fuel-efficient Tier 4 locomotives and actively developing and testing next-generation technologies like hybrid-battery electric locomotives in partnership with technology firms.³⁹ These efforts have tangible results; since the year 2000, Union Pacific has improved its overall fuel efficiency by 22%, reducing both costs and greenhouse gas emissions.⁶⁰

These technology investments are more than just a source of incremental efficiency gains; they are a crucial enabler of the broader PSR strategy. A primary criticism of PSR is that its rigid, schedule-based focus on internal railroad efficiency often comes at the expense of customer service and predictability.¹¹ The digital tools UNP is deploying are a direct attempt to resolve this tension. By providing customers with real-time visibility and data through APIs, the railroad gives them the information they need to manage their own supply chains around the railroad’s fixed schedule, mitigating some of the negative impacts of PSR’s inflexibility. Internally, predictive technologies allow the railroad to operate a leaner network with greater confidence, as they can better anticipate and prevent the disruptions that can cripple a system with little buffer capacity. In essence, technology acts as the “glue” that allows UNP to pursue the significant cost benefits of PSR while simultaneously striving to deliver the reliable and predictable service required to retain customers and compete effectively with trucks.

Risk Assessment

An investment in Union Pacific is subject to a range of business, regulatory, and operational risks that could materially impact its financial performance and strategic objectives.

Business and Economic Risks

• Cyclical Exposure: As a transporter of fundamental industrial and agricultural goods, Union Pacific’s freight volumes are highly correlated with the broader economic cycle. A significant downturn in U.S. industrial production, a weak harvest, or a decline in consumer spending would directly and negatively impact the company’s revenues and profitability.³
• Competition: The company operates in a highly competitive environment. In the west, it faces intense duopolistic competition from BNSF. On a broader scale, it competes with the trucking industry, which offers greater service flexibility. In the long term, the potential development of autonomous trucking technology represents a significant disruptive threat that could erode rail’s long-haul cost advantage.⁴
• Secular Commodity Decline: The ongoing transition away from coal as a primary source for electricity generation represents a persistent headwind for a portion of UNP’s Bulk segment. While the company is actively growing in other areas, the decline in high-volume coal traffic remains a challenge to overcome.³

Regulatory and Legal Risks

• Merger Approval Risk: The single largest and most immediate risk facing the company is the regulatory review of the proposed Norfolk Southern merger. There is a material risk that the Surface Transportation Board could block the transaction altogether on competitive grounds. Alternatively, the STB could approve the merger but impose such onerous conditions—such as the forced divestiture of key lines or the granting of extensive trackage rights to competitors—that the economic and synergistic benefits of the deal would be severely diminished.¹⁶
• Heightened Regulatory Oversight: Following the industry’s service struggles in recent years, the STB has adopted a more aggressive regulatory posture. The potential for new rules governing issues like reciprocal switching or other service mandates could limit the railroads’ pricing power and operational flexibility in the future.¹⁴
• Environmental and Safety Liability: The transportation of hazardous materials is an intrinsic part of the railroad business, exposing UNP to the risk of significant financial liability and reputational damage in the event of a major accident or derailment. Furthermore, the company faces risks associated with climate change, both physical risks from severe weather events disrupting its network and transition risks from potential future regulations on greenhouse gas emissions.⁴

Operational Risks

• PSR Execution Risk: While PSR can deliver superior efficiency, its implementation requires flawless execution. As demonstrated in 2022, a failure to properly balance resources with demand can lead to a rapid and cascading network meltdown, resulting in poor service, customer dissatisfaction, and regulatory intervention.¹⁴
• Labor Relations: With approximately 84% of its workforce covered by collective bargaining agreements, Union Pacific is exposed to the risk of labor disputes.⁴ A future contract negotiation that leads to a work stoppage would have a severe and immediate impact on operations and the national economy.
• Cybersecurity: The company’s increasing reliance on technology and interconnected systems for everything from train dispatching to customer service creates a significant cybersecurity risk. A successful cyber-attack could cause widespread operational disruption and compromise sensitive data.⁴

The proposed merger with Norfolk Southern creates a unique and paradoxical risk profile for Union Pacific. If the merger fails to gain regulatory approval, UNP faces the strategic risk of being competitively disadvantaged in a potentially re-consolidated industry, particularly if a rival merger between BNSF and CSX were to proceed. In this scenario, UNP would be the only major U.S. railroad without a true coast-to-coast network. Conversely, if the merger succeeds, the new, much larger Union Pacific would face immense integration risk and would almost certainly become the subject of permanent, heightened regulatory and political scrutiny. Any future service disruption, safety incident, or pricing action would likely trigger a swift and strong response from Washington. In effect, the company would be trading a degree of its current operational and commercial autonomy for a significant increase in scale and network reach, placing it under a perpetual regulatory microscope.

Valuation Analysis

Assessing the valuation of Union Pacific requires consideration of its current trading multiples in relation to its historical norms and its peer group, as well as an understanding of the key factors that could drive those multiples higher or lower.

Current Multiples and Peer Comparison

The following table presents key valuation metrics for Union Pacific and its publicly traded Class I railroad peers.

Valuation Metrics (as of mid-2025)	UNP	CSX	NSC	CN	CPKC
Market Cap ($B)	~$130	~$67	~$62	~$81 (CAD)	~$92 (CAD)
Enterprise Value ($B)	~$163	~$86	~$78	~$101 (CAD)	~$125 (CAD)
P/E Ratio (TTM)	~19.1x	~21.9x	~18.6x	~17.8x	N/A
EV/EBITDA (TTM)	~13.2x	~11.4x	~12.9x	~11.2x	N/A
Price/Book (TTM)	~8.0x	~5.4x	~4.2x	~3.8x	N/A
Dividend Yield	~2.5%	~1.6%	~2.1%	~2.7%	~0.8%
Note: Financials for CN and CPKC are reported in Canadian Dollars (CAD). Data is aggregated from multiple sources and is approximate.
Sources: 25

As of mid-2025, Union Pacific trades at a trailing Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 19.1x and an Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) multiple of around 13.2x.²⁵ Historically, the company has traded in a P/E range that suggests its current valuation is not at a significant premium or discount to its own long-term average.

In comparison to its peers, UNP’s valuation is broadly in line with other major U.S. railroads. Its P/E multiple is slightly lower than that of CSX but similar to Norfolk Southern’s. This suggests that the market is currently valuing the major U.S. players in a relatively tight band, without awarding a significant premium to any single operator based on its standalone prospects. The Canadian railroads have historically commanded a premium valuation due to their strong operating performance and unique network characteristics, which is reflected in their current multiples.

Valuation Drivers and Considerations

The primary driver of Union Pacific’s valuation multiple in the coming years will be the outcome of the proposed Norfolk Southern merger.

• Potential for Multiple Expansion: A successful merger approval with manageable regulatory conditions would likely lead to a significant re-rating of the stock. The realization of the projected $2.75 billion in synergies would substantially increase earnings power, justifying a higher multiple. Sustained improvement in the operating ratio and ROIC, along with tangible growth from nearshoring, would further support a premium valuation.
• Risks of Multiple Contraction: Conversely, a regulatory rejection of the merger would be a significant negative catalyst, removing the primary avenue for transformational growth and likely causing the stock to underperform. The imposition of severe concessions that impair the deal’s economics, a return to the service and labor problems of 2022, or a sharp economic recession would also place downward pressure on the company’s valuation.

Beyond earnings multiples, it is important to consider the asset-based value of the company. Union Pacific’s rail network is a vast and irreplaceable asset that holds immense strategic value. This underlying asset value provides a degree of support for the stock’s valuation that may not be fully captured in traditional earnings-based metrics, offering a potential margin of safety.

The company’s current valuation appears to be pricing in a considerable degree of uncertainty surrounding the Norfolk Southern transaction. A successful merger, with its massive synergy potential, would fundamentally increase UNP’s earnings and cash flow capacity. If the market were fully confident in this outcome, one would expect the stock to trade at a noticeable premium to its peers and its own historical average. The fact that it does not suggests that investors are applying a significant discount to the potential merger benefits to account for the high regulatory risk and the long, uncertain timeline to closing. This creates a valuation profile that resembles a call option on the merger’s success. If the deal is approved and executed effectively, there is substantial upside potential from both earnings accretion and multiple expansion. If the deal fails, the valuation downside may be cushioned by the fact that the market is not fully pricing in its success, and the company would revert to being a high-quality, standalone business with strong cash flows and a robust shareholder return program.

Management and Strategic Vision

Leadership Assessment: CEO Jim Vena

The strategic direction of Union Pacific is currently defined by its Chief Executive Officer, Jim Vena, who returned to lead the company in August 2023.⁶⁴ Vena is a railroading veteran with over four decades of experience, having started his career at Canadian National Railway (CN) and rising through the ranks of nearly every operational department.²³ He was a key lieutenant to Hunter Harrison, the architect of PSR, and was instrumental in implementing the philosophy at CN.

His first tenure at Union Pacific as Chief Operating Officer from 2019 to 2020 was highly impactful. He is widely credited with leading the initial, successful rollout of PSR at the company, a period during which UNP achieved over $1 billion in efficiency savings and delivered what was, at the time, the best service product in its history.²³ His return as CEO came after a period of operational challenges for the company and was reportedly driven by pressure from investors seeking a renewed focus on operational discipline.⁶⁶ His stated vision for the railroad is clear and unambiguous: “Safety, Service and Operational Excellence will equal Growth”.⁶⁵

Strategic Vision and Execution

The appointment of Jim Vena represented a pivotal strategic choice by Union Pacific’s board. At a time when some industry observers were questioning the long-term sustainability of the PSR model and other railroads were appointing leaders with backgrounds in marketing and commercial strategy, UNP chose to double down on operational excellence by hiring one of the industry’s most respected and effective operators.⁶⁶

Vena’s strategic vision does not view operational efficiency and volume growth as mutually exclusive goals. Instead, it posits that achieving a superior level of operational execution is the fundamental prerequisite for sustainable, profitable growth. The proposed merger with Norfolk Southern is the ultimate expression of this philosophy. The transaction is not merely a play for scale or cost-cutting; it is a strategic maneuver to create a fundamentally superior service product—a seamless, reliable, coast-to-coast network. The belief is that this network, operated with the discipline of PSR, will be so efficient and competitive that it will naturally attract significant volume from trucks and other rail carriers, thus proving that operational excellence is the most powerful growth driver of all.

Corporate Governance

The company’s corporate governance structure appears aligned with this strategic direction. The board’s unanimous decision to pursue the Norfolk Southern merger and its choice to bring back Jim Vena to execute this vision indicate a clear and unified commitment to a strategy centered on operational discipline as the foundation for transformational growth.⁴¹

Synthesis and Key Investment Questions

This analysis of Union Pacific Corporation has examined the company’s strategic positioning, operational performance, and future prospects, with a central focus on the transformative potential of its proposed merger with Norfolk Southern. The findings are synthesized below in response to the key investment questions.

1. How sustainable is UNP’s competitive moat in an evolving transportation landscape?

• Union Pacific’s competitive moat is highly sustainable, anchored by its vast and irreplaceable rail network in the western U.S. This physical barrier to entry is reinforced by the company’s disciplined execution of the PSR operating model, which has created a formidable cost structure. The primary long-term threat to this moat is not from another railroad but from potential technological disruption in the trucking industry, specifically the advent of autonomous long-haul trucks. The proposed merger with Norfolk Southern is a decisive strategic action designed to significantly widen and deepen this moat. By creating an unparalleled coast-to-coast network, the combined entity would possess a scale and service offering that would be even more difficult for any competitor, rail or truck, to challenge effectively.

2. What is the company’s exposure to secular growth vs. cyclical recovery themes?

• The company maintains significant exposure to cyclical economic themes through its Industrial and Bulk segments, which are directly tied to manufacturing, construction, and agricultural cycles. However, its exposure to secular growth drivers is substantial and increasing. The Premium segment, driven by global trade, e-commerce, and consumer spending, provides a partial hedge against industrial cyclicality. More importantly, the company’s unique network access to all major U.S.-Mexico gateways positions it as a prime beneficiary of the multi-decade nearshoring trend. The proposed Norfolk Southern merger is an explicit strategy to accelerate this pivot toward secular growth by creating the premier network for integrated North American and international supply chains.

3. How effectively has management balanced growth investments with shareholder returns?

• Historically, management has maintained a very effective and balanced capital allocation policy, funding necessary network maintenance and selective growth projects while returning a significant amount of capital to shareholders through a consistently growing dividend and substantial share repurchase programs. The proposed merger represents a fundamental, albeit temporary, shift in this balance. It prioritizes a massive, transformational growth investment over near-term shareholder returns by pausing buybacks and increasing leverage. The ultimate effectiveness of this strategic choice is the central question facing the company and its shareholders over the next three to five years and is entirely contingent on the merger’s successful approval and integration.

4. What are the most significant risks that could impair the investment thesis?

• The single most significant, company-specific risk is the failure of the Norfolk Southern merger. A rejection by the Surface Transportation Board would eliminate the primary catalyst for transformational growth and could leave UNP in a competitively disadvantaged position if other industry players consolidate. Even if approved, the imposition of severe regulatory conditions could destroy a significant portion of the deal’s expected value.
• Other major risks include a severe and prolonged industrial recession, which would significantly impact volumes and profitability; a recurrence of the operational and labor-related service disruptions seen in 2022, which would damage customer relationships and attract further negative regulatory attention; and the long-term disruptive threat of autonomous trucking.

5. How does UNP’s valuation reflect its competitive position and growth prospects?

• Union Pacific’s current valuation is broadly in line with its major U.S. railroad peers. This suggests that the market is valuing the company as a high-quality, stable member of a rational oligopoly but is not yet fully pricing in the transformative potential of the Norfolk Southern merger. The valuation appears to be in a “wait-and-see” mode, reflecting deep uncertainty about the binary outcome of the regulatory process. This creates an asymmetrical risk/reward profile: if the merger is approved with manageable conditions, there is significant potential for earnings accretion and a positive re-rating of the stock’s valuation multiple. If the deal fails, the valuation is supported by the strong fundamentals and cash flow generation of the standalone business, potentially cushioning the downside.

Works cited

1. 2023 Investor Factbook – Union Pacific, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/cs/groups/public/@uprr/@investor/documents/investordocuments/pdf_unp_2023_factbook.pdf
2. BNSF Railway – Wikipedia, accessed August 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BNSF_Railway
3. UNION PACIFIC CORP SEC 10-K Report – TradingView, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.tradingview.com/news/tradingview:1dee3f66366ff:0-union-pacific-corp-sec-10-k-report/
4. Form 10-K for Union Pacific Corp filed 02/07/2025 – Investors, accessed August 3, 2025, https://investor.unionpacific.com/static-files/298c6a8f-fbca-4638-ac75-f80f2b9b7d10
5. 60 Years of Nearshoring: A Historical Exploration of US Production Shifting to Mexico, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.bakerinstitute.org/research/60-years-nearshoring-historical-exploration-us-production-shifting-mexico
6. UP: What Is Nearshoring and How Does Transportation Support It? – Union Pacific, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/customers/track-record/tr110723-what-is-nearshoring-shipping-to-from-mexico.htm
7. Freight Rail Overview | FRA, accessed August 3, 2025, https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-network-development/freight-rail-overview
8. Rail Service Data – Surface Transportation Board, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.stb.gov/reports-data/rail-service-data/
9. Surface Transportation Board, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.stb.gov/
10. Precision railroading | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/sports-and-leisure/precision-railroading
11. Precision railroading – Wikipedia, accessed August 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision_railroading
12. UP: What Is Precision Scheduled Railroading? – Union Pacific, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/customers/track-record/tr091019-precision-scheduled-railroading.htm
13. What exactly is PSR? : r/trains – Reddit, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/trains/comments/1bzysno/what_exactly_is_psr/
14. The supply chain may have avoided the rail strike – but the rail …, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.alixpartners.com/insights/102i4i3/the-supply-chain-may-have-avoided-the-rail-strike-but-the-rail-supply-chain-is/
15. Rail Freight Transportation Market in North America to Grow by USD 37.53 Billion from 2025-2029, Driven by Low Freight Transportation Costs, Report on AI’s Impact on Market Trends – Technavio – PR Newswire, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/rail-freight-transportation-market-in-north-america-to-grow-by-usd-37-53-billion-from-2025-2029–driven-by-low-freight-transportation-costs-report-on-ais-impact-on-market-trends—technavio-302376007.html
16. Analysis: What a Union Pacific – Norfolk Southern merger would look like – FreightWaves, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.freightwaves.com/news/analysis-what-a-union-pacific-norfolk-southern-merger-would-look-like
17. Union Pacific and Norfolk seek 1st transcontinental railroad through a massive merger, accessed August 3, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/union-pacific-norfolk-southern-transcontinental-railroad-merger-b15664ec5cc55b985a0a32a1bf990d41
18. NS and CSX: We See More Than Smoke – Railway Age, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.railwayage.com/freight/class-i/ns-and-csx-we-see-more-than-smoke/
19. Project Opal Investor Presentation, accessed August 3, 2025, https://norfolksouthern.investorroom.com/image/America%27s_First_Transcontinental_Railroad.pdf
20. CEOs say Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern merger will reverse rail freight decline, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.freightwaves.com/news/ceos-say-union-pacific-norfolk-southern-merger-will-reverse-rail-freight-decline
21. Union Pacific Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Results, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/press-releases/financial/4q23-earnings-release-nr-240125
22. NEWS RELEASE Union Pacific Reports Fourth Quarter and Full …, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/cs/groups/public/@uprr/@investor/documents/investordocuments/pdf_unp_4q23_er_newsrelease.pdf
23. Executive Profiles – Union Pacific, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/about-us/leadership
24. Union Pacific Appoints Jim Vena Chief Executive Officer, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/press-releases/people/vena-whited-mccarthy-nr-230726
25. Union Pacific (UNP) Statistics & Valuation – Stock Analysis, accessed August 3, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/unp/statistics/
26. Railway 12.31.24 Financials, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.bnsf.com/about-bnsf/financial-information/pdf/rail-financials-4q-2024.pdf
27. Annual Report for Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2024 (Form 10-K), accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.publicnow.com/view/98FE82D146BCE7BEEB8CC8D8ED6BFA88CB656D76
28. CSX Corporation (CSX) Statistics & Valuation – Stock Analysis, accessed August 3, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/csx/statistics/
29. Norfolk Southern reports fourth quarter and full year 2024 results – Jan 29, 2025, accessed August 3, 2025, https://norfolksouthern.mediaroom.com/2025-01-29-Norfolk-Southern-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2024-results
30. Norfolk Southern reports fourth quarter and full year 2024 results, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/norfolk-southern-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2024-results-302362850.html
31. Norfolk Southern (NSC) Statistics & Valuation – Stock Analysis, accessed August 3, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/nsc/statistics/
32. 2024 Annual Stats & MD&A – CN, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.cn.ca/-/media/files/investors/investor-financial-quarterly/investor-financial-quarterly-2024/q4/2024-us-gaap-mda-en.pdf
33. Canadian National Railway Company (TSX:CNR) Statistics & Valuation Metrics, accessed August 3, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/quote/tsx/CNR/statistics/
34. CPKC – Overview, accessed August 3, 2025, https://investor.cpkcr.com/overview/default.aspx
35. Nearshoring in North America and its impact on the trucking industry – IRU, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.iru.org/news-resources/newsroom/nearshoring-north-america-and-its-impact-trucking-industry
36. Nearshoring: The Slow but Major Tectonic Shift and its Impact on Rail Shippers – Tratics, accessed August 3, 2025, https://tratics.com/blog/nearshoring-the-slow-but-major-tectonic-shift-and-its-impact-on-rail-shippers
37. North American intermodal volume rises for Q2 2025 – Railway Supply, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.railway.supply/en/north-american-intermodal-volume-rises-for-q2-2025/
38. IANA: North American intermodal volume grew again in Q2 – Progressive Railroading, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.progressiverailroading.com/intermodal/news/IANA-North-American-intermodal-volume-grew-again-in-Q2–75078
39. Union Pacific to Invest $3.4 Billion in Capital for Safe Operations, Growth with Customers, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/press-releases/service/investing-safety-growth-nr-240221
40. Railroad consolidation push: Union Pacific proposes $85bn merger with Norfolk Southern to create first US transcontinental network; STB nod seen as key hurdle, accessed August 3, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/international-business/railroad-consolidation-push-union-pacific-proposes-85bn-merger-with-norfolk-southern-to-create-first-us-transcontinental-network-stb-nod-seen-as-key-hurdle/articleshow/122979265.cms
41. Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern to Create America’s First Transcontinental Railroad, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/press-releases/growth/norfolk-southern-transcontinental-nr-250729
42. Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern to Combine, Creating America’s First Transcontinental Railroad – A Message from Kenny Rocker, EVP, Marketing & Sales, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/announcements/customer-news/CN2025-13
43. Baldwin, Marshall Demand Regulator Scrutinize Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern Merger as Poor Service, High Costs Already Plague Freight Rail Industry, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.baldwin.senate.gov/news/press-releases/baldwin-marshall-demand-regulator-scrutinize-union-pacific-norfolk-southern-merger-as-poor-service-high-costs-already-plague-freight-rail-industry
44. STB Receives Notice of Intent for Proposed Merger of Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern – Surface Transportation Board, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.stb.gov/news-communications/latest-news/pr-25-27/
45. Statement from SMART-TD on the Proposed Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern Merger, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.smart-union.org/statement-from-smart-td-on-the-proposed-union-pacific-and-norfolk-southern-merger/
46. Union Pacific Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results, accessed August 3, 2025, https://investor.unionpacific.com/news-releases/news-release-details/union-pacific-reports-second-quarter-2025-results/
47. Union Pacific Corporation Declares First Quarter 2022 Dividend and Announces New Share Repurchase Authorization, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/press-releases/financial/dividend-share-repurchase-nr-220203
48. Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) Dividend Date & History – Koyfin, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.koyfin.com/company/unp/dividends/
49. Union Pacific Corp Share Dividends | UNP | US9078181081 – Fidelity International, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.fidelity.co.uk/factsheet-data/factsheet/US9078181081-union-pacific-corp/dividends
50. Dividend History | Union Pacific Railroad Company, accessed August 3, 2025, https://investor.unionpacific.com/stock/dividend-history?mobile=1
51. Union Pacific’s (UNP) Buyback Plan to Grow Shareholders’ Wealth – Nasdaq, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/union-pacifics-unp-buyback-plan-to-grow-shareholders-wealth
52. Union Pacific Reports First Quarter 2025 Results, accessed August 3, 2025, https://investor.unionpacific.com/static-files/9716abc2-6593-45f1-8a43-44e46a2f01eb
53. Union Pacific (UNP) Stock Statistics & Valuation Metrics – TipRanks.com, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.tipranks.com/stocks/unp/statistics
54. UP: What Is Causing Supply Chain Issues? – Union Pacific, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/customers/track-record/tr111621-what-is-causing-supply-chain-issues.htm
55. North America Rail Infrastructure Market | Growth Report, 2029 – Fortune Business Insights, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/north-america-rail-infrastructure-market-107025
56. UNP Investor Relations – Union Pacific Corp – Alpha Spread, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nyse/unp/investor-relations
57. It’s taking a team effort for Union Pacific to roll out its version of PSR, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.ritd-llc.com/industry-news/it-s-taking-a-team-effort-for-union-pacific-to-roll-out-its-version-of-psr?tmpl=component&print=1&format=print
58. Union Pacific Expands ESG Strategy, Adding Health, Safety and Well-being Pillar in Latest Building America Report, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/press-releases/service/esg-strategy-bar-nr-220413
59. 2021 Investor Day – Union Pacific, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/cs/groups/public/@uprr/@corprel/documents/up_pdf_nativedocs/pdf_up_inv-day-infographic.pdf
60. UP: Operations – Union Pacific, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/aboutup/environment/operations/index.htm
61. Union Pacific Highlights Commitment to Safety, Community and Sustainability in 2023 Building America Report, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/press-releases/safety/2023-sustainability-report-nr-240429
62. Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern Merger: Navigating Regulatory Risk and the Future of Rail Valuations – AInvest, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.ainvest.com/news/union-pacific-norfolk-southern-merger-navigating-regulatory-risk-future-rail-valuations-2508/
63. Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) | Union Pacific, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/investors/sustainability/climate-related-financial-disclosures
64. Chronology of Union Pacific Presidents, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.up.com/about-us/history/up-presidents
65. Featured Speakers – ASLRRA, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.aslrra.org/events/conference/agenda/speakers/
66. All eyes on Vena as he takes helm at Union Pacific – FreightWaves, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.freightwaves.com/news/all-eyes-on-vena-as-he-takes-helm-at-union-pacific